Ecology lab report

Construction of a Formal Introduction
Your introduction should provide the reader with all the context and background information
necessary to understand the study and research motivation. The content of good introductions
is often organized as an inverted triangle: begin by discussing the topic broadly and end with a
very specific outline of the research goals. Please use the following structure for your
introduction:

1. Begin with a broad overview of the topic. What are invasive
plant species? Why is it important to investigate the role of
belowground interactions in their growth/success? Define any
unfamiliar concepts, terminology, or ideas where necessary.
(1 paragraph)
2. Discuss what we already know about the topic and what remains
to be understood by ecologists. Provide specific examples from
the literature. The information provided in this section
should directly support the hypotheses you provide at the
end of the introduction. It should explain to the reader
the motivation behind your research and justify your selection
for most and least diverse habitats (2-3 paragraphs)
3. Introduce your research questions. What ecological question(s) is your study looking to
address? Clearly state your research hypotheses. (1 paragraph)

BLG567 Nunes, Krystal – Report Introduction Page 1 of 4
Ryerson University (X University) Department of Chemistry and Biology

BLG567 Ecology

CONSTRUCTING A LAB REPORT
PART 1: THE INTRODUCTION
Weight: 10% of final grade
Due Date: 18 February 2022 at 9:00 PM

Learning Objectives
1. Formulate testable hypotheses based on preliminary observations
2. Develop quantifiable predictions aligned with the hypotheses
3. Support hypotheses with evidence from the peer-reviewed scientific literature
4. Create a properly formatted reference list and in-text citations

Background
Please attend/watch the lecture recording from 25 January 2022 for a more detailed description
of the experiment.

You are an ecologist interested in the impact of soil microorganisms (bacteria, microarthropods
and fungi) on the growth of a (hypothetical) non-native herbaceous plant, Krystalus nunesi. This
plant is native to Portugal but has become invasive in southern and central Ontario. You collect
soil from four locations across Ontario:
1. Toronto, where K. nunesi was first introduced and has been established for >50 years
2. Sudbury, where K. nunesi has been established for 30-40 years
3. Timmins, where K. nunesi has been established for 10-20 years
4. Moosonee, where K. nunesi only appeared in the last year

You order K. nunesi seeds from an online European distributor and germinate them in lab under
sterile conditions. You will plant these seeds in the soils collected from each of the four
locations, as well as sterilized soil from each location (as control). You will grow them in a
growth chamber under consistent light and watering conditions ideal for growth, and after 4
months you will measure plant growth.

The data collected from this experiment will be provided to you. However, as with all scientific
experiments, before commencing data collection one must first familiarize themselves with
the existing literature, clearly define the research objectives, and create testable hypothese

Develop a 1000-1200 word essay (with a minimum of 850 words) that responds to either prompt A or prompt B below. Before writing carefully read the philosophy paper writing guidelines.

Develop a 1000-1200 word essay (with a minimum of 850 words) that responds to either prompt A or prompt B below. Before writing carefully read the philosophy paper writing guidelines. Note, while you may use external sources, you will not be graded on your knowledge of those sources. You will be graded exclusively on the material presented in the text and in the course Explorations. Note also that submissions should be 1) double-spaced and 2) formatted according to MLA standards. This includes appropriately cited in-text citations, as well as a complete bibliography.
For more information on writing argumentative essays, please carefully read the writing guide.
A. Divine Command Theory. According to Divine Command Theory (DCT), morality is determined by God. Explain the DCT, making sure to distinguish the “Unrestricted” version of the theory from the “Restricted” version. Then assess the theory.
Does either version provide a plausible account of morality (i.e. of what’s right, wrong, good or bad)? Is morality really determined by God’s commands? Why? Why not?
Following your introduction and thesis statement, your response should include in order:
(1) an explanation of DCT, including an account of Unrestricted and Restricted versions of the theory
(2) a thesis statement that conforms to the writing guide
(3) a brief discussion of why someone might find DCT appealing
(4) 1-2 objections to DCT (you might consider the Euthyphro dilemma, Nielsen’s argument, Nucci’s empirical studies discussed in the text, or some other challenge related to determinacy, consistency, applicability, intuitive appeal, internal support, external support, explanatory power)
(5) a critical evaluation of those objections (Can they be resolved? How might the Divine Command Theorist respond? Is this response plausible?)
(6) Following this analysis develop a brief conclusion that summarizes your arguments.
B. Moral Relativism. According to Moral Relativism, morality is determined by one’s culture. Explain the moral relativist’s position that morality is determined by culture, taking care to distinguish moral relativism from the context sensitivity thesis. Then assess the theory. Does moral relativism offer a plausible account of morality (i.e. what’s right, wrong, good and bad)? Is morality really determined by one’s culture? Why? Why not?
Following your introduction and thesis statement, your response should include in order:
(1) an explanation of moral relativism, including an account of how it differs from the context sensitivity thesis
(2) a thesis statement that conforms to the writing guide
(3) a brief discussion of why someone might final moral relativism appealing
(4) 1-2 objections to moral relativism (you might consider whether relativism plausibly follows from moral diversity and whether moral disagreements are fundamental, or some challenge related to one of the criteria of evaluation, i.e. determinacy, consistency, applicability, intuitive appeal, internal support, external support, explanatory power)
(5) a critical evaluation of those objections (Can they be resolved? How might a moral relativist response? Is this response plausible?)
(6) Following your analysis, develop a brief conclusion that summarizes your arguments.
See the Schedule and Course Rubrics in the Syllabus Module for due dates and grading information.

Current Ethical Issues

Using one of the news websites from the provided list (attached), search for a current news story that demonstrates a moral or ethical dilemma. Your current news selection must be within the last 90 days. Examine the news story. Be sure to reflect and consider all aspects and viewpoints the author provides.

In your initial post, state the title of the news story and include the link so that others can access the story. Briefly summarize the story and explain the moral or ethical issue/dilemma and how it relates to an ethical theory, principle, and concept or code in the course text. Your response must be at least 200 words and show a clear connection between the news story/event and the course material/ethical theory.

In two to three pages, write a short biography of the African American playwright, highlighting her best-known play “A Raisin in the Sun” & examining how she expressed the African American struggle thru her writing.

In two to three pages, write a short biography of the African American playwright, highlighting her best-known play “A Raisin in the Sun” & examining how she expressed the African American struggle thru her writing.

Case Study: Is BYOD for Business

Questions:

1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of allowing employees to use their personal mobile devices for work?

2. What management, organization, and technology factors should be addressed when deciding whether to allow employees to use their personal mobile devices for work?

3. Evaluate how the companies described in this case study dealt with the challenges of BYOD.

4. Allowing employees to use their own smartphones for work will save the company money. Do you agree? Why or why not?

How does the particular aspect of the text you’ve chosen to discuss (above) support, challenge, or change the way you understand your own identity or experience?

Answer the following(250-500 words):

Which character or passage strikes you the most? Why is it important to you? Why is it disturbing?
How does the particular aspect of the text you’ve chosen to discuss (above) support, challenge, or change the way you understand your own identity or experience?
(If applicable, how does the text support, challenge, or change the way you understand experiences of others?)
Does what you learned from the text have any implications for your present and/or future life?

The Mechanics of Developing a Project Schedule

Your meeting with the vice president went well and she has asked you to prepare a training session for a new crop of middle level leaders in the organization. You’re excited for this presentation and you know that it could potentially have a very positive impact on the organization. For this assignment we would like you to prepare a PowerPoint presentation which deals with the mechanics of developing a project schedule. In putting this PowerPoint together imagine that you are indeed this consultant and you are being asked to create this particular material as a conduit to training these managers in the art and science of developing a project schedule. You are certainly welcome to talk a bit about the overarching importance of project management.

Your PowerPoint presentation should include the following and completely answer all of the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least three (3) citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a reference slide at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint and Prezi presentations related to test size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements.

Component 1: Introduction & Project Overview (1-2 slides)
Component 2: Examination of the Strategic Steps Required to Reduce Estimating Error (4-5 slides)
Component 3: A Presentation of the Strategic Steps Utilized to Apply Modern Forecasting Methodologies (5-7 slides)

What did you learn about digital media design?

Timothy’s video
The inspiration for change can come from unexpected circumstances, yet the idea can then be catapulted into communities through digital media and social networking opportunities. With your digital media presentation, you have the opportunity to share your idea for change with your community or colleagues.
This week is also an opportunity to reflect on what you have accomplished this term and how it has contributed to your growth as a writer. Consider Gilbert’s (2014) video, Success, Failure, and the Drive to Keep Creating, and Timothy’s video or Nathan’s videos from your learning activities as you explore the opportunity to continue advocating for change and growing as a writer. Then, respond to the questions below:
In the first paragraph, reflect on your presentation by answering one of the questions below and connecting it to this unit’s reading:
What did you learn about digital media design?
What changes would you make to your digital media presentation, including visual enhancements, if you wanted to disseminate it to a wider audience via social media sites? Revisit Creating Effective PowerPoints from last week to get some specific ideas about what you could improve.
Do you think your presentation could generate change, and do you foresee pursuing this argument for change in the future?
In the second paragraph, reflect on your growth as a persuasive communicator this term by answering at least two questions in a well-developed paragraph. How have your ideas about persuasive communication changed?
How did what you learned about effective persuasion and logical argument in CM 220 help you in your current job or in other classes you have taken? How might it benefit you in your future career?
What did you learn about research that you think will be beneficial in the future?
What improvements did you see in your writing after completing CM 220?
What advice would you like to share with future students in CM 220 about the class?
Do you think you will be more likely to advocate for changes in your community because of this course?