Explain how a style sheet different from a style guide, such as APA?

This is a rhetorical research paper that is to show the current events between Russia and Ukraine using the history of what has transpired to how we are the current state.

This needs to be in APA Style using the terms below:
ENGL-110 Term Paper Style Sheet
Style Sheet Information
What is a style sheet?
A style sheet is a one-page list of formatting requirements for setting up a document. It provides writers with guidelines for how the document should look on the page and what components need to be included.

Explain how a style sheet different from a style guide, such as APA?
A style sheet specifies basic set-up for the format of a document as a whole, whereas a style guide provides comprehensive guidelines that the various components of the document need to follow.

How will following a style sheet benefit me as a student?
Following the style sheet provided here will take the guesswork out of setting up your paper and save you time. Following the style sheet will also ensure that your paper is easy to read and well-aligned with the criteria on the grading rubric.

How will following a style sheet benefit me as a professional?
Many professional fields use style sheets, including marketing and government contracting, to name just two. For some professional writing situations, such as responding to a Request for Proposal, the style sheet can mean the difference between your proposal being considered and your proposal being thrown out. In the normal course of business, using a standard format for written communication ensures ease of communication with colleagues and superiors, particularly in a fast-paced environment.

Formatting Criteria
Please print out these criteria, or save them to your desktop, so that you can mark off each requirement as you accomplish it for your Term Paper. To print this page, right-click (Mac users control-click) anywhere on the page and select print.

Format Set-up
Margins: 1-inch margins (top, bottom, both sides)
Font (style & size): 12-point Times New Roman
Spacing: Double-space the following paper components: body text, block quotations (if used), reference list (including within and between entries). Do not add additional spaces before or after paragraphs.
Title: Include a descriiptive title aligned with the purpose, audience, and genre of your term paper. Bold and center the title two lines above the first paragraph. Use upper and lower-case for the title, not all capital letters.
Paragraphing: Indent the first line of each paragraph one-half inch from the left margin. Do not add additional spaces before or after paragraphs.
Pagination: Number all pages in the upper right corner.

Standard Paper Components
Title Page or Heading: Set up the title page according to the example on page 8 of the Concise Guide to APA Style.
Header or Running Head: A running head is not required. The header includes the page number only.

Additional Paper Components
Abstract: An abstract is not required.
Section Headings: Section headings are not required.
Figures, Tables, Charts, Images: Figures, tables, charts, and images are not required. They may be included as supporting evidence, if appropriate. Format and cite using APA style.
Citation Style for Citing Information from Outside Sources: Use APA style for citing information from outside sources. Citation resources can be found in the ENGL-110 required textbook: Concise Guide to APA Style.
References or Works Cited Page: A separate references page is required, listing the sources for all information in the term paper from sources. Insert a page break after the last line of the document to ensure that the references page is separate from the body text. The title of the reference page is bolded and centered two lines above the first entry. All entries need to use a hanging indent.
Appendices: Appendices are not required.
For an example of how an APA-formatted paper should look on the page, see pages 26-32 of the ENGL-110 required textbook: Concise Guide to APA Style.

Word Processing Tips
The formatting requirements listed above for your final proposal may require that you make some setting changes in the word processing software you’re using. Here are some keyword tips for finding instructions in the Help section, regardless of what software you’re using.

To set margins to 1-inch all around = “margins”
To set the font to 12-point Times New Roman = “font”
To double-space the document = “line spacing”
To indent the first line of each paragraph one-half inch = “paragraph indent”
To insert page numbers “page numbers”
To create a separate references page = “page break”
To create a hanging indent for reference page entries = “hanging indent”

Below is the grading Rubric:

ENGL-110 Term Paper Rubric v2
ENGL-110 Term Paper Rubric v2
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRhetorical Situation:
Are the purpose and audience you have chosen for the term paper clear? Have you taken relevant contextual factors into account?
25 pts
Accomplished
The purpose and audience for the term paper are clear. Relevant context has been addressed.
21 pts
Proficient
The purpose and audience for the term paper are apparent. Relevant context has been addressed, with some omissions.
20 pts
Developing
The purpose and audience for the term paper are unclear. Relevant context is unclear or has not been addressed.
19 pts
Emerging
The rhetorical situation for the term paper has not been addressed.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGenre and Voice:
Are the genre and voice of the term paper clearly identifiable and well-aligned with its purpose and audience?
5 pts
Accomplished
The genre of the paper is clearly identifiable and well-aligned with its purpose and audience. The voice is appropriate for the genre and consistently maintained throughout the paper.
4 pts
Proficient
The genre of the paper is identifiable and aligned with its purpose and audience. The voice is appropriate for the genre and maintained throughout the paper, with some lapses.
3 pts
Developing
The genre of the paper is unclear. The voice is inconsistent.
2 pts
Emerging
The paper demonstrates a lack of awareness of genre and voice.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAlignment with Source-based Writing:
Are the two perspectives needed to answer the question posed by the paper clearly delineated?
15 pts
Accomplished
The term paper aligns well with source-based writing. The writer’s own knowledge and experience are supported by information from sources in answering the question posed by the paper.
13 pts
Proficient
The term paper mostly aligns with source-based writing. The writer’s own knowledge and experience are supported by information from sources, with some lapses in the role of the information from sources.
12 pts
Developing
The term paper attempts to align with source-based writing, but the two perspectives needed to answer the question posed by the paper are not clearly delineated.
10 pts
Emerging
The paper demonstrates a lack of awareness of the role of information used in source-based writing.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation of Information from Sources:
Does the information from sources meet the validity criteria of Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose?
10 pts
Accomplished
Information from sources clearly meets the validity criteria of Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose.
8 pts
Proficient
Information from sources mostly meets the validity criteria of Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose, with some gaps.
7 pts
Developing
Information from sources meets some of the validity criteria of Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose, with significant lapses.
4 pts
Emerging
Information from sources does not meet the validity criteria of Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship between Notetaking & Integration of Information from Sources:
Is there direct alignment between your notes from sources and the integration of information from sources in the paper?
5 pts
Accomplished
Quoted, paraphrased, and/or summarized information from sources directly aligns with Week 5 Term Paper Source Evaluation & Notes.
4 pts
Proficient
Quoted, paraphrased, and/or summarized information from sources mostly aligns with Week 5 Term Paper Source Evaluation & Notes, with some gaps.
3 pts
Developing
Quoted, paraphrased, and/or summarized information from sources has minimal alignment with Week 5 Term Paper Source Evaluation & Notes.
2 pts
Emerging
There is no alignment between quoted, paraphrased, and/or summarized information from sources and the Week 5 Term Paper Source Evaluation & Notes.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Information from Sources:
Is the information from sources well-integrated into the paper?
10 pts
Accomplished
Paraphrasing, summarizing, and quoting have been chosen based on rhetorical purpose. The information from sources is used in ways that are true to original context.
9 pts
Proficient
Paraphrasing, summarizing, and quoting have mostly been chosen based on rhetorical purpose. The information from sources is used in ways that are true to the original context, with some inconsistencies.
7 pts
Developing
Demonstrates a developing awareness of the differences among paraphrasing, summarizing, and quoting. Uses information from sources in ways that are often inconsistent with original context.
6 pts
Emerging
Makes no distinction among paraphrasing, summarizing, and quoting. Uses information from sources in ways that are inconsistent with original context.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse Information Legally & Ethically:
Does your term paper clearly identify information and ideas taken from sources through the use of citations and references?
15 pts
Accomplished
Distinguishes between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution through use of citations and references.
13 pts
Proficient
Distinguishes between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution through use of citations and references.
12 pts
Developing
Attempts to distinguish between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution through use of citations and references, with some omissions
10 pts
Emerging
Little attempt to distinguish between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution through use of citations and references.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle Guide Use:
Does your paper conform to the relevant requirements in the Concise Guide to APA Style, 7th Edition?
5 pts
Accomplished
Follows citation and reference conventions using APA style, with few errors. Paper elements and format follow APA style.
4 pts
Proficient
Follows citation and reference conventions using APA style, with some errors. Paper elements and format follow APA style, with some errors.
3 pts
Developing
Follows citation and reference conventions using APA style, with frequent errors. Paper elements and format attempt to follow APA style, with major errors.
2 pts
Emerging
Some source material appears to be used without attribution. Plagiarism may have occurred. APA style not used.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeControl of Grammar, Syntax & Mechanics:
Have you carefully edited and proofread your term paper to ensure ease of reading and understanding?
10 pts
Accomplished
Submission has no major errors related to grammar, syntax, or mechanics.
8 pts
Proficient
Submission has minor errors related to grammar, syntax, or mechanics that distract readability.
7 pts
Developing
Submission has major errors related to grammar, syntax, or mechanics that impede the reader’s understanding.
6 pts
Emerging
Submission has critical errors related to grammar, syntax, or mechanics that prevent the reader’s understanding.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted.
10 pts
Total Points: 100

Write a paper addressing a question that can best be answered by a combination of your own learning from experience and evidence from sources.

The purpose of this assignment is to receive feedback and suggestions from your instructor on the rough draft of your term paper prior to finding and incorporating evidence from sources into the final version of the paper due at the end of the course. The feedback and suggestions from your instructor, along with the reader response feedback from your peers will help inform the second draft of your paper, which is due in Week 6.

The rough draft should follow these guidelines:

Write a paper addressing a question that can best be answered by a combination of your own learning from experience and evidence from sources. You will identify the question that the paper will answer, the purpose of the paper, and the paper’s intended audience. You will also choose the genre of the paper to align with its purpose and audience. Possible genre choices include personal essay, white paper, proposal, blog post, and magazine article, among others. The paper will follow the ENGL-110 Term Paper Style Sheet. Please note that evidence from sources will not be included in your rough draft, just what is coming from your own knowledge and experience.

Submit the rough draft of your ENGL-110 Term Paper to the instructor for grading and feedback by Sunday at 11:59 pm. The ENGL-110 Term Paper Rough Draft Rubric will be used to grade this assignment.

.

Rubric
ENGL-110 Term Paper Rough Draft Rubric
ENGL-110 Term Paper Rough Draft Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRhetorical Situation:
20 pts
Full Engagement
The rhetorical situation of source-based writing is addressed by the draft. The content and perspective are clearly from the writer’s own knowledge and experience.
17 pts
Developing Engagement
The rhetorical situation of source-based writing is addressed by the draft, with some gaps in perspective, voice and/or tone.
15 pts
Basic Engagement
The rhetorical situation of source-based writing is addressed by the draft, but with significant gaps in perspective, voice and/or tone.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted or the rhetorical situation of source-based writing has not been met; the submission is a research paper draft relying on information from outside sources.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose
20 pts
Full Engagement
The purpose of the paper is evident.
17 pts
Developing Engagement
The purpose of the paper is implied.
15 pts
Basic Engagement
The purpose of the paper cannot be surmised.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment Not Submitted
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudience
20 pts
Full Engagement
The audience for the paper is evident.
17 pts
Developing Engagement
The audience for the paper is implied.
15 pts
Basic Engagement
The audience for the paper cannot be surmised.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment Not Submitted
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCentral Question
20 pts
Full Engagement
The question the paper will answer is evident.
17 pts
Developing Engagement
The question the paper will answer is implied.
15 pts
Basic Engagement
The question the paper will answer is not present, or it is unclear.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment Not Submitted
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeControl of Grammar, Syntax & Mechanics
15 pts
Full Engagement
Follows standard conventions of written English in a way that doesn’t impede reading or understanding. Minimal errors are present.
13 pts
Developing Engagement
Follows standard conventions of written English in a way that doesn’t seriously impede reading or understanding, although there are errors present.
11 pts
Basic Engagement
Frequent errors in grammar or mechanics impede reading or understanding.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment Not Submitted
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGenre
5 pts
Full Engagement
The genre of the paper is evident.
4 pts
Developing Engagement
The genre of the paper is implied.
3 pts
Basic Engagement
The genre of the paper is unclear.
0 pts
No Credit
Assignment not submitted, or the genre is a research essay.
5 pts
Total Points: 100

What has not been explored or underexplored in the related research literature about your chosen topic?

In the first four weeks, you identified a topic of interest and some preliminary questions you wanted to investigate. Also, you have read in the related literature about what other researchers have done to address your questions by reading and summarizing the findings of at least fifteen peer-reviewed papers. In this week’s discussion, you will need to identify unresolved issues related to your topic of interest and question/s (literature research gap) and refine your original question/s. This means you will have to criticize the research literature you have reviewed to identify possible research literature gap/s. In doing so, it would be best if you address the following questions:

-What do you already know about your chosen topic?
-What do you not know about your chosen topic?
-What has not been explored or underexplored in the related research literature about your chosen topic?
-What aspect/s of your chosen topic and original questions remain unanswered?

What are some of the dilemmas she addresses that are still important today?

Literary works like Frankenstein explore the “human condition” or experiences that humans encounter. The study guides for Frankenstein offer several “Real Life Considerations” meant to help you critically analyze the applications of the work’s themes in today’s world. Now, you will choose one of these topics and explore it using secondary resources to learn more about the novel and its relevant social topics. You might find information about social issues in familiar sources such as magazines, newspapers, or social science journals. Make sure your sources are credible – you do not want a random website or an encyclopedic website such as Wikipedia.2 Your sources will preferably by scholarly ones. Here are some ideas of places where you might find appropriate sources for this assignment:

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/ (note that this is different from regular Google)
Cornell University’s arXiv (open access sources in math, biology, physics, and other fields): http://arxiv.org/
Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE): https://www.base-search.net/
Your local library
Your thesis statement and paper must address both the literary qualities and the social issues as you evaluate the novel, Frankenstein. However, keep in mind, your essay does not have to answer ALL of the questions listed under each topic. Only answer the questions you feel are the most relevant to the thesis statement you choose. Develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims is supported with valid evidence from the novel, Frankenstein, and at least three other credible external sources.3

Using proper MLA style, insert parenthetical citations and signal phrases for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen external sources.

You have several options for this assignment:

Option #1: Can science go too far?

There is an ongoing battle between faith or spirituality and science that has been active even before the time of Mary Shelley. What are some of the dilemmas she addresses that are still important today? What are some of the ethical questions she brings up regarding the scientific definition of life and death? What does she illustrate about the power science has to blur the line between life and death? What is a current news item that is similar to this issue?

Hint: Develop a thesis that answers a question like this one: “How and how well foes Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein address ethical issues of science and/or faith for audiences, regardless of when they read the novel?”

Option #2: Discovery

Both Frankenstein and Walton are trying to discover something important to them. What parts of their real lives drive them to discovery? Does that drive still exist today? While we’ve mapped the globe, are there still geographical places for people to explore? In science, are people still trying to discover the meaning of life, who to save life, and how to defeat death? What methods do they use? Are there better ways to accomplish these goals than others? What are some of today’s motivations for discovery?

Note: Develop a thesis that answers questions like this one: “How and how well does Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein address human discovery as a theme?”

The guidelines for this assignment are as follows:

Header: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information:

Your first and last name
Course Title (Composition II)
Assignment name (Frankenstein Application Essay)
Current Date
Format:

MLA-style source documentation and Works Cited5
Your last name and page number in the upper-right corner of each page
Double-spacing throughout
Standard font (Times New Roman, Calibri)
Title, centered after heading
1″ margins on all sides
Save the file using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc, .rtf, or .txt
Length: This assignment should be at least 750 words.
Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph.

List and describe some of the features that all cells have in common.

Imagine you are a medical researcher in charge of investigating a new disease outbreak. In order to treat this new disease, doctors must understand more about this pathogen, the disease-causing agent. The pathogen could be one of three possibilities: a prokaryotic cell, a eukaryotic cell, or a virus. In general, viruses are infectious particles that require a host cell in order to reproduce. A basic virus is made of organized collections of protein and either DNA or RNA.

You have collected samples of diseased tissue from infected individuals, and you must determine if the pathogen is a prokaryote (Domain Bacteria or Archaea), or a eukaryote (Domain Eukarya), or a virus (not a cell at all)! This is an important distinction, as the treatment for this disease will be impacted by your results. How will you determine what type of pathogen you are studying?

1. List and describe some of the features that all cells have in common. Consider how you could use these features to determine whether the pathogen was a cell or a virus. (Remember that viruses are not cells!)

2. With this information, write a hypothesis that you could use to test whether the pathogen was a cell or a virus.

Remember that a hypothesis is a tentative explanation that suggests experimental predictions. You may share this hypothesis with your classmates through the discussion thread—see instructions.

3. If your experiments revealed the pathogen to be a virus, would this pathogen be considered “alive” by our definition? Explain your answer using the 3 components of cell theory.

4. Now, assume that your tests reveal that this pathogen is a type of cell.

Identify and describe features that differentiate eukaryotic cells of the domain Eukarya from prokaryotic cells in domains Bacteria and Archaea. What are some organelles that would typically be found in eukaryotic cells?

5. Develop a hypothesis you could use to determine whether this pathogen is a prokaryote or eukaryote.

You may alternatively share this hypothesis with your classmates through the discussion thread.

6. Visit CDC Current Outbreak List for US-based disease outbreaks. Choose a disease from among the currently listed outbreaks, and look up whether it is caused by a virus, bacteria, fungus, or other. Report your chosen disease and its classification. — Onions Salmonella

What was problematic about it (or, on the other hand, what made you think this would be a good site)?

This week, we are learning how to critically evaluate information on the internet to distinguish the good from the bad. In this assignment, you will put those skills to work. (USLO 6.3)

Instructions

For this assignment, you’ll do three things.

First, investigate each of the resources below. Then, use the CRAAP Test (View attached file for test) to evaluate the validity of each source for academic research.
“Outbreak of Lung Injury Associated with the Use of e-Cigarette, or Vaping, Products” (Links to an external site.) https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease.html
“How Bad is Vaping for You? Here’s What You Need to Know” (Links to an external site.) https://www.drozshow.com/article/how-bad-vaping-you-heres-what-you-need-know
“Vaping vs Smoking – Is vaping bad for you?” (Links to an external site.) https://vaping360.com/learn/vaping-vs-smoking-is-vaping-bad-for-you/
In a Word document, write an APA citation for each of the three articles. Then, beneath each citation, write a brief paragraph that answers the following questions:
Write an APA citation for the webpage you investigated at the top of the page.
What did the site score on the CRAAP test?
Would you use it for your research?
Why or why not?
What was problematic about it (or, on the other hand, what made you think this would be a good site)?
To be clear, you’ll have three citations, each with an accompanying paragraph, for a total of three citations and three paragraphs.

Your entire document should be formatted in 12-point, Times New Roman font with 1″ margins and double-spaced lines. Each paragraph should be at least 100 words in length (and this will be a combination of all of the answers per source). Your input should be in your own words, demonstrating your understanding and comprehension of the topic. Proper grammar and academic style are expected.
Name your file YourLastName_YourFirstName_CRAAP.docx and upload it to the dropbox for grading.
Your submission this week will be a Word document (.doc or .docx).

Explain how the case identified policies resulting from the case has influenced care for the population through the designated system (as it relates to Mental Health).

Explain how the case identified policies resulting from the case has influenced care for the population through the designated system (as it relates to Mental Health).
-How the case identified policies resulting from the case has influenced social work practice with the designated population (as it relates to Mental Health).