Best Writer

Use the documentary “Three Identical Strangers” as evidence, write a 600-word information report discussing the role of ethical guidelines in scientific investigation involving humans as test subjects.

The following questions may be used to frame your report

– What are ethics?

– Why are they so important in scientific experimentation and investigation

-How can things be done ethically in psychological investigations?

-Use ‘Three Identical Strangers’ and other examples to illustrate the personal, social, and scientific consequences when ethical approaches are ignored

CASE STUDY: http://cdnfiles.laureate.net/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6521/05/mm/decision_trees/week_02/1.html
To Prepare
Review the interactive media piece in this week’s Resources and reflect on the types of drugs used to treat pediatric patients with mood disorders.
Reflect on situations in which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use.
Think about strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Consider specific off-label drugs that you think require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics.
By Day 5 of Week 11
Write a 1-page narrative in APA format that addresses the following:
Explain the circumstances under which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use. Be specific and provide examples.
Describe strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Include descriptions and names of off-label drugs that require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics.
CASE STUDY TO USE CITE http://cdnfiles.laureate.net/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6521/05/mm/decision_trees/week_02/1.html
CASE STUDY TO USE BELOW:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The client is an 8-year-old African American male who arrives at the ER with his mother. He is exhibiting signs of depression.
Client complained of feeling “sad”
Mother reports that teacher said child is withdrawn from peers in class
Mother notes decreased appetite and occasional periods of irritation
Client reached all developmental landmarks at appropriate ages
Physical exam unremarkable
Laboratory studies WNL
Child referred to psychiatry for evaluation

MENTAL STATUS EXAM
Alert & oriented X 3, speech clear, coherent, goal directed, spontaneous. Self-reported mood is “sad”. Affect somewhat blunted, but child smiled appropriately at various points throughout the clinical interview. He denies visual or auditory hallucinations. No delusional or paranoid thought processes noted. Judgment and insight appear to be age-appropriate. He is not endorsing active suicidal ideation, but does admit that he often thinks about himself being dead and what it would be like to be dead.
You administer the Children’s Depression Rating Scale, obtaining a score of 30 (indicating significant depression)

CITES TO USE
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736254/
http://cdnfiles.laureate.net/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6521/05/mm/decision_trees/week_02/1.html

There are
four scholarly discussions in this course. The purpose of the discussions are
to stimulate the intellectual inquiring of evidence for conceptual and
theoretical attributes of nursing knowledge based upon American Nursing
Association (ANA) Standards of Practice and Professional Performance. The student’s
reflection is a 100-word essay in APA 7th edition with
references.

Discussion 2: In
what ways are the ANA Standards of Practice reflected in your practice?

What were the main causes of globalization before World War I? Using “Endowments,” explain the types of goods that were traded between Europe and the Areas of Recent Settlement (ARS) before 1914. Conduct a similar analysis to explain patterns of migration between Europe and the ARS in this era. Then, using “Interests,” identify the winners and the losers of trade or migration in Europe and in the ARS in this period. Finally, using “Institutions,” explain trade or immigration policies in at least two countries prior to 1914.
NOTE: For each of the final two parts on “Interests” and “Institutions,” discuss either trade or migration, not both.

Instructions:
1) Identify two threats to the Statistical Conclusion Validity, Construct Validity, Internal Validity and/or External Validity of your proposed research.
2) Discuss how you will mitigate them.

There are
four scholarly discussions in this course. The purpose of the discussions are
to stimulate the intellectual inquiring of evidence for conceptual and
theoretical attributes of nursing knowledge based upon American Nursing
Association (ANA) Standards of Practice and Professional Performance. The student’s
reflection is a 100-word essay in APA 7th edition with
references.

Discussion 3: Quality
and Safety Education for Nursing (QSEN) recognizes teamwork and collaboration
as a combined competency. How is this
competency reflected in your practice?

The difference between the thoroughbred and Arabian horses”?
And who is the best, the question asked will sound like. “How you can rehabilitation your horse before the races?”
, “What is the best feeds for the horses who race?”

the 3 pdf files are examples

the 3 documents ( .word ) are my work , you need to complete on it and make final discussion like my friends’ examples

Here is your Prompt:

Imagine you could interview the author of the text you selected to read independently.

If you could ask the author two questions, what would they be? Write a response in which you describe what questions you would ask.
Why do you want to know these things? Was there something specific in the text that prompted your questions?
Do you want to know more about a character or event? Or are your questions related to genre, theme, or another aspect of the text?

I am expecting the following:
3-4 paragraphs (introduction, 1-2 body paragraphs, conclusion)
Times New Roman, 12 pt font
Single spaced header

Id prefer if you used a book that is wildly known like harry potter or percy jackson ect.

Please review the resources in your Canvas Module and then prepare a Case Brief for the case Morse v. Frederick using a Legal
Memorandum format. Your memo needs to be in your own words and have proper grammar and spelling.

https://libguides.law.ucdavis.edu/citation
Resource for how to brief a case : https://www.quimbee.com/resources/how-to-write-a-case-brief

Article Reviews have two parts – a summary (bullets 1-4) and a response (bullets 5-8):

Primary research question or issue being investigated (i.e., main argument) – located in the introduction of the article
Theory (if applicable – see the literature review section) and research methods used (if applicable – see the Data/Methods/Methodology section)
Type of data collected and the strategy for analyzing the data (if applicable) – located in the Data/Methods/Methodology section
One of the major findings or conclusions identified by the author(s) – located in the results or discussion/conclusion section
What stood out to you in this reading? Why do you think that is?
What did you want to know more about? Are there any questions that arose while reading this article?
What other course readings/materials or events did this article bring to mind?
How do the article conclusions consist of knowledge that is valuable in some way?
Grading Criteria: Article summaries are graded on a 100-point scale, using the following criteria:

A paper – meets all of the following: illustrates academic integrity; clearly identifies the author’s thesis/main argument; clearly identifies the evidence presented by the author supporting their thesis; clearly identifies how the author got their evidence; provides specific examples of evidence from the reading; makes connection to the reading through a current event, course topic, or own experiences; identifies questions which arose during reading; follows formatting instructions; largely free of spelling and grammatical errors.