World Congress 7

The presentation Link is below:
1. https://mcmaster.zoom.us/rec/share/qQ4jJMRdaXaxIYAj2_eDXFlNSYnJbQeIKm22B6ykEbIRiawoRWbiODnKBPeRSYel.C-arMiNs01COc6ka?startTime=1642617463000

2. https://mcmaster.zoom.us/rec/share/R-oHceOAT85zRKvFVQ-bbTy5xN3qBDhBTro1g7JL5ZWizypH1Fbz2TTgwRNpczCh.BghSK168Y6Zx5uee?startTime=1643831106000

3.https://mcmaster.zoom.us/rec/share/UmKJAadFj11yooXFUTuDuB100KVuc-WzepY9q3lR2tR-RFNm4944TFXsQXLII8NK.MI3xetGZk5jmD5Iu?startTime=1643139675000

Each student is required to prepare a concise summary and evaluation of three (3) presentations.
Each review is limited to one page in length and must contain the following three paragraph headings:
1) Summary – a concise overview of the main content highlighting the presenter(s) and the
presentation itself;
2) Evaluation – a critique of the session (you may wish to comment on the content,
implications, methodology, model, measures, conclusions, presentation style, etc.; and
3) Application – a personal opinion of the usefulness of this presentation as it would apply in business
and/or government with a second opinion drawn from another published article or website (full
citation is necessary for secondary research reference as a footnote).
➢ The total report is limited to 3 pages of text (1 page per presentation)
➢ Your full name, student #, section #, must be at the top right corner of each page
➢ Presenter’s name, affiliation and title of session must be at the top left corner of each page
➢ 8.5 X 11-inch paper, 1-inch margins, 12-point font, single spaced, 3 headings are necessary
➢ Submission is done through Avenue and assignments will be validated through Turnitin.com
➢ Submission must be converted and uploaded in PDF format
➢ Assignments that are handed in late will receive a grade of zero

Discuss the main implications of the study for Healthcare/Public Health and how knowledge in the area could be expanded and applied. (10 points).

Read critically the articles. Many journal articles can be quite complex and use complicated wording and statistics. You may need to read the article a few times before you get a full grasp of it.
Students should address the following topics/sections from the article:
Identify the study design. (10 points)
Report the sample size, power and sampling methods used. (10 points)
Identify the variables (indicators) explored/analyzed in the study.
Independent/Explanatory/Predictor. (Quantitative/Qualitative) (15 points)
Dependent/Response/Outcome. (Quantitative/Qualitative) (15 points)
Construct, based on your article review, two research questions related with the study. Two research questions per article. (15 points)
Include the purpose of the article. (10 points)
Report the most relevant findings. You could also use tables/charts from the article. (10 points)
Discuss the main implications of the study for Healthcare/Public Health and how knowledge in the area could be expanded and applied. (10 points).
The journal articles review summary paper and any additional references should be reported using the American Psychological Association’s (APA) format. (5 points)
Write a summary paper 2 to 4 pages in length in MS Word format. Include topics 1 to 8.
Add a citation for the journal article at the top of the review using the American Psychological Association’s (APA) format.

Case of Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg

Paper Requirements

3 pages + Tile and Reference Page.
Double-spaced
12-point font
Times New Roman font style
One-inch Margins
APA Formatting
Questions needing to be answer using the case, text, and other web sources:

How does Sandberg’s book Lean In emphasize the three content motivation theories.
How does Sandberg’s book Lean In emphasize the three process motivation theroies.
How would you describe Sandberg’s Big Five Personality, and do you believe she has the peronality profile of an effective leader?

Rochin v. California Case Brief

Write a case brief about the Rochin v. California case using the 2 sources provided.
Be very sure to follow the rubric provided and to include all sections of the case brief worksheet. And include a conclusion

NO need to do the first page of the APA with my name, school, etc. Just the case brief

Competitive Intelligence Planning – Six Sigma Approach

Submit a 1-page report (using your own word) about Six Sigma approach in evaluating the Competitive Intelligence process and program. This report must include the following:
Description of the Six Sigma concept
Tools & techniques used in Six Sigma, i.e., DMAIC
Where it can be used?
How can six sigma help to evaluate the CI process

Ethical issues in brain and genetic research

Write a short research paper on ethical issues in brain and genetic research. Many states have passed recent laws or had referenda on stem cell research. What are the issues involved here? Which ones can science consider? Which ones are beyond science because they are based on religion?

Film Marketing & Reception Project

Choose an American feature-length narrative film made between 1930 and 1960, one we have not studied in class, and research how the film was marketed and reviewed during its original release. Materials you gather might include original movie reviews, posters, lobby cards, newspaper ads, trailers, and commercial “tie-ins” such as toys, games, and music.
You will need to find a minimum of five items, including at least two reviews.
Once you have completed this research, write a 1,500-word essay analyzing how the film was promoted and reviewed at the time of its original release. Questions to consider in your analysis:
What aspects of the film are highlighted (or downplayed) in the marketing campaign? [Its directors and/or stars? Its genre? Its (controversial) themes or social issues? Its use of (new) technology?]
What kinds of viewers does the marketing campaign appear to be targeting?
Does the look of the ad campaign relate to the film’s visual design? If so, how?
What aspects of the film are discussed (or avoided) in the reviews? Did critics consider the film controversial or innovative? If so, why and how?
Do reviews mention who saw the film and how they responded? What information about the film’s original audiences can be garnered from reviews?
Do reviews emphasize the same issues stressed in the studio’s ad campaign? If not, can you speculate on how and why they differ?
You are encouraged to use this assignment to begin exploring the topic you will eventually pursue for your research paper. Choose a film that highlights an issue that interests you:
a genre or type of film (science fiction, film noir, screwball comedy, “race movies”)
a social issue (Great Depression, World War II, race relations, homosexuality, crime)
a new technology (sound, color, widescreen, television)
an aspect of Hollywood history (the Production Code, anti-Communism, independent production, female filmmakers, Latinx stars)
Conversely, if you already have a film in mind, begin thinking about the historical issues that it raises. Please speak with Professor Stamp or your TA if you would like help choosing a film.
You are not required to do any additional research for this assignment beyond finding original marketing materials and reviews!
Please submit copies of your source material along with the essay.
**Links to online research resources here.
TIPS FOR THE MARKETING & RECEPTION PAPER
When collecting materials:
Collect at least five original sources, including items from the original marketing campaign and at least two original reviews.
Collect a range of marketing materials that show different aspects of the publicity campaign, rather than several similar posters.
Be sure posters and trailers are from the year of the film’s original US release (i.e., avoid DVD covers, trailers re-cut or re-made for later releases, international posters, etc.).
Be sure reviews are from the year of the film’s original US release (i.e., Rotten Tomatoes and Roger Ebert were not reviewing films before 1960).
When writing your essay:
Do not simply describe the materials you find; instead analyze how the film’s publicity campaign and its original reception relate to issues relevant to the film (i.e., early sound technology, controversial subject matter, new star, etc.).
Use the questions listed on the assignment prompt to help you analyze the material and develop an overall argument about it.
Formulate a strong thesis statement.
Weak thesis: Reviewers did not like The Public Enemy.
Strong thesis: The film’s publicity campaign promised viewers sensational depictions of violence and organized crime, tempered within a moralistic frame, but many reviewers expressed skepticism, suggesting the film merely romanticized gangsters.
Analyze the marketing and reception materials, not the film itself.
Read the sample essay on the marketing and reception of Dirty Harry (1971).
Review the grading rubric.
Before handing-in your essay:
Proof read and spell-check for errors.
Underline or italicize film titles (“quotation marks” or CAPS are incorrect).
Number your pages.
Check that all sources have been cited properly.
Check that your paper satisfies all categories on the grading sheet.
Include copies of all marketing materials and reviews discussed in your paper. For trailers please provide a url if available. A minimum of five items must be included.
Sample paper on Marketing & Reception of DIRTY HARRY Download Sample paper on Marketing & Reception of DIRTY HARRY
F+DM Chicago Style Citation Guide Download F+DM Chicago Style Citation Guide
Rubric

Describe at least two alternative solutions to the issues, and analyze their pros and cons. Consider why the solutions would or would not be effective, and the assumptions that are made in reference to the solutions.

Overview: Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterized by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before
accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion. Case studies are meant to connect real-world scenarios with theoretical teachings. Students
are expected to test assumptions and find creative ways to consider all the facets contributing to analysis of the case.
Prompt: To begin, read the case study: Kleiner-Perkins and Genentech (2012) When Venture Capital Met Science.
Once you have reviewed the case study and researched the main points, write a paper that addresses the following:
 Summarize the scenario in which you identify the key points, the stakeholders, setting, and situation.
 Discuss the specific issue and secondary issues, and explain how they relate. Explain your reasoning and support your analysis with
research from journal articles.
 Describe a solution to address the issues, explaining who should be involved in the solution, and identifying strengths and weaknesses of
the solution. Be sure to analyze your own assumptions, and others’ assumptions, when considering the strengths and weaknesses of the
solution.
 Describe at least two alternative solutions to the issues, and analyze their pros and cons. Consider why the solutions would or would not
be effective, and the assumptions that are made in reference to the solutions.
 Explain how to evaluate the effectiveness of the main proposed solution, once implemented, and discuss the implications of the
solution.

In your Perspectives Piece, please debate whether ecological sustainability and the sustainability of economic growth can be achieved together.

Assignment 1: Perspectives Piece
The concept of “sustainable development” has dominated the discourse on development and
environment for the past 40 years. In class, we discussed various perspectives on sustainable
development, including key international institutions, programs, commissions, and frameworks
related to environment and development. We also discussed various alternatives to sustainable
development. In this perspectives piece, please identify and discuss some of the social and
environmental benefits and some of the social and environmental critiques of the ‘sustainable
development’ paradigm that have emerged over the decades since its first appearance in the
1980s. In your Perspectives Piece, please debate whether ecological sustainability and the
sustainability of economic growth can be achieved together.
Please use 12-point font, Times New Roman, and double-space your Perspectives Piece. There is
a 600 word limit. Please cite important documents that you refer to in your piece and include a
literature cited list. Please use course readings, class discussion, and the suggested readings
below to help you form your Perspectives Piece.

Suggested readings:
1. Asara, V., Otero, I., Demaria, F. et al. (2015) Socially sustainable degrowth as a social–
ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability. Sustainability Science 10: 375–384.
2. Kates, R.W., Parris, T. and Leiserowitz, A.A. (2005). ‘What is sustainable development?
Goals, indicators, values and practice.’ Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable
Development 47(3): 8-21.