Best Writer

Comparative news analysis of a select topic/event/person coverage from equivalent mainstream media sites (e.g., newspaper & its website) that orient to different audiences or interpretative communities. Analyze, compare and contrast, e.g., frames, narratives, details, descriptions in relation to framing, rhetorical and discursive action for meaning-making, discourses, etc. What versions and definitions of events, people, etc., are put into action? In what ways are these similar or different? What are the implications, etc?
The group will need to work together to select a news topic, select comparative/equivalent sources, undertake a cohesive comparative analysis and produce a report. The report submitted also need to be cohesive and consistent in style, terminology, etc., rather than looking like a report where entirely different elements were simply “tacked” together. So some or all member(s) need to take responsibility for this final edited version too.
select a news story/event covered as news (not editorial) that connects to race or gender or its intersection (to comparatively analyze for the ways it is represented as news).
Select at least two contrasting mainstream news media sites/sources – according to the media bias chart – that are equivalent in context (for example, compare digital newspapers).
Find the news items/texts published over a relevant period of time for the issue/event/topic. The time period needs to be justified in the final report – so there should be a rationale. For example, if you decided that kneeling for the national anthem during a football game is the topic, consider at what point and for what period you want to explore the response – and why, considering why this makes sense.
Once you have your texts from the designated time period and sources, analyze each of them for language choices, details, narratives, discourses, rhetorical and discursive action, etc., to consider what accounts, information, and explanations (blame and motivations) about events, people, etc., are being put into action and what version of events/people are being put into action and reported. Consider the audience/interpretive community for the text and how this connects to the analysis and interpretation.
Compile and summarize these for each source.
Compare and contrast across the different sources.
Report your findings in detail, structure is flexible but should include:
Descriptive title
Author names
Introduction and rationale (what are the issues, why would we be interested in doing this kind of work, and why this is a relevant topic/story for analysis)
Sources and time period explored – including rationale for these choices (e.g. media sources)
Findings/analysis (subtitles are welcome to organize, and try to include data to support/show analysis)
Conclusion/concluding remarks
References (APA 7th edition)

Write an essay that explores your personal and professional reasons for seeking admission. This essay should incorporate the following themes into one coherent statement: your self reflections regarding the significant events in your life that led to this choice; your understanding of your personal and professional strengths and weaknesses, particularly in the academic, clinical, and research realms; your scholarly and professional goals and interests, and how these fit with a clinical psychology program, and with Fielding in particular.

n June 2018, more than 600 defendants in 58 federal districts were charged with participating in fraudulent schemes involving about $2 billion in losses to Medicare and Medicaid. The most common types of fraud were billing for services which were never rendered, over-billing or “upcoding” for services which were performed, unbundling steps of procedures typically performed together, or falsifying a diagnosis to justify medically unnecessary procedures or tests.
Develop an original response addressing these questions:
How does an ethical decision-making model support budget variance analysis and response strategies?
What are the consequences of failing to engage an ethical decision-making model?
Comment on the posts of at least two classmates. APA citations are required only for the original response.

Write a paper based on pages 113-127 in your textbook, “Miracle at Philadelphia” and the video production “The Constitution: A Dialogue with James Madison and George Mason.” The paper will focus on why the new nation was failing under its first government, the Articles of Confederation. It should then look at some of the major compromises made at the Constitutional Convention over slavery, and the positions of the large population states versus the smaller ones on representation in the new Congress. What were the backgrounds of the men who wrote the Constitution and briefly describe the roles of Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, James Madison, and George Mason? Finally, why was the amendment process so important and vital to the Constitution lasting over 200 years? Does this explain why the Constitution has lasted even though the original document did not include rights for African Americans, women, and the poor?
REQUIRED TEXTBOOK: Charles Errico and Stephen B. Oates, Portrait of America, Volume One, Tenth Edition, Cengage Publishers, 2011.

1. How can probability be contrary to children’s ways of experiencing the world?

2. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement from Shaughnessy 2003 found on
page 285: “Children and adults are not very good at estimating or generating random
events”? Explain/justify your answer.

Write a report based on the Freedly Consulting Case that summarizes the business case background, evaluates the current business situation, and analyzes the business information system needs.
Summarize the case details and business background by:
Considering perspectives related to the business including:
People/business culture
Business processes
Technology
Identifying several broad questions that will guide your analysis of improving the business
Evaluate the current business situation by:
Providing any supportive screenshots at the end of the document
Identifying of important people, processes, inputs, controls, and outputs related to the current business situation
Analyzing the current relationships between the people, processes, inputs, controls, and outputs
Diagramming the current state business process
An example of a business process diagram using any type of diagramming software such as Visio, SmartArt in Word and PowerPoint, LucidChart, or any other free diagramming tool
Analysis of the business process diagram for bottlenecks and inefficiencies
Summarizing key findings for the current business situation
Analyze business information system needs by:
Identifying global integration requirements based on the case scenario
Analyzing anticipated future relationships between the people, processes, inputs, controls, and outputs
Diagramming the future state business process
Analyzing the future business diagram for bottlenecks and inefficiencies
Summarizing key findings of the future business situation
References (in APA format)
Create a reference list for all works cited

Rhetorical Analysis Assignment
Due to Blackboard: Feb. 7 by 11:59 P.M.
Submission Format: Attached document (.docx or PDF)
PURPOSE:
The goal of a rhetorical analysis is to articulate HOW the author writes, rather than WHAT they actually wrote. To do this, you will analyze the strategies the author uses to achieve his or her goal or purpose of writing their piece. Reflect on the strategies we discussed in class as you make your analysis. We know that angle of vision, style and voice, along with the rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) all play a role in how messages persuade, so you may choose to view your rhetoric through those lenses.
Remember: The purpose of the rhetorical analysis is not to support or critique an argument presented in a text, but to discuss how the argument is made and whether the approach used to make it is effective. The discussion is made by looking into the goals an author is trying to present in the text, the tools he or she uses to present the goals, and Write a thesis-driven analysis of a text (of your own choosing or selected from the provided topics) that addresses the rhetorical effectiveness (or ineffectiveness) of that text. This means you will have to carefully read and briefly summarize the text you choose, and then craft a thesis statement that argues whether or not the selected piece is rhetorically effective (convincing based on the intended audience). Take into consideration the writer’s angle of vision, style and voice, along with the rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) used, and any additional rhetorical strategies that the writer employs to attempt to persuade the reader. Your analysis should include a concise summary of the original text (no more than 200 words) and an analysis that supports your thesis using plentiful examples from the text. Your final essay should be between 3 – 5 pages in length and follow appropriate MLA formatting guidelines.
AUDIENCE:
You are writing for a general college reader who may not have read the text you’re analyzing (which is why a good summary is so important!) You also need to assess the audience of the original essay. Who was the writer trying to reach with this text and how do you know? This is extremely important because rhetorical effectiveness is heavily dependent on the intended audience.

What significant similarities did you notice between these two Washington Irving stories, based on their themes, characters, and plots? Why are these similarities important?
For instance, how and why did each story focus on the perpetuation of myth as a way to address cultural, political, and economic changes in the 1820’s? In what ways do Rip Van Winkle and Ichabod Crane each represent stereotypes (character types) of their own historical periods – and why is this important to the stories’ theme and significance?

Describe the importance of Service Area Competitor Analysis. It highlights how Strategic Managers need to understand and think about what is happening in their markets that they compete. The text provides a detailed approach for this type of analysis and how it can be used in a ever increasing competitive health care system marketplace.
On page 93 Michael Porter’s Five Forces analysis is presented that evaluates a cosmetic plastic surgery service in Charlotte North Carolina. Using this analysis as a Template please choose a specific service/product category in the health care system industry (hospital, nursing home, LTAC, home health agency, etc.) in a service area where you actually compete.
For purposes of this mid-term assignment, please follow the columnar structure of Exhibit 3-3. Also, please be sure to include a cover page, in-text citations, and a reference page.

Mid Term Individual Report (180 points):
The text discusses “Service Area Structural Analysis” on pages 93-96.
For your Mid Term Assignment, select a familiar service/product within the Health Care Industry in a Service Area where you actually compete.
Using Michael Porter’s Five Forces Model as a Template discuss each of the Five Forces in detail.
For purposes of this assignment follow the columnar structure used in Exhibit 3-3.
A Cover Page, in text citations and a Reference page (following APA standards) must be included.
This assignment must be completed by Sunday of Unit 4.
For specifics on grading the paper, see the Written Work Rubric.

Write an essay format present two points you strongly agree with and two points you strongly disagree with in terms of victim blaming and victim defending. Be specific with examples.
Your response should be a minimum of 300 words, not more than 900 words, typed- double spaced in an APA format.
Must be submitted in an APA format with references as appropriate.