Best Writer

Clearly stated the position towards the beginning and throughout the op-ed. The position is constable and non-trivial
Demonstrate strong knowledge of third parties, election legislation, and relevant court cases.
AT LEAST TWO convincing arguments in support of the position. Demonstrate strong knowledge of counterarguments.
THIS IS AN OPINION PIECE. MUST HAVE A CATCHY HEADLINE, A LIVELY TONE, AND A COMPELLING CONCLUSION.
Well organized and interesting reflection of the Working Families Case.

Week 4 Creative Writing Assignment:
Write an epilogue to ” The Cask of Amontillado” in which a case against Montresor comes to trial. In your epilogue, provide the prosecuting attorney’s closing argument, reminding the jury of any evidence that proves Montresor’s guilt. Then provide the defense attorney’s closing argument and describe the jury’s final verdict.
Assignment Requirements:

Your submission must:
include a minimum of 400 words, written in paragraph form.
be written in the third-person point of view (academic voice). You may write in the first-person point of view if you want to pretend you are Montresor.
be double spaced. A title page, running head, and abstract are not required.

This assignment supports the following objective:
Describe the quality of care and the changes that are occurring due to new regulations.
Health care organizations spend time, money, and resources gathering data relating to patient care, but how should that data be used? For this assignment, you will assume the role of a hospital administrator.
Scenario:
As hospital administrator, you have access to a significant amount of data. This includes patient experiences, chronic condition management outcomes, length of stay data, and many other data points in between. You plan to make a proposal at your next leadership team meeting, proposing publication of the hospital’s data.
Respond to the following points as a means of preparing for the meeting:
List six types of data you will suggest for publication. Provide a thorough rationale for each selection. (You will need to conduct research on what types of hospital data are typically published.)
Notate which data sets will be published internally (within the hospital) and externally (for the general public).
Assume your colleagues ask you the following questions – provide your response:
“How are we confirming accuracy of this data?”
“Why does the general public need any of this information about our hospital?”
“What is the relevance of sharing this data internally – what do we expect our employees to do with this information?”
“What is the long-term goal with sharing this data – is this a one-time report, or is there a plan to report this information consistently?”
If approved by the leadership team to proceed with internal and external publication, what platform(s) will you use to share the data? (i.e. how you will ensure the information reaches your target audience).
APA requirements: Title and reference pages, three scholarly sources, in-text citations and APA formatting throughout.

In a concise paragraph, define and describe the role of mentoring in a healthcare organization. You may focus on either an administrative or a clinical job category.
Develop a mentoring program for your healthcare organization
Define eligibility requirements (who may participate).
Define how mentors and mentees are selected.
Define goals and objectives for mentoring relationships.
Define the duration of mentoring relationships.
Explain the benefits of participating in this program, as relevant to your organization.
Writing in third person is expected for this assignment.
Provide a minimum of three references, in APA style, on the page following your content for Week 4.

Discussion 1
Have you ever participated in a mentoring program?
This can be a program at a place of employment, a previous school, or even in the neighborhood working with others. If not, consider what you would expect to find in a mentoring program. Then answer the following questions:
What aspects of the program were/should be present for success?
What negative aspects were/could be encountered?
How would you update the program to be more effective?

Discussion 2
Find a podcast that interests you.
The topic should relate to leadership or organizational development (healthcare or general business context).
Listen to the podcast at your leisure.
While taking a walk, while making dinner, etc. This should be a time for self-improvement and self-reflection. It is not necessary to take notes while listening.
Provide a brief summary of what you liked (or disliked) about the podcast.
This is your opinion, and the only source necessary is the podcast itself.
Share a link to the podcast, including the APA style citation.
If you access your media through a mobile app, you can also check websites like YouTube and Soundcloud where many podcasts are available for easy web-linking.

Please complete the following steps for your discussion post and response.
Research the topic of innovations in value-based care. Select an article published within the last year that provides relevant details about strategies healthcare systems and providers are using to innovatively deliver, evaluate, and improve value-based care. You may choose an article that discusses a prospective innovation, or one that includes evaluation of a strategy already in place. The article may be editorial or scholarly.
Summarize the article’s key points (do not copy/paste the abstract).
Explain how the article is relevant to your career path or personal interests.
Discuss how you can apply the information in the article to your professional practice.
Provide the APA style reference at the bottom of your post, ensuring a link is included for easy access by your peers and instructor.

This paper includes two application questions with one business article and one case analysis.

Please answer all questions and make sure to answer all sub-questions. Please number the answers more clearly 1.a, 1.b..1.c.

Questions 1: Please
read Textbook Chapter 9 Marriott Case on p. 291. (I have included this case in
the the attachements) and answer the three Case questions:

9.1. Can you think of other jobs in Marriott where Big Five dimensions other than agreeableness and conscientiousness would be vital?

9.2. If you applied for a job that involved a personality assessment, would you be honest in your responses or would you exaggerate your answers to appear more desirable? Why?

9.3. What other approaches might companies use to assess personality during hiring, other than an interview or assessment? What strengths and weaknesses might those other approaches have?

Question 2: Please read the article, “The Temper Tantrum” from attachement and answer the following questions:

Question
1. In what ways do temper tantrums relate to the different forms of emotional
intelligence?

Question
2. How might bad tempers have contributed to the success of the entrepreneurs
and tech titans
discussed in the article? How and when might bad tempers be a
disadvantage to these individuals?

Question
3. Did you have to deal with a person who had bad tempers? If yes, please
describe the occasion. What will be your suggestion to these people who showed
temper tantrums?

Please
apply chapter theories and contents in your answer. Also, if you have any
related experience, try to share your own experience in your answers.

write a reflection paper on the on the dark side of Organizational behaviour that you have experienced. Do you think the experience has an effect on your interpersonal communication today? Draw references freely but accurately.

Read Stetler Model and answer the question below. Please be very specific when you answer. Prefer someone with a nursing degree or wrote papers on Theory. It is for Master degree class.

How is the Stetler model is different from the Nursing models and Theories?

Attached below are the questions to be answered in depth and each question answered in its entierty. I have attached this in document form as well, along with the article to be used, reviewed, and analyzed and an example provided by the instructor.

The PICO Question for this is as follows: In adults with chronic back pain, how does yoga compared with alternative therapies affect pain management?

This is what the article review should be focused around. Please message with any questions!

The evaluation table content is the information needed and the attached questions below. Please answer in its entierty. Thank you in advance!

Critical Appraisal Evaluation Table Content
Author and Source – Citation for study using APA format

Conceptual Framework – Theoretical basis for study goes here; conceptual or theoretical framework. If none, state NONE

Design/Method – What is the research design as discussed in class (true experimental pre-test post-test, non-experimental descriptive correlational, etc.)? How was the study carried out? How many groups were there? How were the subjects assigned to groups? What was the intervention exactly? What did the control group receive?

Sample/Setting – What is the sampling design? Was power analysis calculation used to determine the sample size? Characteristics of the sample including the number of subjects and characteristics of the patients such as gender, other important characteristics. Where did the study take place (what country, in a clinic or hospital, etc.)? Was there attrition in the study? If so, give and explain. You may have to look at numbers to determine attrition as it may not be addressed in the study.

Major Variables studied and their definitions – Independent and dependent variables in the study; conceptual definitions of each. If definitions are not given, state not given. IF the study has multiple variables, you NEED to report ONLY those that address the PICO question. Standard of care is not a variable.

Measurement – Names of scales, instruments, or lab samples used to measure the outcome variables including name and author of scale if available and data on reliability (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha, inter-rater reliability, etc.) and validity (e.g., content validity index). If biophysiological measure, report specificity and sensitivity. If reliability and validity measures are not given, state not given. IF the study has multiple variables, you NEED to report ONLY on those that measure the variables addressed in your PICO question.

Data Analysis – Types of statistical tests used; give names of individual tests. If only descriptive statistics (e.g. frequency counts, percentages) used specify which ones. What was the level or significance for the study set at before the statistical tests were ran? (e.g., P<0.05) IF the study has multiple variables, you NEED to report ONLY those statistical tests that that address the variables in the PICO question. Findings - Statistical results of analysis; should be a finding for every test in the previous column. Make sure to list the statistical test value and the p value to indicate statistical significance. It is imperative statistical significance of the findings is addressed. Findings statistically significant or non-significant? IF the study has multiple variables, you NEED to report ONLY the findings that address the variables in the PICO question. Appraisal: Worth to Study - Strengths and limitations of study methods; not the study findings (student may need to identify as author may not give this). For example, was there a power analysis. If so, was the needed sample size met? How was bias reduced in the study? Was the study an experimental or quasi-experimental study? Was random sampling used to select the subjects? Was the generalizability of the findings limited? What is the risk of harm if study intervention or findings are implemented; feasibility of use in nursing practice; Level of the Evidence on the hierarchy. (see hierarchy in chapter 2 of text). Remember level of the evidence + quality of the evidence = strength and confidence to act.