Best Writer

prepare a written essay regarding the Healthcare Reform, its benefit, and its negative aspects.
Analyze the current situation of healthcare services in the state of Florida.

Candace always tried to do the right thing, but did not know what to do in this dilemma. She knew someone would get hurt. All because of an overzealous supervisor, she thought sadly.
Two years ago Candace took a job at ABCO Corporation in its public relations division. Although new to the corporate world, Candace quickly learned the ropes of the highly bureaucratic organization and excelled at many of her projects. As a result, her bosses assigned her more lucrative responsibilities.
The only downside to the job Candace could see was many people appeared to be promoted based more upon their relationships with their superiors than their merit. While Candace knew her work was excellent, she could not help but wonder whether her friendly repertoire with her immediate supervisors had anything to do with her success so far.
A few months ago, Candace learned her division would be getting a new supervisor. Britney transferred to her division from a similar position in another subsidiary of the company because of her proven talent for organizing and improving the efficiency of operations there. A no-nonsense type of manager, Britney was experienced and determined to be successful in this assignment as well. Candace knew from Britney’s reputation that her success had everything to do with hard work and a commitment to make sure everyone else was working just as hard.
On the day Britney assumed her responsibilities as the new division manager, the company held a reception for her to meet the employees. At the reception, Britney circulated throughout the room, introducing herself to people and asking each of them if they had any suggestions that would make the section a better place to work. When she approached Candace, Candace decided to let her know what was bothering her.
“I don’t want to make waves or anything, but one thing I’ve noticed happening recently is some people seem to gain promotions and are given opportunities to work overtime based on who likes them and not on the quality of their work,” Candace told her. She quickly continued. “It’s not that people here don’t work hard or anything. It’s just that I noticed there might some favoritism going on in some of the major personnel decisions.”
Britney looked concerned, but smiled at Candace. “Thank you for telling me, Candace. I assure you I will do everything in my power to make sure this problem does not continue. This kind of thing has no place in the team I’m going to lead.”
The next day, Britney requested Candace meet with her. As Candace entered Britney’s office for the meeting, Britney looked her straight in the face and said, “I will not tolerate individuals in this organization who are not team players. Yesterday afternoon you led me to believe there are people in this office who are not acting in the best interests of the company, and I want to know who. These people have no place in this division.”
Candace was stunned. She did not want to hurt anyone. She just wanted to express her concerns in the hopes certain practices would change.
When she did not answer right away, Britney looked at her with annoyance. “Look,” she said, “I want you to tell me the names of the managers you were referring to now, and keep me informed if you see anyone hurting this company, or I’ve got to think maybe you’re part of the problems around here.”
Candace tried to explain. “I’m sorry,” she said. “I didn’t want to implicate anyone in particular. I just wanted to alert you to some concerns I’ve been having…”
Britney cut Candace off before she could continue. “Candace, you seem like a smart person. I’m trying to create an example here. There are no shortcuts in this job. You work hard, or you get out. I’ve got no room for slackers. Now once again, who are the managers you were talking about?”
Candace’s heart raced in her chest and she felt close to tears. Britney noticed because she sighed exasperatedly “Fine. Here’s what I’ll do. We’ll set up another meeting tomorrow and talk then. That’ll give you time to think about where your priorities lie.”
Candace sat at her desk, her work forgotten. She could not believe the mess she had gotten herself into. If she told Britney what she wanted, certain managers would get disciplined or perhaps even fired. Of course, it would be her word against theirs, so Candace knew she faced the risk of being thought of as someone who was just trying to make trouble. At the very least, the managers she named would dislike her for reporting them. But if she refused Britney, she risked the ire of her new boss.
Questions | Exercises
Describe the organizational structure of ABCO Corporation.
Which type of leadership power is Britney using? Do you feel it is effective in this situation?
Does Candace have any other alternatives than the two that she is considering?

Do crowds limit or enhance human agency? Develop a thesis in response to this and substantiate it with reference to all four readings assigned. Work to build connections across the readings.

Citations: Cite readings as (author, pg. #)

Philosophers, psychologists, and scholars have long argued about whether true altruism really exists or if it is, in fact, just another manifestation of egoism, albeit a veiled one. These skeptics argue that altruism is actually a form of self-interest, including aspects of pride, satisfaction, or the reinforcement of one’s self-worth. Still others, like author and philosopher Ayn Rand, outright reject altruism and instead consider selfishness a virtue.
View the following YouTube TED Talk videos about the essence of altruism:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uq-6T6TAu74+

View the following YouTube/TED Talk videos and identify three views (real and fictional) on the virtue (or lack of) helping others.

After you have viewed the videos, address the following questions:
What are the different opinions about helping others and/or sacrificing that are portrayed in each of these video clips? What do you agree with? What do you disagree with? Why?
Is altruism real? Common? Are people, by nature helpful or selfish?
Is altruism morally “right”? Or morally “wrong”? Explain your perspective.
Can a selfish person be a moral person? A self-interested person? What is the difference, if there is any, between being selfish and being self-interested? Between acting prudently and acting morally?
Is there a difference in sacrificing for a loved one (as in the Hunger Games scenario) and sacrificing for a stranger? Is one more altruistic than the other? Explain your perspective.
How is the bystander effect related to issues of altruism and/or egoism?

In your paper for this class, you will offer analytical readings of some topic related to the class material. What do I mean by “analytical reading”? Foremost, your paper will be an exercise in analyzing ideas as found and supported in the texts we read during the semester (note: you are not expected to do outside research). That is, you will struggle to make sense of and explicate a particular facet of a given topic through engagement with texts. By analytical, I mean that above and beyond explication, you will say something about the topic. The something you say will be a product of concerted wrestling with the text and will be about the text you are writing about. You might point out unacknowledged presuppositions on the author’s part, the unintended consequences of a particular idea if taken to the limit. You might point out holes, inconsistencies and breakdowns in the story your selected author is trying to tell.
How does one go about writing a paper of this sort?
• Choose a topic and some texts. To get started, I would recommend returning to a passage (or passages) that produced in you a strong reaction. Where a text made you surprised, or outraged, or defensive, or even desperately confused, there likely lies a nugget of a thought worth developing. You may and are encouraged to make supplement use of texts not studied in this class.
• Take some notes documenting your critical intuitions about the text. Then look back through the text to determine whether or your intuitions bear out. Allow your thinking to evolve as you reencounter the text.
• Eventually, it might be before you’ve written a draft, it might not be until after you’ve written a draft, you will have something like a “thesis.” The thesis contains the clearest and most comprehensive declaration of the thing you want to say about the text. It is conventional but not obligatory to state your thesis in the first paragraph.
• In settling on your thesis, be creative, be contentious, but be modest. Remember: in 1500 words (about 6 pages), it is possible to compellingly and coherently say something of value about a text. It is near impossible to say something of value about the world or how things really are.
• Use textual evidence to make your case. Draw passages from your text to argue your case. In presenting your evidence, don’t merely transcribe these passages or describe them. Do those things, but also present it. That is to say, show the reader what to see in them.
• Show your work. That is, try to articulate all the steps in your thinking. Even if you don’t realize it, at the point where you stumble upon the thing you want to say, you will have already done a great deal of critical thinking. Excavating and explicating these precipitating thoughts is a huge part of writing a paper like this.
• Define your terms. In the course of your paper, you will find yourself using words like “religion” or “ritual.” Words—especially abstract ones—can mean a number of different things, and the reader does not have access to your inner thoughts. In figuring out what precisely you mean by a given term, the first place to turn to is the text you are writing about. If you’re writing about “religion” in Bellah, you should probably figure out what “religion” means for him. If the critical term you’re using is not central to the text you’re writing about, then it’s up to you to stipulate for your reader what you mean by it. Don’t offer dictionary definitions. Simply say, “By religion, I refer to…”
• Do not brush problematic evidence under the rug. When you encounter evidence that seems to create problems for your argument, take the opportunity to further refine your argument.
• You may write as if your reader is familiar with the text you’re writing about. Summarize only when it is necessary for the particular story you’re trying to tell about your text.
• You might try making an outline before you start writing. Or if you don’t write that way, you may—once you’ve got something on the page—retrofit an outline. At that point you might review each paragraph and determine what exactly it is trying to do. If and when it doesn’t do it just right, tighten it.
• There is no one way to write. If you find yourself enthusiastically following a rabbit of some sort down a hole, don’t worry that it might be the wrong rabbit. Just keep going!
• Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, the thing that comes out of you onto the page is only a draft. Editing and/or rewriting is an essential stage in the process.
• Form and style (and grammar) count. A confused reader is a reader that wishes s/he were doing something else. To see how your paper flows, you might try reading your paper out loud.
• Your paper should be something 1500 words. Longer is fine, shorter is not (the rule of thumb is that if you are within 10% of the required length you are ok).
• Title your paper.
• If, now or later, you feel as though you need more guidance, please ask for it.
Paper Grade Guidelines
An A paper features original insights into a topic and the texts studied. By original, I don’t mean necessarily that no one has ever thought of them before—but only that the author arrived at the them as an organic result of a deliberative process. An A paper shares much of this deliberative process with the reader. An A paper lays out a challenging course, which it successfully navigates. That is to say, it is ambitious, but not too ambitious. Its argument will frequently be provocative, and it will likely boast a number of surprising moments in which seemingly counter-intuitive suggestions end up making a great deal of sense. Most certainly, rather than side-stepping mettlesome problems, an A paper tacks directly into them. It does not brush problematic data under the rug. An A paper is coherent in form. It is lucidly written, evenly paced, and has few errors of grammar or spelling. In sum, an A paper need not be a tour de force, but the experience of reading it is a thoroughly enjoyable and thought-provoking. A papers are rare.
An A- paper does most of what an A paper does. It thoughtfully engages a topic. It is well-written, well-thought, and has few if any errors. While an A- paper is an excellent piece of work, it nonetheless suffers from a serious flaw of some sort. In scope an A- paper might overreach or not go far enough. It might have significant omissions. It might be lopsidedly paced—that is, it might dedicate excessive energy to certain things and insufficient attention given to others. Its writing may be choppy.
A B+ sets out to say something about a given topic, and successfully does so. It gets on track and it stays on track. Nonetheless, a B+ paper suffers from substantive problems. It might be excessively modest in its goals, or excessively ambitious. It might play fast and loose with the data, leave critical stones unturned, or be marred by moments of half-baked thinking or sloppy execution.
A B paper has something to say but seems somewhat uncertain about what it’s saying. A B paper is often something of a Frankenstein’s monster, consisting of different parts that don’t necessarily fit together. A B paper often makes wild claims about things beyond the text that it can’t possibly substantiate. A B paper frequently has a distracting number of errors.
A B- paper reads like the draft of a paper as yet unexecuted. While not devoid of ideas and analysis, it does not pursue them with any discipline. A B- paper is half-baked, and its messy style and dubious structure usually reflect that.
Prompts
These prompts are merely here to serve as a guide. I have given you the option of writing on your own topic as the first choice.
1. Choose your own topic and set of texts.
You must run this by me first, but you are free to choose a topic that is most compelling to you.
2. Identity, Religion, and America
Write an essay that explores how identity is created through religious beliefs and practices. You may focus on either immigrant Catholicism or American Islam both amongst African-Americans and Arab- or South East Asian-Americans or compare these experiences. In both cases you should address questions of how religion either challenges American identity or bolsters it and whether or not this means that religious identity comes first or second.
3. The Public and Private Spheres
Write an essay that explores the Private/Public distinction in the American understanding of religion. You should discuss either (or some combination of) the goal behind this distinction, the way it maps onto the division of gender roles in American society, and/or the contradictions within the distinction especially as it manifests within American prisons.
4. Religion and Popular Culture
Write an essay exploring the role of religion in the construction of American popular culture. You may either focus on older forms of popular culture as discussed in American Jesus or more contemporary forms as discussed in Muslim Cool. You should discuss the way in which the role of religion either bolsters religious beliefs/practices or if the involvement of religion in popular culture undercuts the distinctiveness of that religious belief/practice/tradition.
Citation style
Again, you may use any citation style you are familiar and comfortable with. However, if there is no particular style you are familiar with, you may use Chicago Style. Examples for how these citations work (as footnotes, not in-text citations) see below.
Book
One author
(First time citing in a footnote): Michael Pollan, The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals (New York: Penguin, 2006), 99–100.
(After the first citation or first in-text citation): Pollan, Omnivore’s Dilemma, 3.
(Bibliography): Pollan, Michael. The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. New York: Penguin, 2006.
Two or more authors
1. Geoffrey C. Ward and Ken Burns, The War: An Intimate History, 1941–1945 (New York: Knopf, 2007), 52.
2. Ward and Burns, War, 59–61.
Ward, Geoffrey C., and Ken Burns. The War: An Intimate History, 1941–1945. New York: Knopf, 2007.
For translated books
1. Gabriel García Márquez, Love in the Time of Cholera, trans. Edith Grossman (London: Cape, 1988), 242–55.
2. García Márquez, Cholera, 33.
García Márquez, Gabriel. Love in the Time of Cholera. Translated by Edith Grossman. London: Cape, 1988.
Choose a submission type
Submission type Upload, currently selectedUpload
More submission optionsMore
Submit file using WebcamWebcam
Submit file using Canvas FilesCanvas Files
Drag a file here, or click to select a file to uploadDrag a file here, orChoose a file to upload
I agree to the tool’s End-User License AgreementLinks to an external site.
This assignment submission is my own, original work

“Gay Baker” cases, the one in the EU that recently went to the European Court of Human Rights [Asher Gay Cake Case from Northern Ireland], and relating it back to the Masterpiece Cake Shop Case from Colorado.

This is about religious liberty, relating to the rights of those who have deined, the case law that exists in the US as per the colorado casep and the issues and law surrounding the Norther Ireland Asher case.

What’s your sense about the media attention given to events like the Columbine shootings or the more recent Sandy Hook shootings? Do you think such coverage encourages further violence?

Discuss the different ways in which learning occurs in a company.
Examine the important considerations and best practices in designing effective
training in relation to human resource management.

One source must be Employee Training and Development Raymond A Noe eight
edition

One source must be Employee Training and Development Raymond A Noe eight edition.

Summarize learning according to the textbook. Compare and contrast the
various learning theories and their key components

ARTICLE CRITIQUE ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
In the Article Critique Assignments, you will systematically and objectively critique criminal
justice-related research articles to understand published research. You will critique the strengths
and weaknesses of peer-reviewed journal articles and carefully analyze arguments and points in
the article. You will develop the technical writing skill of critiquing while furthering critical
thinking application and knowledge of the topics investigated. You will incorporate and apply a
Christian worldview perspective to each topic and Article Critique Assignment.
INSTRUCTIONS
 4-7 pages excluding the title page, abstract, and reference pages.
 Current APA format.
 Minimum of two (2) peer-reviewed journal articles from Liberty University library.
 Acceptable sources (peer-reviewed articles published within the last 5-10 years only).
 Include a critique of least two (2) strengths and two (2) weaknesses from each article.
 Include a Christian and Biblical Worldview perspective.
This Article Critique Assignment requires that you follow a template. Please review and follow
the template carefully. Include a running header, title page, abstract (between 120-250 words),
proper APA headings/subheadings, and a reference page. Please note that you are asked not to
change or omit any of the bold headings that are already in the template. You are only asked to
insert your written content into the appropriate sections of the template.

Article Critique: Police Ethnocentricity, Subculture, and Historical Evolution Assignment
Locate two (2) peer-reviewed articles no older than 5-10 years about ethics in policing
administration. Provide an in-depth discussion of the findings in each article.
 Based on your critique of the literary pieces, what might an ethical organization look like?
 Specify the characteristics of training, leadership, and employees that might be expected in
an ethical police organization.
 Review the biblical themes in the video titled: “Police Ethnocentricity, Subculture, and
Historical Evolution” found in the module’s Learn section.
 Discuss some of the challenges associated with organizations that are replete with
corruption like racism and discrimination from a Christian and Biblical worldview.
Article Critique: Dual-Court System and Roles of Courtroom Workgroup Assignment
Locate two (2) peer-reviewed articles no older than 5-10 years that discuss 2 historical Supreme
Court cases and review the video titled: “Dual-Court System and Roles of Courtroom
Workgroup” found in the module’s Learn section. This historical case law choice is limited to
search and seizure, stop and frisk, searches for evidence, or police interrogation and
confessions. Chosen articles do not have to be on the same topic although they may be. Find
articles related to case law on the aforementioned topics but do not consider articles merely
discussing the case law itself. Provide an in-depth discussion of the findings of each article. With CJUS 500
Page 2 of 2
respect to the specific case law you have analyzed, defend constitutional democracy and the
issues raised in case law from a Christian and Biblical worldview.
Article Critique: Correctional Goals and Prison Privatization Assignment
Locate two (2) peer-reviewed articles no older than 5-10 years that discuss American prison
privatization. One article must present arguments advocating for American prison privatization
and the second article must present arguments against American prison privatization. Provide a
critique of each author’s position on the privatization of prisons. Review the video titled:
“Correctional Goals and Prison Privatization” found in the the module’s Learn section. From a
Christian and Biblical worldview, critique the current state of private prisons in America and
present a clear argument on how to fix the system.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism