Best Writer

The Annotated Bibliography is due in Week 3 and is worth 50 points. The bibliography must contain a minimum of three references, following current APA format. It should address the validity of each selected source and relevance to the chosen topic. This is due by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT. The submission must be a minimum of 500 words.

A literature review on police and PTSD to include
Introduction
Stress, PTSD and Police
History of the problem
Risk factors-including police culture
Problems-Suicide, alcoholism, bad behaviors, divorce
Resilency or protective factors
Summary

Often, a loss of function will begin a downward spiral in the life of an elderly person, affecting his or her independence and quality of life.”
Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word APA-formatted paper that addresses the significance and validity of the above statement. Aging can be characterized by a loss of function secondary to chronic disease, conditions, or illness. Include how a specific loss of function and the cause might affect one or more Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) of an older adult. Be sure to focus upon a specific loss and follow the loss as it manifests itself into a downward spiral.

Refer to the Functionality Paper located on the student website for more information.With aging comes physiological, functional, and sensory changes. At times, these changes can manifest as a loss. Often, a loss of function may begin a so-called downward spiral in the life of an elderly person, affecting his or her independence and quality of life.

Use a minimum of 3 references to support your response. Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Submit your assignment.

Develop the assigned topic and post in the Discussion Board. Your work should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts related to the subject assigned and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to the topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Follow the topic list to determine the scope of your discussion, meaning where your topic begins and end. Be thorough in your discussion including all the pertinent details.
Chapter 1 Managers and Managing
Make your subject lines meaningful and precise. For example, instead of saying, “My Thoughts” you might say, “Why Chapter 1 Convinced Me to Stay in School.” This not only grabs the attention of your classmates and instructor, it helps them remember who said what.
Explain and discuss Mintzberg’s Typology:
-The Entrepreneur role
-The Disturbance handler role
-The Resource allocator
-The Negotiator role
-The figurehead role
-The leader role
-The liaison role
-The monitor role
-The disseminator role
-The spokesperson role

Book needed for this assignment: Contemporary Management 12e.
Gareth R. Jones and Jennifer M. George, McGraw-Hill Irvin
Loose leaf option ISBN13: 978-1-264-25060-8, Rental 978-1260-73515-4

Read the paper “Isn’t everyone like me?”: On the presence of self-similarity in strategic interactions by Rubinstein & Salant (link posted on D2L). Provide a summary and a critique of the paper. In your summary, you should describe the following in your own words:
The goal/motivation for the paper
The experimental design (who were the participants? What were they asked to do?
etc)
The main results
Any remaining open questions (either because the experiment did not address them, or because the results suggest certain new questions worth investigating)
The critique portion of this question is fairly open-ended. Essentially, you should say what you liked and disliked about the experimental design (was the set of controls appropriate? Was something important left out? etc); whether you find the results convincing or not (and why); and what, if anything, you might have done differently if you were designing and conducting the experiment. Please limit your response to at most two pages.

Write a Point Paper.(point paper is explained in professional writing attatchment. please follow example) You are a civilian working in a DoD Public Affairs Office in a large Legal Services Command. Your department head has asked you to respond to a query from a U.S. Senator concerning the use of the FISA court in an American being tried for terrorism. Specifically, the Senator wants to know what legal basis did the FISA Court have in surveilling the American suspect. After conducting research, you must write a point paper that follows the following criteria:
1. Create a professional document in accordance with instructions in the Professional Writing Guide.
2. The length must be between 300 and 450 words. You will be penalized for shorter or longer memos.
3. Word length applies to the body of the text only.
4. Cite sources using footnote citations only.
5. Text is single-spaced.
6. Use proper grammar and punctuation.
7. List word length at the end of your document.
Example of point paper attached in attachments
FISA reading attached

Use the reading attached to understand how the FISA Courts operate. Consider the pros and cons of surveillance under the FISA Court.
Congressional inquiries are letters that request information from a government office on behalf of the representative’s constituent. In this scenario, a constituent made a complaint to the Senator. The Senator, in return mails the DoD Public Affairs Office wanting to know what legal basis did the FISA Court have in surveilling the American suspect.
Most Congressional Inquiries must be responded to within thirty days. The DoD PAO is aware of this timeline.
The Senator, like most elected officials, is not looking to place the blame on an organization with an inquiry, or is it taking sides. Instead, elected officials are looking for facts related to the questions in the inquiry.
Elected officials are aware that they only have half the story. They want to hear from the other side of the argument. Your response, as a legal office, would be an opinion on actions taken related to the complaint. You do not want to be defensive or accusatory in your response.
The response should list the legal facts of the case and nothing more. Saying too much could open other doors you do not want to address. Be disciplined in your response. Answer only the question(s) you were asked.
Once you respond to an elected official, the elected official will send the constituent a response saying they investigated the issue and relate the facts as you stated. Their purpose is to show they supported their constituency by sending the inquiry. They normally do not take sides in constituent complaints. If, however, your response causes concern or raises any alarms, this would be the end of the Congressional Inquiry.
You do not need to concern yourself with the actual terrorist acts, unless you want to include that in your problem space. Remember, a FISA Court usually makes decisions based on classified information that is not shared with the general public. In this case, it is unlikely that the PAO knows of the classified information in the case. The PAO would consult with the attorneys in the case and only ask for enough information to respond to the question(s) in the inquiry. Concentrate your response on the legality of the actions being questioned.

Discuss how trends in technology are shaping and impacting future leaders:
Leaders need to figure out how new/advanced technologies are going to impact them, their organizations, and their teams.
Leaders using technology in the following leadership styles: Servant, Transactional
Develop a 12 page literature review that covers the areas outlined below. Your paper should include the title page, abstract, literature review, references and follow all APA 7th edition formatting requirements.
Abstract
Literature Review-
Introduction:
An introductory paragraph with a clear thesis map and overview of the topic. This should lead to reader as to the main areas that will be discussed in the literature review.
Body:
Discuss the topic in detail by incorporating information about:
pros and cons of technology in leadership trend
leadership theories related to the topic
other related theories
relevant literature
impact on leaders and organizations
Use headings and subheadings.
Synthesize the information from the journal articles and references around various topic areas. Do not report each journal article separately.
Develop structured paragraphs with topic sentences, supporting sentences and concluding sentences.
Use transitions to connect sections together.
Summary:
Summarize the main areas of your paper and the findings of the literature related to your topic.
Develop a conclusion based on the literature.
References

Research Article Report Students will be required to write 3 research article reports—due dates
are listed in the course calendar.
Students will search for 3 research articles from one of the following
psychological journals: Developmental
Psychology, Journal of Social and Experimental Psychology, or Abnormal
Psychology. For each article, students
will report on the following information found in the articles:

1)
Write the full APA citation
of the article
2)
Introduction—
What are
the research goals and hypotheses being studied?
3)
Participants—
Who was
involved—explain the demographics of the subjects in the experiment?
4)
Methods—
What did
the participants do? Give examples of types of assessments used in the
experiment
5)
Results—
Describe
the types of data collected
6)
Discussion—
What happened? Were the hypotheses correct or incorrect and
why?
7)
List at least 2 strengths of
the research
8)
List at least 2 weakness of
the research and
9)
Suggest at least 2 ways the
research could be improved.

Please do
not plagiarize any of your report or you will receive a zero for the assignment
and may be dropped from the class if it occurs two or more times. If you are unfamiliar with what plagiarism
is, please check with me, your English teacher, or librarian for further
information.

The
following is some information to help you interpret your research articles:
Heading:
This consists of the title, name of the author(s) and their
institutional affiliations. The title
provides a brief description of the primary independent and dependent variable
that have been investigated in the study.
Abstract:
This section consists of a short preview of the contents of the
article. It should convey a statement of
the problem explored, the methods used, the major results of the study, and the
conclusions reached. The abstract helps
pinpoint the exact questions addressed in the study.
Introduction:
This section provides the foundation for the study, itself. It serves to provide a context for the study
by discussing the past literature that is relevant to and has implications for
the present research. It permits a
thorough discussion of the rationale for the research that was conducted and a
full description of the independent and dependent variables that were employed. It also allows for the hypotheses that were tested
to be stated explicitly and the arguments on which these predictions were based
to be discussed.
Method:
This section describes the procedures that were employed in the
investigation. The Method section
typically comprises two or more subsections, each of which has a specific
function to fulfill. The Method section
usually begins with a subject subsection, consisting of a complete description
of the subjects who participated in the study.
A procedures subsection is also usually included in the method section.
This subsection presents a detailed account of the subjects’ experiences in the
experiment and, a thorough description of all questionnaires administered or
tasks completed, as well as any other features that might be reasonably
expected to affect the behavior of the subjects in the study.
Results:
This section reports the results of the statistical analyses that were
conducted on the data in a clear and concise way. The author is obligated to present all the
significant results obtained in the statistical analysis, not just the results
that support the hypotheses being tested.
Discussion:
This section evaluates and interprets the findings of the study,
particularly as they relate to the hypotheses that were proposed in the Introduction. There is also an attempt to integrate the new
findings into the body of research that provided the background for the
study. It provides the context within
which the data can be understood and interpreted. The author may finish the article with a
brief section about the possible applications of the present work, implications
for future work in the area, and speculations about what lies ahead for the
line of research in the field of psychology.
The article may end with a short conclusion which restates the major
arguments that have been made throughout the article reminding the reader of
the value of the work.
References:
This section provides a list of research articles (and their contact
information) that were referred to in the present study to acknowledge the work
of other researchers and their findings and to avoid plagiarism of such work.

The purpose of this assignment is to present the steps taken to identify and solve an EHR problem. This PowerPoint presentation is designed for executive leadership and explains the work done to solve the identified problem in the case study.
Create a 10-15 slide PowerPoint presentation overviewing the informatics solution to the identified problems in the “Integrated Case Study” resource. Include the following information:
Describe the gap/need identified.
Describe the electronic form created to assist the oncology RN navigator
Describe the future state workflow created to meet the needs of the EHR.
Explain how principles of human factor engineering and user interface were integrated into the design and implementation of the informatics solution.
Outline the evaluation measures for the informatics solution.
Describe the process for evaluating the success of the informatics solution.
Include cover slide, reference slide, and presenter’s notes.

Google is a growing company that has emerged as a market leader in “information” access, distribution, and online advertising services. Have you ever wondered how Google can afford to build, staff, and operate Best of Breed data centers that enable instant access to a world of information, with an “intuitive” capability that adapts to the search interests of a user? Here is your opportunity to find out.
Note: This Discussion Assignment (Module 5: Week 5) requires the viewing of the Google video:
http://www.viddler.com/embed/bf7fc9fa
Additional research should be conducted to thoroughly address the following discussion topics.
Create and post an initial thread that addresses the following questions or issues:
When conducting a Google search, why do some search results appear before others? Describe in detail the processes that Google uses to prioritize the positioning of search results?
Describe Google Ads (formerly Google AdWords) and AdSense services and how each may benefit a company’s online advertising effort with Google.
Explain why there is increasing concern about potential eavesdropping practices by Google and other companies via Internet-enabled “smart home” devices (e.g.: televisions, assistants, and Wi-Fi networks)? What preventative measures may be taken by consumers to mitigate “always listening,” hacking, eavesdropping and other surreptitious information gathering conducted by unwanted intruders?
“Great is our Lord and mighty in power; his understanding has no limit.” (Psalm 147:5 NIV) Discuss the vastness of God’s wisdom, knowledge, and power, in consideration of the power of human marvels such as Google.