Best Writer 1)The Purpose of Medical Language
Why is Medical Language Necessary?
The Origins of Medical Language
Where Does It Come From?
The Principles of Medical Language
How Does It Work?
2)Explain and Summarize the SOAP method.
2-3 senteces as answer on the first 3 questions and summarize the soap method
Exam Content
Create an implementation strategy for the innovative product or process you selected. Assume you concluded to continue with the development of your innovation in Wk 4.
Prepare an 8- to 10-slide presentation with speaker notes. Complete the following in your presentation.
Identify the organizational resources necessary to implement and assess whether the organization has the resources or must hire or contract to get there.
Explain any ethical, legal, and regulatory implications related to the implementation.
Identify regulatory stakeholders that may influence the approval and implementation of your innovation.
Identify legal mechanisms to protect the innovation through patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets.
Identify any ethical issues related to the implementation of the innovation.
Establish a timeline for deploying your innovation. Include major tasks or milestones that must be accomplished to roll out your innovation.
Cite any references to support your assignment.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Submit your assignment.
Resources
Center for Writing Excellence
Reference and Citation Generator
Grammar Assistance
Video Analysis 2.5 – Process Skills in a Kindergarten Classroom
In this video of a kindergarten classroom, how are the students learning and practicing process skills?
Video Analysis 2.6 – Learning Goals and Abilities for Inquiry
Watch this video clip to see Ashley Welsh review learning goals and mention abilities needed for students to do scientific inquiry after her 4th graders explore erosion and weathering at several activity stations. Which of the abilities does she emphasize with her class? What did you find most beneficial from watching this video?
*** Split the page between the 2 analyses.
analyze the case of darling v charleston. Be sure to discuss the duties of the doctor, the nurses, and the hospital itself in the case. Explain the significance of the hospital’s written procedure for care. Be sure to include citations in the paper.
2 full pages
To what extent can it be argued that ‘offenders’ choose to commit crime?
Write a fully-developed central idea essay on the play “Fences” by August Wilson. Your essay should be in the proper format of a central idea essay (i.e. just like you would be writing one for the Regents)- you should cite evidence from the text and explain how the evidence supports your central idea. Look at the central idea essay templates for help, and remember that a proper central idea should be like a lesson that the author is trying to teach us! (It should not be one word or phrase, and you should be able to preface your central idea with the phrase “In life…(for example- some people build Fences to keep their loved ones close)”.
Describe the steps of the evidence-based research process and the importance of using them. In the initial stages of an EBP project, where do nurses in your specialty go to locate sources of information that help them to determine whether or not a practice problem is appropriate for an evidence-based practice change proposal. Include two specific sources on information in your discussion.
i need 3 thesis statements bsed on the file below (Presentation) PLUS sources and citation ( how to quote i will also upload a file )
· The collection of thesis statements summarises the key claims of the presentation
· Short and concise: 1 page → Focus on the core arguments (3 thesis statements)
· Provides the basis for the discussion
· Correct citation and referencing is an important basis for academic writing
· Reference list: Summarises sources in alphabetical order
· Task for this course: Compile a list with core scientific publications for a given topic
· Length: 1 page (alphabetical order)
· Sources in English, a minimum of 10 sources
There are 2 parts to this assignment. You must read the 2 sources I will add and summarise both. Then you must write another paragraph responding to each source regarding the source’s argument. Little to no plagiarism please. Further instructions are posted as follows:
Part 1: Write a single-paragraph comprehensive summary of each of the two source readings (posted as uploaded files). Each summary must be a single paragraph of approximately 200 words (i.e., 180-220). Accurately capture the main content of each argument. Write concisely, avoiding entirely formulations such as “Brumbaugh says…,” “according to Mott…,” etc. To this end, write from the author’s point of view, that is, in his voice, not your own. Although you will probably use terms and phrases from the original readings, no quotation marks are required; in a summary, blanket attribution to the author is assumed.
Part 2: Using your own words write a thoughtful, well-organized 1-paragraph response to each of the two source readings. Organize your own thoughts here, writing in your own voice; bear in mind that your response must engage the argument presented by each secondary source reading. As with your summary, each response must be approximately 200 words.
Before you begin: Read the Project #1 description (attached to the Project #1a assignment folder) paying special attention to the Red Team’s report.
For this week’s discussion our focus will be upon developing a brief (1-2 page) forensics data collection plan to be used during a Red Team exercise. Your plan will be used as part of training exercise for incident response personnel to help them learn to identify and collect evidence.
Your first task is to analyze the Red Team’s report to determine what they attacked or what attack vectors were used. Next, analyze the environment to determine what types of forensic evidence should be collected after the attack(s) and where that evidence can be collected from. You should consider both volatile sources such as RAM (memory) and static sources such as disk drives, thumb drives (USB storage devices), etc. After you have identified the types of evidence and the devices from which evidence should be collected, document that in your short paper (the “plan”).
At a minimum your plan must document evidence collection for three specific attack vectors or vulnerabilities that were exploited by the Red Team as part of its penetration testing. For each vector or vulnerability, document what type of evidence could be collected and where the evidence should be collected from.
(Read through)-Red Team Penetration Testing
Sifers-Grayson hired a cybersecurity consulting firm to
help it meet the security requirements of a contract with a federal agency. The
consulting firm’s Red Team conducted a penetration test and was able to gain
access to the engineering center’s R&D servers by hacking into the
enterprise network through an unprotected network connection (see figure 2).
The Red Team proceeded to exfiltrate files from those servers and managed to
steal 100% of the design documents and source code for the AX10 Drone System.
The Red Team also reported that it had stolen passwords for 20% of the employee
logins using keylogging software installed on USB keys that were left on the
lunch table in the headquarters building employee lounge (see Figure 3). The
Red Team also noted that the Sifers-Grayson employees were quite friendly and
talkative as they opened the RFID controlled doors for the “new folks” on the
engineering staff (who were actually Red Teamers).
The Red Team continued its efforts to penetrate the
enterprise and used a stolen login to install malware over the network onto a
workstation connected to a PROM burner in the R&D DevOps lab (See Figure
3). This malware made its way onto a PROM that was then installed in an AX10-a
test vehicle undergoing flight trials at the Sifers-Grayson test range (See
Figures 1 and 4). The malware “phoned home” to the Red Team over a cellular
connection to the R&D center. The Red Team took control of the test vehicle
and flew it from the test range to a safe landing in the parking lot at Sifers-Grayson
headquarters.
The Red Team used three stolen logins to send Phishing
Emails to employees. These phishing emails appeared to come from coworkers
(employees of the company) and contained a link to one of three videos. Each
video was linked to a server that tracked the email address and IP address of
the computer used to access the video. The Red Team reported that over 80% of
the recipients clicked on the video link for cute kittens or cute
cats. Twenty percent (20%) of the recipients clicked on the video link for
a business news story. A video link to a sports event wrap-up for the Kentucky
Volunteers basketball team had over 95% click-through rate. All three videos
displayed a “Page Not Found (404 Error)” message from the target server. The
Red Team did not put a tracking beacon in the emails to track forwarding of the
phishing emails. But, the team reported that the target server collected email
addresses and IP addresses for over 1500 external recipients within 24 hours of
the original mailing; at that point, the target server was shutdown.
After completing their penetration tests, the Red Team
provided Sifers-Grayson executives with a diagram showing their analysis of the
threat environment and potential weaknesses in the company’s security posture for
the R&D DevOps Lab (see figure 5).