Best Writer

Read both articles: Schlegel Athenaeum-Fragments (selection) and Schlegel On Incomprehensibility, then answer the question.
question: What do you think about Schlegel’s method of ‘intentional incomprehensibility’? Select one passage from Schlegel Athenaeum-Fragments (selection) and one from Schlegel On Incomprehensibility in order to compare them and analyze how they respectively employ incomprehensibility as a tool.

Using the guidelines in the Chapter 3 Presentation following the slide, “Creating a Metacognitive Plan,” you need to create a learning plan for something that you want to accomplish like receiving a good grade on a project, major assignment, or test.
Post 1: Address the following topics in-depth (at least 150 words):
Section 1 – Describe the details of the assignment that you want to complete, so others can understand what you want to learn. Include any instructions given by your instructor or in your syllabus. For example, state that you want to write a compare/contrast paper for your English 201 course and provide the instructions given to you.
Section 2 – Write a goal statement using Bloom’s taxonomy. For example, “I want to write a compare/contrast essay and receive an A on it.”
Section 3 – Break down and identify all steps that you need to take to complete the assignment.
Section 4 – Outline a plan of action for completing each step.
Section 5 – Discuss learning strategies and resources that you will use to help you complete the project (refer to Chapter 3 of your textbook).

Personal Values Versus Social Work Values
The goal of this assignment is to reflect on personal values you have that conflict with professional
social work values. This conflict is expected for most, if not all, social workers. The key is to be aware
of the value conflict and develop insight into how you will maintain ethical standards in clinical social
work. It is also important to mention that your personal values are valid and you can practice effective,
ethical, and competent social work even when your personal values conflict with social work values. It
only becomes problematic if social workers project their personal values onto patients/clients. With that
said, in this assignment, you will pick a social work topic (that conflicts with your personal values) and
articulate your personal values related to the topic, discuss social work values related to the topic, and
explore how you plan to bracket your personal values when practicing clinical social work. For example,
you may identify as pro-life and a patient/client comes to you for counseling and she is considering an
abortion. For point 1, you will articulate your personal values related to being pro-life. For point 2, you
will discuss social work values related to abortion, unplanned pregnancy, choosing to parent or not
parent, or other related topics. For point 3, you will explore how you plan to provide ethical social work
practice by not projecting your personal values onto patients/clients.
To assist you with this assignment, please read Chapter 3 from the Dolgoff and colleagues (2012)
textbook. Also, you can pick any social work topic/value you want, but if you need assistance in
identifying a topic/value, please see the below attachment (in Canvas). The attachment highlights many
social work policies/values, such as topics related to homelessness, immigration, LGBTQ, racism, and
criminal justice reform.
The paper is to be 2 to 3 pages long (double-spaced), not including a title page and reference page (you
will need to cite the social work topic, policy, ethical standard, etc.). Please address the three points
below and have three headings: Personal Value, Social Work Value, and Ethical Social Work
Practice.
1) Personal Value: please articulate your personal values related to the topic.
2) Social Work Value: please discuss social work values related to the topic and cite relevant policies,
ethical standards, etc.
3) Ethical Social Work Practice: please explore how you plan to provide ethical social work practice
by not projecting your personal values onto patients/clients.

Over the course of the paper, the student should
provide a clear argument that is carefully developed using specific references
and analysis of the course readings. To do this, select a small handful of texts and compose a careful comparison of the arguments. Rather than making broad sweeping claims, ground your paper in specific textual analysis. Make sure your
argument can be adequately defended over the space of the paper. Please take
the time to craft a paper that is well written, proofread, and contains proper citation formatting.

Taylor (2016, 16) writes that “[t]oday’s movement [for Black Lives] has similarities with the struggles of the 1960s but does not replicate them.” Write a paper, with a clear argument, that explores how the Black Lives Matter movement draws similarities, and possibility inspirations, from African anti-colonial struggles. Focus on Senghor 1964 to
explain and analyze the Black Lives Matter movement.

Historical
Topic Analysis Assignment Overview
The
purpose of the Historical Topic Analysis
Assignment is to evaluate historical events, topics, and trends and their
related causes and effects, especially in the field of education. The topic will
also be addressed from a Biblical worldview perspective integrating current
course materials and peer-reviewed journal articles. Candidates are encouraged
to explore from a historical perspective a topic they anticipate might relate
to their future capstone or dissertation project. Candidates research and
conduct the analysis. They demonstrate knowledge of educational ideas of the
past, consider the relevance of the topic, analyze the topic in light of their
own educational beliefs, and critically analyze related actions and beliefs.

This
paper is based on the topic, guiding question, and preliminary thesis statement
you submitted in previous assignments and should be in APA format (see the APA Format Quick Guide).

Length: This paper is to be
at least 1,300 words in length from
the introductory paragraph to the conclusion. This does not count the title
page, abstract, or reference pages.

Citations and
References: Cite
at least five sources throughout the paper and list them on the reference
page. Of the five sources, one of them is required to be the course textbook. You
may incorporate articles from your Annotated
Bibliography Assignment and other course assignments as appropriate. Other
sources may include course videos, academic journal articles, books, and
textbooks from other courses.

Structure: You have a great
deal of latitude in how the paper is structured, but it should follow a logical
progression of thought and the guidelines below. See the Historical Topic Analysis Grading Rubric for required elements.
1. Title Page
Pagination: In APA, all
pages are numbered. The title page should be page 1.
Title: The title
should not be the name of the assignment (i.e., Historical Topic Analysis).
It should be a phrase drawn from the thesis statement in the introductory
paragraph. It should provide the reader a hint of the topic and the main
idea supported throughout the paper and may be phrased in a clever, unique
fashion. The first letter of all words should be capitalized except for articles
(e.g. a, an, the),
conjunctions (e.g., and, but), and short prepositions (e.g.,
of, about), unless they appear as the first word, which is always
capitalized. Center and boldface your title and position it near the
middle of the page or slightly above the middle.
Other
Information on Title Page: All other information on the title
page should comply with current APA requirements.
2. Abstract: The heading of the abstract should be
centered and boldfaced.
·
Place
the abstract at the top of a page by itself after the title page.
·
Do
not indent the first line.
·
The
abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper. It
should present the main ideas and main conclusions/implications. Including the
main ideas and conclusions in the abstract is much more important than a simple
outline of the structure or headings.
3. Introduction: Do not
use the word “Introduction” as a heading for this section.
·
The
purpose of the introductory paragraph is different from that of the abstract. Do
not simply copy the abstract.
·
In
this section, introduce your thesis statement that will be developed throughout
the paper. It is the main idea you are presenting. Save other supporting ideas for
the body of the manuscript. Do not overload the introductory paragraph with too
many concepts that distract from the key point of the thesis statement.
·
It
is best to place the thesis statement at the end of the introductory paragraph.
It is typically one or two sentences that serve as a transition into the rest
of the paper. Some writers choose to place it as the first sentence of the
introduction. Either option is acceptable as long as the introduction is well
written and has a logical progression of thought.
4. Summary and Context: Centered in bold
with all major words capitalized, enter the first Level 1 heading of your
paper. (Level 2 headings are unnecessary for this short of a paper.) Use the
words “Summary and Context.”
This brief section describes
and/or summarizes the topic you have chosen so the reader understands the
setting in which the topic developed. This is a succinct presentation of
events or circumstances that may have influenced the topic.
Include transitions that build
a logical progression from the thesis statement in the introductory
paragraph into the topic and its historical context.
5. Critical Analysis: This Level 1 heading should be
formatted the same as the previous one. Use the words “Critical Analysis.” This
section should reflect various perspectives about the topic, including a Biblical
worldview lens.
6. Conclusion: Use the same Level 1 formatting as you
have done with your other headings above and enter the word “Conclusion” is centered, bold font. Although your
conclusion should include concepts from the thesis statement in the
introduction and should have some alignment with the title of the paper, you
should not simply restate the thesis statement. Wrap up the paper by
emphasizing your main idea and draw a clear conclusion. Typically, a good conclusion
does not introduce new information. The conclusion is where you are to discuss
implications about what you have already shared and relate ideas to current
educational issues.

What caused mental health issues increase in the face of pandemic (COVID-19) as it relates to Policy and Politics in Healthcare

After viewing/reading the course page and conducting your own research via the GMC library and course text book, respond to the following prompt. Keep in mind that this is not a discussion forum. This is a writing assignment. You will not be responding to other student’s posts; you will simply be posting your response to the prompt below. The grading rubric for this assignment is also posted in the Course Syllabus. Remember to follow all guidelines below:
In at least two well-developed paragraphs (and a paragraph is at least five to seven sentences) discuss:
Was the American Revolution, revolutionary? Meaning, many historians argue that yes a new government was created and amazingly survived. That is astounding and theywere really creating something wholly different than other governments from around the world. However, for many people their lives the day afterthe war did not look anydifferent from their lives before the war. They had the same jobs, the same economic status, politicalbenefits or exclusions. Positions of power did not change for many white men and women and certainly not for American Indians and slaves. With these two different ideas in mind about the Revolution answer the question: was the American Revolution revolutionary or not and be sure to support your answers with primary and secondary sources.
Your post should be cited in APA format with credible and scholarly sources from the GMC library databases. You may also use your textbook as a source. Remember to cite all quotes.
The guidelines for this assignment are:
Your response must be two well-developed paragraphs of a minimum of five sentences each.
Your complete word count on this assignment must be at least 250 words.
You must ONLY use the GMC library, online learning resources, or the course textbook.
You must cite all direct quotes and paraphrased material with proper APA in-text citations in the paragraphs.
At the bottom of your submission (right below the paragraphs), you must include an APA-style bibliography of all the sources you used.
Your submission should be free of grammar, content, and style errors.

Each Reply should be 250 – 300 words

From a Biblical perspective, using the assigned readings as well as your own research, address the
argument that government should require health care costs to be spread across the general population regardless of health care status using healthcare “reform” legislation such as the ACA (or other similar means).

For each
thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly
citations in Bluebook
citation format. Any sources cited must have
been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the
textbook, the Bible, scholarly articles, etc.

***Textbook – Furrow et al (chapters 2-3) – Health Law
Abridged 8th edition ISBN978-1-68328-911-1 *****

Explain an example of how paying someone to teach could cause problems in society.
2) Explain an example of how people today are happier in their caves?

prepare a two-page double-spaced paper (maximum) describing a research question of interest. Students will formally apply theory and engage in evidence-informed health practice and decision making. As researchers, you will describe your research question – identifying variables clearly and evaluating them using the PICO criteria. The grading rubric can be found below.
Your research question paper will include:
Title page (APA format)
Two-page paper where you will describe your research question, identify and evaluate the variables and use the FINER criteria to summarize your research question.
Reference Page(s) – Ensure appropriate APA format for in-text citations and reference page(s)
Cite relevant published reports, best practice guidelines for health professionals and peer-reviewed articles to support your viewpoints (minimum of 2 credible websites and 3 current {< 5 years} peer-reviewed articles). Please cite references according to APA format in your brief. Research Question – Clearly state your research question. Describe the components of the research question using PICO criteria. Feasible – Describe the feasibility of your research question. Define and describe the number of participants you will need for your study, the technical expertise required, the affordability of the study, how manageable the study will be and whether it is fundable. Novel – Describe the novelty of your research study. Briefly summarize previous literature in the research study area to demonstrate how your research question is novel. Ethical – Describe how ethically sound your research question will be. Identify the potential risk and benefits of participation for your participants. Define the relevant ethical principles associated with your research question. Relevance – Describe how your research question will be relevant in terms of expanding scientific knowledge and/or relevance to clinical and health policy. Describe the importance and significance of the problem addressed.