Best Writer

Social Welfare Before the Elizabethan Poor Laws: The Early Christian Tradition, AD 33 to 313, by Vicent Faherty (2006)
Please read the article by Vicent Faherty and answer the following questions:
1. Please describe, in 25 words or more, the Elizabethan Poor Laws of 1601.
2. Do you agree or disagree with the author when he states, “Clearly, what is constructed as social welfare today has been organized and delivered for centuries before 1601 through the rich religious traditions of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam and thousands of other traditional religions and cultural practices embraced by humankind throughout the world? In 25 words or more, please explain your answer.
3. Briefly describe, in 25 words or more, Greek and Roman societies, in terms of the practice of philanthropy and how they took care of the poor.
4. According to the author, “Within Judaism, starting in the fourteenth century B.C., a different kind of concern for the disadvantaged emerged.” In 25 words or more, can you describe this new way of practicing philanthropy and caring for the poor?
5. In 25 words or more, can you describe how the Christian church “adapted to and absorbed substantial parts of Greek, Jewish and Roman cultures” in providing charity for the less fortunate?
6. Based on the numerous early Social Welfare services within the Christian church that are mentioned, list and describe your top 3 that you feel are still important.
7. Based on the article, come up with a question and then provide an answer. In 25 words or more.

the topic will be on venous insufficiency.

Select one of the concepts from your PICOT question——–Venous insufficiency
Describe and articulate the concept. Articulate and Describe venous insufficiency
Please write this in bullet points Utilize one of the concept analysis methods for your selected
concept, and briefly describe strategies to utilize the strengths and
compensate for the weaknesses. Use Walker and Avant concept analysis (1) select a concept, (2) determine the aims of analysis, (3) identify the uses of the concept, (4) determine the defining attributes, (5) identify the antecedents and consequences, (6) identify a model case, (7) identify supplementary cases, and (8) define the empirical referents since antecedents are events that must occur before the concept occurs, and consequences occur as a result of the concept

Assignment composition:
As part of the Business Simulation and Report, you will need to complete the following (marks are allocated for each of the below milestones)
1) Complete all parts (all tabs of the excel spreadsheet) of the simulation games;

2) Calculate all ratios from the excel spreadsheet (both for the 2019 and 2020 financial year);
3) Write a report comparing your 2019 ratios to the 2020 ratios.

Prior to completing the business simulation, carefully watch the instruction video provided below and carefully read through the instruction PDF provided below.
When completing your report, please refer to the example provided on the first page of the “Business Simulation Instruction Document” (please find this below) and ensure to word your report as per the examplar.
Once you have completed all three milestones described above, you will be required to upload (please refer to the instruction video [see below] on “How to submit your assessment”):
a) Your completed Simulation (the full spreadsheet) – please label the file as “studentnumber.lastname.campus.xlsx” (i.e. “12345678.Smith.Bentley.xlsx”); and
b) Your report (ensuring that you follow the structure as provided in the example in red above) in word version – please label the file as “studentnumber.lastname.campus.doc” (i.e. “12345678.Smith.Bentley.docx”).

Overview of the Business Simulation and Report Assessment – Must Watch
https://echo360.net.au/ui/player/d03d9b40-ea70-4d0c-b39b-65d85930d2ee?secureLinkAccessDataId=7083eb5f-45e5-4a9a-85d9-d9a55d2414c8&autoplay=false&automute=false

Business Simulation Demonstration

How to submit your Business Simulation and Report

https://echo360.org.au/media/af121f96-c9f7-4ff4-ad34-6744c2d99f02/public?autoplay=false&automute=false&startTimeMillis=403

Covid19 Case Question
https://echo360.org.au/media/d336d455-b0d7-4903-a899-68682a2c11f1/public?autoplay=false&automute=false&startTimeMillis=3802

you will analyze John Updike’s short story “A & P” and, using plot, discuss how the story is or is not a “coming-of-age” story. A coming-of-age story usually suggests a loss of innocence and/or an “epiphany” that leads to maturity. It may mean an acceptance of responsibility and becoming more like an adult. For this paper, you must point out crucial parts of the plot (possibly using Freytag’s Pyramid) that support or do not support this “coming-of-age” label.

Remember that your essay must contain brief relevant background information for the author in the beginning paragraph and quotes taken from the story’s content with accompanying in-text citations in the essay’s body paragraphs.
Assignment: For this essay, you will write up to two pages (no less than one) that includes an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion citing examples that support your thesis. The essay will include a minimum of two sources (including the Literature textbook) shown in the form of in-text cited quotes and/or paraphrases with a Works Cited page (not counted in the one to two pages).

NOTE: Essays are never conversational and should not contain pronouns such as “I,” “you,” or “we.” The subject matter should be foremost in the writer’s mind and should guide where he or she is going with his or her thesis in every part of the essay.
Length: 1-2 pages and Works Cited page, typed, Times New Roman, 12 Font, double-spaced
Format: MLA

Your company has decided that they will be embarking on a master data management project. It is your job to determine the best tools for the project.
Review the tools and technologies available for the mapping process of enterprise data and analyze the criteria for tool selection. Elaborate and expand on the criteria from the second discussion in this unit, which include:
Cost.
Accuracy.
Ease of integration.
User-friendliness.
Other criteria as you deem necessary.
Use a sample data business module from the Integrated Business Processes With ERP Systems textbook, such as accounting, production process, or other modules. Review its corresponding master data design. Use your preferred database or spreadsheet software or other analysis tools as the master data mapping tool.
Please view the scoring guide to ensure you fulfill all grading criteria. If you use assigned readings or other professional literature to support your assignment, include in-text citations and full references, adhering to APA style and format guidelines.

Scenario
Imagine you just came back from lunch and found the email string regarding the proposed EOC staff meeting related in the scenario. It’s your plan to address the situation, and it’s your intent to do it in a single email that demonstrates leadership and a keen understanding of the issue, participants, and their associated dynamics.
INSTRUCTIONS
Complete both parts of this assignment.
PART 1: ANALYZE YOUR APPROACH TO THE ISSUE
Describe your approach to constructing the email.
Describe possible causes for the caustic exchange depicted in the email chain. Consider possible core organizational issues. State any assumptions that you might need to make regarding the scenario to support your assertions.
Justify why your message would likely be effective. Consider content, tone, style, et cetera.
Explain your intent for how your message might impact future communications and actions among team members.
Part 2: Write a Response Email
Write an email that effectively addresses the email chain. It should:
Properly consider the audience, your position, and the circumstances.
Articulate a well-conceived solution to the problem.
Effectively end the thread completely and de-escalate the tension.
Send a message that this exchange was “sub-optimal.”
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The assignment is expected to meet the following requirements:
Font: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Length: 4–5 pages, double spaced.

YouTube Demonstration Speech Video Review
Topic/Description:
Provide a critical review of a YouTube Demonstration video.
Purpose & Audience:
For this assignment, you will select and view a YouTube Demonstration. Choose one of the following videos:
Making a gift basket
How to make frozen hot chocolate
How to do the Charleston (dance)
You will then write an essay in which you critically analyze the video you selected by pointing out its strengths and weaknesses.
In your essay, you will need to cite the YouTube video you are analyzing; additional research is not required. You must use parenthetical citations and a properly formatted APA References page.
Your essay should be 1-2 pages, double-spaced, 12-font, Times New Roman.
Instructions:
After you have selected your video to analyze for this assignment (see above for video options), watch the video again, taking notes as you view it. As you watch, critically think about the presentation’s effectiveness and determine if the demonstration speech was successful or not and why.
Draft your response to these questions in the form of a narrative essay (think paragraphs versus just question and answer) that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, transitions (you can use headers if you like), a conclusion, and proper APA formatting. See the essay requirements, below.
Essay Review Format Requirements
Introduction (1 paragraph): Should explain what video was chosen and why.
Thesis statement: The thesis should state if the demonstration speech (video that you chose) was successful or not, and what main elements made it successful or not.
Discussion (a handful of paragraphs): This is the key component of the essay. Discuss what was found after analyzing the demonstration speech (video).
What is the main point of the speaker’s presentation?
What qualifications does the speaker have to present on the topic?
Was the speaker prepared, thorough, and clear with their instructions?
Who is the intended audience for this presentation (i.e. who would benefit the most from listening to this presentation)?
Was there evidence that the demonstration was successful?
Was the speaker successful in holding your attention throughout the presentation? Why or why not?
What did the speaker do especially well? What could’ve been improved upon?
What did you learn from this video that can help you with your own YouTube demonstration?
Conclusion (1 paragraph): What do your findings suggest about the successes or failures of the demonstration speech (video)? How has the video influenced your approach to the demonstration speech that you will be giving?

Audience Analysis Survey
Topic/Description:
Use a Google Form to create a survey that will gauge your audience’s knowledge level on your chosen TED Talk topic.
Purpose & Audience:
As we’ve already discussed, knowing your audience is an integral part of effective communication. Through this assignment, you will have the opportunity to learn what your audience already knows about your chosen topic so that you may tailor your message accordingly. Additionally, you will also need to assist in helping your classmates gather the same knowledge about their chosen topics.
Instructions:
Create a new Google Form
If you are unfamiliar with Google forms, there are many helpful (and brief) tutorial videos on YouTube, including the one found here. Additionally, you can view a sample of a completed survey by clicking here.
Create questions about your topic, including one of *each* of the following question types:
Fixed-alternative (e.g. yes/no, choice a/choice b, etc.)
Scale (e.g. on a scale of 1-10, how likely are you..)
Open-ended (e.g. When it comes to (topic), what do you wish you knew more about?)
Here is an example of an audience analysis survey: Analyzing Your Audience

Drafting/Research Strategies:
Remember that an audience will tune out if the information presented to them is overly simplistic or overly complex. As you consider what questions to ask, try to choose questions that will help you establish a baseline level of your audience’s understanding/awareness on your topic, while not losing them with simplicity or over-complication (i.e. avoid jargon, etc.).
Why is this survey-process important? It is important to know your audience’s knowledge-level on the topic so that you can adapt the information in your next speech appropriately to meet audience needs, while providing a substantive argument. Moreover, learning how to use Google Form is a great tool for your future (or current) career.

For our first essay, you will write a categorical evaluation argument of approximately 800-1000 words (probably around 4-6 paragraphs). You should organize this argument using the Classical Argument structure described in Ch. 14.
Choosing a Topic
A categorical evaluation claim asserts that something is a good or bad example of its kind. This is different from an evaluation that just examines whether something is good or bad morally or whether something has good or bad effects!
You can evaluate just about anything. Just be sure you can clearly identify both the thing you are evaluating (X) and the category in which the thing belongs (Y). Your claim should the model “X is a good (or bad) Y.” For example:
Thing: The Murderbot Diaries by Martha Wells
Category: Sci-fi novel series
Possible claim: The Murderbot Diaries by Martha Wells is a good sci-fi novel series.
A few other fun categories to consider:
Restaurants
Hobbies
Jobs
Places to live
Schools
Products
Media (books, movies, TV shows)
Games
Video games
You are encouraged to choose a topic that won’t require you to do any outside research. The more familiar you are with the thing you’re evaluating, the better; you can draw your evidence from personal experience/observation. If you do end up using outside research in this essay, you should cite it in either MLA 8th/9th edition or APA 7th edition. Do your best using the tools you have; we will delve more into citations in the next essay.
Note: It is possible that you wrote an evaluation essay for the final essay in your Comp 1 class. It is also likely that you’ve written other evaluation essays in the past. This is a good place to remind you that you must write NEW work for this course; recycling work from previous classes without your instructor’s express permission is considered Academic Dishonesty.
Final drafts will be graded according to the following rubric*:
The essay focuses on a clear categorical evaluation claim that is supported by 2-4 clearly and thoroughly developed lines of reasoning and evidence, including effective responses to opposing views. /35
The essay effectively uses a classical structure (traditional, revised, or blended). /20
The essay is written in appropriately academic style. /20
The author shows attention to detail, avoiding careless mistakes in grammar or documentation*. /15
You may earn bonus points for the following:
-Creative and original topic selection
-Excellent uses of rhetorical devices
-A particularly strong title
-Any other thing that’s not required but is impressive
(Total points for essay not to exceed 90)
/0
Total
/90
*Essays with severe errors in grammar – such as frequent run-on sentences, sentence fragments, or subject-verb agreement errors – will receive a zero with the option for the writer to make corrections and resubmit for partial credit; details and a deadline for resubmission will be posted in the feedback on the essay. Essays that violate the Academic Honesty Policy will be dealt with according to the following procedures:
Academic misconduct (accidental plagiarism due to errors in documentation) – The essay will be initially given a zero. The student will be given one week from the posting of the grade to make the necessary corrections and resubmit the essay for credit minus 10% of the earned points for a first offense, minus 30% for a second offense, minus 50% for a third offense, and minus 70% for a fourth offense.
Academic dishonesty (intentional plagiarism/cheating) – On a first offense, the essay will receive a zero, and the student will be given one week from the posting of the grade to submit original work for the assignment for 50% credit. On a second offense, the essay will receive a zero with no option to resubmit. On a third offense, the student will fail the course.

you will submit a paper stating your organization’s position on the specific legislation selected for your final project. Make sure to state your
role in your organization.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
III. Your Position. In this section, you will lay out your organization’s position on the specific legislation being considered. It should be evident from your
analysis that you have reviewed a full copy of the legislation and have researched the related issues and debate. Specifically, you should address the
following points:
a. Is your organization for or against the legislation? Why? Your answer should analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the legislation in
terms of potential effectiveness, cost, public acceptance, and political feasibility. In other words, how might economic, social, or political factors
(including other legislation) help or hinder the policy’s implementation and effectiveness? What specific concerns does your organization have?
b. How might cultural, socioeconomic, and other diversity issues impact the quality and equity of services provided under the selected legislation?
What concerns does your organization have? Provide examples to support your position.
c. What legal or ethical matters related to the legislation is your organization concerned about, if any? Explain your answer and provide examples,
if appropriate.
d. Based on your analysis, how could the legislation in question be redesigned to better address the needs of intended beneficiaries? Be sure to
address the following points and provide evidence to support your recommendations.
i. How could the legislation better address diversity in meeting the needs of intended beneficiaries?
ii. How could it better address legal or ethical concerns in meeting beneficiaries’ needs? If there are no concerns specific to this legislation,
make suggestions for how the legislation might help prevent legal or ethical concerns in future policies. Support your suggestions with
evidence.
iii. What other changes to the legislation would make it more effective in serving intended beneficiaries? Consider the cost, public
acceptance, and political feasibility issues you identified above in making your suggestions.
e. Be sure to use language and communication strategies appropriate for political or organizational leaders in explaining your organization’s
position and recommendations. Remember the goal is to convince your audience that your analysis is credible without burdening them with
undue detail.