Best Writer

PICOT is an acronym used to help develop clinical research questions and guide you in your search for evidence:
P = Patient population
I = Intervention or issue of interest
C = Comparison of interventions or comparison of interests
O = Outcome
T = Time frame
For example, you may wish to research the effects of interrupted sleep on cognition of ICU patients 65 or older.
Using this PICOT model,
In _________(P), how does __________ (I) compared to _________ (C) influence _________ (O) over ________ (T)?
In ICU patients who are 65 or older, how does interrupted sleep (awakened one time or more in four hours) as compared to uninterrupted sleep influence the patient’s cognitive ability over 5 days?
Assignment Directions
Begin by selecting a topic in nursing Download a topic in nursing that is of interest to you. Next, use PICOT to format possible research questions about that topic. Provide 3 possible PICOT research questions.
Include the following:
Title page
Provide a brief description of the topic and background information.
Explain the significance of the topic to nursing practice.
Provide 3 clearly stated PICOT questions.
Your paper should:
Be 2–3 pages (not including the title page and reference page)
Use the current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources.

Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic/ Relevance to Nursing
33 to >29.37 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
A clear and succinct description of the topic is presented. Background information is relevant and specific to the topic. The significance of the topic to nursing practice is explained clearly and is supported with examples.
29.37 to >24.75 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
A description of the topic is presented but may be ambiguous or confusing. Some background information is provided, but more is needed for a full explanation. The significance of the topic to nursing practice is somewhat explained and may not be supported with examples.
24.75 to >19.47 pts
Below Expectations
A description of the topic is presented but is ambiguous or confusing. Some background information is provided, but more is needed for a full explanation. The significance of the topic to nursing practice is somewhat explained but is not supported with examples.
19.47 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
An unclear description of the topic is presented or is missing. No background information is provided. The significance of the topic to nursing practice is not explained.
33 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Research Questions
33 to >29.37 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
All research questions are accurately framed as complete PICOT questions. PICOT questions provide a clear and specific focus for research within the topic.
29.37 to >24.75 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Only some research questions are framed as PICOT questions, or some PICOT questions are incomplete. PICOT questions provide a vague or unclear focus for research that may not be within the topic.
24.75 to >19.47 pts
Below Expectations
Few questions are framed as PICOT questions, or are incomplete. PICOT questions provide a vague or unclear focus for research that is not within the topic.
19.47 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Research questions are missing or are not framed as PICOT questions.
33 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA and Mechanics
34 to >30.26 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited.
30.26 to >25.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly.
25.5 to >20.06 pts
Below Expectations
Follows few requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Writing may be unclear or informal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar, interfering with readability or comprehension. Some information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly.
20.06 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited.
34 pts
Total Points: 100

Discussion Question:
You can find visual art anywhere! Vast repositories are online, but you probably have art on your refrigerator door (your child’s artwork) and see it on billboards that you pass on the way to work or on T-shirts with ironic
sayings.
This week, find a piece of visual art that you like or that challenges you (“Why is THIS art?” for instance).
Live with it for two whole days. Print out a copy so that you can carry it with you. Study it while you brush your teeth. Look at it before you go to sleep. Reference it often.
At the end of the two days, start by writing a description of the art you chose. For the moment, pretend your
readers can’t see or aren’t familiar with your chosen art work. Describe it to us in a strong paragraph that helps
us to understand what the art looks like.
Next, write about how your perception of the piece of art changed after intense study. Did this exercise
change your idea about art at all? Be sure to include your chosen piece in your discussion board post so that
we can compare your description to the actual piece.

Your assignment will be to develop a written paper that will provide a summary of the following:
Cybersecurity Definitions: Identify and quote three different definitions of Cybersecurity – with sources, where one should be government source (ensure to quote per APA, cite the reference with exact page number of the source).
Dimensions and Principles of Cybersecurity: In your own words (no quotes, but use references), describe the three dimensions of cybersecurity and within each dimension describe the three principles (sub-dimensions) known as the “McCumber Cube” of Cybersecurity (follow APA!)
Overall Security: In your own words (no quotes, but use references), describe how each of the three dimensions of cybersecurity and their principles of the cybersecurity discipline are used to provide overall system security
Assured Operations: In your own words (no quotes, but use references), describe why each principle is important to cybersecurity and how it enables the concept of ‘Assured Operations’
Conclusion: In your own words (no quotes, but use references), provide a conclusion that summarizes the whole paper.
In particular, you will need to develop a 5- to 7-page document (not more!) that outlines each of the section above and provides the details to address the points above.

All text in the proposal should be word-processed (letter or correspondence-quality font), New Times Roman or Calibri, 12 point, double space and standard margins. The body of the proposal should be 5- to 7-pages long (not including title page, Table of Contents, Reference List, & Certificate of Authorship).

The report should also be done professionally and should include:
Table of Contents (with sections & page numbers identified – Ensure the context text starts on page 1, frontmatter shouldn’t be counted in page numbers)
Page numbers on all pages
Clear and consistent headings of all sections
No running heads
Reference List following APA (At least seven different references)

Discuss at least five differences between US counterterrorism policy and British counterterrorism policy. Why do American and British approaches differ in these ways?

Morag, Chapter 3.
HM
Government, CONTEST: The United Kingdom’s
Strategy for Countering Terrorism, (London: The Stationery Office, June
2018).

Your submition must fall within the course literature,anything outside the course literature means a fail.You must go deep with your explanation.

You should write an essay which discusses the
following two questions:
1)
What understanding of the relationship
between society and nature is predominant in contemporary societies?
2)
How can that understanding (i.e. the
current relationship) be challenged?
In responding to both questions it is important to
build upon the course literature. When responding to the second questions you
should use different environmental sociological concepts and theories which may
serve to illustrate the unsustainability of current society-nature
relationships, and thereby suggest how a more sustainable relationship would
look like. You should introduce the concepts, define, and explain them.
Motivate how they may serve to challenge the dominant understanding of nature
in society and what changes they might suggest.
You are free to organize your essay and
argumentation as you see fit and to choose the concepts that you find the most relevant.
Your text will be assessed based on how you relate to and build upon the course
literature in your argumentation, your familiarity with and critical
understanding of the literature. Don’t forget that it is important to provide
clear references to the course literature in your text, with reference to the
specific page. Unless it is a reference to a very general argument, then you may
reference the whole book or chapter.
You should
write no more than 3 pages. Be aware that this means that you must work
carefully with your text, your arguments and references. Use 12p font size and
1.15 line spacing.

Good luck!

The home exam
must be written individually,
and you shall use your own formulations. Quotations,
which you should use sparsely, must be marked by quotation marks, and the
source correctly cited. Except for shorter quotations (correctly marked and
cited), it is not allowed to copy text from books, articles or any other
sources. It is neither allowed to use arguments from other texts without
correct reference to the source of inspiration. Suspected cheating or plagiarism is reported to the university’s
disciplinary committee.

Case: James is a 41-year-old
man who comes into the ER with complaints of acute low back pain. He states that he did some heavy lifting
yesterday, went to sleep with some back pain, and woke up this morning with
horrible back pain. He rates the pain as
a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10 scale. He had
a similar episode a few years ago after lifting something heavy at work. James has a medical history of peptic ulcer
disease secondary to NSAID use. He is 5’
9” tall, weighs 265 pounds, and has a large potbelly.

Discussion:
1.
What questions might you want to ask James in
evaluating the extent of his back pain and injury?
2.
What characteristics does James have that makes
him highly susceptible to low back injury?
3.
JC used to take piroxicam 20 mg until he
developed an ulcer. What is the relationship between the two?
4.
What signs/symptoms would you expect to see if
an ulcer developed?

Case Study
James is diagnosed with a lumbar strain after all serious
causes are ruled out. The NP orders
physical therapy consultation to him James develop back strengthening and a
dietary consult for weight reduction.
James receives prescriptions for celecoxib 100 mg/day for 90 days. He also receives instructions to apply heat
to the lower back for 20 to 30 minutes qid, no twisting or unnecessary bending,
and no lifting more than 10 pounds. He
is also instructed to rest his back and is given an excuse to stay home from
work for 5 days. Once James returns to work he cannot lift more than 10 pounds
for 3 months. He is also told to contact
his primary care provider if the pain worsens.

5.
James looks at the prescription for
cyclobenzaprine and says, “I’m glad you didn’t give me any of that valium. They gave me valium the last time and that
stuff knocked me out.” How would you respond to James?
6.
Why do you think James is given celecoxib
instead of the piroxicam?
7.
It has been over 5 years since James had a bleeding
episode. Are there any conditions that
you need to assess for before James begins taking the celecoxib? Explain.
8.
Why did the NP prescribe an NSAID instead of
acetaminophen?
9.
The physical therapist teaches James maintenance
exercises he can do on his own to promote back health. Identify two common
exercises that would be included.
10. Describe
the teaching you would perform regarding the celecoxib.

According to J. Richard Hackman, a noted team research scholar, using a team to complete a complex project may not be the best approach. However, imagine that your organization relies heavily on teams to complete projects. Your boss wants you to develop a well-researched report analyzing Hackman’s comment.
As you prepare to write this report, please respond to any four of the questions below.

What are the first steps of the 3×3 writing process–the prewriting process?
What is the purpose of your report? Why are you writing this report? What do you hope to achieve with this report?
What is the best channel to send your report? What factors did you consider in making this decision?
Who is your primary audience? Do you have a secondary audience?
What is the appropriate tone for your report?
What techniques will you use to help you achieve a positive tone?
How are you going to ensure your report has a “you” view?
Give an example of how you will make your report:
Conversational and professional
Courteous
Bias-free
Precise and vigorous

Write a properly focused comparison essay on one of the topics below or another that your instructor approves. Determine the points you will discuss and how you will develop and arrange them. Emphasize similarities, differences, or both.
The representation of women, fathers, teenagers, or some other group in a 1950s or 1960s sitcom and in a similar contemporary sitcom
Online and traditional classes
The effectiveness of two pieces of writing or webpages
Two or more video games or types of video games
Develop an analogy based on one of the following sets of items or another set that your instructor approves. Proceed as you would for any other comparison.
Writing and gardening, mountain climbing, or spelunking
A teacher and a merchant, coach, or prison guard
Developing an idea and building a house or exploring new territory (or another idea)

This is 5 questions that you’re going to write about.
1.What are some of the difference between a job that provides meaningful work, and one that provides prestige? 2.What are four reasons an organization’s action’s may be viewed as ethically troubling?3. What responsibilities to others may a job seeker consider when looking for a job?4. If money is selected as the prime value a job seeker decides to pursue, what other values may become easier to reach because of money, and which values may be pushed further away?5. For you what are the components of comfort-do they include flexible hours, working in a office instead of outside, something else? Can you rank the components as more and less important?

Does your understanding of globalization affect your belief of globalization? Write a reflection about globalization.