Premium Writing

How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed, answer the prompt below. You need to analyze the reading based on the prompt that you select and demonstrate a thorough reading of the book .Throughout the book, the author shares examples of ways in which society, particularly women, dealt with the failings of communism. Using at least 3 specific examples of the failings of communism, evaluate how society learned to survive, and even laugh, during the communist regimes

Assignment 1: Lab Assignment: Differential Diagnosis
for Skin Conditions
Photo
Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto
Properly identifying the
cause and type of a patient’s skin condition involves a process of elimination
known as differential diagnosis. Using this process, a health professional can
take a given set of physical abnormalities, vital signs, health assessment
findings, and patient descriptions of symptoms, and incrementally narrow them
down until one diagnosis is determined as the most likely cause.
In this Lab Assignment, you
will examine several visual representations of various skin conditions,
describe your observations, and use the techniques of differential diagnosis to
determine the most likely condition.
To Prepare
Review the Skin
Conditions document provided in this week’s Learning Resources, and select
one condition to closely examine for this Lab Assignment.
Consider the
abnormal physical characteristics you observe in the graphic you selected.
How would you describe the characteristics using clinical terminologies?
Explore different
conditions that could be the cause of the skin abnormalities in the
graphics you selected.
Consider which
of the conditions is most likely to be the correct diagnosis, and why.
Search the
Walden library for one evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed article
based on the skin condition you chose for this Lab Assignment.
Review the
Comprehensive SOAP Exemplar found in this week’s Learning Resources to
guide you as you prepare your SOAP note.
Download the
SOAP Template found in this week’s Learning Resources, and use this
template to complete this Lab Assignment.

The Lab Assignment
Choose one skin
condition graphic (identify by number in your Chief Complaint) to document
your assignment in the SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan)
note format rather than the traditional narrative style. Refer to Chapter
2 of the Sullivan text and the Comprehensive SOAP Template in this week’s
Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that not all comprehensive SOAP
data are included in every patient case.
Use clinical
terminologies to explain the physical characteristics featured in the
graphic. Formulate a differential diagnosis of three to five possible
conditions for the skin graphic that you chose. Determine which is most
likely to be the correct diagnosis and explain your reasoning using at
least three different references, one reference from current
evidence-based literature from your search and two different references
from this week’s Learning Resources.

SKIN
CONDITION ABOVE IS # 2. It looks like
Striae gravidarum, or striae nigrae. Please do your research.

Sorry, I couldn’t paste the picture. Let me describe it: there are stech marks on the abdomen of a pregnant woman.

Shadow Health Comprehensive
SOAP Note Template

Patient Initials:
_______ Age:
_______ Gender:
_______

SUBJECTIVE DATA:

Chief Complaint (CC):

History of Present Illness
(HPI):

Medications:

Allergies:

Past Medical History (PMH):

Past Surgical History (PSH):

Sexual/Reproductive History:

Personal/Social History:

Health Maintenance:

Immunization History:

Significant Family History:

Review of Systems:

General:
HEENT:
Respiratory:
Cardiovascular/Peripheral Vascular:
Gastrointestinal:
Genitourinary:
Musculoskeletal:
Neurological:
Psychiatric:
Skin/hair/nails:

OBJECTIVE DATA:

Physical Exam:
Vital signs:
General:
HEENT:
Neck:
Chest/Lungs:.
Heart/Peripheral Vascular:
Abdomen:
Genital/Rectal:
Musculoskeletal:
Neurological:
Skin:

Diagnostic results:

ASSESSMENT:

Upon completion of the website, you will make it available online for us to be able to assess it.

https://bar-rochford.glitch.me/
Write a rationale containing:
A link to your website
A reflection on the website development process (e.g Did it work as you anticipated? What went wrong? How did you overcome any issues?). Maximum 800 words. (+/- 10%)

1. Read the attached marketing plan directions, rubric, and market share case.
2. For the marketing mix section utilize Marketshare Simulation to access report data.
https://www.interpretive.com/students/
username: apatalano2013@fau.edu
password: GladDaisy7
Deliverable: Create a PowerPoint with one slide per section (see attached marketing plan example).

If there is one thing you can change about the education system what would it be?

Guidelines;
· After reading and viewing the content, please respond to the prompt posted below. Your response should strive to be at least 3-4 paragraphs, providing examples from the assigned content.
· After posting your response to the prompt below, please respond to at least one student’s response post with additional information from the assigned content that can further develop the student’s post

Below are the themes from Chapter Four:
· Tyranny and oppression were tools used by both the colonial and British elite against the ordinary American colonists.
· By , upper-class colonial politicians realized that they could mobilize the lower-class energy that had previously been directed against them and redirect such anger at the British Crown.
· A totally united prewar effort did not materialize among the colonists; significant colonial resistance occurred both before and during the Revolutionary War.
· Political, economic, and social divisiveness existed in colonial America— divisiveness that spilled over into the efforts to prepare for war with England.

Discussion Prompt: Identify 1-2 primary sources and explain how they reinforce any of the four chapter themes
chapter 4 : https://sites.google.com/view/chapter-1-columbus-the-indians/chapter-4-tyranny-is-tyranny

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and
Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation
in which you do the following:
Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical
issue of interest.
Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused
on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to
conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Provide APA citations of the four relevant
peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your
research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or
meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer
reviewed article.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four
peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the
strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific
and provide examples.

Clinical issue of interest is:Hospital acquired Infection(HAI)

Nursing research databases I will
use are

Medline
CINAHL plus full text
APA
HAPI: Health and Psychosocial Instruments

One of the themes we’ve examined in this course is the role of the U.S. Constitution, and how it is interpreted by the courts, on American culture and society. Rights we take for granted, such as where we can eat, where we can live, and who we can marry were defined by judicial decisions interpreting this document.
One such case involved something as simple as buying a wedding cake. In 2012 a gay couple walked into a bakery in Lakewood, Colorado and tried to order a special cake to celebrate their marriage. The owner of the bakery, a devout Christian, refused to create the cake on the grounds such an act would violate his religious beliefs. He offered any items already made, but refused to create a cake specifically designed to celebrate the couples’ marriage.
The gay couple sued the baker, and the case eventually wound up before the U.S. Supreme Court. The case is titled Masterpiece Bakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (although it was the gay couple, David Mullins and Charles Craig, who sued for procedural reasons the defendant in the case is the Colorado Civil Rights Commission).
This final installment consists of five short essays, each worth 20 points. The goal of this exercise is to identify the Constitutional arguments and principles we examined throughout this session, and not to necessarily argue which side is “right.”
A PowerPoint presentation file has been posted in the Files section of Canvas, under “Week 8_The Supreme Court – Final Installment” as a source and guide for this assignment. Other documents have been included as well, including a transcript of the actual oral argument for this case before the Supreme Court. These other documents have been provided only if you wish to research this case further and are not necessary for this assignment (but feel free to refer to them in your responses below if you wish).
Question One (20 points)
Using the information discussed during class and in the textbook regarding the American court system and administrative law, explain the process of how this case wound its way from the Civil Rights Commission, to the Colorado Court of Appeals, and finally to the United States Supreme Court.
Question Two (20 points)
Two fundamental constitutional rights found in the Bill of Rights form the basis of the arguments made by Masterpiece Cakeshop. Identify one of these rights, and discuss the arguments for and against whether this right was violated.
Question Three (20 points)
In Question 2 you were asked to identify one of the rights found in the Bill of Rights that serve as the basis for the arguments made by Masterpiece Cakeshop. For Question 3, identify the other right and discuss the arguments for and against whether this right was violated.
Question Four (20 points)
Discuss the claims made by the plaintiffs, Charlie Craig and David Mullins. What was the basis of their claims? While these claims were made under state law, what federal law discussed in class would be analogous to these claims?
Question Five (20 points)
What was the basis for the decision by the U. S. Supreme Court? Did it address the main issues of the case?
Submit a Word document, with each essay starting on a new page and clearly labeled as Question 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. Depending on the question, your essay responses may be less than 1 page or up to 2 pages, double-spaced. As in all DeVry courses, APA style formatting should be used, and sources properly cited.”

Dear Students,
Access the discussion packet here: Discussion 02 – The New Deal’s Legacy.pdf
Remember, you need to answer at least two of the following questions, and then reply to at least three of your classmates responses.
Franklin D. Roosevelt greatly expanded the power of the federal government to fight the Great Depression. Do you think Roosevelt’s New Deal was effective? If so, why? If not, how could it have been more effective?
Conservatives vehemently disagreed with Roosevelt’s New Deal. Why? What was their reasoning, and how did they attack the New Deal? Do you find their arguments valid? Explain why or why not.
The New Deal left an uneven legacy in American history—not all groups of people were helped or considered equally. How did the New Deal affect the lives of women and African Americans? In what ways did the prevailing racial and gender beliefs of the time manifest in the New Deal?
Consider the article on the Green New Deal. Briefly explain the Green New Deal. How is Roosevelt’s New Deal influencing Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s fight against climate change? What connection exists between conservative philosophies from the 1930s and the modern attacks against the Green New Deal?
The New Deal was one of the most important political turning points in twentieth century America. So, a philosophical question: Does a catastrophe the size of the Great Depression warrant an expansion of government powers? Or, were conservatives correct in stating that any expansion of government power is inherently negative?

Improving patient care and outcomes is paramount to the practice of nursing. As we conclude our learning journey through our world of research and evidence-based practice, it is important to reflect upon your time spent in the course:
Think about nursing practice and describe one barrier that you feel prohibits nurses from engaging in EBP; share one strategy you could use to facilitate the use of evidence to help improve nursing care for patients.
Reflect back over your time in the course and describe how your thinking has changed about nursing research and evidence-based practice; describe one new learning during this course that you believe was the most helpful.