Discuss how your identity reflects the dynamics of both domination and subordination, as defined and discussed in your reading and learning materials.

I’m very nice and welcoming, middle class. Serbian-croatian. It’s fine if you go off of imagination. I can just edit that if necessary but if you can make sure to follow the instructions there should be no issues! :]
Overview:
During Module 5, we are exploring the ways in which our identity is shaped and informed by the social, cultural, historical context within which we live and grow. This involves reflecting on the relationship between identity and power, with specfic attention to the dynamics of domination and subordination in society. Journal #2 invites you to reflect on the applicability of these ideas and insights to your own lived experiences.
Instructions:
Step 1: Begin by reflecting on ‘who you are’ and the ways in which your identity is multidimensional. What different traits and characteristics most define you? How would you introduce or describe yourself to someone who doesn’t know you?
Step 2: Discuss how your identity reflects the dynamics of both domination and subordination, as defined and discussed in your reading and learning materials. What elements or aspects of your identity are privileged in society, and in what ways? What elements or aspects of your identity are subordinated in society, and in what ways?
Step 3: Conclude by reflecting on Tatum’s argument that we are all responsible for “acknowledging our complicity in the oppression of others.” (Tatum, 1997, 27) Do you agree with Tatum? If yes, how might we ‘acknowledge our complicity in systems of oppression’? If not, why not, and how else might we understand and approach social inequality?

Requirements:
Your entire journal (all three parts) should be approximately 250 words in length, using proper sentence and paragraph structure.
In your response, you are required to use ideas taken from both your reading and your online learning materials. All ideas need to be paraphrased properly (i.e. you are required to put ideas entirely in your own words; do not copy directly from your textbook or learning materials). For help with paraphrasing, consult this resource: https://liberalarts.humber.ca/assets/files/writing_centre/PARAPHRASING.pdf
NO OUTSIDE SOURCES are permitted for this assignment. NO MORE THAN ONE BRIEF DIRECT QUOTE is permitted for this assignment. Failure to properly paraphrase and/or use of any source other than your reading and learning materials will be considered plagiarism and will result in an automatic grade of zero.
You are required to reference all paraphrased and directly quoted ideas using proper APA referencing format. This involves both complete in-text citations within the body of your paper (see this link for guidance: https://library.humber.ca/help/apa/text-citations) and a complete bibliography at the end your journal (see this link for guidance: https://library.humber.ca/sites/default/files/APA%20Tip%20Sheet-v2-06-2020.pdf)
I look forward to reading your reflections.

What measures could the facility implement to curtail future medication errors?

A physician wrote a prescription for .5 mg IM morphine for postoperative pain for a 9-month-old infant. The unit secretary recorded the order in the MAR as 5 mg. An inexperienced nurse followed the directions on the MAR without question and gave the baby 5 mg of IM morphine initially and another 5-mg dose 4 hours later. About 2 hours after the second dose, the baby stopped breathing and experienced respiratory arrest. If the physician had written 0.5 mg, the unit secretary would probably not have had any misunderstanding of the intended amount, and the nurse would have administered the correct dose.

Although the initial error was not the nurses, what steps should he or she have taken to avoid this medication error?
What measures could the facility implement to curtail future medication errors?
Explain how using a standardized written measurement system would have prevented this adverse drug event.
What technology is available to help prevent errors and has it been successful?
Substance abuse and misuse have become a national concern. Select a substance, research solutions and provide a plan.
sources cannot be more than five years old

What is Sartre’s argument (or arguments) for rejecting the essentialism of philosophers like Aristotle, and hence the implications of essentialism for how we should live (i.e., what we should do)?

Disscusion forum 1
Attachment link For Disscusion forum 1- https://www.theschooloflife.com/thebookoflife/what-is-philosophy-and-whats-it-for/

Question for Disscusion forum 1- Post a
sentence from the assigned article, or one of the assigned videos, that
was most significant or meaningful for you, and explain why you found it
noteworthy and interesting. [Or, why you found it confusing, or false,
or..you get the picture.] Feel free to use examples to illustrate your
viewpoint or your thinking.

Disscusion forum 2
Attachmnets are in photos. i upload documents.
Question for Disscusion forum 2- What is Aristotle’s essentialism, and what is his support for it? (On the latter, you may have to extrapolate from what he says, and summarize in your words.) Do you agree that there is a human nature that dictates what it means to flourish or thrive as a human (to be a eudaimon)? Why or why not? Give your post an interesting title that captures the flavor of what you are writing.

Disscusion forum 3
Attachmnets are in photos. i upload documnets.
Question for Disscusion forum 3-What is Sartre’s argument (or arguments) for rejecting the essentialism of philosophers like Aristotle, and hence the implications of essentialism for how we should live (i.e., what we should do)? Do you agree with these arguments? Why or why not? Give your post an interesting title that captures the flavor of what you are writing.

Disscusion forum 4
Attachment for Diss-4 below and i also upload documents.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oocunV4JX4w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trqDnLNRuSc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcIqoN9oRgo

Question for Disscusion forum 4- From among the views of “self” that we are considering here, choose the view that you find most compelling, or true, and do the following: (1) offer at least one reason for believing it is true, and (2) offer at least one reason for doubting it, or believing it to be in error. (The reasons don’t need to be your own, or unique to you, but you should find them important and persuasive.) Give your post an interesting title that captures the flavor of what you are writing.

Disscusion forum 5
Attachmnets are in photos. i upload documnets.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seUVb7gbrTY&t=331s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLcg6jyg3zk&t=7s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuaSnYtvsdU

Question for Disscusion forum 5
Based on your interests and reading, choose one of the 3 discussions below:
(1) Why does Anthony Appiah say that we should abandon the concept of race in favor of speaking about “civilizations?” (p. 8) (What was Du Bois’ error?) Do you agree or disagree with him? Why or why not?
(2) How would making the “terminological shift” (p. 9) that Sally Haslanger argues for help end oppression and injustice (according to her?) Do you agree or disagree with her? Why or why not?
(3) Describe one of Elizabeth Barnes’s counterexamples to Haslanger’s analysis of “X is a woman?” Is it plausible (believable)? Why or why not?
Give your post an interesting title that captures the flavor of what you are writing.

Write about a specific person or event that had a profound effect on your life.

This should be written in one sitting with NO outside sources. In other words, you should not be looking up internet resources. thanks
choose one.

1: Write about a specific person or event that had a profound effect on your life. How did this person or event affect you? Why does your experience matter? In what ways does your experience connect to readers’ lives? TIMED WRITING TOPIC CHOICE

2: Do you believe in ghosts? Why or why not? Explain with support from observations in your personal experience, research, or both.

What is the relationship between this article/event and personality psychology?

The Applied Personality Project consists of four components:
Component 1: Summary and Analysis of Popular Media Article or Current Event
You will start by locating a popular media article, video or current event that is relevant to personality psychology. Relevant topics may include personality theory, assessment, use of assessment results, personality disorders, or personality research. Your article or current event must have been published (or occurred) within the last six months. For this component of the assignment, you will use information found in the popular media. This includes articles or events distributed via social media, blogs, videos (e.g., Ted Talks), television shows, newspaper reports, magazines, and similar sources.
For example, the LA Times published a report of identical triplets separated at birth in a secret psychology study to understand the relative influence of nature and nurture in personality development (The surreal, sad story behind the acclaimed new documentary, ‘Three Identical Strangers’: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-three-identical-strangers-documentary-20180702-story.html). An article such as this would be appropriate for your target article/event.
Provide a two-page summary and analysis of the article/event that addresses the following questions:
What is the focus of the article/event?
Why is this article/event relevant now?
What is the relationship between this article/event and personality psychology?
What are the key conclusions, questions, or issues relevant to this article/event?
What questions remain unanswered in relationship to this article/event?
Your summary and analysis should be written as a coherent essay (do not format as a list of answers to these questions). You may include additional insights in your analysis, but you must address these key issues. In addition, you must provide a hyperlink to the article/event that you are focusing on; if the article/event is not online, you must provide a complete citation so that the instructor can view your article/event.
Component 2: Research Article Application
The next step is to find an empirical, primary-source journal article that is relevant to your article/event. Empirical, primary-source articles are original reports of research published in scholarly journals (such as the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology). You will use the UMGC library database to find primary-source, empirical research. To find a relevant article, you will use personality terms, ideas or theories discussed in your article/event as key words in your library database search. It is your responsibility to make sure that the journal article you select is appropriate. If you are unsure about the relevance of your article, contact your instructor for approval. Articles must meet the following criteria:
Primary research Articles should report the results of an original research study (no meta-analyses, summaries, editorials or theoretical articles).
Refereed Articles must come from peer-reviewed journals found in the UMGC library.
Personality focus Articles must be relevant to personality psychology.
Recent Articles must have been published within the last 10 years.
For example, the following would be a relevant primary-source, empirical journal article for investigating the influence of nature and nurture on personality:
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hebkov, M., Avia, M. D., Smith, P. B. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 173186. https://doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.173
Write a three-page summary, analysis, and application of the journal article that addresses the following questions:
What is the purpose of this research?
How did the researchers investigate their research question?
Are the conclusions of the study appropriate? Has the author overemphasized or under-emphasized any findings?
What are the key strengths and weaknesses of this study?
How does this research add to our understanding of personality or personality theory?
How does this study inform your popular article/event?
Do the conclusions of this research align with the message of your article/event?
Your summary, analysis, and application should be written as a coherent essay (do not format as a list of answers to these questions). You may include additional insights in your analysis, but you must address these key issues.
Component 3: Connection to Personality Theory
The third step is to analyze your popular article/event in relation to three different theories that we explored throughout the course. For each theory, you will want to explore the relevance (or lack thereof) for understanding your article/event.
Write a one- to two-page analysis for each of your three theories that includes the following information:
Brief overview of theory (up to two paragraphs with appropriate citations)
Discussion of how the theory either supports and explains your article/event OR how the theory offers an alternate understanding of your article/event
Analysis of the value of the theory for understanding personality in the context of your article/event
Component 4: Personal Relevance
The last step is to reflect upon the popular article/event, research, and personality theory in relation to your own life.
Write a three-page reflection and analysis that addresses the following questions:
How is the material in this article/event relevant to your life?
What can you learn from the personality theories or research relevant to this article/event?
Does the article/event or research challenge any of your old opinions? Or does it challenge you to form any new opinions?
How can you apply what you have learned about personality research or theory to better understand your life? What is the practical value to understanding personality research or theory?
What concerns do you have about the article/event, personality research, or personality theory?
Your reflections should be written as a coherent essay (do not format as a list of answers to these questions). You may include additional insights in your reflection, but you must address these key issues.
Assignment Guidelines
Prepare your assignment according to the following guidelines:
Structure your assignment utilizing APA style; this includes title page, headers, subheadings, in-text citations, reference page, and general paper format (1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12-point font, etc.). An abstract is not required. (Excellent guidance on utilizing APA style can be found in our classroom’s Course Resources -> Writing Resources.)
Submit as a single document (do not submit each component of the paper separately) in either Microsoft Word, PDF, or RTF format.
Utilize the following subheadings to organize the body of your paper:
Summary and Analysis
Research Application
Personality Theory
Theory 1: (name the theory)
Theory 2: (name the theory)
Theory 3: (name the theory)
Personal Reflection
Include three to five references (one should be the research article utilized in your analysis).
Your final paper should be approximately 13 to 16 pages:
Title page (1 page)
Body of paper
Summary and Analysis (2 pages)
Research Application (3 pages)
Personality Theory
Theory 1 (1-2 pages)
Theory 2 (1-2 pages)
Theory 3 (1-2 pages)
Personal Reflection (3 pages)
Reference page (1 page)