Premium Writing

Instructions:
For this Art Interpretive Evaluation Essay, you will view and evaluate the work of visual art presented in the Module 5 Online Exploration. The painting is the “Self-Portrait on the Border Between Mexico and the United States” by Frida Kahlo. She composed this painting during a prolonged stay in the United States while her husband Diego Rivera was working there on another art project.
1. First be sure you have reviewed all materials in this learning module and that you have read Chapter 5 in your textbook.
2. You may wish to open the larger version of Kahlo’s painting to more carefully examine it as you compose your evaluation. Copy and paste website link below into URL address: https://mycourses.spcollege.edu/content/enforced/285450-OFR_HUM1020_1588_0590/Module05/self-portrait-along-the-border-between-mexico-and-the-united-states.jpg
3. You should also refer back to the Module 5 Online Exploration resources and USE AND CITE these research sources in your essay. You may use additional resources too. In any case, be sure to cite your sources.
4. Submit your essay as a Word Document (.doc or .docx) or as a Rich Text Format (.rtf) file.
5. Essay Instructions: Now that you’ve carefully examined the work of visual art and completed your research, compose an essay of at least 400 words (total) where you compose an essay of FIVE fully developed paragraphs (one paragraph for each of the following questions):
Paragraph 1: Describe the painting: What is your general impression of the painting? What parts of the painting represent Mexico? What parts of the painting represent the United States? How do these two depictions differ?
Paragraph 2: Interpret the painting: Kahlo once said, “I paint myself because I am so often alone and because I am the subject I know best.” What parts of herself does Kahlo seem to be exploring in this self-portrait? What might she be saying about herself in relation to the two countries in the painting? Cite examples to support your interpretation.
Paragraph 3: Identify the artistic characteristics and styles in the painting: What elements of surrealism do you see in the painting? What elements of indigenous art do you see? How do the two work together? Cite specific examples.
Paragraph 4: Interpret the artist’s motivation: This is the most speculative. Frida Kahlo was first exhibited as Mrs. Diego Rivera. How do you think being married to a famous man affected Kahlo’s life and her work? Is there anything in the painting that has relevance to her position as a famous artist’s wife?
Paragraph 5: This painting is considered a “valuable and important” piece of art. Do you agree? If so, explain which features of the painting makes you agree. If not, explain why you disagree by citing relevant features of the painting.

Explain you describe the rhythm (regular, syncopated, polyrhythmic, or nonmetric) and meter (simple, duple, triple, quadruple, compound, or sextuple) of the following excerpts?
Beethoven: Moonlight Sonata, I
Mozart: Eine kleine Nachtmusik, I have
Brahms: A German Requiem, IV I

Read Near v.
Minnesota: Attached
New York Times Company v.
United States: Use link -> https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/713
and a brief snippet of United States v. The
Progressive: Attached
Please
answer the following questions
1. Do you
agree that after-the-fact punishment should be preferred to prior restraints?
Injunctions don’t land anyone in jail (unless they are violated) –is that a
point in their favor?
2. What
burden should the government have to meet to sustain a prior restraint?
3. Should
prior restraints be sustained against speech that threatens specific
individuals such as a story headlined, “Witnesses in the Federal Witness
Protection Program–Where Are They Now?”?
4. What, if
any, public policy goals are served by publication of information concerning
the building of atomic weapons?

Write two-paragraphs response to Where the Wild Things Are, The Snowy Day and Goodnight, Moon. Your paragraphs sound be structured as follows:
In the first paragraph: (at least 100 words) Discuss your initial response to teach of the three picture books. What did you find interesting? moving? striking? What did you notice about the pictures? Use the response that you wrote immediately after first reading these books to construct this paragraph.
In the second paragraph: (at least 100 words) Discuss any ways your thinking about these books has changed as a result of what you learned about them in this module. Use the following guiding questions: (1) Discuss the text: What is important about the stories these books tell? What do you notice about the written words? (2) Discuss the images: How do the images add to, enhance, supplement that text? (3) Discuss your own response to the texts: How has your own personal responses these texts evolved? Remember to make reference to specific points and ideas that you learned in the instructional materials (the audio/NPR links and/or the narrated presentations). This reflection is a way for you to demonstrate the important things you learned this week.

People from multiple areas of psychology take this course which means that concepts related to lifespan development are and will be used in different ways. Think about your own specialization. What aspects of the theory and research related to lifespan development are most relevant to your own specialization? Are there any themes that emerged that are most meaningful for you? How can you apply this information to your current and future work?

My field will be mental health

This is an
Argumentative Paper
Already, questions arose in class about health care in the United States.
1)What are the problems
facing health care today?
2)Why does the United States trail other developed
countries with regard to mortality rates?
3)Within the United States, why are
there such wide disparities in health care and wellness?
4)Do you see the
inequities within health care subsiding in the near future, or are the problems
plaguing health care in the United States going to persist?
5)Whose interests are
served by the current structure and hierarchy of health care in the United
States? What roles do profit and capitalism play in health care?
6) Is there a
need to return the focus of health care back to the patient and the patients
needs?
Our article from (JAMA), we will have another reading (Warner)
and we watched a film (Money and Medicine). So in total, we will have three
shared sources. Essay must be three pages in length,
and must critically review all three sources. Limit and focus your
discussion by organizing your essay around one, two, or three of the questions
listed above, and you will interrogate each of the sources in response to these
questions. This is an argumentative paperyou are arguing for a particular way
of understanding your group of texts. You should assume you are writing to an
academic audience who may or may not have read your sources.
Try to think of the texts and film as a way of actively
entering a conversation about health care in the United States. While preparing
to write, you will need to ask yourself certain questions about your sources:
In what ways do these sources present similar pictures of the world? In what
ways do they contradict each other? What questions or problems do they produce?
Are there ways in which you very much disagree or very much agree? What are the
relationships between sources? Do you see one source as more important than
another? Do you see sides forming?

IF you can watch the film Money and Medicine.. that will be great.
https://pluto.tv/on-demand/movies/money-and-medicine-1-1?utm_medium=textsearch&utm_source=google

Define and explain the different Classification of Death. Give examples of each (natural, accident, suicide, homicide, and undetermined

The paper must have a MINIMUM of 3 pages of content. NOT to exceed 5 pages of content. The 3 pages of content DO NOT include the Cover Page, Abstract Page and Reference Page. The paper will be written in 12 point Font with one inch (1) margins, doubled spaced, Times Roman Script with the pages numbered. The last page of the paper MUST be at LEAST three quarters (3/4) filled with content. (One or two sentences at the top of the page WILL NOT meet this requirement.) No design or graphics on the Cover page. No Pictures, Graphs, Charts or Power Points will be included in the body of the paper. The paper will have NO MORE than three (3) quoted or paraphrased passages/sections in the content/body portion of the paper. All specific information mentioned in the paper MUST be referenced using in-text citations (APA 7th edition format).
(Graphs, charts, addendum: These items can be attached as addendum’s to the end of the paper)
The paper MUST have 5 scholarly research reference sources. (Wikipedia and ask.com are NOT scholarly research sources.The references MUST be titled and cited using APA (7th edition)

Explain the generalist model.
Discuss why the generalist model became the operational model in social work.
Analyze the advantages and disadvantages to the social worker in using the generalist model.
Be sure to cite at least three relevant scholarly sources in support of your content.
Use only sources found at the GCU Library or those provided in Topic Materials.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Write a paper that examines the moral and ethical issues involved in making a decision regarding limiting life support.
End-of-Life Issues
With our framework of ethical theories and principles in hand, we begin our look at some of the critical ethical issues in our contemporary world, starting with end-of-life issues. This assessment covers ethical questions related to end-of-life care. Passive euthanasia is the removal or refusal of life-sustaining treatment. Examples of passive euthanasia include removal of a feeding tube or a ventilator, or forgoing a life-prolonging surgery. Passive euthanasia is legal in all 50 states, and the principle of autonomy gives informed patients the right to refuse any and all treatments. Patients who are unable to make such decisions in the moment (because they are unconscious, for example) might have made their intentions clear beforehand with an advance directive or similar document. Things become more complicated, however, when a patient who is unable to make treatment choices has not made his or her wishes clear, either formally in a written document, or informally in conversations with family members or friends. Another problem concerns cases in which there is disagreement about whether the treatment is sustaining the life of a person in the full sense or merely as a body that, because of severe and irreversible brain trauma, is no longer truly a living person.
Active euthanasia, or assisted suicide, introduces further difficult moral questions. A patient who has a terminal illness and who has refused treatments that would merely prolong a potentially very painful and debilitating death might want the process of dying to be hastened and made less painful. The patient might want to take his or her own life before the disease reaches its horrible final stages. Should patients be legally allowed to have help in this endeavor? If suicide itself is not morally wrong, at least in cases like these, is it wrong for another person to directly help bring about the patient’s death? Is it wrong for doctors, a role we naturally associate with healing and the promotion of life, to use their medical expertise to deliberately end a patient’s life if the patient wants this?
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Articulate ethical issues in health care.
Articulate the moral issues associated with limiting life support.
Competency 2: Apply sound ethical thinking related to a health care issue.
Demonstrate sound ethical thinking and relevant ethical principles when considering limiting life support.
Explain important considerations that arise when contemplating limiting life support.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with health care professionals.
Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.
Preparation
Case Study: Mr. Martinez.
This media piece provides the context for this assessment; make sure you have reviewed the case study thoroughly.
Additionally, it may be useful to think through the following issues as they relate to Mr. Martinez’s case:
Should Mr. Martinez be transferred to intensive care, where his respiratory failure can be treated by a ventilator, and by CPR if necessary, and his oxygen level can be monitored?
What are the key ethical issues or models at play in this case study?
What are the key end-of-life issues at play in this case study?
How can an understanding of models and best-practice help to guide health care practitioners to make ethical and legal decisions?
Instructions
In a 23 page analysis of the case study, address the following:
The patient’s directives.
The patient’s quality of life.
The family’s stated preferences.
The moral issues associated with limiting life support.
The ethical principles most relevant to reaching an ethically sound decision.
Important considerations such as implications, justifications, and any conflicts of interest that might arise because of the patient’s respiratory failure.
When writing your assessment submission assume that doctors cannot contact Mrs. Martinez and must make this choice on their own. To help you reach an objective, ethically sound decision, draw upon concepts and arguments from the suggested resources or your independent research. Support your response with clear, concise, and correct examples, weaving and citing the readings and media throughout your answer.
Submission Requirements
Written communication:Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
Length: 23 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

For this essay we need to analyze the maps that I have provided, both maps are on the air toxins in Michigan but for different areas
the specific air toxin is Benzene. The first area is Wayne county the second area is Osceola. Analyze both of the maps below,
Both have different levels of air toxins and we need to give possible reasons as to why this could be.
We also need to research and explain the health effects of small amounts of benzene and low amounts of benzene on a person.
The last part of the essay is to explain the possible ways that we can reduce levels of benzene in the air.

Below I will attach the maps