Discuss the impact that the conflict has on leadership’s decision making.

Option #1: Resolving Work Conflict
*****THERE ARE TWO OPTIONS TO CHOOSE FROM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!**********

For this assignment, you will identify a workplace conflict that you are now experiencing. Address the following in a presentation:
Provide a brief description of the conflict. (Note that you should strive to be as unbiased as possible in this description; consider yourself a video camera recording the situation.)
Consider how cultural norms may be impacting the conflict.
Discuss the impact that the conflict has on leadership’s decision making.
Describe specific techniques that are most useful in reducing or overcoming the particular problem behavior. (Note that you should use specific terms and concepts presented in the module.)
Present a summary of leadership de-escalation strategies that provide oversight for the conflict and turn the challenge into an opportunity.
Postulate the potential negative and positive impacts that your techniques may have on resolving the conflict.
Assignment Requirements:
Create a slide presentation with a 6-7 minute narration, or video presentation using your smartphone, webcam, or other video/audio recording tool. The option to use audio/video is your opportunity to practice and demonstrate the important leadership skill of oral presentation, which is a skill preferred by employers.
Your well-crafted presentation, must include 5-7 slides, including audio, and be 6-7 minutes in length. Review the grading rubric for this assignment, to understand exactly how you will be graded. It is preferred that your presentation be a video, but you can do a PowerPoint presentation with narration.You will find resources focused on helping you create your visual presentations in the Visual Presentation
(Links to an external site.)
resource located in the CSU Global Writing Center. Contact your instructor if you have questions about the assignment.
Cite a minimum of six scholarly sources to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to the textbook, four of which should be academic, peer-reviewed sources. (You may not use the required and recommended readings for this course.)
Be sure to review the Critical Thinking Assignment rubric for details regarding grading standards.
Option #2: Reflections on Resolving Work Conflict
For this assignment, you will identify a workplace conflict that you have researched. Address the following in a paper:
Describe the organization and share its URL.
Briefly describe the conflict and make sure to use at least two different sources, such as a newspaper article, a scholarly article, or a trade (business) publication. Do you detect differences in the accounts of the conflict?
Outline the steps in the de-escalation technique used; highlight the benefit of each step in the process.
Identify the conflict resolution or negotiation processes that were used.
Highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the approach.
Describe why you believe the approach was successful or unsuccessful.
What was the end result of the conflict? Analyzing the conflict, what might have been handled differently and by whom?
Assignment Requirements:
Your paper should be 4-5 pages in length, not counting the required title and references pages.
Format your paper according to the CSU Global Writing Center
(Links to an external site.)
.
Cite a minimum of six scholarly sources to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to the textbook, four of which should be academic, peer-reviewed sources. (You may not use the required and recommended readings for this course.)
Be sure to review the Critical Thinking Assignment rubric in the Module 6 folder for details regarding grading standards.

Describe your family of origin, current family relationships, and important and supportive social relationships.

A reasonably full account of your life. Include, for example, significant and important persons and events, especially as they have impacted, or
continue to impact, your personal growth and development. Describe your family of origin, current family relationships, and important and
supportive social relationships.
An account of a helping incident in which you were the person who provided the help. Include the nature and extent of the request, your
assessment of the issue(s), problem(s), situation(s). Describe how you came to be involved and what you did. Give a brief, evaluative
commentary on what you did and how you believe you were able to help
6. Your impressions of Clinical Pastoral Education. Indicate, for example, what you believe or imagine CPE to be. Indicate if CPE is being
required of you. Indicate any learning goals or issues of which you are aware and would like to address in CPE. Finally, indicate how CPE
may be able to help you meet needs generated by your spiritual care practice or call to ministry.

What in your view is the most moral thing for that person to do in that dilemma?

Instructions
Return to the topic you chose in the week three assignment. Articulate a specific dilemma in a situation faced by a particular person based on that topic. The situation can be real or fictional.
Summarize the dilemma.
Define any needed key terms associated with the dilemma.
Analyze the conflicts or controversies involved in the dilemma.
Revise and rewrite based on any feedback you received in your previous draft (week three). Reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, etc. State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties or conflicts between loyalty to self and loyalty to a community or nation.
What in your view is the most moral thing for that person to do in that dilemma? Why is that the most moral thing? Use moral values and logical reasoning to justify your answer
Next, apply the following:
Aristotles Golden Mean to the dilemma
Utilitarianism to the dilemma
Natural Law ethics to the dilemma
Which of those three theories works best ethically speaking? Why that one?
Why do the other two not work or not work as well?
Is it the same as what you said is the most moral thing earlier? Why or why not?
Use the 5 articles from your annotated bibliography to support your answers. (Additional academic scholarly research from the past 5 years can be included as well.)
Include a reference page at the end of your paper in APA format that includes your bibliography with the annotations removed and any other sources used in your final paper.

Compare and contrast the different types of clinical interviews and identify the settings or circumstances in which you would use each.

Topic: Clinical interviewing
Assignment: Clinical interviewing is an essential skill that takes a great deal of practice. Compare and contrast the different types of clinical interviews and identify the settings or circumstances in which you would use each.
As with all of your assignments, be sure to include at least two peer-reviewed journal references (not your textbook), adhere to APA style, and answer all parts of the questions or discussions indicated. Assignments in this course are usually 3-5 pages, excluding the title page and reference section. Be sure that your paper is typed, double-spaced, and has a 12-point standard font (such as Times New Roman) with 1-inch margins all around.

Remember, all papers require at least 2-peer reviewed journal articles.

this assignment must be APA 7th edition
must follow the student writing template (i will attach it)
3 pages, NOT INCLUDING REFERENCE PAGE i will handle title and abstract)

Discuss what skills todays managers need in the knowledge economy that werent required a decade ago?

The shift to the information economy has changed the role of the manager
in todays organization. Research has demonstrated that a majority of
workers in this new knowledge economy are knowledge workers or workers
whose work output is the result of thinking versus a physical process.
Discuss what skills todays managers need in the knowledge economy that
werent required a decade ago?

What are the differences between different people that cause one group’s experience to be different than another’s?

Instructions for M6.6 – Final Paper (minimum 4500 words or app. 20 pages)

Abstract: (see link)
Write 1-2 paragraphs explaining your work

https://writingcenter.gmu.edu/guides/writing-an-abstract

Introduction:
What is your topic, and why is it important? Who is affected by this issue? (Use one or two citations as examples)

Revised Literature Review
Your revised work must present a comprehensive overview of the contemporary research studies and other recent scholarly articles examining the topic approved by your instructor (a minimum of 7-9 relevant scholarly articles in this final version).

Your revised work must present a comprehensive overview of the contemporary research studies and other recent scholarly articles examining the topic approved by your instructor (a minimum of 7-9 relevant scholarly articles in this final version).

You should expand the sources from your original Literature Review with other peer-reviewed sources specific to diversity and ethics.

Diversity and Ethics
How are people in your topic affected differently? What are the differences between different people that cause one group’s experience to be different than another’s? Language, customs, location, race, gender, wealth or poverty? How does bias affect the issue? (Use at least two citations)

Ethical Implications

What happened? Who was responsible or should have been responsible or should be responsible? What changes could help improve the situation? (Remember – you don’t have a magic wand) What makes your solution an ethical one? (Use at least two citations)
Proposed Solutions

In the articles you have researched, what are some of their solutions? (Use a least three articles as sources.) What do YOU think of these ideas, and what are your own suggestions?
Conclusions – no citation for the conclusion
Reference list – at least nine sources, in APA style

Write essays based on personal experiences, observation, and/or assigned readings.

Create a final version of your Narrative Essay according to the following formatting guidelines. Papers submitted that do not meet these requirements will be returned, UNGRADED.
2-2.5 typed, double-spaced pages (about 550-600 words), 12 pt. font size, Times New Roman, etc.
MLA formatting (see the MLA Format page as needed)
Submitted as a Word document with your first and last name in the file name.
Use an ORIGINAL title.
Outside sources should be cited and documented (Works Cited)

What do you think is the author’s purpose (or purposes) in relating this narrative (or story) about one college student’s life during the pandemic?

“The Unsettled Semester” by Becky Supiano appears in The Chronicle of Higher Education, a weekly publication written by journalists who report on news about American colleges and universities.

For the sake of this essay, assume that Supiano seeks to persuade readers to do, think, feel, or believe something. That is, assume that the author wants to have an impact on the reader. From that point of view, write an essay of 1000-1200 words in which you analyze “The Unsettled Semester.” The audience for your essay is the instructor of your first-year writing course, who will read your essay before the start of the term. What you write will help them begin to understand how you read, how you organize and develop your ideas, and how you think about yourself as a writer.

To get started, think about answering some of the following questions:

What do you think is the author’s purpose (or purposes) in relating this narrative (or story) about one college student’s life during the pandemic? In other words, what does the author seek to persuade readers to do, think, feel, or believe?
What are the benefits and/or disadvantages of the author using a narrative (story) to develop her purpose(s)?
As you read “The Unsettled Semester,” do you find that the author appeals to your emotions, your reason, or both? How might those appeals relate to the authors purpose(s)? Use specific details from the article (such as quotations) as evidence of how the author tries to appeal to the reader.
How effective is the essay at achieving its purpose(s)?
You may respond to as many or as few of these questions as you think you can develop well within the assigned word count.

At the end of your essay, add a paragraph in which you reflect on your experience of writing it. You should describe your goal(s) for the essay, how you organized your thoughts, how you appealed to your audience, and why you selected specific details from the article to discuss. Finally, what do you think you did best, and what (if anything) do you think could be improved?

Draft a 1,0001,200 word response to the prompt .

Write a paper in response to the prompt and reference at least three empirical journal articles found in the Fielding library.

Write a paper in response to the prompt and reference at least three empirical journal articles found in the Fielding library. Your paper, including references, should be in APA-style. The writing rubric will be used to grade this assignment.
How might recent changes (or any one particular change) in the DSM-5 influence clinical psychologists and the patients they treat or assess?
Please remember to include line-numbering in your document (see Announcements for instructions).
Line numbering- this is a professor preference item. It simply helps us provide you with feedback more easily to direct you to the correct line. In Word, go to layout, select line numbering with the continuous option.

Write an research paper on a topic that is relative to health care financial theories/topics.

Write an research paper on a topic that is relative to health care financial theories/topics. The paper must follow current APA format and utilize
at least 5 scholarly resources. TOPIC: HEALTHCARE SPENDING IN THE UNITED STATES.
Please include current CMS reported national healthcare spending, can be found through CMS.gov page, NHE Fact Sheet. Also, reasons for higher/increase in healthcare costs and what, if anything, is being done to reduce healthcare costs and increasing efficiency in healthcare. Can include comparisons to healthcare costs to other countries, healthcare services that are higher costs now versus the past.