Premium Writing

Please help me improve or rewrite this outline (see uploaded file) for an important Bio-Ethics Essay. The topic given to us goes like this:

Generally, you are identifying and providing (with citations & attachments) all of the rules, laws, and guidance as to when is it ethically appropriate to (a) offer and administer (e.g., voluntary, by informed consent) a vaccine AND (b) mandate administration of (police power/force, not simply offer) a vaccine? At the very least, you must provide and cite the minimum thresholds regarding the (i) Pathogen [e.g., contagiousness, virulence, prevalence, and other available treatments which would limit/reduce contagion]; (ii) Vaccine [e.g., effectiveness, and safety]; as well as (iii) Society valuation of personal rights versus collective / societys rights. You will likely need to develop a matrix as well as using versions of the chart provided to you. It is imperative that each and every sub-issue must have a clearly identified minimum threshold with an explicit citation showing the source of such threshold as applying to the Philippines.

Please let me know if you need more information about this topic so I can further elaborate and add some preferred sources or references. Thank you.

Research and discuss some of the various tasks in logistics management and the benefits of applying statistics to each of the tasks.
(Chapter 4 from “MANAGING, CONTROLLING, AND IMPROVING QUALITY” by Douglas C. Montgomery)
The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:
Write between 750 1,250 words (approximately 3 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.
Use font size 12 and 1 margins.
Include cover page and reference page.
At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.
No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.
Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.
Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.
References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.

ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION AND GUIDANCE
Assignment Description
This assignment engages the student in applying their knowledge of contract law principles and engages the student in analyzing and interpreting various scenarios relating to contract law.
Part A

Sara needs her car repaired before she leaves for a business trip on December 15. She takes it to Speedy Repair, where she agrees to pay $500, and Speedy Repair agrees to have her car ready for December 14. On December 12, Speedy Repair telephones Sara to tell her that the repairs are behind schedule and it does not think it can have the car ready by December 14 as promised. Sara is frantic and offers them an additional $500 to have the car ready for December 14. Speedy Repair agrees and offers to throw in a car wash and wax for good business relations. Speedy Repairs mechanics work overtime and the car is ready by December 14, as well as being shiny and clean. Sara then refuses to pay the extra $500. Is Speedy Repair entitled to the additional $500? Explain.
Part B
Extreme Skiing Company, a company that specializes in ski trips, offers a heli-skiing trip that involves a helicopter ride to a remote mountain slope. The price of $1,000 per person, which includes hotel, meals, and helicopter transportation, is advertised in a skiing magazine. In response to the advertisement, Allyson calls Extreme Skiing and agrees over the telephone that she and Matthias will join the trip. Extreme Skiings representative says he will mail the enrollment forms to Allyson and Matthias. Allyson agrees that she and Matthias will meet the trip operators at the hotel the day before the trip. Two weeks before the trip date, Allyson and Matthias receive and complete the enrollment forms. They mail the forms back to Extreme Skiing along with the payment price. These are received by the company one week before the trip.

Allyson and Matthias go to the designated hotel the day before the trip. As they and the other eight participants assemble in the hotel lobby, the trip operators hand out forms entitled Standard Release and Waiver of Liability and ask each participant to sign one. The form states that ExtremeSkiing is not responsible for any losses or damages suffered by the participants for any reason, including negligence on the part of the company.
Allyson and Matthias are reluctant to sign the form but are told that unless they do so they will not be allowed to go on the trip. Finally, they sign the form. The next day, all the participants are taken by helicopter to the ski slope.
During the course of the ski trip, there is an avalanche and Allyson suffers a broken leg as a result. Matthias also loses all his ski equipment. An investigation reveals that there had been an avalanche warning about the area into which the participants were flown, and that Extreme Skiing ought to have been aware of this warning.
What is the main contract issue that arises in this fact situation? Discuss why it is an issue in accordance with contract law principles.
Part C
Cheryl contracts to sell her moped to Jean for $900. However, a few days before Jean is supposed to pick up the moped, Cheryl phones to tell her that she has changed her mind and no longer wants to sell it. Jean is concerned, because to buy the same or similar moped elsewhere would cost at least $1,200. How would you characterize the breach committed by Cheryl? What remedies are available to Jean? If she claims damages, how would she calculate such damages? Would such damages be liquidated or unliquidated?
Assignment Steps
Review the assignment instructions and rubric to ensure you understand the requirements and expectations.
Draft your submissions in the format of a legal opinion letter. Adopt the structure of the questions and deal with each part separately.
Submissions should be double spaced, 12-point font, 1-inch margins and a maximum of 4 pages.
Ensure that your documents are presentable to the reader. For example, proper formatting for the type of letter you are drafting.
Double-check your submission for completeness and accuracy.

Describe the normal process by which insulin is secreted from the cell, starting from the time the insulin mRNA (INS mRNA) is bound to the ribosome and ending when the insulin protein has arrived in the extracellular space

This assignment is three different discussions boards that need to be 250 words each and may be written from a first view if needed. The references will be assigned to each discussion and 2 references/sources are to be used for each individual discussion for a total of 6. These references are to come from the attached files and do not have to be cited. The references for each discussion are to come from the attached sources.

+Discussion 1-Being Good in Groups
-Overview
People acting in groups can be better or worse than they are when acting individually – usually worse. This assignment asks you to consider the challenges in maintaining your individual integrity in an organizational environment.
-Instructions
Respond to the following prompt. Use references from the readings.
**Prompt: Can you be sure of being a moral actor in your job despite organizational pressures? What part do your religious practices play, if any?**

+Discussion 2-Ethical Challenges in the Organization
-Overview
When you are part of a business, your ethical challenges are not individual challenges. The discussion invites you to consider the special ethical challenges an organization might face.
-Instructions
Respond to the following prompt in the forum below.
**Prompt: Which is more challenging for an organization: creating an ethical climate in the organization, or resolving ethical dilemmas? What makes it so challenging?**

+Discussion 3-Act Utilitarianism vs. Rule Utilitarianism
-Overview
In this assignment, you will research and compare “act” utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism.
-Instructions
Research the distinction between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism and respond to the following prompt in the forum below.
**Prompt: Which form of analysis would you promote, act utilitarianism or rule utilitarianism? Why?**

The relationship between the environment and physical health is both dynamic and complex. From the air you breathe, to the water you drink, the food you eat, and the physical environment where you reside, each day your life is touched by environmental factors. In fact, most current models describing our determinants of health integrate the impact of the environment on our health and well-being. Furthermore, best practices in the area of health promotion and prevention incorporate an ecological component.
Local and state health departments, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), local and state legislature, as well as federal agencies strive to identify and mitigate environmental health threats within the nation. In this forum, you will delve into a selected environmental health concern in order to identify the impact of that issue on the health of the population. Additionally, you will explore specific health policy initiatives and regulatory statutes which serve to protect the public and reduce the risk of diseases related to environmental health issues.
Upon successful completion of the course material, you will be able to:
Discuss the impact of the environment on population health status.
Identify health-related policies and legislative regulations designed to enhance health and minimize the risk of disease within the
population.
Resources
Textbook: Community as Partner: Theory and Practice in Nursing
Textbook: Public Health Nursing: Population-centered Health Care in the Community
Optional Resources
Website: Healthy People 2020
Website: Healthy People 2030
Website: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Textbook: Kleiber, J. & Cohen, B. (2020, April). Reducing Waste and Increasing Sustainablity in Health Care Settings. Changing the Way Plastic Medical Waste is Used and Desposed of. American Journal of Nursing, 120(4).

Background Information
This discussion is based on the environmental health issue you selected in 3.5 Discussion: Environmental Health Issue Selection.
Health effects of fracking, i.e. hydraulic fracturing
Instructions
Review the appropriate rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Read Chapter 10 in the textbook, Public Health Nursing: Population-centered Health Care in the Community.
Prepare to discuss the following prompts:
In your own words, summarize the impact and prevalence of this environmental concern on the health of the population.
Define the interventions which are currently in place to address this issue, and additional interventions which may be needed to protect the public from this environmental concern.
What agencies or organizations are in place to address this concern, or monitor compliance with safety standards and preventive measures?
Identify local, national, and global strategies to protect the public from this environmental health threat
Research and select at least two current scholarly sources to support your explanations and insights. Wikipedia is not permitted, as it is not a peer-reviewed, scholarly source.
As time allows, review the following optional resources:
Visit the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences website.
Download the Healthy People 2020 Framework pdf on this website.
Review Development of the National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives for 2030.
Whether written or spoken, interactions are expected to:
clearly and thoroughly address the prompt with meaningful information that shows critical thinking.

Paper (25% percent of final grade) Each student will write an 8-10 page paper analyzing films containing important themes or questions involving the American legal system. The paper must draw on the theoretical materials presented in the linked textbook readings, additional readings assigned, class discussion, as well as outside research such as case law, journal articles, or law review articles. I must approve the paper topic.

The following list contains examples:
Do films understand lawyers?
The Impact of Legal Movies on How the Public Perceives the Judicial System
A Few Questions to Ponder for Papers/Presentations in Lawyers and Film:
1. What legal point(s) is the film making and does it make that point(s) well? How does the film emphasize its point(s) about lawyers and the legal system?
2. How are the lawyers in the film portrayed? (litigators, counselors, heroes, villains, etc.) Are the portrayals authentic or unrealistic?
3. How does the films portrayal of the certain events compare and contrast with actual historical events? For example, does Inherit The Wind accurately portray the Scopes Monkey Trial as demonstrated in the historical documentary?
4. What are the examples of justice being served or not being served?
5. Is there tension between what the law demands and what justice requires?
6. Was the judicial/legal process just or unjust?
7. What are the social, political, and cultural messages encoded in the film and how do we interpret those messages?
8. As a result of watching the film, what have you learned about lawyers and the legal process?
9. What recommendation(s) would you make to improve the judicial system/lawyers?
Discuss these questions in your paper, as you integrate the film, the text, the articles, and the legal cases.
Use 12 point font. All papers are due Thursday of the final week. Late papers will be discounted 50 points.
A papers will be analytical, integrate the course materials, and have a Bibliography. B papers will discuss the issues analytically. C papers will be merely competent. D papers will not be competent. F papers will be short, uninspiring, and a waste of your time and mine.
Poor grammar, spelling, and punctuation will result in a lowered grade. College-level writing is required.
Film List For Flagler College Students at Proctor Library
(You are also encouraged to use films which are not assigned to supplement you paper.)
The Accused PN1993.5.U6 A33 2002 (DVD)
Adams Rib NOT HELD (available in my office)
The Amistad PN1997 .A48 1999 (DVD)
Anatomy of a Murder PN1997 .A538 1999 (VIDEO)
And Justice for All PN1997 .A25 2001 (DVD)
The Candidate PN1997 .C22 1996 (Video)
The Chamber PS3557.R5355 C472 1997 (VIDEO)
A Civil Action PN1997 .C521 1999 (VIDEO)
A Class Action PN1997 .C53 1995 (VIDEO)
The Client PN1993.5.U6 C575 1997 (DVD)
The Contender PN1995.9.P6 C68 2001 (VIDEO)
The Distinguished Gentleman PN1997 .D57 2000 (DVD)
Double Jeopardy PN1995.9.D4 D6 1999 (DVD)
A Few Good Men PN1997 .F49 1992 (DVD)
The Firm PN1997 .F476 2000 (DVD)
First Monday in October PN1997 .F57 2004 (DVD)
Inherit the Wind PN1997 .I54 2001 (DVD)
Judgment at Nuremberg PS3563.A5358 J8 1996 (Video)
Kramer vs. Kramer PN1997 .K73 2001 (DVD & Video)
Legal Eagles PN1997 .L384 2003 (DVD)
Nuts PN1997 .N88 3003 (DVD)
Paper Chase PN1997 .P365 2003 (DVD)
Paris Trout PN1997 .P37 1991 (VIDEO)
Philadelphia PN1995.9.J8 P4 1997 (DVD)
Presumed Innocent PN1997 .P747 1997 (DVD)
Primal Fear PN1995.9.J8 P75 1996 (VIDEO)
Primary Colors PN1997 .P75 1998 (DVD)
The Rainmaker PS3557.R5355 R352 1998 (VIDEO)
Rules of Engagement PN1997 .R84 2000 (DVD)
Runaway Jury PN1997.2 .R86 2004 (DVD)
A Time to Kill PN1995.9.D4 T544 1997 (DVD)
To Kill a Mocking Bird PS3562.E353 T62 1998 (DVD)
Twelve Angry Men (1957) PN1997 .T74 1996 (VIDEO & DVD)
Twelve Angry Men (1997) PN1995.9.J8 T9 1997 (VIDEO)
The Verdict PN1997 .V4743 2002 (DVD)
Witness for the Prosecution PN1995.9.D4 W58 2001 (DVD)
The Wrong Man KF9756 .W76 1996 (VIDEO)

Research and discuss lot-by-lot acceptance sampling procedures and its role in logistics management
(Chapter 7 from “MANAGING, CONTROLLING, AND IMPROVING
QUALITY” by Douglas C. Montgomery)
The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:
Write between 750 1,250 words (approximately 3 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.
Use font size 12 and 1 margins.
Include cover page and reference page.
At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.
No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.
Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.
Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.
References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.

Please write one paragraph (half a page) response to attached “Summary of article” (NOT to the article – “Point-of-care Blood Glucose Meter Accuracy in the Hospital Setting”). The article is also attached in case for reference. When writing response, just basically on thoughts and comments about “Summary of article”.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has provided a national dialogue designed to bolster and promote a collective approach to emergency management called a whole community approach to emergency management. Please review the article, A whole community approach to emergency management: Principles, themes, and pathways for action. After reviewing the article, provide an assessment of how this approach applies today for both the public and private sectors in ensuring our homeland is secure.

The article is attached
The Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2011). A whole community approach to emergency management: Principles, themes, and pathways for action. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1813-25045-0649/whole_community_dec2011__2_.pdf

respond to the stated question, including any relevance to and implications on the field of homeland security and defense. These discussions are intended to create thought-provoking, lively, and respectful discussions. Remarks can include your opinion(s), but must be based on experience, research, and/or prior learning. Use this exercise to foster a rich dialogue with your colleagues about issues that are important to the field of homeland security and defense.