Premium Writing

The integration of Little Rock High School was one of many conflicts faced during the civil rights movements of the 1950’s and 1960’s. The Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education overturned the “Separate but Equal” doctrine created by the Court in Plessy v. Ferguson, and required the integration of schools across the United States. In the following video, you will see the reaction to that ruling during the integration of Little Rock High School. Please view and take notes on Fighting Back 1957–1962: Eyes on the Prize—America’s Civil Rights Movement 1954–1985 and read the Civil Rights Chapter in your textbook. The first half hour will be enough to complete the discussion.
*Warning, this video contains offensive racist language.

Then respond to the following two questions:

Address the Constitutional questions presented by this conflict. Why were the states in defiance of the federal law? What provision in the Constitution addresses State and Federal conflict? Which branch of government is responsible for enforcing federal law? How was that accomplished?

What does this video reveal to you about those involved in the personal and governmental struggles during the Civil Rights movement of the 1950’s? How did Brown v. Board of Education advance the the guarantees of the 14th Amendment? Lastly, what role if any do you think media/television played in the Civil Rights Movement.
Once you have posted your response, the other students’ responses will appear. Please read over the other students’ response and then reply to at least two classmates. In your replies identify something you had not previously been aware of or something which challenges you to think differently.

Your response must be at least 300 words. List all web resources and referenced materials that were used. You must use the APA citation style format in listing references used and in parenthetical citations.

Criteria for This Assignment
Length and Formatting Requirements
• Six+ pages, double spaced
• Time New Roman, 12-point font
• Works Cited page- Alphabetical order
• In-text citations
• Organize your paper using the outline described in the instructions.
Content Requirements
• Locate 10 to 15 reliable, credible, and valid resources about the pros and cons of your sport of choice.
• Write an essay using those resources, citing them properly both in-text and in the works cited page.
• Include your personal opinion only after explaining and describing the research you gathered.

In your final research paper, you will research and explore the benefits and dangers of today’s sports. The movie Concussion, based on the discoveries and research by Nigerian doctor, Bennet Omalu, generated controversy by suggesting that the game of football, along with other sports, promoted serious physical and even life-threatening injuries to players. A barrage of news articles, texts, and documentaries posed the following question: “Are Sports Becoming Too Dangerous?”

For the final research paper:
Choose a sport (boxing, ice-skating, football, rugby, etc.), and research the pros and cons of the sport. Your research should be reliable and extensive (10 to 15 sources minimum).
• In your first two pages of writing, create a case for the benefits of this sport. (Keep your personal feelings removed from these first two pages. Only submit the evidence based on your research and carefully document that evidence through in-text (parenthetical) citations.

• In pages three and four, create a case for the dangers of this sport. This writing is not based on personal observation, but on your well-documented evidence.
• In pages five and six should be a summation of the conclusions that you were able to surmise based on the research.
• You may include graphs and figures to enhance the position of your essay. These would be inserted as an appendix after your essay and before your works cited page.
• The final page of this paper should be a properly documented works cited page (10-15 sources that were listed throughout your paper). Be sure to include texts and scholarly journals as well as online sources.

These journals, articles, and resources are a good place to start:
• British Broadcasting Co. “Are Sports Becoming Too Dangerous?”
• National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (US Department of Health and Human Services)
• Journal of Sport & Health Science (JSHS)
• NFL Concussion Litigation
• Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

Please complate the asignment below, dont worrie about R just need to do that data part in realtion to the part 1 and part 2 topic that is attached in the file. on the state of Arizona and water conservation topics let me know if you have any questions

Find your data and read it into R studio cloud. ***Upload a screen shot of your data uploaded into R, read into R and shown in the environment window.

In this assignment, you are to scour the internet for data from the state you chose in week one relating to the headlines and story you were intending to investigate from week 2. You are then to download that data and upload it to the R studio cloud.

Of course, you will use RStudio Cloud in future weeks to produce a lot of the output (graphs, maps, analysis, etc.), but this week you should be simply focusing on finding the data you will need to tell the story you are interested in for your state. This means you will need to pay careful attention to the data. Be sure it includes variables that will help you tell your story. Variables that will be able to be graphed and/or mapped. It would be beneficial if you found it in .csv form, as the template I have written for you uses that coding/file type.

What led to the rise of juvenile boot camps?
What does the data on juvenile boot camps reveal?
What are your thoughts on utilizing boot camps as a way of reducing juvenile crime?

Instructions for Rond Motor Corporation Case
This is a largely fictional case—it involves fictional characters and companies. However, it draws on a variety of actual cases. Imagine yourself in the position of an ethics analyst who is asked to go work for the company and draft a report analysing the situations, identifying the main moral wrongdoings, justifying the conclusions why they are wrong.
In writing the report, identify the main issues and discuss each separately. There are four to six distinct situations–you should identify them all (for example, health and safety issue, privacy issue, etc…). One or one and a half single-spaced pages per issue should be sufficient, but it can be a bit more or a bit less depending on the complexity of the issue. Your analysis should contain the following parts:
a)Identify the problem and assess it. This is a good place to ask yourself this question—where does this situation fit as far as legal and ethical responsibilities are concerned? For example, if there (hypothetically) were a workplace safety issue where the employer ignores the dangers to employees and their objections, you would evaluate the actions of employers and pass a judgement on whether and why they were wrong as far as regulations and expectations of responsibility are concerned. If there were a privacy issue, you could determine whether there was a privacy violation by considering the workplace relationship, the nature of the infringement, and possible justification. Here you could appeal to legislation (i.e. Health and Safety Guides from the Legal Perspective uploads or PIPEDA guidelines), but note that not every situation in the case can easily fit the assessment on the basis of regulations or legislation.
b)Justify your moral assessment in a normative theory (theories) we have discussed in class (this could be deontological rights approach; utilitarian analysis or other moral standards discussed.
If in the section above you passed a moral judgement, in this section you need to ground the moral judgements in moral principles and ultimately a moral standard. To ground your analysis of the situation, keep these questions in mind:
Who is harmed by the activity?
How serious is the harm?
Who is responsible for the harm?
Does it violate essential human interests or moral rights?
Can this harm be morally justified by conflicting moral values?
What are the real motivations of the parties involved (e.g. perpetrators and critics)?
Appealing to this normative foundation should justify your analysis and help to clarify moral values involved. You need to show how moral obligations identified in a) follow from the moral theories we have covered in class. Instructions for Rond Motor Corporation Case
This is a largely fictional case—it involves fictional characters and companies. However, it draws on a variety of actual cases. Imagine yourself in the position of an ethics analyst who is asked to go work for the company and draft a report analysing the situations, identifying the main moral wrongdoings, justifying the conclusions why they are wrong.
In writing the report, identify the main issues and discuss each separately. There are four to six distinct situations–you should identify them all (for example, health and safety issue, privacy issue, etc…). One or one and a half single-spaced pages per issue should be sufficient, but it can be a bit more or a bit less depending on the complexity of the issue. Your analysis should contain the following parts:
a)Identify the problem and assess it. This is a good place to ask yourself this question—where does this situation fit as far as legal and ethical responsibilities are concerned? For example, if there (hypothetically) were a workplace safety issue where the employer ignores the dangers to employees and their objections, you would evaluate the actions of employers and pass a judgement on whether and why they were wrong as far as regulations and expectations of responsibility are concerned. If there were a privacy issue, you could determine whether there was a privacy violation by considering the workplace relationship, the nature of the infringement, and possible justification. Here you could appeal to legislation (i.e. Health and Safety Guides from the Legal Perspective uploads or PIPEDA guidelines), but note that not every situation in the case can easily fit the assessment on the basis of regulations or legislation.
b)Justify your moral assessment in a normative theory (theories) we have discussed in class (this could be deontological rights approach; utilitarian analysis or other moral standards discussed.
If in the section above you passed a moral judgement, in this section you need to ground the moral judgements in moral principles and ultimately a moral standard. To ground your analysis of the situation, keep these questions in mind:
Who is harmed by the activity?
How serious is the harm?
Who is responsible for the harm?
Does it violate essential human interests or moral rights?
Can this harm be morally justified by conflicting moral values?
What are the real motivations of the parties involved (e.g. perpetrators and critics)?
Appealing to this normative foundation should justify your analysis and help to clarify moral values involved. You need to show how moral obligations identified in a) follow from the moral theories we have covered in class. Instructions for Rond Motor Corporation Case
This is a largely fictional case—it involves fictional characters and companies. However, it draws on a variety of actual cases. Imagine yourself in the position of an ethics analyst who is asked to go work for the company and draft a report analysing the situations, identifying the main moral wrongdoings, justifying the conclusions why they are wrong.
In writing the report, identify the main issues and discuss each separately. There are four to six distinct situations–you should identify them all (for example, health and safety issue, privacy issue, etc…). One or one and a half single-spaced pages per issue should be sufficient, but it can be a bit more or a bit less depending on the complexity of the issue. Your analysis should contain the following parts:
a)Identify the problem and assess it. This is a good place to ask yourself this question—where does this situation fit as far as legal and ethical responsibilities are concerned? For example, if there (hypothetically) were a workplace safety issue where the employer ignores the dangers to employees and their objections, you would evaluate the actions of employers and pass a judgement on whether and why they were wrong as far as regulations and expectations of responsibility are concerned. If there were a privacy issue, you could determine whether there was a privacy violation by considering the workplace relationship, the nature of the infringement, and possible justification. Here you could appeal to legislation (i.e. Health and Safety Guides from the Legal Perspective uploads or PIPEDA guidelines), but note that not every situation in the case can easily fit the assessment on the basis of regulations or legislation.
b)Justify your moral assessment in a normative theory (theories) we have discussed in class (this could be deontological rights approach; utilitarian analysis or other moral standards discussed.
If in the section above you passed a moral judgement, in this section you need to ground the moral judgements in moral principles and ultimately a moral standard. To ground your analysis of the situation, keep these questions in mind:
Who is harmed by the activity?
How serious is the harm?
Who is responsible for the harm?
Does it violate essential human interests or moral rights?
Can this harm be morally justified by conflicting moral values?
What are the real motivations of the parties involved (e.g. perpetrators and critics)?
Appealing to this normative foundation should justify your analysis and help to clarify moral values involved. You need to show how moral obligations identified in a) follow from the moral theories we have covered in class. Instructions for Rond Motor Corporation Case
This is a largely fictional case—it involves fictional characters and companies. However, it draws on a variety of actual cases. Imagine yourself in the position of an ethics analyst who is asked to go work for the company and draft a report analysing the situations, identifying the main moral wrongdoings, justifying the conclusions why they are wrong.
In writing the report, identify the main issues and discuss each separately. There are four to six distinct situations–you should identify them all (for example, health and safety issue, privacy issue, etc…). One or one and a half single-spaced pages per issue should be sufficient, but it can be a bit more or a bit less depending on the complexity of the issue. Your analysis should contain the following parts:
a)Identify the problem and assess it. This is a good place to ask yourself this question—where does this situation fit as far as legal and ethical responsibilities are concerned? For example, if there (hypothetically) were a workplace safety issue where the employer ignores the dangers to employees and their objections, you would evaluate the actions of employers and pass a judgement on whether and why they were wrong as far as regulations and expectations of responsibility are concerned. If there were a privacy issue, you could determine whether there was a privacy violation by considering the workplace relationship, the nature of the infringement, and possible justification. Here you could appeal to legislation (i.e. Health and Safety Guides from the Legal Perspective uploads or PIPEDA guidelines), but note that not every situation in the case can easily fit the assessment on the basis of regulations or legislation.
b)Justify your moral assessment in a normative theory (theories) we have discussed in class (this could be deontological rights approach; utilitarian analysis or other moral standards discussed.
If in the section above you passed a moral judgement, in this section you need to ground the moral judgements in moral principles and ultimately a moral standard. To ground your analysis of the situation, keep these questions in mind:
Who is harmed by the activity?
How serious is the harm?
Who is responsible for the harm?
Does it violate essential human interests or moral rights?
Can this harm be morally justified by conflicting moral values?
What are the real motivations of the parties involved (e.g. perpetrators and critics)?
Appealing to this normative foundation should justify your analysis and help to clarify moral values involved. You need to show how moral obligations identified in a) follow from the moral theories we have covered in class. Instructions for Rond Motor Corporation Case
This is a largely fictional case—it involves fictional characters and companies. However, it draws on a variety of actual cases. Imagine yourself in the position of an ethics analyst who is asked to go work for the company and draft a report analysing the situations, identifying the main moral wrongdoings, justifying the conclusions why they are wrong.
In writing the report, identify the main issues and discuss each separately. There are four to six distinct situations–you should identify them all (for example, health and safety issue, privacy issue, etc…). One or one and a half single-spaced pages per issue should be sufficient, but it can be a bit more or a bit less depending on the complexity of the issue. Your analysis should contain the following parts:
a)Identify the problem and assess it. This is a good place to ask yourself this question—where does this situation fit as far as legal and ethical responsibilities are concerned? For example, if there (hypothetically) were a workplace safety issue where the employer ignores the dangers to employees and their objections, you would evaluate the actions of employers and pass a judgement on whether and why they were wrong as far as regulations and expectations of responsibility are concerned. If there were a privacy issue, you could determine whether there was a privacy violation by considering the workplace relationship, the nature of the infringement, and possible justification. Here you could appeal to legislation (i.e. Health and Safety Guides from the Legal Perspective uploads or PIPEDA guidelines), but note that not every situation in the case can easily fit the assessment on the basis of regulations or legislation.
b)Justify your moral assessment in a normative theory (theories) we have discussed in class (this could be deontological rights approach; utilitarian analysis or other moral standards discussed.
If in the section above you passed a moral judgement, in this section you need to ground the moral judgements in moral principles and ultimately a moral standard. To ground your analysis of the situation, keep these questions in mind:
Who is harmed by the activity?
How serious is the harm?
Who is responsible for the harm?
Does it violate essential human interests or moral rights?
Can this harm be morally justified by conflicting moral values?
What are the real motivations of the parties involved (e.g. perpetrators and critics)?
Appealing to this normative foundation should justify your analysis and help to clarify moral values involved. You need to show how moral obligations identified in a) follow from the moral theories we have covered in class.

1.Requirement from the professor

Objectives:
☞ Students explore the research-pedagogy link by bridging the gap between theory in ISLA and SLA and instructional issues.

Guidelines:

oChoose a L2 teaching/learning issue covered in the program
oI would like you to choose an issue that you feel passionate about
oPedagogical Issues needs to be related to ISLA and SLA. Please do not choose an issue outside the realm of SLA research (e.g., classroom management, curriculum development, language assessment, etc.).Suggested length: 3000 words maximum

(UNIT 1) What is ISLA and SLA? And What are the main findings? How is second language instruction evolved over the years?
(UNIT 2) What is the role of communication? And Interactive speaking and writing tasks
(UNIT 3) What is the role of input, listening and reading tasks?
(UNIT 4-5) What is language? And How do we process grammar and vocabulary?
(UNIT 6) What is the role of corrective feedback?

1. Title:A Comparative Study of Metalinguistic Feedback and Recasts in Acquiring the morphological feature(ed) of Simple Past Tense by Secondary School Chinese EFL Learners
2.Please write the main arguments within the thesis statement and pedagogical solutions in the essay.
3.Use peer reviewed journals or books in the attachment

You must write about The Network Society and refer to Manuel Castells work on it and contextualise it (who, where, when, what), you must explain its main concepts, and discuss how this perspective can be used to understand the society in which we live and its main changes.
You must focus on both the pros and cons of the selected perspective, on both the arguments in favour of a theory and its limitations
You must then compare the selected perspective (The Network Society) with two alternative perspectives, which is Post-industrialism refer to Daniel Bell’s work and the The Platform Society
After having illustrated the main perspective, they should briefly illustrate the two alternative perspectives and critically analyse what aspects of the information society are better addressed by each perspective
The main focus is on the first perspective, which has to be illustrated in greater detail.

Use these readings when discussing the networked society perspective
Castells M (2010) The Rise of the Network Society
Castells M (2010) The Power of Identity
Castells M (2010) End of Millennium
Castells M (Ed)(2004) Part I – The Network Society – A Cross-Cultural Perspective
Castells M (2009) Communication Power

Use these readings when discussing the Post Industrialism society

Daniel Bell – Notes on the Post-Industrial Society I
Daniel Bell – Notes on the Post-Industrial Society II
Waters – 2007 – Daniel Bell. In The Blackwell Companion to Major Contemporary Social Theorists

use Dijck, J. van, Poell, T., & Waal, M. de. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press for platform society

Instructions:

In order to do the assignment, you must watch ALL Demo Videos (3 Parts/ Videos, About 33 min)
Also, read all short-attached file (Demo_CRM – Customer Relationship) and (Managing Communication.pdf)

Then, read and answer all questions correctly in file attached (CLTV at SiriusXM (Instruction and Questions).docx) AND (AHI_Demo.xlsx)
Please notice both files CLTV at SiriusXM (Instruction and Questions).docx AND (AHI_Demo.xlsx)
Are RELATED to do the assignment

Please, answer all questions correctly to avoid refund.
Please notice: If needed I’ll send feedback for revision and I’ll need your quick response.

In an argumentative Essay of a least 1000 words, argue against the abolition of prisons (or police). Why is the institution you’ve decided to write about needed (or unnecessary)?

Psych 101: Self-Analysis Paper
Overview: How do our psychological traits and experiences impact our life outcomes? That is the key
question we will be asking in this assignment. You will first complete measures of a variety of important
psychological variables (e.g., Big Five personality traits, self-esteem, social belonging, etc.). Your task will
then be to select one of these variables and write a short paper reflecting on the role you think this
variable has had in your own life. You will also provide a critical analysis of the measure itself.
Purpose: This assignment will give you the opportunity to analyze how psychological variables impact
personal experiences and outcomes in the real world. You will also gain first-hand experience with
psychological measures and get practice considering the strengths and limitations of common
measurement approaches.
Background and Explanation:
Modern psychology suggests that our behaviour and life outcomes are determined, in large part, by both
the type of people we are (our personality, beliefs, goals, etc.) and the experiences we have. For
example, how we adapt to university is shaped by both our individual traits and characteristics and the
environment and experiences we encounter when we get there. However, studying these kinds of
variables is challenging as it often requires “getting into people’s heads” to understand how individuals
think and feel about the world. As a result, research in psychology often uses self-report methods, an
approach which has both strengths and limitations.
For this assignment you will first complete self-report measures of a variety of important psychological
variables to gain first-hand experience with these constructs and how they are typically measured. After
completing the measures and viewing your scores, you will then select one variable you are interested in
exploring in greater depth and write a short paper including: (a) a description of the variable you
selected; (b) a critical evaluation of the accuracy of self-reports for this variable; and (c) an analysis of
this variable and how you think it has personally impacted your life experiences and outcomes. Your
assignment will be evaluated based on your completion of the psychological measures as well as the
quality and depth of your written analysis.
Completing the Survey
All of the measures will be provided in a single, online Qualtrics survey that you can complete any time
before the assignment deadline. Your responses on the survey are completely anonymous and neither
myself nor any of the TAs involved in grading your work will be able to identify which responses belong
to which student. You will be assigned a Project Identification Number (PIN) that you will enter on the
first page of the survey in order to identify yourself and get credit for completing this step. A single TA in
the course who is not involved in grading your work will be the sole person who can identify which PIN
belongs to which student in order to assign credit; however, they will not, at any point in time, look at
your personal responses or survey scores. After completing the survey, you will see a summary of your
scores and you can use this information to pick a single variable that you would like to analyze in depth
for the paper. The measures include: Big Five personality traits, Self-Esteem, Optimism, Happiness, Life
Satisfaction, Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Achievement Motivation, Academic Self-Efficacy, Social
Connectedness, and Belonging.
Paper Requirements
Your paper should include:
• A description of the variable you selected and why it is an important construct to study. For example,
what do we know about how this variable impacts people’s lives or outcomes? You should use at
least two academic sources to support your explanation of the concept and its importance. One of
these can be the textbook or lecture slides, and a second should be from a peer-reviewed
psychological journal.
• A critical analysis of the use of self-report to measure this variable, both generally and for you in
particular. Consider the factors that we know to have an impact on the validity of self-report
measures and apply these principles to the self-report measurement of this variable. Finally, reflect
on whether you think your responses on this measure were accurate, and why or why not.
• A reflective analysis of how this variable has impacted you, your life experiences, and/or your life
outcomes. Do you score low, moderate, or high on this variable, and how has this impacted the way
you feel, the way you see the world, or the type of experiences you have? You may want to consider
one or more life domains such as your experiences or outcomes at school, at work, or in your
relationships. Based on what we know about this variable, why do you think it has impacted your life
in this way? For this analysis, consider at least one way in which this variable has been a strength in
your life or one way in which you can overcome past challenges in this domain to thrive in the future.
Technical and Formatting Requirements:
• 1000 to 1200 words in length or approximately 3 pages, but use the word count
• 1” margins
• Times New Roman, 12 point font OR 11 point Calibri
• APA style for formatting title page, citations, and reference page (no abstract required)
Voluntary Consent to Use Your Data for Scientific Research
Are you interested in sharing your survey responses to contribute to scientific research? After
completing the survey measures, you will have a chance to provide or deny consent for your anonymized
survey data be used for scientific research purposes. The decision is entirely yours and your course grade
will in no way be affected by your decision either way. After completing the surveys, you will see a
consent form asking if you consent to use your data for research. You will also see a separate consent
form asking if you consent to using your course grades for research purposes. You are free to provide or
deny consent, and your course instructor and the TAs who grade your work will never know of your
decision. The data from students who choose not to give consent will be deleted once the term is over,
and data associated with those responses will never be used in any scientific research publications. Your
decision is completely voluntary and just for the good of science should you like to contribute.
Due Date
Your paper is due April 6 by 11:59 pm. Please submit to the appropriate dropbox on LEARN as a Word
document.
Alternative Assignment
If you are not comfortable providing a personal analysis, see your instructor for an alternative
assignment option.
Rubric for Self-Analysis Paper
Completion of Survey Measures (30 points)
Completion of online survey before the assignment deadline ______
Description of Selected Variable (25 points)
Clear and accurate explanation of selected variable and why it is important ______
to study, including effective use of sources (textbook and journal article)
Critical Analysis of Self-Report (25 points)
Strong critical analysis of self-report measures in general, and for this variable in ______
particular, including an analysis of the accuracy of your own responses
Self-Reflection and Analysis (40 points)
Insightful analysis and self-reflection considering the role of the selected variable ______
in at least one life domain, including an analysis of personal strengths and/or
future growth; effective use of sources to support analysis
Quality of Writing (15 points)
Organization and coherence (paragraphs are focused and well organized), ______
clear and engaging prose (precise and effective word choice, varied sentence
structure), and sentence-level editing (spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.)
Technical and Formatting Requirements (15 points)
Follows formatting and citation style of APA 7th edition; sources are properly ______
referenced and reference list matches in-text citations; word count
TOTAL SCORE (out of 150) ______