Premium Writing

Explain and examine how using critical analysis tools influences your interactions with others.

Explain how Judith Walkowitz interpret the Ripper murders?

The discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week on the basis of the course competencies covered.

For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned.

To support your work, use your course and text readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for this assignment by the end of the week.

Scholarly Project Progress

Provide the chosen title for your scholarly project, along with your thesis statement and PICOT question supported by evidence .
Provide an overview of your topic and background information.
Describe the importance of the project to nursing practice.
Build a case for the need for the project.

What do you think will be the effect of the
COVID-19 pandemic to city services? Are
there lessons from the 2007-09 recession
applicable? Are municipal revenue sources
diverse enough to limit downturns in the
economy? Why or why not?

Policy memo type submission. This includes an executive summary as well as a discussion and recommendation to address the pandemic.

This assignment will be a two part.

There will be two primary sources to read and write on, and two secondary sources. Below is some information about what is asked of the assignment.
Please separate each source with the title name that the document will be labled as.

Primary Source 1 : Interview with Juan Loza
Secondary Source 1 : A Town Full of Dead Mexicans: The Salinas Valley Bracero Tragedy of 1963, the End of the Bracero Program, and the Evolution of California Chicano Movement

Primary Source 2 : “Boycott for Democracy” Poster
Secondary Source 2 : Chapter Twenty-Six A Generation of Leaders, but Not in the Fields The Legacy of Cesar Chavez

Purpose: This reading practice exercise is to encourage a daily and weekly habit of reading. Reading is essential to the discipline of studying and writing history.

Goal: To learn how to read like a historian.

Task: Write a one-page reading practice on one secondary source and one primary source from the readings due today. I recommend writing one paragraph on the secondary source and one paragraph on the primary source. Please write in full sentences and identify the authors by their names.

Content: Answer the guiding questions that are applicable:

How to Read a Secondary Source:

Understand the author’s argument. What is the author’s thesis? What previous historical arguments or interpretations is the author trying to refute or expand upon?
Understand the context in which the historian was writing. Does the historian’s time period have bearing on her interpretations? Does the historian’s geographical location have an influence on his work? Does the historian subscribe to a particular school of thought or methodology?
Understand the sources used. All history is based on primary sources. How deep and well-rounded is the body of sources the author used? If the sources were all written from one point of view, for example, this weakens any argument that the historian can make.

How to Read a Primary Source:

Who is the author and what is the author’s place in society (explain why you are justified in thinking so)?
Why do you think the author wrote it?
Does the author have a thesis? What is that thesis?
What is the intended audience of the text?
How might this text support one of the arguments found in secondary sources you’ve read?

You will research evidence-based strategies for dealing with your issue at the classroom and school-wide level and write a 2-3-page paper discussing possible intervention strategies and programs for your specific issue topic. (Bullying)

The following websites offer evidence-based intervention strategies and programs:

What’s Working Clearinghouse (WWC) opens in a new window

Best Evidence Encyclopedia-(BEE) opens in a new window

Doing What Works (DWW) opens in a new window

1. How is hypotermia used in treating the pateint after post cardiac arrest. (it was a treatment recommended over 20 years ago)
2. The benefit of hypertermia in treatment of patient in post cardia arrest.
3. What is the current protocol for treating thermoregulation? (Hint: Currently hypothermia is not recommended anymore. Why. We only us hyperthermia, why)

John Wesley said that Constantine’s legalization of Christianity ‘greatly wounded the church’ (114).Explain how making Christianity legal could end up hurting the church.

a. Describe the purpose of the paper, the issue, and your position.
b. Explain why your position is important and the relevance of your position to nursing practice.
c. Describe what has contributed to this issue.
d. State specific recommendations that support your position and improve nursing practice, the life of the concerned parties and society. Consider recommendations that might include advocacy at the legislative level, financial funding for resources, delivery of nursing and other interdisciplinary care, reduction of stigma at the local, state or national level.
e. Describe your interprofessional team and how they will implement your recommendations.
f. Include a summary and concluding paragraph.
g. Utilize proper grammar and APA formatting.
h. refrence should be within 5year

As with most patient errors, there was a chain of events that led up to the result. List the chain of events involved with the client’s case.
Who or what was primarily responsible for causing the poor outcome in this case? Why do you believe this individual, or entity was primarily responsible?
What sentinel events would have been identified as needing risk-reduction policies?
What would you do to correct the events that led to the poor outcome?