Premium Writing

I have included the assignment and instruction below. Please do exactly how the instructions say. I will also upload the article that I have been doing my assignments from.
Climate Change and Environmental Issues
UNCOVERING BIAS AND MISSING NARRATIVES Discussion 5 -1
Thus far, you have learned how historical contexts, perspectives, and biases influence the interpretation and “telling” of historical narratives. For this discussion, reflect on what you have learned about your research question and the historical event and current event you chose. To ensure an interesting discussion, you are encouraged to think creatively about your initial posts and extend the points made by your peers. It is also important to review the module resources and read the prompts in their entirety before participating in the discussion. You should include examples and other supporting evidence from the module resources in your posts.
Discussing challenges that face our world often means investigating opinions and ideas different from your own. Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful towards your peers and instructor in your discussion post and replies.
Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.
For your initial post, address the following:
Discuss the brainstorming process you used to identify bias in your primary and secondary sources. How did you do it? Describe the strategies that were successful for you. List the primary and secondary sources.
Consider the challenges you encountered identifying the narratives about your historical event. What methods did you use to identify the absent voices in the historical narratives?
What perspectives do you think are missing from the narrative about your historical event?
Be sure to cite evidence from your sources to justify your points.
For your response posts, address the following:
How might you use your peers’ strategies to uncover another absent perspective related to your historical event or expose a historical narrative bias? If you think you cannot apply your peers’ strategies to your own event or narrative, explain why.
Remember, this assignment is graded on the quality of your initial post and at least two response posts to your classmates. If you refer to any module resources, be sure to include an attribution (or citation) for the resource.
Response Post # 1
When I am brainstorming, I feel very chaotic. I tend to end up being all over the place but ultimately I narrow down my sources based on how a reading catches my attention and how it makes me feel. I like to read each source in its entirety and make sure they include all necessary information. I was able to identify bias pretty easily because two of my sources are third person factual based readings whereas the other two are first person interviews that clearly hold bias because they contain personal thoughts, feelings, and opinions.
Absent voices can be felt in these sources because there are only a handful of survivors left from this time therefore we are left with much secondhand information. If we had access to more first person accounts, we would be able to analyze the events at a much more personal level. This also goes hand in hand with the missing perspectives. It is hard to understand what really happened without having various accounts from those that experienced. I have one source that does have a first hand account but many more would help to connect all the various pieces of information. Unfortunately, at over 100 years after the fact, this is next to impossible to achieve.
– Please respond to this discussion post using the # right above the post.
Response Post # 2
Picking my topic was very easy for me because I have always felt that despite how The Native Americans were treated, forced from their lands and relocated hundreds of miles to places deemed undesirable at the time, people tend to forget or leave them out of the conversation surrounding racial inequality or racial justice. Reading all these stories written during the time of the Wounded Knee Occupation, from several different perspectives, has shown just how divided the country was when it came to equality for the Native Americans. I have a couple sources from the government side of things, written with a definite bias against the Indians and a more forgiving viewpoint on the wrongdoing of the government. On the other hand I have several sources that were at the Occupation, whose first hand viewpoint or personal feeling may have been biased due to The Massacre a Wounded Knee.
I did some research on each source I chose to try and make sure I would be a able to add a viewpoint from each side of the story. I feel I am missing more of the government side of things. As time has passed and the stories are written in a more sympathetic tone in regard to the Indians, the original stance by the authorities has been toned down and made more palatable for todays audience.
– Please respond to this discussion post using the # right above the post, separately from response post # 1.

Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail.
Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail.
Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations.
Climate Change and Environmental Issues
UNCOVERING BIAS AND MISSING NARRATIVES Discussion 5 -1
Thus far, you have learned how historical contexts, perspectives, and biases influence the interpretation and “telling” of historical narratives. For this discussion, reflect on what you have learned about your research question and the historical event and current event you chose. To ensure an interesting discussion, you are encouraged to think creatively about your initial posts and extend the points made by your peers. It is also important to review the module resources and read the prompts in their entirety before participating in the discussion. You should include examples and other supporting evidence from the module resources in your posts.
Discussing challenges that face our world often means investigating opinions and ideas different from your own. Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful towards your peers and instructor in your discussion post and replies.
Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.
For your initial post, address the following:
Discuss the brainstorming process you used to identify bias in your primary and secondary sources. How did you do it? Describe the strategies that were successful for you. List the primary and secondary sources.
Consider the challenges you encountered identifying the narratives about your historical event. What methods did you use to identify the absent voices in the historical narratives?
What perspectives do you think are missing from the narrative about your historical event?
Be sure to cite evidence from your sources to justify your points.
For your response posts, address the following:
How might you use your peers’ strategies to uncover another absent perspective related to your historical event or expose a historical narrative bias? If you think you cannot apply your peers’ strategies to your own event or narrative, explain why.
Remember, this assignment is graded on the quality of your initial post and at least two response posts to your classmates. If you refer to any module resources, be sure to include an attribution (or citation) for the resource.
Response Post # 1
When I am brainstorming, I feel very chaotic. I tend to end up being all over the place but ultimately I narrow down my sources based on how a reading catches my attention and how it makes me feel. I like to read each source in its entirety and make sure they include all necessary information. I was able to identify bias pretty easily because two of my sources are third person factual based readings whereas the other two are first person interviews that clearly hold bias because they contain personal thoughts, feelings, and opinions.
Absent voices can be felt in these sources because there are only a handful of survivors left from this time therefore we are left with much secondhand information. If we had access to more first person accounts, we would be able to analyze the events at a much more personal level. This also goes hand in hand with the missing perspectives. It is hard to understand what really happened without having various accounts from those that experienced. I have one source that does have a first hand account but many more would help to connect all the various pieces of information. Unfortunately, at over 100 years after the fact, this is next to impossible to achieve.
– Please respond to this discussion post using the # right above the post.
Response Post # 2
Picking my topic was very easy for me because I have always felt that despite how The Native Americans were treated, forced from their lands and relocated hundreds of miles to places deemed undesirable at the time, people tend to forget or leave them out of the conversation surrounding racial inequality or racial justice. Reading all these stories written during the time of the Wounded Knee Occupation, from several different perspectives, has shown just how divided the country was when it came to equality for the Native Americans. I have a couple sources from the government side of things, written with a definite bias against the Indians and a more forgiving viewpoint on the wrongdoing of the government. On the other hand I have several sources that were at the Occupation, whose first hand viewpoint or personal feeling may have been biased due to The Massacre a Wounded Knee.
I did some research on each source I chose to try and make sure I would be a able to add a viewpoint from each side of the story. I feel I am missing more of the government side of things. As time has passed and the stories are written in a more sympathetic tone in regard to the Indians, the original stance by the authorities has been toned down and made more palatable for todays audience.
– Please respond to this discussion post using the # right above the post, separately from response post # 1.

Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail.
Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail.
Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations.
Climate Change and Environmental Issues
UNCOVERING BIAS AND MISSING NARRATIVES Discussion 5 -1
Thus far, you have learned how historical contexts, perspectives, and biases influence the interpretation and “telling” of historical narratives. For this discussion, reflect on what you have learned about your research question and the historical event and current event you chose. To ensure an interesting discussion, you are encouraged to think creatively about your initial posts and extend the points made by your peers. It is also important to review the module resources and read the prompts in their entirety before participating in the discussion. You should include examples and other supporting evidence from the module resources in your posts.
Discussing challenges that face our world often means investigating opinions and ideas different from your own. Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful towards your peers and instructor in your discussion post and replies.
Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.
For your initial post, address the following:
Discuss the brainstorming process you used to identify bias in your primary and secondary sources. How did you do it? Describe the strategies that were successful for you. List the primary and secondary sources.
Consider the challenges you encountered identifying the narratives about your historical event. What methods did you use to identify the absent voices in the historical narratives?
What perspectives do you think are missing from the narrative about your historical event?
Be sure to cite evidence from your sources to justify your points.
For your response posts, address the following:
How might you use your peers’ strategies to uncover another absent perspective related to your historical event or expose a historical narrative bias? If you think you cannot apply your peers’ strategies to your own event or narrative, explain why.
Remember, this assignment is graded on the quality of your initial post and at least two response posts to your classmates. If you refer to any module resources, be sure to include an attribution (or citation) for the resource.
Response Post # 1
When I am brainstorming, I feel very chaotic. I tend to end up being all over the place but ultimately I narrow down my sources based on how a reading catches my attention and how it makes me feel. I like to read each source in its entirety and make sure they include all necessary information. I was able to identify bias pretty easily because two of my sources are third person factual based readings whereas the other two are first person interviews that clearly hold bias because they contain personal thoughts, feelings, and opinions.
Absent voices can be felt in these sources because there are only a handful of survivors left from this time therefore we are left with much secondhand information. If we had access to more first person accounts, we would be able to analyze the events at a much more personal level. This also goes hand in hand with the missing perspectives. It is hard to understand what really happened without having various accounts from those that experienced. I have one source that does have a first hand account but many more would help to connect all the various pieces of information. Unfortunately, at over 100 years after the fact, this is next to impossible to achieve.
– Please respond to this discussion post using the # right above the post.
Response Post # 2
Picking my topic was very easy for me because I have always felt that despite how The Native Americans were treated, forced from their lands and relocated hundreds of miles to places deemed undesirable at the time, people tend to forget or leave them out of the conversation surrounding racial inequality or racial justice. Reading all these stories written during the time of the Wounded Knee Occupation, from several different perspectives, has shown just how divided the country was when it came to equality for the Native Americans. I have a couple sources from the government side of things, written with a definite bias against the Indians and a more forgiving viewpoint on the wrongdoing of the government. On the other hand I have several sources that were at the Occupation, whose first hand viewpoint or personal feeling may have been biased due to The Massacre a Wounded Knee.
I did some research on each source I chose to try and make sure I would be a able to add a viewpoint from each side of the story. I feel I am missing more of the government side of things. As time has passed and the stories are written in a more sympathetic tone in regard to the Indians, the original stance by the authorities has been toned down and made more palatable for todays audience.
– Please respond to this discussion post using the # right above the post, separately from response post # 1.

Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail.
Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail.
Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations.

Instructions:

Part I

Who is the author? What do we know about him/her? Is she/he qualified (expert) to write about the topic?
Identify the author’s thesis. A thesis is a statement capable of proof.
Does the author state WHY the writing is important? Does the writing fulfill a “historical gap?”
Does the author state HOW he/she is going to prove the thesis?
Part II

In this part you will give several examples of how the author substantiates his/her thesis.
What proof does he/she put forward?
Choose examples carefully to show how the author validates the thesis. Be specific here.
Part III

In this part you will determine whether you are persuaded by the author’s argument. Using the examples from Part II, you will determine whether they in fact validate the thesis. Use your TEXTBOOK as guide. Does the author’s claims match or follow in line with the textbook. (This will take you some time to flesh out.)
Part IV

In this part you will evaluate sources and footnotes. Are the footnotes accurate and to the point? What sources has the author consulted? Are both sides of the conflict represented to the same degree, or is the author relying too heavily on only one set of sources?
Part V

Conclusion. Does the author prove his/her point? Would you recommend this book for others to read? Why or why not?
This review needs to be in an essay. You are NOT to simply number the page and answer the questions. If you do this, your grade will be reduced by 50%.

Compare and contrast sexual and asexual reproduction in flowering plants.

Answering the question above, apply it into these questions below:
What did I learn in this module that was new information to me?

What misconceptions about the topic covered did I have coming in?

What information did I get to help me clarify these misconceptions?

How is the information presented in this module relevant to how I can maintain my lifestyle in the Earth’s environment today and in years to come?

What are recommendations that I can make to myself that will help me remember difficult topics from this module as I continue in this class?

What is the solution that author provides to the problem outlined earlier in the essay? How did the author try to convince their reader that the solution would work? Provide two quoted examples and elaborate on how the author used the examples to convince the reader of the viability of their solution.
How did the author use the problem to set up the solution? What connections did the author form in their solution section back to the problem? Provide two quoted examples of connections the author made and whether or not those connections were effective.
According to you, was the solution provided by the author practical? Why or why not? What criterion did you use to evaluate the solution’s practicality? How do you think your criterion would have changed if you were directly impacted by the problem the author proposed?

Submit on Canvas 1-2 pages (typed single-spaced) by April 4 at 8 a.m.: (1) your tentative analytic title for your paper, (2) your ideas regarding empirical and theoretical social science books and articles that you plan to link with your fieldwork and community organization experience, and (3) your draft Final Paper recommendations for policy and future research. A Guide to Writing Sociology Papers is useful.

This assignment will be at least 1500 words. Address each bulleted item (topic) in detail including the questions that follow each bullet. There should be three (3) sections in your paper; one for each bullet below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear brief heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Include a “Conclusion” section that summarizes all topics.
This week you will reflect upon accountability in healthcare and address the following questions:
Briefly define an Accountable Care Organization (ACO) and how it impacts health care providers:
How do ACOs differ from the health maintenance organizations (HMOs) of earlier years
What role does health information technology (HIT) play in the newer models of care?
What is the benefit of hospitals partnering with primary care providers?
How does bundling payments contain healthcare costs?
How does pay for performance (P4P) improve quality care?
Briefly discuss the value-based purchasing program?
How do value-based purchasing (VBP) programs affect reimbursement to hospitals?
Who benefits the most from value-based reimbursement and why?
How does the VBP program measure hospital performance?

Assessment Description

Write an essay of 1,400 to 1,500 words on an approach to health care reform.

Scenario: You will create a fictitious health care reform plan. Based on what you have learned throughout class on U.S. and international health care programs, consider what reforms you would implement.
Include to the following points in your essay:
Describe the conflicts between existing federal and state policies.
Explain the Standard of Care Approach (nutrition, family support, spirituality) versus the current approach used.
Describe how this reform ensures public health preparedness.
Identify the percentage of the gross domestic product you would propose to be set aside for health care.
Use at least three references, including the textbook.Use at least three references, including the textbook.Use at least three references, including the textbook.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Rubric Criteria

Federal and State Policy
22 points

Standard of Care Approach
22 points

Health Preparedness
22 points

Percent of GDP for Health Care
22 points

Thesis Development and Purpose
6.6 points

Paragraph Development and Transitions
6.6 points

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.5 points

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
1.1 points

Documentation of Sources
2.2 points

TOTAL 110 POINTS

Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Go to the National Organization for Human Service site and read “Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals”.
Go to the Social Work Today site and read Eye on Ethics: Making Difficult Decisions.
View the video “Social Work Ethical Dilemma”
In a two- to three-page paper, answer the following questions:
In the case shown in the video, what impact do this client’s culture and ethnicity have?
What are three issues from the NOHS Ethical Standards that apply to this case and how would you address these with the client?
Explain the importance of confidentiality with this client.
Explain how “client autonomy” (the client’s ability to choose his/her behavior and involvement with treatment) applies in this case.
Explain how the human service worker’s reliability for the client and responsibility to the process of assisting the client contribute to this case.
Process your own reaction to this case and how you would sort out the way to respond appropriately.
When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself and submit a copy to your instructor using the Assignment submission page by the end of the workshop.
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Go to the National Organization for Human Service site and read “Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals”.
Go to the Social Work Today site and read Eye on Ethics: Making Difficult Decisions.
View the video “Social Work Ethical Dilemma”
In a two- to three-page paper, answer the following questions:
In the case shown in the video, what impact do this client’s culture and ethnicity have?
What are three issues from the NOHS Ethical Standards that apply to this case and how would you address these with the client?
Explain the importance of confidentiality with this client.
Explain how “client autonomy” (the client’s ability to choose his/her behavior and involvement with treatment) applies in this case.
Explain how the human service worker’s reliability for the client and responsibility to the process of assisting the client contribute to this case.
Process your own reaction to this case and how you would sort out the way to respond appropriately.
When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself and submit a copy to your instructor using the Assignment submission page by the end of the workshop.
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Go to the National Organization for Human Service site and read “Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals”.
Go to the Social Work Today site and read Eye on Ethics: Making Difficult Decisions.
View the video “Social Work Ethical Dilemma”
In a two- to three-page paper, answer the following questions:
In the case shown in the video, what impact do this client’s culture and ethnicity have?
What are three issues from the NOHS Ethical Standards that apply to this case and how would you address these with the client?
Explain the importance of confidentiality with this client.
Explain how “client autonomy” (the client’s ability to choose his/her behavior and involvement with treatment) applies in this case.
Explain how the human service worker’s reliability for the client and responsibility to the process of assisting the client contribute to this case.
Process your own reaction to this case and how you would sort out the way to respond appropriately.
When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself and submit a copy to your instructor using the Assignment submission page by the end of the workshop.
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Go to the National Organization for Human Service site and read “Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals”.
Go to the Social Work Today site and read Eye on Ethics: Making Difficult Decisions.
View the video “Social Work Ethical Dilemma”
In a two- to three-page paper, answer the following questions:
In the case shown in the video, what impact do this client’s culture and ethnicity have?
What are three issues from the NOHS Ethical Standards that apply to this case and how would you address these with the client?
Explain the importance of confidentiality with this client.
Explain how “client autonomy” (the client’s ability to choose his/her behavior and involvement with treatment) applies in this case.
Explain how the human service worker’s reliability for the client and responsibility to the process of assisting the client contribute to this case.
Process your own reaction to this case and how you would sort out the way to respond appropriately.
When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself and submit a copy to your instructor using the Assignment submission page by the end of the workshop.
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Go to the National Organization for Human Service site and read “Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals”.
Go to the Social Work Today site and read Eye on Ethics: Making Difficult Decisions.
View the video “Social Work Ethical Dilemma”
In a two- to three-page paper, answer the following questions:
In the case shown in the video, what impact do this client’s culture and ethnicity have?
What are three issues from the NOHS Ethical Standards that apply to this case and how would you address these with the client?
Explain the importance of confidentiality with this client.
Explain how “client autonomy” (the client’s ability to choose his/her behavior and involvement with treatment) applies in this case.
Explain how the human service worker’s reliability for the client and responsibility to the process of assisting the client contribute to this case.
Process your own reaction to this case and how you would sort out the way to respond appropriately.
When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself and submit a copy to your instructor using the Assignment submission page by the end of the workshop.
PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THE LINKS BELOW THEY WILL LEAD YOU TO THE VIDEO AND READINGS FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

READING 1 https://www.nationalhumanservices.org/ethical-standards-for-hs-professionals

READING 2 :
https://www.socialworktoday.com/news/eoe_101402.shtml

VIDEO: https://youtu.be/PgLlZm5xhpI

Using the four elements in the paragraph practice example, (hook, bridge, summary, and thesis), write an introductory paragraph of your own about Langston Hughes’ short story “Thank You, Ma’am”.

You are to write a three-to-five-page MLA-style research paper that will profile three postsecondary (after-high school) paths that you are considering pursuing. You are to write a three-to-five-page MLA-style research paper that will profile three postsecondary (after-high school) paths that you are considering pursuing. The information necessary to present each path will vary due to what each path is. For example, profiling a college or university may include information such as location, financial aid, study programs, housing, school mission, etc. On the other hand, profiling a career may state its entry-level requirements, training expectations, potential salary and benefits, availability of jobs, etc. It just depends on the type of path you’re detailing. Each path must include a minimum of five relevant details that provide an adequate profile of the path.
The information necessary to present each path will vary due to what each path is. For example, profiling a college or university may include information such as location, financial aid, study programs, housing, school mission, etc. On the other hand, profiling a career may state its entry-level requirements, training expectations, potential salary and benefits, availability of jobs, etc. It just depends on the type of path you’re detailing. Each path must include a minimum of five relevant details that provide an adequate profile of the path. You must have a minimum of two sources for each path you profile. One of the sources for each path must be a person closely associated with the path (such as an admissions counselor, military recruiter, a person currently in the career field you are considering, etc.). You can interview this person either one-on-one in person or via email or phone conversation. The other source may be a school website, printed pamphlets or handouts, etc.

All quoted materials in your paper are to be cited according to MLA guidelines. (We will review these guidelines as the due date approaches.)

You must have a minimum of two sources for each path you profile. One of the sources for each path must be a person closely associated with the path (such as an admissions counselor, military recruiter, a person currently in the career field you are considering, etc.). You can interview this person either one-on-one in person or via email or phone conversation. The other source may be a school website, printed pamphlets or handouts, etc.

All quoted materials in your paper are to be cited according to MLA guidelines. (We will review these guidelines as the due date approaches.)