Premium Writing

Overview: Now that you have given an overview of your historic figure Franklin Roosevelt, I want you to evaluate them as a person. No one is perfect and that is true for historical figures as well as contemporary ones, and so I want you to describe three ways your person could have done a better job, been a better person, or generally did not live up to their potential. I would also like you to use two secondary sources (lectures, readings, or the book you chose) but also two primary sources to make your Critique. I recommend primary sources created by your figure or by their detractors, but it is up to you.

Structure: Your paper should be between 2-3 pages double-spaced and should follow a five-paragraph essay format and the first thing you need to do is to come up with a general criticism of the figure that explains why the failed in the three ways you are going to describe. There are two major categories that might be useful to you: societal failings (blind spots that were common among people of the time) and personal failings (personal prejudice or character flaws). Once you have selected a flaw, choose three examples of when that demonstrate that flaw and these will be your three body paragraphs. In your last paragraph you should summarize the examples you just gave and end with a thought of how history might be different if your figure had acted differently.

Citations: For this assignment I want you to use at least one primary source and two secondary sources. Whenever you use your sources, you should cite it using Chicago Manual of Style in either a footnote or an endnote. Check the Finding Sources and Citing Sources pages in Lesson 2.3 if you would like a reminder on where to look for sources and how to cite them. Make sure to use the correct format for your footnotes well as it is a part of your grade.

For this forum, consider the following examples of defensiveness. Pick two of these examples and identify the defense mechanism at work, explain your reasoning, then use Gibb’s analysis of defensive communication to explain how the defensiveness might be overcome.

A spouse refuses to speak to their partner because the partner was late for dinner and did not call.
A student tells their professor that it is the professor’s “fault” that they are on academic probation, which will “ruin their life.”
A parent tells her teen not to binge drink and the teen yells, “Who are you to judge me? You did the same thing when you were my age!”
An employer tells a recent college graduate that they know more because they went to the “school of hard knocks,” and “you think you’re better than the rest of us—well, I’ve got news for you—you’re not! I’ve forgotten more than you will ever know about this business!”
A client in treatment for alcohol dependence tells the therapist that they got drunk because they were at a party and they “had to drink to fit in.” The client goes on to say, “One or two drinks isn’t going to kill me, so stop overreacting!!”For this forum, consider the following examples of defensiveness. Pick two of these examples and identify the defense mechanism at work, explain your reasoning, then use Gibb’s analysis of defensive communication to explain how the defensiveness might be overcome.

Students are to read Chapters 1-2 of the Ladson-Billings text and choose one of the chapters and one of the subtopics discussed by the author within the chapter. Based on the context and content, students are to identify two current (2019 to present) peer-reviewed journal articles, which align with the topic and submit an essay brief (five-page maximum) integrating the literature as appropriate.
Adrien O.
6 minutes ago
5 pages maximum

Why is life challenging for both the “pieds noirs,” as Kramer refers to Martins, after returning to mainland France, and the Ilics in Sweden? (You may choose to focus on either one of the articles or include them both.)

This is a senior seminar course. I am majoring in Economics (Economic Finance Concentration).

Presenting this Article by Swindell, Who Benefits from the Presence of Professional Sports Teams? The Implications for Public Funding of Stadiums and Arenas, PAR

Powerpoint should not be any more than 5 slides. Clean and Professional.

Introduction (1 slide)
Literature Review/Theory (1 slide)
Methods & Data Collection (1 slide)
Data Presentation/Findings (1slides)
Conclusion (1 slide)

Be brief and concise.
Focus on the subject.
Attract attention; indicate interesting details.
If possible, use relevant visual illustrations (pictures, maps, charts graphs, etc.).
Use bullet points or numbers to structure the text.
Make clear statements about the essence/results of the topic/research.

I have attached the PDF file of the article.

First, read and think about Cruz et al., 2005. Feel free to use the Research Article Worksheet to help you organize your thoughts before the class discussion.

After write, in your own words, a brief summary (100-150 words) of the article. You will also include a full APA citation of your paper. I have created a Sample Annotation to give you an idea of what I am expecting.

Next, read and think about Myers et al., 2015. Feel free to use the Research Article Worksheet to help you organize your thoughts before the class discussion.

After the class discussion, write, in your own words, a brief summary (100-150 words) of the article. You will also include a full APA citation of your paper.

TikTok has had a profound impact on our lives, including our economic futures, political controversies, and culture itself. Media are the tools that enable sending and
receiving messages, shaping how ideas and social movements spread or fade out. As the popularity of TikTok grows, its significant influence has developed into a cultural phenomenon.
In this assignment, you will research, analyze, and craft a paper addressing TikTok, and you will draw connections between Jack Lules Globalization & Media, Social Proof Theory, and Technological Determinism.

Provide direct quotes from Jack Lules Globalization and Media book.

Bias should generally serve the negative impacts on culture.

Please cite sources in APA style.

Give your ethical opinion about this topic. Dissect it and support your arguments using facts from the book and ethical theory.

Book: Doing Ethics Moral Reasoning, Theory, and Contemporary Issues 6th Edition by Lewis Vaughn. Chapter 16, Topic: Ethical Dilemmas page: 548

You will pick an Agency (no duplicates) and answer the following questions in detail; include at least one example per question. (For example: NIH; FEMA; NIMH, etc.) At our second class meeting, you will bring the Name of three (3) Agencies you are interested in for your report – Approval of your Agency will be granted during this class. PRESENTATION OF YOUR PROJECT ARE SCHEDULED ON THE SYLLABUS.

What is the Agency charged with performing? (Mission Statement)
Under what/whose jurisdiction?
When was it formed?
Why was it formed?
Who is administratively in charge of the agency?
How is personnel obtained for the Agency?
What are their qualifications?
What are the Policy and Procedures the agency must abide by?
How are they carried out?
What are the laws the Agency sets/follows?

University of Phoenix

Due Thursday: Discussion Preparation

Individually, search the University Library for 1 peer-reviewed research study with possible ethical concerns. When you select your research study, consider the possible ethical issues in the research process, such as sampling, methodology, data collection, etc. Focus on the research study, not the health issue.

Share your selected research study with your group.

Read the research studies shared by the other group members to prepare for your discussion.

Note: You may use a research study you identified in a previous assignment, if appropriate. However, you may not use any article discussed in this group discussion for your Wk 5 – Summative Assessment: Ethical Scenario Presentation.

Due Monday: Discussion
Discuss the following with your group:

What are the possible ethical issues within the research studies?
How might ethical concerns influence the research outcomes of these research studies?
What is the research design validity and how can research bias can impact validity? (Hint: Research how design validity and instrumentation validity are different concepts.)
How can stakeholders externally influence health care research?
What conclusions can you draw about ethics and validity in the research process based on the research studies your group discussed?