Premium Writing

PLEASE MAKE SURE THE SOURCES ARE ARTICLES OF PEOPLE THEMSELVES AND ARE TRUE TO THE HOW ART IMPACT A PERSONS LIFE POSTIVITLY.
FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project? FINAL PROJECT: Develop a project (at least 3-4 full pages) with the following sections:
Section 1: Summarize two of the sources you discovered. Here, very briefly describe the main idea, or thesis, of the sources. That is, describe the specific insight the sources offer to readers. Be careful not to blur away the insight. For instance, notice how the second example attempts to
offer Steinbeck’s particular point about the relationship between early American settlers and the land (in Chapter 3 of the textbook):
Blurred Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes early Americans’ treatment of the land.
Focused Summary: In “Americans and the Land,” John Steinbeck describes the American settlers’ disdain for the frontier and their “childlike” aggression, which destroyed the early forests, extinguished species, and diminished the continent’s fertility.
Section 2: Analyze the sources. Here we are not evaluating the worth (arguing that the sources are good, bad, agreeable, etc.), Instead, we are explaining how the sources fit into a broader conversation about the topic. Consider the following questions:
• Who is the intended audience? Scholars? The general public? Any particular group?
• What kinds of credentials do the writers have (if you can find information on them)?
• How do the sources speak to the audience/what is their tone? Are they formal or informal?
Are they serious or do they contain humorous elements? Do they attempt to elicit emotional
reactions from the reader, or are they purely fact-based and informational?
• What do the writers seem to value? What ideas or principles or hopes do you detect?
• How do the sources deal with the audience’s potential questions, concerns, or doubts? Do
they ever address potential concerns or doubts directly? Do the authors utilize research, statistics, or data to support their claims?
Section 3: Synthesize ideas. Here, explain how the sources relate to the claims you made in your previous essay (Project #2). In other words, explain how the sources respond to, undermine, extend, challenge, or reinforce the claims you make about the relationship. Consider the following questions in your synthesis:
• How do the sources contribute to your understanding of the topic or your ability to engage in this conversation? (What knowledge did it help you to construct?)
• What further questions do the sources provoke?
• How do the sources (or one of the sources) reveal some layer of the relationship that you did
not imagine or discuss?
• What different take or perspective do the sources have? For instance, do they see the public
value of the relationship differently? Do they not address some psychological or philosophical layer that seemed essential to your project?

Watch this YouTube video:

2. Based on your watching, write a 500-word essay about the relationship between psychology and faith.

Success: How do we define it, how do we achieve the optimal brain for it, and how does our religion affect the way we see it?

Do not summarize Brown’s presentation, but present what is your opinion regarding this topic.

Requirements:

Write a 500-word paper.

Refer to the Bible and other 2-3 peer-reviewed and/or spiritual writings in your essay.

Follow the American Psychology Association (APA) writing style (double-spaced, 12 points Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins).

500-word count:

Title/Cover and Reference pages are not counted in the 500 words.

Your paper does include also the Title/Cover and References page.

Do not quote.

Use the third person pronouns in this academic paper.

Please answer the following questions for your initial post:

I have uploaded all necessary docs & links.
No outside sources please.

Question 1 (12+ sentences, 2 paragraphs). America’s historical treatment of racial groups has traditionally been very much shaped by the state of America’s economy. In approximately 12 sentences, discuss two historical examples of how the state of America’s economy shaped its treatment of Mexican Americans. In other words, please discuss how U.S. economic interests and new developments in the U.S. economy impacted the way Mexican Americans got treated and racialized in this country. For each example, please discuss the treatment of Mexican Americans and then connect it to an economic change, development, or motivation. Make sure to identify this economic change or development in the process, and please start a new paragraph when discussing each example. Each example must be based on this week’s assigned readings or videos.

Question 2 (6+ sentences, 1 paragraph) Please discuss 1 example of Mexican Americans exerting their agency in the U.S. during the 19th or 20th centuries. Please refer to this week’s assigned readings or videos for this question.

Last, but not least, please follow the prompt instructions carefully and break your post into multiple paragraphs (two paragraphs for question #1 and one paragraph for question #2).

Chapter 8 Reading – Developing and Supporting Innovators in Public Service Organizations
1. Which of the models of individual agency in innovation public services (the individual characteristics, the structural, or the contingency models), do you find most convincing and why? What evidence can you find to support this belief from your knowledge of public services provision in your region?
2. To what extent do you believe that it is possible to bring about innovation by individual agency alone, as envisaged in the ‘hero innovator’ concept? What evidence for and against this role can you find from your knowledge of public services provision in your region?
3. Based on your own experiences of public services provision, how important do you think is the relationship of a PSO to its environment in developing its innovative capacity?PSO to its environment in developing its innovative capacity?

Read Book : Brown & Osborne SP (2012) Capter 8

Adding to this week’s chapter reading and lecture, it is important to also consider the value of sport, recreation, and fitness facilities and whether a facility is sustainable. Essentially, we want to ask the questions of:

What is the value of a facility?
How is that value achieved?

As one method to answering these questions, take a look at this video and their strategy for measuring value.

Select one sport, recreation, or fitness facility in your local community to analyze. Select one criterion from each of the three elements of value (economic, social, environmental) to research and apply to the facility you selected. Then write a case review (no less than 500 words, single-spaced) to report your findings/thoughts about the definitions of the 3 criteria you selected, a description and link to the facility you selected, and your analysis of how the facility rates in terms of the criterion you selected.

Please be sure to cite your sources including the web link as well as provide a link to the selected facility. Please use APA 7th edition for citing your sources.Adding to this week’s chapter reading and lecture, it is important to also consider the value of sport, recreation, and fitness facilities and whether a facility is sustainable. Essentially, we want to ask the questions of:

What is the value of a facility?
How is that value achieved?
As one method to answering these questions, take a look at this video and their strategy for measuring value.

Select one sport, recreation, or fitness facility in your local community to analyze. Select one criterion from each of the three elements of value (economic, social, environmental) to research and apply to the facility you selected. Then write a case review (no less than 500 words, single-spaced) to report your findings/thoughts about the definitions of the 3 criteria you selected, a description and link to the facility you selected, and your analysis of how the facility rates in terms of the criterion you selected.

Please be sure to cite your sources including the web link as well as provide a link to the selected facility. Please use APA 7th edition for citing your sources.Adding to this week’s chapter reading and lecture, it is important to also consider the value of sport, recreation, and fitness facilities and whether a facility is sustainable. Essentially, we want to ask the questions of:

What is the value of a facility?
How is that value achieved?
As one method to answering these questions, take a look at this video and their strategy for measuring value.

Select one sport, recreation, or fitness facility in your local community to analyze. Select one criterion from each of the three elements of value (economic, social, environmental) to research and apply to the facility you selected. Then write a case review (no less than 500 words, single-spaced) to report your findings/thoughts about the definitions of the 3 criteria you selected, a description and link to the facility you selected, and your analysis of how the facility rates in terms of the criterion you selected.

Please be sure to cite your sources including the web link as well as provide a link to the selected facility. Please use APA 7th edition for citing your sources.

Please see ALL attachments and review all instructions before writing this letter. Your writing a letter to an elected official to address a cause which is provided in the instructions. DON’T MAKE UP YOUR OWN CAUSE.A TEMPLATE OF HOW TO WRITE THE LETTER IS PROVIDED FOR YOU AS REFERENCE OF HOW TO COMPLETE THE ASSIGNMENTPlease see ALL attachments and review all instructions before writing this letter. Your writing a letter to an elected official to address a cause which is provided in the instructions.

answer the question why is it important for indigenous people to have a “standing as people in international law”?

i need in text citation
from this 2 source only:

UN human rights report shows that Canada is failing Indigenous peoples

and from an article by Nicole Schabus, “Going International to decolonize” (pp.62 -66), in Whose Land is it Anyway?article by Nicole Schabus, “Going International to decolonize” (pp.62 -66), in Whose Land is it Anyway?

refernce from pages 62-66 only

The advanced practice nurse is updating the plan of care of nursing home patients with hypertension.
Briefly describe the therapeutic actions of drugs affecting blood pressure (diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCB, sympathetic nervous system drugs).
What important teaching points should be addressed for patients receiving antihypertensive drugs?The advanced practice nurse is updating the plan of care of nursing home patients with hypertension.
Briefly describe the therapeutic actions of drugs affecting blood pressure (diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCB, sympathetic nervous system drugs).
What important teaching points should be addressed for patients receiving antihypertensive drugs?

PROMPT:
The Chief Executive Office has recently charged your CISO to present a comprehensive strategy for migration to the cloud. You and your group mates have been selected for a newly formed cloud migration team. The CISO is expecting you to create a detailed report containing strategic, operational, and technical aspects of the potential migration. The report should include business, technical, risk, and legal analysis. It will be presented at the next BOD meeting in April.

Assumptions:
the company wants to have maximum control over the environment
the company has multiple offices across and operates in American and European markets
any major security incident would have a critical impact on the company’s operations and financials

all i want is the intro and the references has to be online links

OUTLINE:-
intro : background of the business (Blackrock), the company wants to have maximum control over the environment
the company has multiple offices across and operates in American and European markets
any major security incident would have a critical impact on the company’s operations and financials

Weight: 10% of course grade
Correlation and Regression Analysis Using Sun Coast Data Set/Files (Attached)
Using the Sun Coast data set, perform a correlation analysis, simple regression analysis,
and multiple regression analysis, and interpret the results.
Please follow the Unit V Scholarly Activity template to complete your assignment.
You will utilize Microsoft Excel ToolPak for this assignment.
Example:
-Correlation Analysis
Restate the hypotheses.
Provide data output results from Excel Toolpak.
Interpret the correlation analysis results
Simple Regression Analysis
Restate the hypotheses.
Provide data output results from Excel Toolpak.
Interpret the simple regression analysis results
Multiple Regression Analysis
Restate the hypotheses.
Provide data output results from Excel Toolpak.
Interpret the multiple regression analysis results.
The title and reference pages do not count toward the page requirement for this assignment. This assignment should be no less than two pages in length, follow APA-style formatting and guidelines, and use references and citations as necessary.