Premium Writing

In a paper of 1000-1500 words, write a book review of N. T. Wright’s Simply Christian. Be sure to cite the book abundantly, including page numbers, and use the following template:
For your introduction to the paper, first identify the author’s thesis, then provide an analytical statement about the author’s thesis. This analytical statement should reflect what you will argue throughout the rest of this paper. (10 points)
Analysis: how does the author argue, defend and develop the thesis? Ultimately, to what conclusions does the author come? This portion of the paper ought to be around 500 words. (20 points)
Synthesis: How does the author’s perspective compare or contrast to what you have learned from other sources in this course (lectures, other readings, etc.)? (20 points)
Reflection: What new things did you learn from the book and what issues did the book leave unresolved for you? (15 points)
Be sure that the entire paper is well-written, edited for mistakes and clarity, and worthy of submission. (10 points)
Total: /75 points

OPTION 2
“When psychiatrists and psychologists are faced with a dangerous outpatient
client, the balance to disclose such information outweighs any obligation of
confidentiality. The concerns regarding many overseas cases of dangerous
patients, are too serious to be ignored here in Australia.”
Critically discuss these statements and whether you agree or not. Your response
should explain what model would be appropriate in Victoria.OPTION 2
“When psychiatrists and psychologists are faced with a dangerous outpatient
client, the balance to disclose such information outweighs any obligation of
confidentiality. The concerns regarding many overseas cases of dangerous
patients, are too serious to be ignored here in Australia.”
Critically discuss these statements and whether you agree or not. Your response
should explain what model would be appropriate in Victoria.

Write a dialogue between two fictional characters (students you make up) who have both just finished reading one of the literary works listed below. (Hereafter called “the work.” You must choose a work from this list; no exceptions.) The time of the conversation must be the present. The two students must be living in the United States. Both of them must be thoughtful, serious people who are familiar with the basic vocabulary of literary analysis.

Write a dialogue between two fictional characters (students you make up) who have both just finished reading one of the literary works listed below. (Hereafter called “the work.” You must choose a work from this list; no exceptions.) The time of the conversation must be the present. The two students must be living in the United States. Both of them must be thoughtful, serious people who are familiar with the basic vocabulary of literary analysis.

In 2-3 pages, write a formal, organized essay that addresses the following questions:
1. What are the social sciences and what do they have in common?
2. What important questions can the social sciences address and answer?
3. What are the special challenges in teaching the social sciences to a socio-economically and culturally diverse demographic in today’s classroom?
• The essay must be double-spaced, and formatted according to APA, MLA, or Chicago style. Please see (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html) for templates for each format
• The essay must be written in a college/professional level tone and style. (It is strongly recommended that you make use of appropriate resources, including the writing center.)
• In supporting its answers to these three questions, the essay must use no fewer than three college-appropriate resources. (Internet sources are acceptable.)
• The essay must use APA, MLA or Chicago style in-text citation and include a works cited page.
• The essay will be screened for plagiarism using the SafeAssign tool. This database includes papers submitted previously by students in this course. Papers found to have an unacceptable SafeAssign match (as determined by the instructor) will receive an automatic “zero” (0).

Think about your practicum project and the issue you identified in Module 3. What issue or problem did you identify? (Note: You may have also selected a prominent nursing practice issue that is of interest to you.) Analyze scholarly literature related to the issue/problem of and strategies for resolution. Review different nursing theories that could support a resolution to the practice issue or problem you have identified. NOTE: Many students may be inclined to choose Lewin’s Change Theory. This is not a nursing theory and would not apply to the required content for this assignment.

In a four to six-page written paper, address the following.
Discuss how nursing theory can be applied to solve the practice issue/problem.
A minimum of four scholarly nursing literature references must be used.
Describe the selected issue or problem, and address the following.
What is the specific issue or problem?
Why should the nursing profession care about this issue or problem?
What does the nursing literature say about this issue or problem, including its frequency of occurrence?
Who are the stakeholders affected by the issue or problem?
Identify a nursing theory that provides a framework to support the selected practice issue or problem. Provide an overview of the nursing theory. Use scholarly nursing literature.
Use the selected nursing theory to develop a strategy to resolve the selected practice issue or problem. Use scholarly literature.
Assignment
Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
Title page, pagination, subheadings, body of paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the most current edition of the manual.

Issue:between 7p-9p in elderly population in nursing home would decrease if multi factorial interventions included hourly rounds and increased staffing

1100 4 pages plus reference page

Introduction
a. Attention-getter: An apt quotation, a striking example, or a brief anecdote may serve to capture your readers insert and focus it on the point you plan to make.
b. Background information: Historical background of the problem and its development. Most of the problem we will be researching did not occur overnight. There will be a history of events that led to the current situation. When and how did it start? Who is suffering? How many?
C. Thesis: this should clearly state the controlling idea(s) of your paper which is base upon explaining a problem and discussing the possible solutions.

ll. Causes of the problem:
a. Discussion of contributing and significant causes of this problem. Your research should provide data which may include case histories, examples, statistical evidence or authoritative quotations. Who is causing the suffering? Why?
b. Who is benefiting from the situation? T
c. What national or international policies contribute to the problem? Who is contributing indirectly to the problem by not taking steps to stop it? The only genuine restriction is that the materials presented in the body must provide clear and relevant support for your thesis.

lll. Effects of the problem:
a. Laws, regulations, and government programs that directly impact this issue can be effective evidence.
b. Discussion of the effects this problem has on society. On people ( immediate and long term). On the environment. On the economy.
c. What are the short – term and long term impacts? What does the future hold in respect to this issue?
lv. Solutions to the problem (this section will be longer than any other):
a. What logical solutions have been proposed in the past? How did these work out?
Success/failure
b. What are solutions proposed for the future?
c. It would be acceptable for you to make assumptions and offer an opinion or recommend a course of action in addition to those offer by authoritative sources. You may also analyze, evaluate, and explain the most favorable course of action.

V. Conclusion
a. Deductions: what deductions can you logically draw from your research?
b. The conclusion that will serve you best is one that briefly pulls together the main points of your essay and reinforces your controlling idea (thesis).
c. The conclusion of a problem- solution essay should include a restatement of the problem and the benefits of the proposed solution.
d. Call to action – what do you want your reader to do now or or to better understand?

ENGL 224 Midterm Assignment • Close Reading and Concepts in American Literature, 1867-1934
• Due Sunday by midnight via eLearn (submission under Week 4 topic)
• 15% of grade
• 3-4 double-spaced pages in 12 pt. Times New Roman or equivalent; 1-inch margins*
Description: This session we have practiced close reading, the foundational method of literary study, as a way to slow down our interpretive pace, to show our thought process, and to build evidence-based arguments about our course readings. While we’ve practiced close reading in our Discussion Forums and Reading Responses, for the midterm you will have the opportunity to build a coherent, focused argument in the shape of a formal essay. This assignment will require you to define a thesis and to support that thesis with evidence from the passage/text of your choice. Additionally, you will link your thesis and support to a concept (or lens of analysis) that we have discussed so far this semester. Process: You may work with any text we’ve discussed this semester, beginning small with a passage of your choice.
Follow the steps of a close reading, as outlined in Week 2 of our semester. In doing so, link your analysis to a broader concept we’ve introduced in Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4.
1. Choose one passage from one of the following texts:
• Walt Whitman, “Oh Captain! My Captain!” or “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry”
• Emily Dickinson, “I Taste a Liquor Never Brewed” or “The Soul Selects Her Own Society”
• Charlotte Perkins Gilman, “The Yellow Wallpaper”
• Kate Chopin, “Désirée’s Baby”
• Stephen Crane, “The Open Boat”
• Pauline Hopkins, “Talma Gordon”
• Booker T. Washington, from Up from Slavery
• W. E. B. Du Bois, “Of Our Spiritual Strivings” from The Souls of Black Folk
• William Carlos Williams, “This Is Just to Say”
• Marianne Moore, “Poetry”
2. Retype your passage choice (just a selection from your reading, unless you are using a shorter poem) before beginning your paper; this does not count toward page length.
Identify one concept that you will use as your analytic lens. Concepts might include:
3. Postbellum Democracy
4. Accommodation
5. Double Consciousness
6. Immigration
7. High Modernism
8. American Modernism
9. Realism/Naturalism
10. “Amalgamation/Miscegenation”
11. “The Woman Question”
12. Local Color
13. The Color Line
* Remember, I grade these on a computer! I can very easily re-format your submission (even a pdf) to meet these requirements to ensure you’re reaching the page length. † For shorter poems (William Carlos Williams and Emily Dickinson), you may select the entire poem as your “passage.
3. Develop a thesis that you pose early in your paper (ideally, within the first paragraph). Your thesis should use the first-person pronoun “I” to show your reader your unique intervention. Example: “In this paper, I argue that, based on the evidence from this passage’s staged confrontation between the men and the birds in Stephen Crane’s “The Open Boat,” Crane uses the concept of realism to show man’s struggle against nature.
[you will obviously come up with something better. This is just a sample; do not use it in your own paper! We’ve talked enough about the birds!)
4. For the rest of your paper, follow the steps of a close reading, showing your reader how each point supports your thesis. Those steps are:
Understanding
Noticing the lexicon
Explaining your findings
Connecting your passage to the larger context of the text
5. Conclude by thinking of the larger implications and significance of your argument. Do not just restate your thesis. Questions to think about when drafting a conclusion:
• What does this detailed argument about the passage reveal about the world in which the author wrote?
• What does this concept tell us about literature of the time period in which the author is writing?
Helpful Hints!
• Your paper should have a title.
• The attached rubric is your friend! Make sure you are aware of what “A” level work looks like before you begin your paper.
• You may have to take your paper through several drafts! Unlike Reading Responses, this is a polished, formal paper. It is not something you can complete the night before/day of the due date.
• You should not use any outside sources, beyond course materials. Remember that TurnItIn is turned on for all assignments and gives me a very detailed and accurate picture of unique (or not-so-unique) work. Remind yourself of UC’s plagiarism policy (linked on syllabus) if you have to.
• When quoting from the text (and you should definitely do this!), use citation form: “any visible expression of nature would surely be pelted with his jeers” (Crane 1059).
• I am happy to read drafts, intro paragraphs, thesis statements, I can only accept drafts 48 hours in advance of the due date.
• On our Week 4 eLearn topic, there is an anonymous sample successful Reading Response close reading exercise. Examining this example may help show the process as you prepare your own work. Remember, though, the Midterm is a polished, formal paper. Please use Grammarly and/or run a spelling and grammar check before submitting.
ENGL 224 Midterm Assignment • Close Reading and Concepts in American Literature, 1867-1934
• Due Sunday by midnight via eLearn (submission under Week 4 topic)
• 15% of grade
• 3-4 double-spaced pages in 12 pt. Times New Roman or equivalent; 1-inch margins*
Description: This session we have practiced close reading, the foundational method of literary study, as a way to slow down our interpretive pace, to show our thought process, and to build evidence-based arguments about our course readings. While we’ve practiced close reading in our Discussion Forums and Reading Responses, for the midterm you will have the opportunity to build a coherent, focused argument in the shape of a formal essay. This assignment will require you to define a thesis and to support that thesis with evidence from the passage/text of your choice. Additionally, you will link your thesis and support to a concept (or lens of analysis) that we have discussed so far this semester. Process: You may work with any text we’ve discussed this semester, beginning small with a passage of your choice.
Follow the steps of a close reading, as outlined in Week 2 of our semester. In doing so, link your analysis to a broader concept we’ve introduced in Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4.
1. Choose one passage from one of the following texts:
• Walt Whitman, “Oh Captain! My Captain!” or “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry”
• Emily Dickinson, “I Taste a Liquor Never Brewed” or “The Soul Selects Her Own Society”
• Charlotte Perkins Gilman, “The Yellow Wallpaper”
• Kate Chopin, “Désirée’s Baby”
• Stephen Crane, “The Open Boat”
• Pauline Hopkins, “Talma Gordon”
• Booker T. Washington, from Up from Slavery
• W. E. B. Du Bois, “Of Our Spiritual Strivings” from The Souls of Black Folk
• William Carlos Williams, “This Is Just to Say”
• Marianne Moore, “Poetry”
2. Retype your passage choice (just a selection from your reading, unless you are using a shorter poem) before beginning your paper; this does not count toward page length.
Identify one concept that you will use as your analytic lens. Concepts might include:
3. Postbellum Democracy
4. Accommodation
5. Double Consciousness
6. Immigration
7. High Modernism
8. American Modernism
9. Realism/Naturalism
10. “Amalgamation/Miscegenation”
11. “The Woman Question”
12. Local Color
13. The Color Line
* Remember, I grade these on a computer! I can very easily re-format your submission (even a pdf) to meet these requirements to ensure you’re reaching the page length. † For shorter poems (William Carlos Williams and Emily Dickinson), you may select the entire poem as your “passage.
3. Develop a thesis that you pose early in your paper (ideally, within the first paragraph). Your thesis should use the first-person pronoun “I” to show your reader your unique intervention. Example: “In this paper, I argue that, based on the evidence from this passage’s staged confrontation between the men and the birds in Stephen Crane’s “The Open Boat,” Crane uses the concept of realism to show man’s struggle against nature.
[you will obviously come up with something better. This is just a sample; do not use it in your own paper! We’ve talked enough about the birds!)
4. For the rest of your paper, follow the steps of a close reading, showing your reader how each point supports your thesis. Those steps are:
Understanding
Noticing the lexicon
Explaining your findings
Connecting your passage to the larger context of the text
5. Conclude by thinking of the larger implications and significance of your argument. Do not just restate your thesis. Questions to think about when drafting a conclusion:
• What does this detailed argument about the passage reveal about the world in which the author wrote?
• What does this concept tell us about literature of the time period in which the author is writing?
Helpful Hints!
• Your paper should have a title.
• The attached rubric is your friend! Make sure you are aware of what “A” level work looks like before you begin your paper.
• You may have to take your paper through several drafts! Unlike Reading Responses, this is a polished, formal paper. It is not something you can complete the night before/day of the due date.
• You should not use any outside sources, beyond course materials. Remember that TurnItIn is turned on for all assignments and gives me a very detailed and accurate picture of unique (or not-so-unique) work. Remind yourself of UC’s plagiarism policy (linked on syllabus) if you have to.
• When quoting from the text (and you should definitely do this!), use citation form: “any visible expression of nature would surely be pelted with his jeers” (Crane 1059).
• I am happy to read drafts, intro paragraphs, thesis statements, I can only accept drafts 48 hours in advance of the due date.
• On our Week 4 eLearn topic, there is an anonymous sample successful Reading Response close reading exercise. Examining this example may help show the process as you prepare your own work. Remember, though, the Midterm is a polished, formal paper. Please use Grammarly and/or run a spelling and grammar check before submitting.
ENGL 224 Midterm Assignment • Close Reading and Concepts in American Literature, 1867-1934
• Due Sunday by midnight via eLearn (submission under Week 4 topic)
• 15% of grade
• 3-4 double-spaced pages in 12 pt. Times New Roman or equivalent; 1-inch margins*
Description: This session we have practiced close reading, the foundational method of literary study, as a way to slow down our interpretive pace, to show our thought process, and to build evidence-based arguments about our course readings. While we’ve practiced close reading in our Discussion Forums and Reading Responses, for the midterm you will have the opportunity to build a coherent, focused argument in the shape of a formal essay. This assignment will require you to define a thesis and to support that thesis with evidence from the passage/text of your choice. Additionally, you will link your thesis and support to a concept (or lens of analysis) that we have discussed so far this semester. Process: You may work with any text we’ve discussed this semester, beginning small with a passage of your choice.
Follow the steps of a close reading, as outlined in Week 2 of our semester. In doing so, link your analysis to a broader concept we’ve introduced in Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4.
1. Choose one passage from one of the following texts:
• Walt Whitman, “Oh Captain! My Captain!” or “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry”
• Emily Dickinson, “I Taste a Liquor Never Brewed” or “The Soul Selects Her Own Society”
• Charlotte Perkins Gilman, “The Yellow Wallpaper”
• Kate Chopin, “Désirée’s Baby”
• Stephen Crane, “The Open Boat”
• Pauline Hopkins, “Talma Gordon”
• Booker T. Washington, from Up from Slavery
• W. E. B. Du Bois, “Of Our Spiritual Strivings” from The Souls of Black Folk
• William Carlos Williams, “This Is Just to Say”
• Marianne Moore, “Poetry”
2. Retype your passage choice (just a selection from your reading, unless you are using a shorter poem) before beginning your paper; this does not count toward page length.
Identify one concept that you will use as your analytic lens. Concepts might include:
3. Postbellum Democracy
4. Accommodation
5. Double Consciousness
6. Immigration
7. High Modernism
8. American Modernism
9. Realism/Naturalism
10. “Amalgamation/Miscegenation”
11. “The Woman Question”
12. Local Color
13. The Color Line
* Remember, I grade these on a computer! I can very easily re-format your submission (even a pdf) to meet these requirements to ensure you’re reaching the page length. † For shorter poems (William Carlos Williams and Emily Dickinson), you may select the entire poem as your “passage.
3. Develop a thesis that you pose early in your paper (ideally, within the first paragraph). Your thesis should use the first-person pronoun “I” to show your reader your unique intervention. Example: “In this paper, I argue that, based on the evidence from this passage’s staged confrontation between the men and the birds in Stephen Crane’s “The Open Boat,” Crane uses the concept of realism to show man’s struggle against nature.
[you will obviously come up with something better. This is just a sample; do not use it in your own paper! We’ve talked enough about the birds!)
4. For the rest of your paper, follow the steps of a close reading, showing your reader how each point supports your thesis. Those steps are:
Understanding
Noticing the lexicon
Explaining your findings
Connecting your passage to the larger context of the text
5. Conclude by thinking of the larger implications and significance of your argument. Do not just restate your thesis. Questions to think about when drafting a conclusion:
• What does this detailed argument about the passage reveal about the world in which the author wrote?
• What does this concept tell us about literature of the time period in which the author is writing?
Helpful Hints!
• Your paper should have a title.
• The attached rubric is your friend! Make sure you are aware of what “A” level work looks like before you begin your paper.
• You may have to take your paper through several drafts! Unlike Reading Responses, this is a polished, formal paper. It is not something you can complete the night before/day of the due date.
• You should not use any outside sources, beyond course materials. Remember that TurnItIn is turned on for all assignments and gives me a very detailed and accurate picture of unique (or not-so-unique) work. Remind yourself of UC’s plagiarism policy (linked on syllabus) if you have to.
• When quoting from the text (and you should definitely do this!), use citation form: “any visible expression of nature would surely be pelted with his jeers” (Crane 1059).
• I am happy to read drafts, intro paragraphs, thesis statements, I can only accept drafts 48 hours in advance of the due date.
• On our Week 4 eLearn topic, there is an anonymous sample successful Reading Response close reading exercise. Examining this example may help show the process as you prepare your own work. Remember, though, the Midterm is a polished, formal paper. Please use Grammarly and/or run a spelling and grammar check before submitting.

Write a generalized paper concerning common side effects and how to manage these for the psychiatric mental health patient.
Why is it important to include side effects in informed consent?
The paper should be 3-4 pages double spaced then an additional 1-2 pages addressing the following mini-cases.
For the following 5 mini-cases, answer the following questions:
What is the potential side effect of the medication that will be started?
Is this medication appropriate (right med, right dose, right time, right route) for this patient?
What would be another medication(s) you could possibly start and the side effects of that medication(s)?
Patient 1: 67-year-old female who presents with MDD and GAD. She has been treated with Cymbalta in the past however finds it not working very well and having sadness, insomnia, ruminations, and a sense of impending doom again. She is to be started on Pristiq 50mg.
Patient 2: 9-year-old male who presents with ADHD and panic disorder. He is to be started on Adderall XR 20mg at noon.
Patient 3: 40-year-old male who presents with Bipolar 1 Disorder and in a manic state after stopping his Abilify for the 3rd time in 8 months. It had been discussed previously to start Abilify Maintena 400mg IM q 4 weeks and will be started today. He has not had PO Abilify for 1 week.
Patient 4: 93-year-old female who presents with the recent loss (6 months ago) of her husband of 58 years. She notes trouble sleeping, not being hungry, and sad. She has no previous psychiatric history and is to be started on paroxetine 30mg daily and quetiapine 200mg hs for her recent insomnia.
Patient 5: 52-year-old female who presents with MDD. She reports recently going through menopause and having a lot of trouble with irritability and hot flashes. Her current medication is not working like it was before and she will be started on clonazepam 0.5mg bid.Write a generalized paper concerning common side effects and how to manage these for the psychiatric mental health patient.
Why is it important to include side effects in informed consent?
The paper should be 3-4 pages double spaced then an additional 1-2 pages addressing the following mini-cases.
For the following 5 mini-cases, answer the following questions:
What is the potential side effect of the medication that will be started?
Is this medication appropriate (right med, right dose, right time, right route) for this patient?
What would be another medication(s) you could possibly start and the side effects of that medication(s)?
Patient 1: 67-year-old female who presents with MDD and GAD. She has been treated with Cymbalta in the past however finds it not working very well and having sadness, insomnia, ruminations, and a sense of impending doom again. She is to be started on Pristiq 50mg.
Patient 2: 9-year-old male who presents with ADHD and panic disorder. He is to be started on Adderall XR 20mg at noon.
Patient 3: 40-year-old male who presents with Bipolar 1 Disorder and in a manic state after stopping his Abilify for the 3rd time in 8 months. It had been discussed previously to start Abilify Maintena 400mg IM q 4 weeks and will be started today. He has not had PO Abilify for 1 week.
Patient 4: 93-year-old female who presents with the recent loss (6 months ago) of her husband of 58 years. She notes trouble sleeping, not being hungry, and sad. She has no previous psychiatric history and is to be started on paroxetine 30mg daily and quetiapine 200mg hs for her recent insomnia.
Patient 5: 52-year-old female who presents with MDD. She reports recently going through menopause and having a lot of trouble with irritability and hot flashes. Her current medication is not working like it was before and she will be started on clonazepam 0.5mg bid.

Submit your one to two page resumeSubmit your one to two page resumeSubmit your one to two page resumeSubmit your one to two page resume. The resume must be neatly formatted and contain bulleted points explaining your work experience and educational experiences.

Considering the 10 OM decisions, your paper will be a review of issues that were caused by a failure in the production/operations management process. You will compare and contrast the current research findings with the principles and concepts presented in your Heizer, et al. textbook.
All reference sources should be from academic journals, professional trade publications, and respected business or industry magazines. Limit the use of books as sources. Do NOT use articles or sources from Wikipedia! Use references published within the past six years.
• APA
• The paper should be 10 pages at a minimum.
• Use one-inch margins on all sides.
• Left justify all narrative.
• Use Times New Roman font, 12-point.
• Indent the first line of each paragraph one-half inch.
Paper will be about:
A Major Aerospace and defense industry concern lie in the design of goods and services. For many years now, there are many platforms (types of aircraft) that have been becoming obsolete due to the lack of parts no longer produced even with these types of aircraft still performing many missions and being an important asset for many squadrons.
Considering the 10 OM decisions, your paper will be a review of issues that were caused by a failure in the production/operations management process. You will compare and contrast the current research findings with the principles and concepts presented in your Heizer, et al. textbook.
All reference sources should be from academic journals, professional trade publications, and respected business or industry magazines. Limit the use of books as sources. Do NOT use articles or sources from Wikipedia! Use references published within the past six years.
• APA
• The paper should be 10 pages at a minimum.
• Use one-inch margins on all sides.
• Left justify all narrative.
• Use Times New Roman font, 12-point.
• Indent the first line of each paragraph one-half inch.
Paper will be about:
A Major Aerospace and defense industry concern lie in the design of goods and services. For many years now, there are many platforms (types of aircraft) that have been becoming obsolete due to the lack of parts no longer produced even with these types of aircraft still performing many missions and being an important asset for many squadrons.