Premium Writing

After reading Chapter 2 in the Weber text, discuss how systems of oppression are variable/adaptable, and will adjust to accommodate changes, while still maintaining the traditional power structure. In examining the timelines, what evidence do you see of this adaptability/variability, and how it’s used to compensate for the gains marginalized groups have managed to secure for themselves? Include in-text citations in APA format to make clear where you are directly or indirectly drawing information to inform your response.

Your original post is due by 11:59 pm on Wednesday. Your original post needs to be a minimum of 1 paragraph, for the purposes of this course a paragraph should have a minimum of 4 sentences.
I attached photos from chapter 2 please read and use them for this answer. The book is called understanding race class,gender, and sexuality by Lynn Weber if you can find it on the internet.

You will write about the story “Monster”

Create a unique title for this Essay

You will focus on writing about:

Write a response essay reflecting on the use of humor in at least one of the stories in this album. What kinds of humor do you see in the story? How does humor shape your response to the story and its characters?

I will provide screenshots of the Story and the Story has subtitles with different sections (like chapters)

*ONLY USE THIS STORY AS A SOURCE NO OUTSIDE SOURCE*
NO PLAGIARISM ALLOWED it will be submitted through “turnitin”

Was told to rewrite paper with more quotations. Rewrite introduction with quotation and be more specific. Only source to be used is the book listed below and I uploaded pdf of the chapters to be used. Quotations will need page number according to the pdf. Goulds writings are are non-fictions essays.

Here is the original instructions:

Write an analytical essay that explains to your reader how one recognizes Gould’s unique writing voice. In doing so, you should try to, very briefly, touch on the rhetorical terms that are covered in the first two chapters in A Rhetoric of Argument (Ethos, Pathos, Logos) however, the majority of vour paper should be structured around the characteristics of his writing. In addition, vou will be including quotations and paraphrases from his essays to illustrate your points. You must refer to at least three of the essays to show typicality. You need not read beyond what we will read in Modern American Prose, but you do want to come up with a solid thesis and defend it with the texts we have read. Include atleast 5 quotations with page numbers.

The three writing style to talk about in the essay is:

1. Long quotations
2. Subjects are in 19th century
3. Precise vocabulary/Use of big words

You should critique (positively and negatively) the ways in which he chooses to present his arguments. Does the style work for you, or does it have flaws? Remember that Gould is writing for a specific audience and he defines that audience in “Prologue.” The bigger question is whether this works for the audience he hopes will read his work. Need neither approve of nor appreciate Gould’s writing, but you do need to demonstrate careful analysis, treat the topic appropriately, present your points skillfully, and hold my attention.

Only use this book for the essay:
Use chapter seven in the book Modern American Prose: Fifteen Writer +15 by John Clifford and Robert DiYanni. Use the essays “Prologue”, “Flaws in a Victorian Veil”, “Women’s Brains”, and “ Evolution as Fact and Theory”.

Write your paper in response to the topic below. Be sure to introduce and briefly summarize the relevant text in your introduction. Remember that you’ll be advancing an idea or set of ideas you have about how the reading(s) develops themes or values which are also of importance to our lives out here, outside the text.

Be sure to link your ideas in the body of your essay to textual details which show where you’re deriving your ideas from—“show how you know, what you know.” Related to this, remember that quotes are not self-explanatory: you’ll need to explain to your reader why they mean what you say they do.

Compare two or more political neophytes (amateurs, people who’ve never before held high public office ) winning elections and examine their legacy in office.
First-time office holders (i.e, “amateur” politicians, some of them celebrities). Compare the California governorship of former body-builder Arnold Schwarzenegger to the governorship of former body-builder, wrestler, Navy Seal, etc. Jesse Venture of Minnesota. Or to Donald Trump. Or consider comedian later Senator Al Franken, or former President Ronald Reagan. Or to the president of the Ukraine, or the president of France (Macron). Or pick other first time office holder, and of course you are not limited to those in the U.S.! Your theme is notable first time office holders. Evaluate their goal/aims and the local and national response. Suggestion: introduce your topic by acknowledging the ways in which they are apparently alike; focus your thesis and the body of your paper in examining how what they said or did in office, or say they will do in office, and their political legacy, differs. Consider also the question of non-expert or ‘amateur’ citizen statesman ascending to policy-making power and office: what are the risks and potential benefits of this for the voters?

-Try to edit my repetitions if i bring up something too much
-Reword some phrases to a better understanding like status quo

Purpose: To exercise reading, analytical, and critical thinking skills of a set of primary sources and secondary sources around a particular historical period.

Skills: Learn and practice how to read a primary source. Learn and practice how to read a secondary source. Learn and practice how to make an argument. Learn and practice how to use evidence from the primary source and secondary source to support your analysis. Learn and practice how to do Chicago Style Footnotes.

Knowledge: By completing this assignment, you will understand the major historical debates and current interpretations of the period of Conquest and Statehood.

Essay Prompt: Choose one of the following essay questions to write on.

Q1 From Conquest to Repatriation: Rebuilding Mexican American Communities (This will be the one to be worked on NOT Q2 that is show in one of the attachements)

After the U.S. government declared war on Mexico, California became a part of U.S. conquest. Land once granted to Mexicans under Mexico-governed California were no longer observed under U.S. governed-California. The gold rush drew hundreds of thousands of new migrants that outnumbered and racially targeted Mexicans. Still, Mexican migration continued steadily into the 1910s and 1920s and formed communities that participated in progressive movements. By the 1930s, Mexican Americans developed a number of strategies to improve their economic standing, but faced the onset of the Great Depression. How did Mexican Americans and Mexican migrants’ strategies for defending and rebuilding their communities change to meet the shifting political terrains of the Gold Rush (1850s-1870s), Progressive Era (1910s-1920s), and Great Depression (1930s)? Use three secondary and three primary sources to support your thesis.

Sources will be listed below and pdfs will be uploaded.
There will be 4 attachments of the requirement of the paper and what the professor is looking for. Thank you !

1Primary source:
Writings of Father Junipero Serra
Pablo Tac
1Secondary source:
Chapter 5: Junipero Serra Across the Three Generations
Chapter 1: Colonial Settlements on Indigenous Lands

2Primary Source:
John O’ Sullivan Declares Manifest Destiny
More Like a Pig Than a Bear
2Secondary Source:
Independent Indians and the U.S. Mexican War
War in California

3Primary Source:
Life Joaquin Murieta
Mason v. Smith
3Secondary Source:
Remaking Slavery in a Free State: Masters and Slaves in Gold Rush California
Dame Shirely Describes Like in a California Mining Camp

4Primary Source:
Later from San Diego – The Indian War Not Yet Ended
Excerpt from Helen Hunt Jackson’s Ramona
Governor Bigler vs. Merchant Asing
4Secondary Source:
Chapter 1 The Chinese Question
Native Californians in the Nineteenth Century

5Primary Source:
Dese a la Mujer de California El Derecho de Votar
Argument Against Women’s Suffrage, 1911
5Secondary Source:
Constructing the Woman Citizen and Struggling for the Vote in California 1896-1911

6Primary Source:
The Japanese Evil in California
Susie Yamamoto
Letter to San Diego’s Mexican and Mexican American population 1932
6Secondary Source:
Chapter 1: The Rural New Woman
Invisible Borders: Repatriation and Colonization of Mexican Migrant Workers along the California Borderlands during the 1930s

Term papers should be substantial pieces of analysis and criticism. They should not simply report, summarize, or review course materials (although you may draw from class presentations, discussions, and readings). Term papers should demonstrate thoughtful reflection, and evaluation, and should embody a critical and conceptual argument in which various angles of the question are explored in fairness and at length. In this respect, they differ from the argument summaries, which did not involve critique.

It is a market study report.
We choose the brazil country and product electronic device.

1. Introduction (the objective of the report, the target country, who it is for, what it will cover…)

2. The Market Intelligence Report
A comprehensive market study of the target country. It must include but not limited to:

a) Geographic location, population, climate, language
b)Demographics – age distribution, education, ethnic groups, religions, income etc.

3)The Market Opportunity Briefing
• The potential business opportunities for the products/services chosen, mode of entry, international strategy, and structure. Based on the research in the above section, support your choices.

4. Conclusion

Use APA citation and cite th source.

Report your results of Part 2A of the Sky Project.
The report has to show your explanation to the method that you used to estimate the local time from the Polaris and Big Dipper position. It has to show filled Table 2.

In about 300 words, respond to the following prompt:

Both Phoenix Jackson in “A Worn Path” and the unnamed man in “To Build a Fire” make choices in their respective stories. Choose one choice that each character makes and address how that choice was influenced by who they are as a person. What specific traits contributed to them making the choice they did? How do you know? Be sure to include at least one quote from each short story to support your comments.

BOTH STORIES ARE LINKED BELOW

A WORN PATH
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1941/02/a-worn-path/376236/

You will be researching and writing on one of the most basic methods of forecasting: Judgmental Forecasting. After reading Chapter 3 in Chase (Overview of Forecasting Methods), access the three excellent resources on Judgmental Forecasting hyperlinked below. Use all three, for they each provide a different perspectives on the broad methodology of forecasting future demand using experience, insight, and business savvy. You may also want to search the internet for any additional resources that add to the lesson material in chapter 3.

1- https://otexts.com/fpp2/judgmental.htmlhttps://otexts.com/fpp2/judgmental.html
2- Attached
3-https://otexts.com/fpp2/delphimethod.htmlhttps://otexts.com/fpp2/delphimethod.html