Compare Morgan, Henderson, Bradbury, and Schrauwers on nineteenth century politics in BNA.

Compare these four sources.
When preparing this essay, begin by determining what themes they have in common. Consider the different approaches the authors have chosen to take. You might want to look at methodologies or sources used, too. It is key in this assignment to demonstrate that you have thoroughly and carefully read and understood the articles. Make sure to double check on the citations already given, they may be incorrect.

¬Morgan, Cecilia. “’When Bad Men Conspire, Good Men Must Unite!’: Gender and Political Discourses in Upper Canada, 1820s-1830s.” In Gendered Pasts: Historical Essays in Femininity and Masculinity in Canada. Edited by Forestell, Nancy M., Kathryn M. McPherson, and Cecilia Louise Morgan, 12-28. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 2003.
¬Jarett Henderson, “Banishment to Bermuda: Gender, Race, Empire, Independence and the Struggle to Abolish Irresponsible Government in Lower Canada” Histoire sociale/Social History, vol. XLVI, no. 92 (Nov 2013): 321-348.
¬Bradbury, Bettina. “Widows’ Votes.” In Wife to Widow: Lives, Laws, and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Montreal, 260-288. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2011.
¬Schrauwers, Albert. “The Gentlemanly Order & the Politics of Production in the Transition to Capitalism in the Home District, Upper Canada.” Labour/Le Travail 65 (Spring 2010): 9-45.

must have:
¬correct footnotes
¬cite all sources of direct quotations and borrowed ideas

If needed use this textbook and this online seminar, although they might not even be needed, these are
just the courses resources and textbooks.
¬file:///C:/Users/grace/Downloads/Canadian-History-Pre-Confederation-1559748062.pdf
¬https://openhistoryseminar.com/canadianhistory/

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered