Have a brief and concise introduction.
Map out the key components that you addressed in the presentation
Choose a few components from them and deeply analyze them.
Draw your conclusions (your conclusion could be based on your progressive thought or recommendation).
please use the attached resources and any more schorlaly resources of your choice
Please read rubric before you begin
we’ll talk about the social issue- white fragility (/epistemic injustice).
overview and description of legislation and or social policy that exists or could be changed or added
Discuss where it happens (discussions around anti-oppression and learning institutions). —-(a)
2.the impact on Indigenous peoples of Canada if the legislation or social policy was changed or added
Discuss how it put BIPOC at risk and silence our voices. —-(b)
Recommendations for alternative ways of practice ( society/agencies and social work roles)
resources that you find in your research that will help social workers engage
role social workers could/would play in relation to your chosen topic
G
Explains the content clearly and with an understanding of the subject matter
Demonstrates excellent research and use of literature where appropriate. Reveals sound, critical, and innovative thinking/ideas on a subject. Shows personal engagement with the topic
Please read the rubric for your selected questions, before you start to write and again before submit your essay to make sure you have included everything!
paper – 10 marks
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Represents work of exceptional quality. Content, organization, and style all at a high level.
Demonstrates excellent research and use of literature where appropriate. Reveals sound, critical, and innovative thinking/ideas on a subject. Shows personal engagement with the topic.
Represents work of good quality with no major weaknesses. Writing is clear, explicit.
Coverage, comprehension of topic more than adequate. Some degree of critical thinking; personal engagement with the work. Good use of existing knowledge on the subject.
Adequate average work. Shows fair comprehension of the subject.
Some weakness in content, style, and or organization of the work. Minimal critical awareness, personal involvement in the work. Minimal use of literature.
Lack of self awareness about the subject and critical analysis is not integrated into a presentable format. Materials not supporting analysis of subject matter.
Lack of demonstrated APA citation and referencing, content is poorly described and lack of comprehension of subject matter.
Flow of content is poorly organized and presented with minimal comprehension of the subject.
Serious flaws in content, organization and / or style. Poor to minimal understanding of the subject. Minimal involvement in the subject. Poor use of research and literature.
Completely inadequate work.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
