*Begin your assignment by reviewing/summarizing the sociological content and key methodological points from the assigned article — focus on Humphreys’ methods (one page).
*Next, give a critical analysis of the article’s methods (two pages — this should be the majority of your paper). In
your analysis, you should point out where you see the author(s)
demonstrating concepts (sociological and methodological) you learned
about in the textbook reading (Chapter 3: Ethics). Throughout your
paper, you should include direct connections to the textbook reading
(Chapter 3: Ethics). Don’t forget to cite both Humphreys’ article AND Chapter 3: Ethics (use in-text citations, including page numbers — no need for a separate reference page).
*In
your analysis, you can discuss aspects of the article and methods that
you found compelling and explain why. Consider whether or not you think
the author(s) methods are robust. Include things such as: do you agree
with their chosen methods? Do you think they were appropriately applied?
What do you think was strong about their methodological approach? Was
there anything you thought was weak about their methods? Why? Were you
left with questions or concerns? Or were you thoroughly convinced by
their approach?
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|