Review the details of your assessment including the rubric. You will have the ability to submit the assessment once you submit your required self-assessments and engage with your Faculty Subject Matter Expert (SME) in a substantive way about the competency.
In this Performance Task Assessment, you will locate different sources of evidence based on your PICO question and appraise each one. You will also evaluate your PICO question based on the research and decide if modifications need to be made.
Submission Length: 2 appraisal worksheets and a 3- to 5-page paper
To complete this Assessment, do the following:
Be sure to adhere to the indicated assignment length.
Access the following:
During this performance task, you will use the PICO question that you drafted in EP4002 to evaluate published research related to the topic.
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the SME will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.
All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring.
Your response to this performance task should reflect the criteria provided in the rubric and adhere to the required length. This assessment requires submission of three (3) files, an approved research evaluation paper (3-5 pages) and two completed resource appraisal worksheets. Save your files as follows:
Save the research evaluation paper as EP4003_res_ firstinitial_lastname (for example, EP4003_res_J_Smith).
Save the complete resource appraisal worksheets as EP4003_App1_firstinitial_lastname and EP4003_App2_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EP4003_App1_J_Smith).
You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.
Important Note: As a student taking this Competency, you agree that you may be required to submit your Assessment for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted Assessment materials will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such materials. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Usage Policy posted on the Turnitin.com site.
In this assessment, you will summarize and appraise research related to the PICO question that you wrote in EP4002. You may choose any combination of qualitative, quantitative, systematic review, and/or practice guideline resources for a total of two different resources. Collect what you believe to be the most relevant resources by using an effective combination of search terms, search parameters, and a systematic search process. In order to demonstrate competence, you must collect evidence from reputable sources, including health science databases, databases maintained by nonprofit international organizations for health practitioners, and databases supported by professional specialty organizations in the health field. Refer to the resources in Module 1, Learning Activity 1, “Searching for Evidence” for ways to assess databases, information about conducting effective searches, and names of some of the databases that are relevant to evidence-based nursing practice.
After you have selected the two resources related to your PICO question, complete the performance task assessment using the following prompts:
Resource Appraisal: Complete the corresponding appraisal worksheet for each of the resources selected. This will guide you to not only find credible and reliable resources, but also synthesize the information. Note: That there are different appraisal worksheets for the different types of articles, so be sure that you choose the worksheet that corresponds to the resource you select.
Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment.
Part 1 (3-4 pages)
Write a summary of each article or resource and describe how each one relates to your PICO question.
Identify the level of evidence in each article and describe the relative strengths and applicability of the study to your PICO question by using the AACCN hierarchy of evidence.
Synthesize the evidence from both articles into a statement that supports your PICO question.
Describe any additional evidence that you think will be necessary to support your PICO question.
Finally, describe any gaps in the literature related to the PICO question.
Part 2 (1 page)
Based on the literature search, appraisals, and synthesis, defend either by keeping your PICO question the same or making changes. If you will make changes to the PICO question, provide the new version
- Discuss the ethical considerations relating to surrogate motherhood and contraception.
- How can students improve their reading skill by using Metacognitive strategies
- Describe a quality improvement program you would design in your LTC facility and why you chose that particular measure? Who would you include on your team? Focus on choosing an area that aligns with one of the 6 AIMS.
- Quality and lean operation
- Customer service skills response
- Health Care Ethics Case Studies
- The Maus I&II by Spiegelman begins with Hitler’s quote: “The Jews are undoubtedly a race, but they are not human.”
- Find Trends in Your Profession (My desired profession is HR)
- Hilbert Spaces
- utilitarian argument