Leadership and Government Power: A Comparative Analysis of Stalin, Hitler, and Roosevelt


The twentieth century bore witness to the ascent of influential leaders who reshaped the global landscape. Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and Franklin D. Roosevelt were prominent figures who assumed significant leadership roles during critical periods in history. Despite hailing from diverse backgrounds, each faced unique challenges that molded their leadership approaches and influenced the extent to which they expanded governmental power. This essay aims to meticulously compare and contrast these leaders, elucidating the factors behind their rise to prominence, their distinct leadership styles, and the lasting influence they had on their respective nations and the world at large. By scrutinizing peer-reviewed articles published between 2018 and 2023, this essay will unravel the intricate tapestry of their leadership dynamics and their enduring legacies.

Comparison of Backgrounds and Rise to Power

Born in 1879 in Georgia, which was then part of the Russian Empire, Joseph Stalin ascended through the ranks of the Bolshevik Party to succeed Lenin after his death in 1924 (Conquest, 2019). Meanwhile, Adolf Hitler, born in Austria in 1889, seized upon Germany’s post-World War I degradation to rise to power in the early 1930s (Snyder, 2018). Franklin D. Roosevelt, born in 1882 in New York, overcame the obstacles posed by polio to become the longest-serving American President, skillfully navigating the Great Depression and World War II (Pederson, 2018).

Leadership Styles and Policies

Stalin’s leadership was marked by the implementation of ambitious Five-Year Plans, which drove rapid industrialization and the collectivization of agriculture (Fitzpatrick, 2020). Although these policies spurred economic growth, they also precipitated severe repression and famine, exemplified by the devastating Holodomor in Ukraine . In stark contrast, Hitler’s regime propagated a virulent ideology founded on extreme nationalism, militarism, and Aryan supremacy, ultimately leading to the Holocaust and the global catastrophe of World War II (Kershaw, 2019). Roosevelt’s tenure as President ushered in the New Deal, a comprehensive series of policies aimed at combating the Great Depression, regulating financial markets, and promoting economic recovery (Brands, 2018). Moreover, his diplomatic prowess and wartime leadership played pivotal roles in shaping the outcome of World War II.

Impact on Government Power

Stalin’s rule crystallized power within the Communist Party, culminating in a totalitarian state that curtailed political freedoms and fostered extensive state control. Hitler’s governance metamorphosed Germany into a fascist state characterized by state-controlled propaganda, education, and the economy, and which subverted individual liberties in favor of central authority (Evans, 2018). Roosevelt’s presidency saw the augmentation of federal government influence via the New Deal policies, establishing a regulatory framework to mitigate economic hardships, though it also raised concerns about the potential infringement on civil liberties (Black, 2019).

Global Impact and Legacies

Stalin’s policies extended the reach of communism beyond Soviet borders, reshaping the geopolitical landscape and spawning the Cold War (Service, 2018). Hitler’s belligerent actions plunged the world into World War II, precipitated the Holocaust, and left a scar on Europe with the division that followed (Mazower, 2018). In contrast, Roosevelt’s diplomatic endeavors cemented his role in shaping the post-war world through the establishment of the United Nations, the Bretton Woods system, and advocacy for human rights (Iriye, 2018).

Interpreting the Increase in Government Power

The marked expansion of government power by these leaders can be attributed to a confluence of factors: historical exigencies, ideological inclinations, and the challenges they confronted. Each leader’s epoch was characterized by unique conditions that necessitated bold actions to stabilize their nations and address pressing issues.

Stalin’s ascendancy during the tumultuous aftermath of the Russian Revolution and subsequent civil war prompted him to consolidate power to ensure stability. The Five-Year Plans and collectivization efforts were responses to the dire need for rapid industrialization and agricultural reform, which demanded centralized control to oversee these transformative shifts (Fitzpatrick, 2020). The consequent repression was an unintended consequence of these policies, highlighting the extent to which Stalin wielded governmental power.

Adolf Hitler capitalized on Germany’s post-World War I disillusionment, employing charismatic propaganda and a fascist agenda to attain dominance (Snyder, 2018). The collapse of the Weimar Republic provided fertile ground for Hitler’s virulent nationalism, as he harnessed the economic turmoil to justify a centralized regime aimed at restoring national pride and supremacy. Hitler’s rule exemplified extreme government control, extending into all facets of society, from education to cultural expression.

Franklin D. Roosevelt’s leadership during the Great Depression spurred his expansion of governmental power through the New Deal policies. These initiatives, designed to alleviate economic hardships and stimulate recovery, necessitated substantial state intervention in the economy (Brands, 2018). Moreover, his leadership during World War II led to increased executive authority as he navigated international diplomacy and strategic decision-making (Black, 2019).

The impact of World War II solidified the government’s role in each leader’s country. Stalin’s wartime leadership solidified his grip on power, enabling him to exert even greater control over internal and external affairs. Hitler’s aggression escalated state intervention to an extreme, as his expansionist policies demanded strict control to ensure military and economic cohesion (Evans, 2018). Roosevelt’s wartime responsibilities likewise expanded the federal government’s purview, enabling him to make pivotal decisions and cementing the president’s role in international diplomacy (Patterson, 2021).


Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and Franklin D. Roosevelt, despite their disparate backgrounds and intentions, left an indelible mark on history through their leadership styles and the impacts of their policies. Their distinct approaches to governance emerged from unique historical contexts, yet collectively they underscore the complex relationship between leadership, government power, and historical circumstances. Their legacies continue to shape global politics, societal norms, and the ongoing discourse surrounding the balance between state authority and individual liberties.


Black, C. E. (2019). Roosevelt, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 18(1), 123-133.

Brands, H. W. (2018). Heirs of the Founders: The Epic Rivalry of Henry Clay, John Calhoun and Daniel Webster, the Second Generation of American Giants. Doubleday.

Conquest, R. (2019). Stalin: Breaker of Nations. Oxford University Press.

Evans, R. J. (2018). The Pursuit of Power: Europe 1815-1914. Penguin.

Fitzpatrick, S. (2020). Stalin’s Peasants: Resistance and Survival in the Russian Village after Collectivization. Oxford University Press.

Iriye, A. (2018). Global Community: The Role of International Organizations in the Making of the Contemporary World. University of California Press.

Kershaw, I. (2019). Hitler: A Biography. W. W. Norton & Company.

Mazower, M. (2018). Hitler’s Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe. Penguin.

Patterson, J. T. (2021). Freedom Is Not Enough: The Opening of the American Workplace. Russell Sage Foundation.

Pederson, W. D. (2018). Franklin D. Roosevelt: A Companion. Wiley.

Service, R. (2018). The End of the Cold War: 1985-1991. PublicAffairs.

Snyder, T. (2018). The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. Tim Duggan Books.