What are the big issues raised here,and how the book fit into a larger philosophical debate?

1. Give an outline of The main argument, a discussion of salient points, with a briefish biography of the author.
2. Give a critical reading of the argument, remember that critical doesn’t always mean neagative,simply that the euro is given a close evaluative reading.
3.What are the big issues raised here,and how the book fit into a larger philosophical debate? You need a little more research here.
4. A recommendation: Should this book be required reading for next years students, and why. Give a substantive rational
5. A works cited page with at Least three sources including the central text.

Suggested Books:
Albert Camus – The myth of Sisyphus.
Jostein Gaarder- Sophie’s World.
Jim holt – Why does the world exist.
Bruce hood – The self illusion
Robert pirsig – zen and the art of Motorcycle maintenance
Russell Bertrand – The problems of philosophy
John Paul sartre – Nausea
Mark Rowland – The philosopher and the Wolf.
Stephen pinker- The Blank slate
Micheal walker -Quantum flux
Mario livio – Is God a mathematician?
Aaron James – Assholes: A theory.

Last Completed Projects