What would happen if Congress, because it did not like the decisions the federal courts were handing down in a particular policy area, passed a law that removed the subject matter from the courts’ jurisdiction?

Second Request Writer #375946359 if other writer is unable. This 1-page reflection paper must have 2 approved academic sources. This includes peer-reviewed journal articles, government documents and reports, books, and court cases. No Wikipedia. No internet sources such as national news, blogs or websites and no opinion statements (used reference to explain topic). 12 font Times New Roman font with 1″ margins, and double space APA format, citations and references Header and footer no plagiarism Tips: chapter 4 book Judicial Process in America author Robert A. Carp/Kenneth L. Manning/Lisa M. Holmes & book Judging Law and Policy (Courts and Policymaking in the American political system by Robert M. Howard and Amy Steigerwalt Chapter 4.
What would happen if Congress, because it did not like the decisions the federal courts were handing down in a particular policy area, passed a law that removed the subject matter from the courts’ jurisdiction? Would the action be constitutional? It has happened in the past, and it occurred more recently when Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006Links to an external site., which forbade the US district courts from continuing to hear habeas corpus pleas from terrorist suspects in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. In what realms might Congress act in a comparable manner again?

Women in the work place and equal pay in America- what are you thoughts on equality? Have the courts reached the goal(s) for legal equality between the sexes? Why or why not?
Fully explain your answer and defend your position.

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered