Best Writer

Paper about an Essay: “From Famine to Five Points” by Tyler Abinder: Due – 3/30

For this assignment, you will be writing a paper approximately 1100 words long (2.5 – 3 pages) discussing Tyler Abinder’s journal article on Irish Immigration, “From Famine to Five Points: Lord Lansdowne’s Irish Tenants Encounter North America’s Most Notorious Slum”. In writing about his article, you will
1. Identify his main argument,
2. Examine and discuss the types of primary source evidence he uses to construct his narrative and how he uses them, and
3. Evaluate how well he employs those sources in supporting his argument.

2. Read the article closely, taking notes as you read.
3. Write a paper review of the article that includes the following:
i. Abinder’s main argument (250-300 words)
ii. A discussion of the types of primary sources he uses and how he uses them (must discuss at least three different kinds) (550-600 words)
iii. Your evaluation of how well Abinder supports his argument. What source(s) did you find most compelling, interesting, or useful? Why? (300 words)

Based off the three articles provided i need for you to form discussion questions and also find a youtube vudeo related to the topic thats about 20-30 min

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276544396_Stories_of_Violence_A_Narrative_Criminological_Study_of_Ambiguity

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2059799120926085

Revenge Porn and Mental Health: A Qualitative Analysis of the Mental Health Effects of Revenge Porn on Female Survivors-Samantha Bates

Final rough draft for 2 story you add them together you give them a quote for each story and. Worked cited: author last name short title publication info. Year . URL summary. In 3-5 sentences why the sources or story is important to your essay. For intro: 3-5 sentences summary what service you complete. 3-5 sentences summary of the story and how it connects to the service you complete. Thesis: what action the readers should take on their own live base on both story and your experience. The story are: Christian de pisan and Plato allegory the cave. I have my rough draft paper in case you need please read the instructions carefully

Explore the following case study and investigate the ethically problematic situation(s) that can be found. Your specific tasks have been provided directly below the case study. (case study is in the uploaded files)

Task:
Write a reflective formal report, responding to the following concerns/questions:
1. Briefly describe the ethically problematic situation(s) that can be identified in the case study.
2. You should critically review the case study (not repeat the case study information) and discuss how various ethics and social responsibility theories and concepts could be applied to address the ethically problematic situation(s) identified.
3. Propose your own approach to resolving the situation and explain why and how your approach will work in practice.

THE STRUCTURE (A suggested format of the report should be as follows)
The following provides specific guidance on writing the reflective report. The report should
contain the following:
1. Executive Summary (challenges and objectives, business ethics and social responsibility analytical methods applied, limitations, and findings of the report – about 200 words only, no bullet points; no repetition of the introduction).
2. Introduction (around 200 words – briefly describe the company, its history, objectives, key activities, present situation, and stakeholders)
3. Ethically problematic situation(s) that can be identified in the case study.
4. A critical review of the case study and theories applicable.
5. Your own approach to resolving the situation and explain why and how your approach
will work in practice.
6. A brief conclusion section that summarises the key aspects of the report (around 200
words)
7. The reference list.

Please read the uploaded file before accepting the job as the case study, questions and structure of the assigment with requirements are all there.

Write an 100-word Argumentive essay on why people should explore the sea more and it’s cheaper than exploring outer space

You will conduct an analysis of a political or commercial campaign and discuss it as an attempt to have an impact on the public opinion. This assessment aims to strengthen your analytical and practical skills, and to deepen your understanding of mass communication and public discourse. Your campaign analysis must be concluded with the proposal of improvements and its justification. This assignment will assess your research skills, the ability to analyse and present information, and the correct application of tools, techniques and examples.

The analysis must present a clear structure with index and includes bibliography with Harvard referencing system. It is obligatory to follow the standard academic research scheme (introduction, state of the art, methodology, results, and discussion of the results, conclusions and bibliography) and use the academic language and valid academic resources. Using newspaper as sources is allowed as long as they are cited accordingly and coming from reputable press.

i want to write about financial fair play, it is a set of financial regulations used in european leagues only. they bring financial stability to footballing clubs in europe. The chinese league is struggling now after being known for spending alot of money in 2018-19, however after the pandemic they suffered alot of debts. i believe that the implementaion of financial regulations such as FFP could be benficial for the chinese super league. Find studies, articles, that use different methods and see how we can propose doing this research. How benficial would the implementation of FFP be in foreign leagues such as the chinese super league. i have posted the instructions and estimated word counts for each section below. i also attached the template of what the proposal is meant to look like at the end . need it heavily refrenced as well. and as many articles as posiible. MUST BE CREDIBLE NO MATTER WHAT. atleast 20

– What is the research project about and why is it important? An overview explaining what the research is about, previous research in this area and what differentiates your research from this, and why now is a good time to conduct your research. [400 Words]
– What are your aim and objectives? Summarise what you want to achieve with the entire study (Aim), and the specific, short-term steps you will need to take to achieve this (Objectives). [150 Words]
– What is the theory you are using? After a brief overview of theory that has been used in your research area, specify which theoretical body of knowledge you are basing your study within, and what are you using that theory to understand. [400 Words]
– What is the context of the research? Give an overview of the business, industry, sector, country, etc. that forms the backdrop to your research, and explain why this is an appropriate context. [300 Words]
– Research Philosophy. In which philosophical paradigm are you rooting your research, and why is this particularly appropriate for your research? Contrast your chosen approach with those you consider less appropriate. [200 Words]
– Data Collection Methods. How and where are you generating your data and which tools for data collection are you using? Contrast your chosen approach with those you consider less appropriate. [400 words]
– Data Analysis Techniques. How are you going to analyse your data when you have collected it? Contrast your chosen approach with those you consider less appropriate. [400 Words]
– Ethical Issues. How will your research comply with the principles of ethical research? What are the specific aspects of your research that might raise ethical concerns? [250 Words]
N.B. Please remember that your coursework should be heavily referenced, drawing on journal articles and books

Construct a 1 page course definition with an accompanying alignment table for a nursing education course using a topic of your choice. Include a 1 page memo to a department supervisor that contains a rationale for the assessment and evaluation strategies you plan to use in the course.

Paper #2 Due April 2 at 11:59PM

Your second paper asks that you demonstrate your ability to understand an argument as well as understand how an argument works. You will select to speak about any one of the following essays outlined below. Your task in this essay is to tell me what the essay does and how the essay does it. For example, if we look at the essay of Lee and Grant, we might argue that the essay establishes America as a country of divided opinions as well as one of decency and respect. We might go on to argue that the essay illustrates this idea through the presentation of two drastically different and celebrated heroes of the Civil War. The remainder of my essay might continue to explain how the author drives his point home by using the final meeting of Lee and Grant to show that decency is the hallmark of a great country.

Please notice that although I am speaking about the text of Lee and Grant, I am not simply giving a summary of what the author said. I am explaining the agenda of this piece, and then I am explaining how the author went about presenting that agenda. Please also note that this essay should not be a summary of the text, although you will be required to summarize or quote a point or place in the text or in order to put your reader in context.

Your task for this paper is to select one of the essays below and to write a 2- page paper explaining what the piece does and how it does it. I do not want a research paper. Points will be deducted for research used, nor do I want a plagiarized paper from the Internet. I want your own words and your own thoughts about the what the text does and how it does it. I would like you to maintain a singular focus in your argument and connect your sentences so that they logically build from one another. I would like a mature and thoughtful discussion about what lies beneath the surface of the text.

Your essay must be an argument — not a list of facts — about the text. The point of this essay is to show that you are capable of developing a logical and reasonable argument based on facts and reason. You have been given discussions and examples that focus on how to examine a text. You will ask yourself what argument just the text make, and how the text makes that argument. You will explain the value of the text beyond the words on the page.

Questions to ask yourself:

1. What topic does this text explore?

2. What attitude does the author have about this issue? How does he express his opinion about this topic?

3. What evidence from the text can I use to support my argument?

4. How can I elaborate on this argument? In other words, what do I have to say that it’s important to relevant to this argument, without becoming too self-indulgent and making the text about me? What do I have to add to the topic expressed — not the plot.

* Please remember that I do not want a summary of the text. You might, however, use a summary for your introduction, so you can provide your reader with context before you move to your thesis and your analysis. I want you to explain to me the message that the text communicates and how he communicates that message.

You will select from one of the following essays for your paper:

Straw in metamorphosis

A few words about breasts

Shooting in elephant

Once more to the lake

A man without a country

Basics of the Paper (If you miss any of these basic requirements, you cannot receive an A. Please read carefully. )

Two full pages (You may stop anywhere on Page 3. You cannot stop on page 2, and you cannot start halfway down on Page 1. Page 1 includes your title in the center, your name and date on left hand, and the beginning of your discussion. I do not want a cover page.)
double space
12 font
indent paragraphs
underline thesis — this must be a claim about what the text does and how it does it
title in the center of your page (your title cannot be the title of the piece)
name and date on the left hand side of the page
Please do not use secondary sources. I want only your thinking
Please also know that if you plagiarize, you will fail the class. Plagiarism also includes using papers that have been submitted to other instructors.
Please also know that I do not want any research. I just want your ideas substantiated by the text.
Please do not use second person and do not use first person. You will lose one letter grade for doing so.

Grading Criteria

Did you follow directions? (If you have not followed all of the basic directions, you will not receive an A)
Do you have a clear thesis that explains what the piece does? A thesis is not a summary of the piece.
Are your paragraphs focused to one specific issue?
Have you used the text appropriately in your writing to help make your argument?
Are your sentences clear and grammatically appropriate?
Do your paragraph carry ideas over in order to develop them?
Have you done more than simply summarized the text? (Please note that a simple summary will result in a failure. We are beyond the skill of simply summarizing.)
Have you explained the agenda of the text and how the author carried out this argument.Paper #2 Due April 2 at 11:59PM

Your second paper asks that you demonstrate your ability to understand an argument as well as understand how an argument works. You will select to speak about any one of the following essays outlined below. Your task in this essay is to tell me what the essay does and how the essay does it. For example, if we look at the essay of Lee and Grant, we might argue that the essay establishes America as a country of divided opinions as well as one of decency and respect. We might go on to argue that the essay illustrates this idea through the presentation of two drastically different and celebrated heroes of the Civil War. The remainder of my essay might continue to explain how the author drives his point home by using the final meeting of Lee and Grant to show that decency is the hallmark of a great country.

Please notice that although I am speaking about the text of Lee and Grant, I am not simply giving a summary of what the author said. I am explaining the agenda of this piece, and then I am explaining how the author went about presenting that agenda. Please also note that this essay should not be a summary of the text, although you will be required to summarize or quote a point or place in the text or in order to put your reader in context.

Your task for this paper is to select one of the essays below and to write a 2- page paper explaining what the piece does and how it does it. I do not want a research paper. Points will be deducted for research used, nor do I want a plagiarized paper from the Internet. I want your own words and your own thoughts about the what the text does and how it does it. I would like you to maintain a singular focus in your argument and connect your sentences so that they logically build from one another. I would like a mature and thoughtful discussion about what lies beneath the surface of the text.

Your essay must be an argument — not a list of facts — about the text. The point of this essay is to show that you are capable of developing a logical and reasonable argument based on facts and reason. You have been given discussions and examples that focus on how to examine a text. You will ask yourself what argument just the text make, and how the text makes that argument. You will explain the value of the text beyond the words on the page.

Questions to ask yourself:

1. What topic does this text explore?

2. What attitude does the author have about this issue? How does he express his opinion about this topic?

3. What evidence from the text can I use to support my argument?

4. How can I elaborate on this argument? In other words, what do I have to say that it’s important to relevant to this argument, without becoming too self-indulgent and making the text about me? What do I have to add to the topic expressed — not the plot.

* Please remember that I do not want a summary of the text. You might, however, use a summary for your introduction, so you can provide your reader with context before you move to your thesis and your analysis. I want you to explain to me the message that the text communicates and how he communicates that message.

You will select from one of the following essays for your paper:

Straw in metamorphosis

A few words about breasts

Shooting in elephant

Once more to the lake

A man without a country

Basics of the Paper (If you miss any of these basic requirements, you cannot receive an A. Please read carefully. )

Two full pages (You may stop anywhere on Page 3. You cannot stop on page 2, and you cannot start halfway down on Page 1. Page 1 includes your title in the center, your name and date on left hand, and the beginning of your discussion. I do not want a cover page.)
double space
12 font
indent paragraphs
underline thesis — this must be a claim about what the text does and how it does it
title in the center of your page (your title cannot be the title of the piece)
name and date on the left hand side of the page
Please do not use secondary sources. I want only your thinking
Please also know that if you plagiarize, you will fail the class. Plagiarism also includes using papers that have been submitted to other instructors.
Please also know that I do not want any research. I just want your ideas substantiated by the text.
Please do not use second person and do not use first person. You will lose one letter grade for doing so.

Grading Criteria

Did you follow directions? (If you have not followed all of the basic directions, you will not receive an A)
Do you have a clear thesis that explains what the piece does? A thesis is not a summary of the piece.
Are your paragraphs focused to one specific issue?
Have you used the text appropriately in your writing to help make your argument?
Are your sentences clear and grammatically appropriate?
Do your paragraph carry ideas over in order to develop them?
Have you done more than simply summarized the text? (Please note that a simple summary will result in a failure. We are beyond the skill of simply summarizing.)
Have you explained the agenda of the text and how the author carried out this argument.Paper #2 Due April 2 at 11:59PM

Your second paper asks that you demonstrate your ability to understand an argument as well as understand how an argument works. You will select to speak about any one of the following essays outlined below. Your task in this essay is to tell me what the essay does and how the essay does it. For example, if we look at the essay of Lee and Grant, we might argue that the essay establishes America as a country of divided opinions as well as one of decency and respect. We might go on to argue that the essay illustrates this idea through the presentation of two drastically different and celebrated heroes of the Civil War. The remainder of my essay might continue to explain how the author drives his point home by using the final meeting of Lee and Grant to show that decency is the hallmark of a great country.

Please notice that although I am speaking about the text of Lee and Grant, I am not simply giving a summary of what the author said. I am explaining the agenda of this piece, and then I am explaining how the author went about presenting that agenda. Please also note that this essay should not be a summary of the text, although you will be required to summarize or quote a point or place in the text or in order to put your reader in context.

Your task for this paper is to select one of the essays below and to write a 2- page paper explaining what the piece does and how it does it. I do not want a research paper. Points will be deducted for research used, nor do I want a plagiarized paper from the Internet. I want your own words and your own thoughts about the what the text does and how it does it. I would like you to maintain a singular focus in your argument and connect your sentences so that they logically build from one another. I would like a mature and thoughtful discussion about what lies beneath the surface of the text.

Your essay must be an argument — not a list of facts — about the text. The point of this essay is to show that you are capable of developing a logical and reasonable argument based on facts and reason. You have been given discussions and examples that focus on how to examine a text. You will ask yourself what argument just the text make, and how the text makes that argument. You will explain the value of the text beyond the words on the page.

Questions to ask yourself:

1. What topic does this text explore?

2. What attitude does the author have about this issue? How does he express his opinion about this topic?

3. What evidence from the text can I use to support my argument?

4. How can I elaborate on this argument? In other words, what do I have to say that it’s important to relevant to this argument, without becoming too self-indulgent and making the text about me? What do I have to add to the topic expressed — not the plot.

* Please remember that I do not want a summary of the text. You might, however, use a summary for your introduction, so you can provide your reader with context before you move to your thesis and your analysis. I want you to explain to me the message that the text communicates and how he communicates that message.

You will select from one of the following essays for your paper:

Straw in metamorphosis

A few words about breasts

Shooting in elephant

Once more to the lake

A man without a country

Basics of the Paper (If you miss any of these basic requirements, you cannot receive an A. Please read carefully. )

Two full pages (You may stop anywhere on Page 3. You cannot stop on page 2, and you cannot start halfway down on Page 1. Page 1 includes your title in the center, your name and date on left hand, and the beginning of your discussion. I do not want a cover page.)
double space
12 font
indent paragraphs
underline thesis — this must be a claim about what the text does and how it does it
title in the center of your page (your title cannot be the title of the piece)
name and date on the left hand side of the page
Please do not use secondary sources. I want only your thinking
Please also know that if you plagiarize, you will fail the class. Plagiarism also includes using papers that have been submitted to other instructors.
Please also know that I do not want any research. I just want your ideas substantiated by the text.
Please do not use second person and do not use first person. You will lose one letter grade for doing so.

Grading Criteria

Did you follow directions? (If you have not followed all of the basic directions, you will not receive an A)
Do you have a clear thesis that explains what the piece does? A thesis is not a summary of the piece.
Are your paragraphs focused to one specific issue?
Have you used the text appropriately in your writing to help make your argument?
Are your sentences clear and grammatically appropriate?
Do your paragraph carry ideas over in order to develop them?
Have you done more than simply summarized the text? (Please note that a simple summary will result in a failure. We are beyond the skill of simply summarizing.)
Have you explained the agenda of the text and how the author carried out this argument.Paper #2 Due April 2 at 11:59PM

Your second paper asks that you demonstrate your ability to understand an argument as well as understand how an argument works. You will select to speak about any one of the following essays outlined below. Your task in this essay is to tell me what the essay does and how the essay does it. For example, if we look at the essay of Lee and Grant, we might argue that the essay establishes America as a country of divided opinions as well as one of decency and respect. We might go on to argue that the essay illustrates this idea through the presentation of two drastically different and celebrated heroes of the Civil War. The remainder of my essay might continue to explain how the author drives his point home by using the final meeting of Lee and Grant to show that decency is the hallmark of a great country.

Please notice that although I am speaking about the text of Lee and Grant, I am not simply giving a summary of what the author said. I am explaining the agenda of this piece, and then I am explaining how the author went about presenting that agenda. Please also note that this essay should not be a summary of the text, although you will be required to summarize or quote a point or place in the text or in order to put your reader in context.

Your task for this paper is to select one of the essays below and to write a 2- page paper explaining what the piece does and how it does it. I do not want a research paper. Points will be deducted for research used, nor do I want a plagiarized paper from the Internet. I want your own words and your own thoughts about the what the text does and how it does it. I would like you to maintain a singular focus in your argument and connect your sentences so that they logically build from one another. I would like a mature and thoughtful discussion about what lies beneath the surface of the text.

Your essay must be an argument — not a list of facts — about the text. The point of this essay is to show that you are capable of developing a logical and reasonable argument based on facts and reason. You have been given discussions and examples that focus on how to examine a text. You will ask yourself what argument just the text make, and how the text makes that argument. You will explain the value of the text beyond the words on the page.

Questions to ask yourself:

1. What topic does this text explore?

2. What attitude does the author have about this issue? How does he express his opinion about this topic?

3. What evidence from the text can I use to support my argument?

4. How can I elaborate on this argument? In other words, what do I have to say that it’s important to relevant to this argument, without becoming too self-indulgent and making the text about me? What do I have to add to the topic expressed — not the plot.

* Please remember that I do not want a summary of the text. You might, however, use a summary for your introduction, so you can provide your reader with context before you move to your thesis and your analysis. I want you to explain to me the message that the text communicates and how he communicates that message.

You will select from one of the following essays for your paper:

Straw in metamorphosis

A few words about breasts

Shooting in elephant

Once more to the lake

A man without a country

Basics of the Paper (If you miss any of these basic requirements, you cannot receive an A. Please read carefully. )

Two full pages (You may stop anywhere on Page 3. You cannot stop on page 2, and you cannot start halfway down on Page 1. Page 1 includes your title in the center, your name and date on left hand, and the beginning of your discussion. I do not want a cover page.)
double space
12 font
indent paragraphs
underline thesis — this must be a claim about what the text does and how it does it
title in the center of your page (your title cannot be the title of the piece)
name and date on the left hand side of the page
Please do not use secondary sources. I want only your thinking
Please also know that if you plagiarize, you will fail the class. Plagiarism also includes using papers that have been submitted to other instructors.
Please also know that I do not want any research. I just want your ideas substantiated by the text.
Please do not use second person and do not use first person. You will lose one letter grade for doing so.

Grading Criteria

Did you follow directions? (If you have not followed all of the basic directions, you will not receive an A)
Do you have a clear thesis that explains what the piece does? A thesis is not a summary of the piece.
Are your paragraphs focused to one specific issue?
Have you used the text appropriately in your writing to help make your argument?
Are your sentences clear and grammatically appropriate?
Do your paragraph carry ideas over in order to develop them?
Have you done more than simply summarized the text? (Please note that a simple summary will result in a failure. We are beyond the skill of simply summarizing.)
Have you explained the agenda of the text and how the author carried out this argument.

Topic: 1) As forensic psychologists, should we treat offenders or should we just lock them up and throw away the key? (Also, consider what challenges a forensic psychologist might face when working with offenders?)

Written paper:
The written paper is worth 25% of your final grade.
you shall have a cover page, an abstract page, table of contents, and a references page. The body of the paper itself should be four to five pages in length, double-spaced, not counting the title page, abstract, table of contents, and references. The body of the paper needs an introduction section and a conclusion section. The student should use topic headings throughout the body of the paper, except for the introduction and conclusions sections. You should have at least twelve reference sources with no more than three scholarly sources from Internet sites. The font type will be comparable to 12 Arial or 12 Times New Roman and double-spaced. The term paper must be written and submitted in a Microsoft Word document. If the document is not a Microsoft Word document, then the student will receive a zero (0) score for the paper.
The rules for the preparation and presentation of the manuscript shall conform to the APA Manual (7th Edition). Under no circumstances shall you quote any portion of a text from a source. Instead, you shall use his own words in conveying the meaning of source material. There are point deductions for quotes. you shall use grammar that conforms to standard and acceptable prose-writing style that is found in journal articles, scholarly books, and guides. The student should write in the first or third person and should avoid the use of “etc.” There are point deductions for writing in the second person or using “etc.” The cover page shall include the following information, typed in about the centre of the page: title, your name, PSY Special Topics: Introduction to Forensic Psychology, and your academic affiliation. The student shall use the running head feature and page numbers, in accordance with the APA Manual. The page numbers shall be displayed in the top right portion of the pages of the document. In Microsoft Word, locate the Insert tab, Page Number, Top of Page, and Plain Number 3. Select Plain Number 3. At this point, you may type in your header, according to the APA Manual.