Explain how analysis of love in the play further, influence, and improve our understanding of the play?

Explain how analysis of love in the play further, influence, and improve our understanding of the play? Are there different kinds of love in the play? If so, how are they different from one another and what are their relationships to one another within the play? For example, do they work together? Do they work against each other? How is love portrayed in the play? How does analysis of love(s) in the play further, influence, and improve our understanding of the play?

What resources are provided for teachers assist with interpreting and teaching the standards?

What is the purpose of having standards? Discuss how they are divided. Discuss anchor standards. How should teachers use the standards? What resources are provided for teachers assist with interpreting and teaching the standards? You must list references from the book or other resources to strengthen your response.

Part 2. Pick one subject and one grade (Math or ELA). Do a detailed comparison of the standards of the Mississippi and Texas standards for that particular grade and subject. For example, if you select 4th grade English Language Arts. You will review the 4th grade ELA standards for Mississippi and Texas. Then, you will do a comparison of the two. What do you see? Do students at that grade and subject level seem to learn the same things in both states? Does one seem more rigorous than the other? Etc…

Part 3. Pick one subject and one grade (Math or ELA Mississippi Standards). Then select one standard (or combination for that grade/subject) and create one small activity/assignment that aligns to that standard. Be sure to identify which standard you are aligning to for your activity/assignment. Be very descriptive in your directions.

Part 4. Reflection. Discuss your experience with this activity. Include implications for educational leadership. Why is knowledge in the area of curriculum imperative for an administrator?

What are the arguments that have been presented against using the atomic bomb?

Discussion #8: The decision to drop the atomic bomb.
Critics have charged that the United States was morally irresponsible in using atomic weapons against Japan during World War II. Were the United States’ actions justified?

In order to prepare for this discussion forum:

Review and identify relevant sections of Chapter 26 to support your discussion.
Read the essay DEBATING THE PAST: THE DECISION TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB.Download DEBATING THE PAST: THE DECISION TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB.
In 2005 a group of historians held a mock trial-Hiroshima: Truman on Trial.Links to an external site.
After you have completed your readings post your answers to only ONE of the following questions.

What are the explanations that have been offered in support of dropping the atomic bomb? What is your response to these explanations? Make sure that you provide specific support from your readings.
What are the arguments that have been presented against using the atomic bomb? What is your response to these arguments? Make sure that you provide specific support from your readings.
Review the trial and cast your verdict. How do you find President Truman? Guilty or Not Guilty? Discuss why you reached that decision.
In order to earn the full 100 points (100%) for this assignment, you must:

Directly and completely answer at least ONE question. Please make sure that you clearly indicate which question you have chosen to discuss. Clearly and accurately explain your answer based on factual information contained in the assigned readings. (80 points)