Best Writer

The paper should :
1. based on library research of scholarly materials.

2. relate to some specific issues and problems discussed and debated in books, journal articles, book chapters, periodicals and government reports.
3. The use of web-based information, except for official reports and reputable newspapers, should be kept to a minimum. Grey literature (such as magazines published by environmental groups) could be used, but with great care, because they may not always contain factually correct information.
4. be about 2,000 – 2,500 words in length. It should include a list of references, as well as tables and figures (if applicable). The list of references is excluded from the word count.

Things to be included:
1. Title – What is your report about?
2. Introduction – What do you examine? Why do you examine it? What is the importance of examining it?
3. Data & Methods – Which period and which place do you examine? What data are used? How do you examine?
4. Results – What do you find?
5. Discussion – What do you want to argue/imply?
6. Conclusion – What can be summarized?
7. References – List references that have been cited.

This course work assignment requires the submission of THREE seperate documents including:
1. Paper – 2 page paper in APA 7th edition
2. Teaching/Educational Flyer (1 page)
3. Informational teaching Powerpower with a minimal of 7 slides

INSTRUCTIONS:

1) PAPER:
– 2 pages
– APA 7th addition

– Community Resources Paper: Identify three (3) separate and different local community resources for your assigned population. See course schedule for assigned populations. Please identify your local area (Tri-Cities, TN).
– POPULATION: Childbearing Mothers
– Local area: Tri-Cities, Tennessee (Johnson city, Kingsport, and Bristol TN)

A) Then indicate the reason for selecting each resource and how that resource will be of a benefit for the client population.

B) In addition, identify 2 separate and different state or national resources that would be appropriate for the assigned population.
– Include with each state/national resource the rationale for selecting said resource and how the client population will be able to utilize each resource identified.

C) Feel free to be creative in the manner in which the community resources are identified and the rationales for selecting each resource are presented for submission.

2) Teaching/Educational Flyer
Teaching Assignment: Develop a community informational teaching session for the assigned client population. Create a flyer to advertise the class/session. The flyer should include:
• The topic of the informational teaching session
• The targeted population
• 2 teaching points that will encourage attendance
• A minimum of 2 of the resources identified

3) informational Teaching Powerpoint
The informational teaching session should be presented in slide show format and include a voice recording (voice over) of you presenting the informational teaching session. The slide show should consist of a minimum of 7 slides:
• Slide 1: topic
• Slide 2: three (3) learning objectives for the informational session with client (i.e., client will identify at least 3 of the 5 presented resources)
• Slide 3: identification of resources and the rationale for selected resources
• Slide 4: active learning strategy (may require more than 1 slide)
• Slide 5: assess outcome of all 3 learning objectives (i.e., client recalled the names of the 3 out of the 5 resources provided; may require more than 1 slide)
• Slide 6: create a plan to resolve unmet objectives
• Slide 7: reference list

ATTACHMENTS:
RUBRIC
The official assignment instructions and rubic document

1. How do community stakeholders interact with each other? Do you identify closely with any of the groups listed?
2. Review the concerns associated with restitution. How valid do you think these concerns are?
3. Discuss whether paying for court costs is fair.
4. Review the definition of forfeiture. Does how it is defined leave open the possibility of abuse?

You must share an interest you have outside of school and ask two philosophical questions about it. Make sure to spend a little time explaining your interest, along with articulating the kind (metaphysical, epistemological, ethical, or logical) of philosophical questions you are asking about your interest.

(Some of my interests are football and sports gambling.)

Don’t use dictionary definitions; instead, rely on your experience to develop as clear definitions as possible.

*PLEASE DO NOT USE OUTSIDE SOURCES*

You need to read, interpret, articulate, and relate what Descartes is getting at by two epistemological claims listed below.

In the first paragraph of Part IV in Discourse on Method, Descartes states when doing his philosophical meditation he: “reject[ed] as absolutely false everything in which I could imagine the least doubt, in order to see whether, after this process, something in my beliefs remained that was entirely indubitable” (18). He then states in paragraph three that he: “could take as a general rule that the things we conceive very clearly and distinctly are all true, but that there is some difficultly in properly discerning which are those that we distinctly conceive” (19).

In your own words, articulate the epistemological principles that Descartes is laying out and relate them to one another.

Don’t use dictionary definitions; instead, rely on your experience to develop as clear definitions as possible.

Base your essay on one of the activities listed below.
1. Explain the evolution of state-sponsored social services within the framework of changing political ideology and the impact this has had on the recipients of services. State your reasoned assumptions, based on your analysis, on what might take place in the next 5 to 10 years in Canada.

2. Explain in detail how political ideology has impacted the human services sector, or field in which you work and the response you would take if you were the decision-maker for your organization or program. Draw on your own reflections of the main concepts from the course to support your position.

3. Evaluate and discuss the evolution of the social safety net within North America and elaborate how it has helped a specific marginalized group of society to rise above its circumstances and how retrenchment has impacted this group. Draw on your own reflections of the main concepts from the course to support your position.

4. Present opposing ideological positions in a debate format on a national social policy issue (health care, post-secondary education, unemployment, child care, poverty reduction, Aboriginal self-governance, etc.) drawing on course concepts regarding the level of ideal government involvement, using historical precedents and current circumstances, and reflecting on potential future implications.

how is the haitian revoution global, what was its legacy?

In our reading and videos, we talked about functional congruence in sports advertising, which means that the brand should be aligned with the sport or athlete in terms of their attitudes, characteristics, and values. Please share one positive example AND one negative example of functional congruence in sports advertising. Tell your classmates why you think the ads are congruent or not congruent. (Please upload related screenshots or post video links so your classmates would understand your examples better.)
How has the rise of social media changed sports advertising? What are some examples of successful social media campaigns by sports brands or teams? Please share at least one example with your classmates. (Please upload related screenshots or post video links so your classmates would understand your examples better.)

In a 3-4 four-page paper, respond to the following:
Discuss at least three ways in which policing, at the local level, has changed in the Post 9/11 Era. Give specific examples.
Are these changes positive or negative? Why?
Is policing in the Post 9/11 Era more effective or less effective in fulfilling the primary goals of the police – maintaining order and protecting life and property? Why or why not?
Discuss the conflict in the Post 9/11 Era concerning security versus protection of Constitutional Rights. Which do you believe should have a higher priority? Why?
Your response should be thorough and you must support your ideas with at least two appropriate outside reference sources other than the course textbook.
Submit the completed first draft of your assignment. Your work will automatically be checked by Turnitin.

BIO375 Race for the Double Helix Assignment

Write an essay that answers ONE of the following questions. Your paper should be an absolute MINIMUM of two pages, typed (I recommend going at least one line onto the third page to be sure you meet this requirement). Use 12-point Times New Roman, double spacing, and 1-inch margins (2-page MINIMUM; if yours is less than this, your score will be reduced). Use evidence from the movie in your essay (you can Google the movie if you want to use quotes; be sure to cite any source(s) you use). You should cite AT LEAST the movie (so your paper will have at least one citation; this does not count as part of your two pages). You may use any citation format.

1. How was the scientific method used and described in The Double Helix?

2. What was James Watson’s primary motivation for studying nucleic acids?

3. Did Rosalind Franklin make any significant contribution to the discovery of DNA? What explains the attitude and/or treatment of her, by her colleagues? Was this indicative of the times or was her case an exception?

4. What was the most important experiment in discovering the structure of DNA was and how would the question be different if the work was done today.

5. Did Watson, Crick, and Wilkins deserve to be awarded a Nobel Prize for their work documented in The Double Helix? If you had been on the prize committee, what would you have done about Franklin?

6. Watson’s book (that the movie is based on) has an unusual style of scientific reporting to make it more appealing to the general public. It received a great deal of criticism from the scientific community for not being scientific enough. What do you think of this controversy? —You’d likely need to read the book to answer this question; I have a copy if you’d like to borrow it.

7. If you were going to be a research scientist, which person from the film do you think you would be most like and why?

8. Which do you think should be the goal of a scientist: receiving credit for being the first one to make an important discovery, or sharing your results with others so that the discovery can be made as soon as possible, even if you don’t get the credit for it?

9. Do you think that women scientists are still discriminated against the way Rosalind Franklin was in the 1950s?

10. Aside from the direct effects of discrimination against women, please describe other possible consequences of the fact that science has historically been a profession that has been dominated by men, most of whom had above average incomes.

11. Does the film suggest there is one way of doing science or several ways? If there are several, how do they differ? What about the reasons for doing science? What reasons seem to motivate the different scientists portrayed in the film?

12. What does this example of scientific discovery suggest about the importance of combining the perspectives of different disciplines in an effort to solve a problem?

13. Based on your understanding of the structure of DNA, explain why the film tries to generate so much excitement as Watson and Crick pin down the correlations for A-T and C-G.

14. Compare the research approaches, styles, and attitudes of Watson and Crick with those of Franklin.

15. When Franklin finally had the opportunity to look at the DNA double-helix model constructed by Watson and Crick, what was her response? What was Wilkins’ response? What would have been your response and why?

16. Why is the movie called “The Race for the Double Helix?” Do you think scientific research should be a race? Why or why not?

17. Who do you think played the most important role in the discovery of the structure of DNA? The least important role? In your opinion, were the Nobel Prizes awarded fairly? Why or why not?