Best Writer

Speech Type: Persuasive
Sources: (4) sources should be referenced verbally within your speech
You must have a minimum of four (4) sources outside of your own knowledge on your subject.
Combined sources must cover more than one side of the argument

In general you must:
Arouse and maintain the interest and attention of the audience.
Provide the audience with a compelling and supported argument for your position on the subject.
Address the opposing viewpoint and show its fallacies.

When your speech is over, your audience should feel that:
you have expressed your position clearly
their concerns about the topic have been recognized and addressed
your position is reasonable and supported by others

Use verbal support.
Provide support for your argument.
Cite sources, when appropriate, in the text of your speech. Note: A minimum of four citations must be made.
Use a variety of different forms of verbal support in your speech: statistics, reports, anecdotes, etc.

Guidelines and directions for this paper are very strict and need to be followed accordingly. Please see them as they will be attached. Please read in the directions what counts as a source for this assignment as not all things count!

Must be double spaced 1″ margins, 12pt font, 5 pages NOT INCLUDING title page or works cited page.

The rhetoric you will be analyzing will be attached here as a link! ⬇️
https://www.nj.com/opinion/2020/08/heres-why-i-say-black-lives-matter.html

Read Chapter 5 “After Bretton Woods” in Globalizing Capital. Then write a brief summary of this period in history (a paragraph or two only). The bulk of your writing should be a reflection of the reading as it relates to the Shapiro textbook “Foundations of Multinational Financial Management”. In other words, what does the post Bretton Woods world look like and how does it help us understand what’s happening in our world today? Close the paper with an opinion on how this time in history will continue to affect our immediate future, if at all. Support your work with at least one additional source. I am not too strict on what is considered a source as long as you avoid wikipedia, investopedia, blogs, etc. They are useful tools in their own right, but not appropriate for an academic assignment. Appropriate sources would include peer reviewed research, white papers, or even a rigorous WSJ or Bloomberg article.
Don’t simply summarize the sources. Build an argument to support the purpose, noted above: what can history teach us about today and our immediate future.

Length: 2 to 3 pages (not including reference page)

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing (double-spacing, complete sentences, etc.) and current APA standards for citing and referencing. Be sure to adhere to the University’s Academic Integrity Policy. Anything that looks like plagiarism, accidental or otherwise, will receive a zero.

write an adaptation of Hunger games the book and hunger games the movie.
Compare one small aspect/ scene/quote/character in the text and film version of the Hunger Games. Quote must be included

The course is RACISM IN CANADA.
Begin with a clearly written introductory section that explains the title of the paper and gives the reader a general idea of the topic, Introduction should include a thesis statement.
Sources must be from scholars in the social sciences. Internet sources are not valid scholarly sources unless it is the web version of an academic journal article.
Include an extra page for reference.
Paper should include, Introduction, Arguments and conclusion.
You may use the following book: Augie Fleras, Unequal Relations: Acritical Relations Aboriginal Critical Introduction to Race, Ethnic, and Aboriginal Dynamics in Canada. Pearson, Toronto (Eight Edition).
Pick a title for the paper.

All instructions are on the attached file

Any additional info would be on this link
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ekyjnD-HInm_UR6xKz8UZGaq6tphm9z9bcU1RiqXtvo/edit?usp=sharing

Write an essay in which you analyze the persuasive strategies that Mark Antony uses to sway the crowd to his perspective in Act 3, scene 2 of Shakespeare’s Julius Ceasar. consider strategies that appeal to logic and emotions and the way that he uses his own character to sway the crowds

1). first year srudent s making the transition ro college need to focus on their studies,not money.(Thesis Statment)
2).While its true some students have to work to support themselves.(concession)
3).they could limit their work hours to part time or take out extra loan money.(Rufastration)
this a start of how the argument paper could go

1. An introduction that will set the tone for your “slant” on the article – positive, negative, or
middle of the road. Will you recommend it to read? Does it have good and new insight to the
topic covered?
2. Something about the author: experience, reputation, credibility, etc.
3. Article’s publishing characteristics: print, illustrations, index, endnotes, overall organization and
helpful guides.
4. Article’s thesis, intention, or argument, and how well it was executed.
5. Discussion of controversial points with which you agree or do not agree.
6. Flaws of the article (outright errors, weakly-supported arguments).
7. Documentation presented.
8. Comparison to works threatening roughly or precisely the same subject.
9. Value of the contribution to the body of Knowledge on the subject.

Case Study #3 Chapter 25 Community Acquired Pneumonia with orthostatic hypotension.

Complete the answers for the case study on a word document.

Use the rubric for completing this assignment, include in-text citations and references.