What specific examples might you draw from these pages to make more significant points?

In this essay, you must demonstrate that you have completed and understood the reading to present supporting solid evidence and a clear argument that leads to an excellent conclusion. What specific examples might you draw from these pages to make more significant points?
If you use a direct quotation from course materials, please cite the source by placing the author, title, and page number(s) within parentheses in the text correctly (attached link).

Write an analysis of a mobile game of your choice using either or both of the week 9 readings (one by Mäyrä & Alha, the other by Steirer & Barnes).

Write an analysis of a mobile game of your choice using either or both of the week 9 readings (one by Mäyrä & Alha, the other by Steirer & Barnes). You may choose to focus on either Candy Crush Saga or Red, the two mobile games assigned as your screening for week 9. Alternately, you can pick a mobile game of your choice to focus on, though it should primarily be a mobile game, rather than a port of a game released on other systems (e.g. Minecraft and Fortnite were released for PC and consoles first and then a mobile game port was subsequently released, meaning they are not primarily/originally mobile games). Given that one of the readings focuses on Angry Birds, you cannot pick that game to write on.

Your response paper should discuss in detail the mechanics and design of the game, the game’s economic model, and what aspects of the game (if any) make the game “mobile.” Your analysis should draw on specifics about the game you chose to write on, providing examples for close analysis. If it is a game you are already familiar with, you should be sure to play/replay the opening of the game to better understand how it introduces itself to new players .

– The mobile you are going to be writting about is candy crush.

Discuss the person’s view of the cause of their health condition, the person’s health literacy, and the person’s identity on the continuum of privilege-disadvantage (Table 4 in the Lor article on p. 361).

Briefly introduce a person you have recently cared for in your nursing practice. (Be sure not to include any identifying information that would be protected by HIPAA!) Discuss the person’s view of the cause of their health condition, the person’s health literacy, and the person’s identity on the continuum of privilege-disadvantage (Table 4 in the Lor article on p. 361). What was (or would be) your approach to care for him/her in a culturally competent way?

Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.Briefly introduce a person you have recently cared for in your nursing practice. (Be sure not to include any identifying information that would be protected by HIPAA!) Discuss the person’s view of the cause of their health condition, the person’s health literacy, and the person’s identity on the continuum of privilege-disadvantage (Table 4 in the Lor article on p. 361). What was (or would be) your approach to care for him/her in a culturally competent way?

materials
Ritter, L.A., Graham, D.H. (2017). Multicultural Health (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
ISBN: 9781284021028Ritter, L.A., Graham, D.H. (2017). Multicultural Health (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
ISBN: 9781284021028
Carteret, M. (2015, October). Reading Between the Head Nods | Dimensions of Culture. Retrieved from http://www.dimensionsofculture.com/2015/10/reading-between-the-head-nods/Links to an external site.Carteret, M. (2015, October). Reading Between the Head Nods | Dimensions of Culture. Retrieved from http://www.dimensionsofculture.com/2015/10/reading-between-the-head-nods/Links to an external site.

Does the inherent right of self-defence (Art.51 UN Charter) permit a State to use force against States or non-State actors even when they do not pose an immediate threat?

1. Does the inherent right of self-defence (Art.51 UN Charter) permit a State to use force
against States or non-State actors even when they do not pose an immediate threat?
This question asks you to examine how States like the US have sought to avoid breaching the
prohibition against the use of force by widening their interpretation of the right to self-
defence. Answers to this question should look at the following:
a. Articles 2(4) and 51 UN Charter; `Self-defence’, `anticipatory self-defence’; pre-
emptive self-defence; Caroline test
b. Recommended sources:
 ch.4 `Self-defence as a justification for war: the geo-political and war on
terror models’ in Chinkin and Kaldor, International Law and New Wars
 ch.5 `The use of force against terrorism: a new war for a new century?’ in
Gray, International Law and the Use of Force
 ch.31 `The problem of imminence in an uncertain world’ in Weller, The
Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law

Your answer should be structured as an essay: it should respond directly to the question; it should include introductory and concluding paragraphs; it should develop its argument in a clear and logical way; it should support its argument with relevant and properly-referenced sources from the academic literature (using the OSCOLA referencing system). It must include a bibliography.

Before beginning to write make sure you understand fully the question and what it is you are being asked to do.
✓ In your essay, be sure to define and explain any key concepts (e.g., `diplomatic recognition’ or `reservations’).
✓ Try to include references to legal sources, e.g., treaties, court decisions (international and domestic), the UN International Law Commission, or legal scholarship.
✓ Remember, this is an international law essay and so your paper must focus on analysing the nature of different international legal regimes and how these function!