Identify 5 aspects of teaching that are similar for “regular” education (i.e. Math, Science, Social Studies, English, etc.) and for Physical Education.

1. Identify 5 aspects of teaching that are similar for “regular” education (i.e. Math, Science,
Social Studies, English, etc.) and for Physical Education.
2. Identify 5 aspects of teaching that are different for “regular” education (i.e. Math, Science,
Social Studies, English, etc.) and for Physical Education.
3. Based on your experience thus far which do you think is harder to teach? Why?
5. Zim thinks if you can teach PE “well” you can teach anything well. Defend or argue his
statement based on your thoughts and experiences.
6. Why am I asking you these questions and these types of questions? Try to remove yourself as
a student to answer this question and put yourself in the role as a teacher. Why would YOU ask
these questions (if you did)? What’s the point? What do you want your students to get from
them individually and as a collective? (Note: there may or may not be a right answer to this
question, and the ones before so you may want to think about why I am REALLY asking you
these questions…see the levels of Cognitive domain for a hint!)1. Identify 5 aspects of teaching that are similar for “regular” education (i.e. Math, Science,
Social Studies, English, etc.) and for Physical Education.
2. Identify 5 aspects of teaching that are different for “regular” education (i.e. Math, Science,
Social Studies, English, etc.) and for Physical Education.
3. Based on your experience thus far which do you think is harder to teach? Why? (Try not to
think about your potential lack of knowledge of things like specific manipulatives; rather think in
terms of teaching in general.).
4. Bad teaching is bad teaching. Based on your experiences and observations what are some
characteristics of bad teaching that you will try to avoid in your future as a teacher.
5. Zim thinks if you can teach PE “well” you can teach anything well. Defend or argue his
statement based on your thoughts and experiences.
6. Why am I asking you these questions and these types of questions? Try to remove yourself as
a student to answer this question and put yourself in the role as a teacher. Why would YOU ask
these questions (if you did)? What’s the point? What do you want your students to get from
them individually and as a collective?
4. Bad teaching is bad teaching. Based on your experiences and observations what are some
characteristics of bad teaching that you will try to avoid in your future as a teacher.
5. Zim thinks if you can teach PE “well” you can teach anything well. Defend or argue his
statement based on your thoughts and experiences.
6. Why am I asking you these questions and these types of questions? Try to remove yourself as
a student to answer this question and put yourself in the role as a teacher. Why would YOU ask
these questions (if you did)? What’s the point? What do you want your students to get from
them individually and as a collective? (Note: there may or may not be a right answer to this
question, and the ones before so you may want to think about why I am REALLY asking you
these questions…see the levels of Cognitive domain for a hint!)1. Identify 5 aspects of teaching that are similar for “regular” education (i.e. Math, Science,
Social Studies, English, etc.) and for Physical Education.
2. Identify 5 aspects of teaching that are different for “regular” education (i.e. Math, Science,
Social Studies, English, etc.) and for Physical Education.
3. Based on your experience thus far which do you think is harder to teach? Why? (Try not to
think about your potential lack of knowledge of things like specific manipulatives; rather think in
terms of teaching in general.).
4. Bad teaching is bad teaching. Based on your experiences and observations what are some
characteristics of bad teaching that you will try to avoid in your future as a teacher.
5. Zim thinks if you can teach PE “well” you can teach anything well. Defend or argue his
statement based on your thoughts and experiences.
6. Why am I asking you these questions and these types of questions? Try to remove yourself as
a student to answer this question and put yourself in the role as a teacher. Why would YOU ask
these questions (if you did)?

Wage disparity based on gender in the football industry.

TOPIC:
I need a Argumentative essay. The topic is the difference in wages from football (soccer) players, how man and woman get paied different. If it needed clarification its not about american football its about soccer.
The approach i want to take is how men players still get paied more than female footballers, regardless of trying to find payment equality.

INTRUCTIONS:
Develop a strong thesis statement; read, summarize and paraphrase approximately 10 or more relevant (academic) articles to back up the statement; and write an argumentative essay of 1,700 to 2,500 words (Calibri, font size 11, line spacing 1.15, references in APA, title page and reference list are not included in the word count).

cultural identites

For this assignment, you will write a well-supported, well-organized thesis-driven essay about cultural identities i have done my thesis but im not sure if its right but i will provide my outline here to give better undertsanding.

professor outline:
An outline and a reverse outline, keeping in mind the principles of #organization.
Research: You should consult with at least 5 sources (at least 2 of which are academic).
Include an annotated bibliography (see below).
Format the entire paper correctly in APA style (see below).
Proofread and revise, revise, revise. -** Hand in the following parts of the assignment (in one document) to get the full score (see template):**
Topic / Thesis with rationale
Annotated bibliography
Outline of the Essay
Introduction of the Essay containing the (revised) thesis
The Rest of the Essay

mine about cultural identites:
• introduction
• thesis-
• hook
• S- substantial
• P- precise
• A- Arguable
• R- relevant
• C- concise
• thesis: cultural identity is complex because it is often shaped by an individual’s interactions with their environment, society and beliefs.
• Body1:
• topic sentence/ individual interactions
• evidences.
• idea 1
• examples: person religion or cultural beliefs, how ones family dynamics influence their identity, or how a person environment can shape their values or beliefs.
• evidence from research findings from psychology or sociology, personal anecdotes and stories or historical examples.
• University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing edition, 2016. This edition adapted from a work originally produced in 2013 by a publisher who has requested that it not receive attribution. (2016, September 29).
Body2:
• topic sentence- environment/society.
• counter claim
• evidence
body3:
• topic sentence- beliefs.
• idea 3
• exploring the various ways that identity can be shaped or formed.
• Exmaples/ evidence.
conclusion
• restate thesis
• final thoughts.

Add footnotes to draw attention to your most prominent applications of LOs (especially those mentioned in the “LOs to be graded” section below).
In the footnote text (at the bottom of the page), provide the hashtag of the LO and at least a 2-3 sentence explanation of your application. Help the professor understand exactly why this constitutes a strong application.
Remember: the use of #thesis should be within the paper itself; the footnote is merely there to show how you believe you applied it well in the text. For each LO, footnote what you believe your strongest application of the LO is.
Footnote text does not count toward the target length of the assignment, and all applications of the (not just those that are footnoted) will count toward your grade.
Including footnotes is an important part of reflecting on your learning. It should be an occasion for #professionalism. Help the professor understand exactly why this constitutes a strong application. For samples of effective annotations, refer to the footnotes that go along with each LO example (in Why/Use of pre-class readings) written in square brackets.Add footnotes to draw attention to your most prominent applications of LOs (especially those mentioned in the “LOs to be graded” section below).
In the footnote text (at the bottom of the page), provide the hashtag of the LO and at least a 2-3 sentence explanation of your application. Help the professor understand exactly why this constitutes a strong application.
Remember: the use of #thesis should be within the paper itself; the footnote is merely there to show how you believe you applied it well in the text. For each LO, footnote what you believe your strongest application of the LO is.
Footnote text does not count toward the target length of the assignment, and all applications of the (not just those that are footnoted) will count toward your grade.
Including footnotes is an important part of reflecting on your learning. It should be an occasion for #professionalism. Help the professor understand exactly why this constitutes a strong application. For samples of effective annotations, refer to the footnotes that go along with each LO example (in Why/Use of pre-class readings) written in square brackets.

Please comply with the following APA conventions for formatting an annotated bibliography:

The text and the reference list should be double-spaced.
Entries should be organized alphabetically.
Each paragraph should be indented.
Reference list entries must have a hanging indent.
Use Times New Roman size 12 font.Please comply with the following APA conventions for formatting an annotated bibliography:

The text and the reference list should be double-spaced.
Entries should be organized alphabetically.
Each paragraph should be indented.
Reference list entries must have a hanging indent.
Use Times New Roman size 12 font.

Learning Outcomes Added
Composition: Communicate with a clear and precise style.
Thesis: Write a clear declarative sentence that takes a firm position on the topic under consideration and serves to organize the rest of the work.
Organization: Effectively organize communications.
EvidenceBased: Identify and appropriately structure the information needed to support an argument effectively.
SourceQuality: Distinguish between categories and types of information to determine source quality.
Professionalism: Ensure that your communication follows established guidelines and use a careful editing processLearning Outcomes Added
Composition: Communicate with a clear and precise style.
Thesis: Write a clear declarative sentence that takes a firm position on the topic under consideration and serves to organize the rest of the work.
Organization: Effectively organize communications.
EvidenceBased: Identify and appropriately structure the information needed to support an argument effectively.
SourceQuality: Distinguish between categories and types of information to determine source quality.
Professionalism: Ensure that your communication follows established guidelines and use a careful editing process

You could cite Appiah as evidence in one or two paragraphs. Chapter 6 of his book is all about cultural identity, so there should be something in there that you can use to support your ideas in the essay.You could cite Appiah as evidence in one or two paragraphs. Chapter 6 of his book is all about cultural identity, so there should be something in there that you can use to support your ideas in the essay.

Appiah, K.(2018). The lies that bind: Rethinking identity. Profile Books.

In chapter 6 “culture”Appiah, K.(2018). The lies that bind: Rethinking identity. Profile Books.

In chapter 6 “culture”

Methods in Social Research

1. Start with researching why police body cameras are a good tool for police officers.

2. Find three research articles, (one journal article at least) dated no older that 2017, that do the best job helping you answer your research question. Include these three references with your 1 page.

3. Take the 1 page (or 500 words max) and now cut it down to no more than 250 words.

4. Take your 250 words and cut it down to 100. Submit all three versions of your writing.

5. Use one of the journal articles and do a deep dive. I want you to critically evaluate everything that the researcher(s) did–including the literature review. Was it relevant? Complete? Recent? Don’t forget to look at the ethics of the design–any potential issues? Spend 2 pages inspecting the article through the lens of a seasoned expert in research methods. Wow me.:) Make sure to provide a full citation for the article.

Methods in social research (plan)

Answer the following question in the most comprehensive and concise manner.

You have just opened your own research consulting business and a local Chief wants to hire you for a community-based research project. The Chief wants you to design and implement a research project to help her find the best ways to communicate public safety concerns as well as to announce community-building opportunities and events within the city. Since Covid, the Chief has struggled with very low community attendance at said events and she thinks community building is critical to her Officers’ success in helping the communities they serve. In three pages or less, provide a research “plan” that incorporates the best practices you learned in this class in the following categories:

-Ethics

-Relevant research

-Method design and related guidelines

-Community-based research

You can use tables, detailed outlines, and bullet points to illustrate the components of your research plan.