Best Writer

Your assignment here is to write a 3-5 page paper analyzing political themes and ideas in one of three films—either The Candidate, All the President’s Men, or Game Change. You should watch the film looking for ideas you will have read about (for example—the impact of the media, incumbency, party politics, public opinion…..) then write an essay explaining how you felt these ideas were portrayed in the film’s story. You are welcome to draw on outside writings but be sure and include them in a bibliography at the end of the essay.

Compare the 2 graphs and explain what the data is demonstrating. Some ideas about what to address, but you can come up with your own!
Where are some types of farm labor concentrated? Which types of crops are grown that are using different amounts of labor in different places?
Does the concentration of farm labor correlate to the wages? How and why?
Does the farm production and food processing happen in the same states? Are they both concentrated in the same ways?
What explains different concentrations and wages for food preparation jobs?
Are there differences that are explained by laws?
Does farm labor organizing happen in some areas more than others? Are any differences in employment concentration attributable to farm labor organizing efforts (or lack thereof)?
For reference:
Location quotient shows the concentration of that employment compared to the national average.
>1 indicates the occupation has a higher share of employment than average
<1 indicates the occupation is less prevalent in the area than average In 2018, average annual real wages in the U.S. amounted to $63,093 U.S. dollars. All data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2018 survey (website with full list of categories https://www.bls.gov/oes/2018/may/oessrci.htm#11 )

What’s your nursing philosophy? In your own words, discuss your philosophy of nursing. Reflect on the definition of the four concepts nursing meta-paradigm. Write your own definition of each concept of the meta-paradigm of nursing. Which concept would you add to the meta-paradigm of nursing and why? Which concept would you eliminate and why?

1. Is our national government today a “democratic” system? Give specific examples to support your position.
2. As Americans were like to rank everything from sports teams to movies to presidents. Yet many argue the nature of the presidency has changed so greatly over the years that to compare Jefferson with Clinton simply makes no sense. What are some of the most significant ways the presidency has changed throughout American political history? What initiated those changes?
3. If the authors of the Constitution saw the government today, what aspects of it would they be the most surprised about? What aspects would still look familiar to them?
4. What are some of the main forces which you feel shape political culture in America today? Are these factors similar or different from those of other nations? Are they similar or different from factors that shaped American political culture in the past?
5. In what ways does the Constitution and the Bill of Rights set up checks and controls on the national government? Have these controls been successful?

In a 750-1,000 word reflection, identify the school settings for the teachers you interviewed and discuss the following:
All team members are accountable for understanding the procedures and guidelines for the special education process. Discuss how you plan to comply with this requirement and explain how you will ensure that other team members understand their roles.
Describe strategies you could employ for ensuring confidentiality of information and instilling trust with parents/guardians. Discuss the legal, ethical, and policy responsibilities teachers have related to the educational, developmental, and medical services for individuals with disabilities and their parents/guardians.
Describe how you will encourage the involvement of parents/guardians and students in the IEP process. Include discussion about how you will document all efforts to involve parents/guardians and students in the process.
Describe the major differences in roles between the special education teacher and the general education teacher. Discuss whether your frame of reference about the roles of educators in the special education process has changed, and if so, explain how.
Describe strategies that could be used for effective collaboration between the special education teacher and general education teacher to support learning for students with disabilities.
Data collection should be completed by both special education and general education teachers. Describe specific strategies you can employ in your future professional practice to streamline the data collection process and support team members in the process of data collection.

1. What are some examples of the Supreme Court issuing a
ruling which changed its previous position?
What legal principles did they use to justify their change?
2. Give examples of politicians in different eras using or
being hurt by the media
3. What are some examples of national third party
movements? Why were they created? Why did they ultimately fail?
4. What are some landmark points in the government’s
commitment to (or lack thereof) civil rights?
Why did the changes occur?
5. Under what conditions has the government altered its
position toward American civil liberties (e.g. war-time, terrorist attacks or
threats)?

This week, you will prepare a pamphlet for your assignment
submission. Assume your pamphlet will be used by local researchers to help
educate potential research subjects. Your materials will help these
individuals decide whether they want to participate in future research
studies, as ethical treatment and adherence to guidelines are important
considerations.
As related to your topic or selected research area, first, briefly
describe each of the five APA ethical principles and illustrate their importance
when conducting research. Then, explore possible concerns or consideration
to be mindful of when designing a research study with your specific topic
or area of focus in mind. Select at least one relevant issue for each of
the five ethical principles that could be a concern for your topic, and
then document how you could avoid these ahead of time. What might you do to
comply with these ethical principles and guidelines?
Provide a pamphlet with graphics and visual aids to help you
illustrate these points.
Support your assignment with at least three scholarly
resources. In addition to these specified resources,
other appropriate scholarly resources, including seminal articles, or
the APA website, may be included.
Length: trifold pamphlet, not including title and reference
pages
Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the
ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and
insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect
scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to
Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.
Upload your document and click the Submit to Dropbox button.

Princes of the Yen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5Ac7ap_MAY
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR W3 REFLECTION EXERCISE
This week, we want to get you engaging with each other while integrating the analytical skills you’ve been applying to class readings, lectures, and films. Please note that unlike previous reflections, this one is graded as three separate parts. You will get 5 points for your analysis and 5 points for each of your two comments, totaling 15 points.
Please note that you must complete all three parts: one analysis and two comments. For example, if you were assigned to group 2, you would write an analysis for group 2. You would also make one comment in group 1 and another comment in group 3. It is essential that you contribute to each of the film groups so incomplete assignments will not be graded if, for instance, a person makes two comments but does not submit an analysis of their assigned film.
In this film discussion group, you are either writing an assigned film analysis OR making one thoughtful comment to your peers. Please make sure to double-check that you know if you should be writing an analysis or comment for this film by checking the “People” section of our class canvas page.
ANALYSIS INSTRUCTIONS
Write an analysis of the documentary using questions 1-3. Don’t forget ask your peers one question at the end.
1) What is the overall message of the film?
Choose a topic/theme you found to be important to the film’s message. Topics can include but are not limited to: gender, politics, religion, culture, inequality, etc.
2a) How did the filmmakers portray that topic? Give specific details.
2b) Do you agree with how they represented the topic? Why or why not? Anything else you’d like to add?
3) What question would you ask you peers about the film?
COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Write one engaging comment to other students about this film that explores an assigned reading or lecture. This comment should be in conversation with your peers and class materials so make sure you clearly and correctly draw on one assigned class reading or lecture you think is relevant and interesting. If there are already three comments on a post then try to comment on posts with less replies.
TIMELINE
Submit your analysis and two comments by Thursday, July 8th at 5pm.
IN-TEXT CITATION FORMATTING
You do not need to create a bibliography. However, you are required to provide in-text citations so we can see how you are utilizing class readings and lectures. As standard in publishing and academic writing, citing is mostly done by paraphrasing and verbatim quotes are used sparingly. So just one or two verbatim quotes max if you have a longer discussion. We want to read your unique voice. Show us that you can identify, define, and apply key terms paraphrasing your citations as much as possible.
Citing readings
Example: paraphrasing an author’s work (Chang 2014)
Example: using verbatim quotes (Chang 2014: 8)
Citing Professor Yolmo’s Lectures
Example: (Yolmo 6-21-2021) or Professor Yolmo (6-21-2021) explained that……
*Make to clearly identify the day, month, and year of the lecture.
EDITING YOUR WORK FOR FLOW AND GRAMMAR
The most effective writing style in academia and the workplace is precise and concise. After performing a spelling and grammar check with whatever writing software you are using, read your reflection aloud before you submit. Reading aloud is one of the best ways to catch errors the software might have missed. Reading aloud can also help you eliminate redundant words and refine sentence structure, especially in sentences over two lines. Once a sentence gets to about three lines, it’s often cluttered with information that confuses readers. Instead of cramming everything into one long sentence, consider how it can be broken down into smaller sentences that build on one another so readers better follow your ideas.
Free editing software that can be used in addition to Word, Google Docs, etc.:
https://www.grammarly.com/
(Links to an external site.)
PLAGIARISM
This is an individual assignment and each reflection should be unique. We will deduct points from reflections that duplicate the work of other students or fail to quote and credit authors. As instructors, we love when you cite your sources because it helps understand how you are engaging with the class!
Credit must be given for every direct quotation, for paraphrasing or summarizing a work (in whole or in part) in one’s own words, and for information that is not common knowledge. It is the writer’s responsibility to ensure that submitted papers are free of plagiarism. Be aware that because each student has his or her own writing style, and because convenient software exists to match online texts, plagiarism is relatively easy for instructors to detect, and the consequences can be devastating to a student’s academic career. Submitting work that you did not write with your name on it is grounds for failure in the course. UCI takes academic honesty very seriously, and instructors are required to report any instances of plagiarism to the student’s academic dean who keeps a permanent record of the offense.
The most common offense.
The most common form of plagiarism that I have come across is when students use the exact words of someone else, do not put quotes around those words, and then end the phrase with the author and year in the parentheses. While I appreciate the ATTEMPT at citing the source (putting the author and year at the end), if you have used the exact words of someone else and those exact words are not in quotes, you have committed plagiarism. To be more specific, the rule I will be using is: if you have used 6 or more words from another source and those words are not in quotes, this constitutes plagiarism and you will, at the very least, receive a 0 for the section of the assignment in which the plagiarism occurred. I don’t know how to be any more clear about this. Not your words + not in quotes = plagiarism. If you plagiarize, we will catch it, and there will be unpleasant consequences. Writing tip. When summarizing the work of others without using direct quotes, you should read their work (e.g., journal article), study it a bit, and then PUT THE ARTICLE AWAY. Only when it is not in front of you, tell us what the article was about IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Only then is it okay to cite the author & year without quotation marks around the words.
“Recycling” papers/comments. Also, it is NOT OKAY to use sections of a paper that you have already turned in for another class, as this puts you at an advantage over other students who have written their assignment100% from scratch for this class. Turning in work that you already got credit for in another class may not technically be labeled plagiarism, but it still definitely falls under the category of “academic dishonesty,” and it is not allowed; please see Item #3 under “dishonest conduct” in the UCI Academic Honesty Policy: http://senate.uci.edu/academic-integrity/Turnitin.com. To help minimize (and catch) instances of plagiarism and paper recycling, you will be required to upload your written assignments to CANVAS, which is automatically linked to turnitin.com.
Here are some links to additional resources that explain how to paraphrase and avoid plagiarism:
Plagiarism and Best Writing Practices
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/avoiding_plagiarism/best_practices.html (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)
Plagiarism and Best Writing Practices for ESL students
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/english_as_a_second_language/esl_students/plagiarism_and_esl_writers.html
Reading 1-How the Other Half Bank_ Mehrsa Baradaran
Reading 2- Exclusion, Exploitation, and the Threat to Democracy_Mehrsa Baradaran
Reading 3_ BANKERS, BAILOUTS, AND BLAMING THE STATE_Austerity_Mark Blyth

This assignment asks you to describe in more detail the
operation you chose during Week 1 using some of the terms and concepts you
read about in OM6 Ch. 3 and 4.

Answer the following questions: “Your Operation” is GENERAL MANGER of a Copper Mine
Submit the 1/2 to 1 page Your Operation
description you created in Week 1. This will remind me what
operation you chose, your role in it, etc. and so it will help me more
fairly evaluate your answers to the following questions.
Chapter 3, Sections 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3 and the
notion of a “customer benefit package” are all exploring a
similar topic — understanding what the customers
value. Describe Your Operation’s customer value
(benefit) package. Your Operation may not have a clear understanding
of what their customers value. If so, then describe what you think the
customer value(benefit) package should be. You may want to discuss this
notion of customer value( package with your supervisor.
Subsection 3-4 explains how the product or service
attributes the customers value get translated into operational
priorities. For example, Walmart targets customers who care
most about low cost while Target targets customers who may be willing to pay a
bit more for a more pleasant shopping experience. OM6 (pages 54 – 57) describe
five competitive priority options and explain that firms must choose which are
most important. Explain which one or two priorities you believe are most
important for Your Operation and the reasoning for your choices. Explain
why you believe the operation does, or does not, behave consistent with
the priorities you chose.
The rest of Chapter 3 explains how an operation should
manage its activity in a way that supports the overall strategy.
Do Your Operation’s management and associates have a shared
understanding of the strategy? Do decisions and priorities support
accomplishing the strategy?
As I said earlier, Chapter 4 gives too little attention to
the challenges of technological change and the impact on operations. That
is why I included the supplemental reading material. Today it is
difficult to find an example of a business or organization that is unaffected
by changing technologies but some are more dramatically affected than
others. Retail businesses have certainly been dramatically affected by
the Internet. The auto industry is facing overwhelming change as a result
of battery technology improvements and autonomous driving technology. A
recent advertising campaign tells us that the development of new beer flavors
has become much faster because of Microsoft technology. How is Your Operation
being affected by technology today?
Does Your Operation ‘s management envision significant
change in the future because of technology shifts? If so, then how will
it be affected. Is Your Operation positioned to prosper in the face of
technological change?
A typical high scoring response to these question
would be about 1,000 – 1,500 words long in addition to the Your Operation
description from Week 1.

After reading the three articles on helping behavior, what do you think are the main variables that enhance or reduce a person’s chance of getting help when needed? Are there any ethical concerns that arise when using research to test these variables and their effect on helping?
Use these 3 articles only:
High cost helping scenario: The role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior – ScienceDirect (snhu.edu)
Singh, B., & Winkel, D. E. (2012). Racial differences in helping behaviors: The role of respect, safety, and identification: JBE. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 467-477. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1007/s10551-011-1011-x
Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100–108. https://doi-org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1037/h0034449