The assignment is to create a sustainable community. You can create the name, location, etc. (this part doesn’t matter to me). For each subcategory find an environmental policy and implement it in the sustainable community design.
Instructions:
Sustainable Community Design (worth 100 points). A 7-10 page paper on how you would create a sustainable community (or city), based on policies discussed in the course, through research, and other methods (be creative!). Points breakdown:
Introduction to your community- name of community, where it’s located, governance structure (how do community members make decisions?, etc.) 10 points
Covering policies addressing (at minimum):
•Energy (10 points)
• Social Systems (10 points)
•Buildings/Infrastructure (10 points)
• Transportation (10 points)
• Water Management (10 points)
• Waste Management (10 points)
• Land Management (10 points)
Vision for the future- You can talk about how you would like your community to grow/change over the next several decades (you can choose the time frame, just some sort of plan for the future). (10 points)
Some sort of visual representation of your community- at minimum should be a rough sketch. This is where you can really get creative; especially those of you into GIS, virtual reality, etc. (10 points). If you draw a sketch, it counts as one page towards your 7 page minimum. However, if you choose to do something more elaborate to visually represent your community, I will count this as more than one page. Please contact me in advance with your idea, so I can tell you how many written pages this will count towards.
Best Writer
write a minimum of 250 words summarizing one of the three sources you chose to read (read 3, summarize 1). In your summary, you need to include all of the elements described in the lectures, including a quotation in MLA formatting.
Using these three sources
Fast Facts – AACC (nche.edu)
Microsoft PowerPoint – 2017-04-03 Econ Press Briefing – combined FINAL printout (newyorkfed.org)
https://www.tbr.edu/sites/tbr.edu/files/media/2018/05/TBR_TNPromise_2015_2.pdf
Summarize the article in your own words and include information in your paper on how the article relates to course concepts. Discuss the course material. Demonstrate you have read the course content and you understand how to relate your research to current events. Use the appropriate APA citation to illustrate when you move from the article summary to material from the course content.
Instructions:
Find one article on any course related topic (computer or information technology). You may use the Library link in the classroom. The article should be relevant to a course topic and from a creditable source. You may choose your article from independent reading and research; or you may search the Internet. Also consider the following:
pcmag
itworld
pcworld
electronics
geek
pcpitstop
Summarize the article in your own words and include information in your paper on how the article relates to course concepts. Discuss the course material. Demonstrate you have read the course content and you understand how to relate your research to current events. Use the appropriate APA citation to illustrate when you move from the article summary to material from the course content.
Your article summary should not exceed 5 pages. Turnitin is used in this class to assess the originality of your work–you must have less than 15% Similarity/matching. Paraphrase instead of using direct quotes to reduce your matching percent to 15% or less.
the best reading strategy for this poem
Reading Strategies 1: Mythological Strategies, Reader-Response Strategies, Deconstructionist Strategies.
pick one of the reading strategies from above and write an analysis that conforms to any of the Reading Strategies covered in the Reading Strategies Section that best relates to the poem. Remember to use logic and textual evidence (quotes) to support your claims (i.e. to show how what you say is valid). Avoid using first and second person pronouns (“I,” “me,” “my,” “mine,” “we,” “us,” “our,” “ours,” “you,” “your,” “yours,” or commands) because your response should not be about yourself (first person) and it should certainly not be about your reader, me, (second person); your response should be about the poem.
REMEMBER SOURCES MUST COME FROM THE POEM ONLY!!!
Integument and Bone tissue
Select four (4) of the following questions and answer each in an essay format. Please be sure to include an introduction and a conclusion for the assignment.
What vitamin is synthesized by the skin? Explain why this vitamin is critical for various physiological processes.
Four-year-old Susie loves carrots. Her skin has turned orange from a pigment found in carrots called beta carotene. Briefly explain how long it will take for Susie’s skin to return to its normal color and why.
Why should a surgeon cut along the tension (cleavage) lines when performing surgery?
Christina’s fair skin flushes red when she exercises. What is the name of this condition and why does her skin appear red?
In the laboratory, your professor presents a bone for study. She explains it has a diaphysis and epiphyses. Determine the type of bone, by shape, that she has presented and explain how you came to your conclusion.
Brittle bone disease (osteogenesis imperfecta) usually results from a collagen deficiency. Explain how a collagen deficiency affects bone structure.
How does an epiphyseal plate differ from an epiphyseal line? Six-year-old Matthew broke his femur and one of his epiphyseal plates was damaged. Explain the role of the epiphyseal plate in longitudinal growth and predict the effects of a damaged epiphyseal plate on his future longitudinal growth.
A hypothetical drug reduces osteoblast activity, but has no effect on osteoclast activity. Predict the effects of this hypothetical drug on bone resorption and bone deposition.
Assignment Expectations
Length: 750 – 1250 words
Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count towards the minimal word amount for this assignment.
References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least two (2) scholarly sources to support your claims.
Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx).
File name: Name your saved file according to your first initial, last name, and the module number (for example, “RHall Module 1.docx”)
Childhood Obesity
Describe the lifestyle factors pertaining to nutrition that can help to prevent childhood obesity and the development of Type 2 diabetes and heart disease in childhood.
Sensory Disorders
Sensory Disorders
1.
Infection
and trauma can happen to both the cornea and the conjunctiva. Which is more
serious? Using pathophysiology, explain why.
2.
Compare
wide-angle and narrow-angle glaucoma, including the pathophysiology and signs
of each.
3.
Describe
the two types of macular degeneration and current treatments.
4.
Patients
who have experienced a blow to the back of the head often report “seeing stars.”
Using pathophysiology, explain why this happens.
5.
Otitis
media is much more common in infants and young children. Thinking about the
structure and function of the ear, explain why this is.
6.
Why
does Ménière’s syndrome cause both hearing loss and vertigo?
A Right to Experimental Drugs?
Write a 2-3 page paper that explains and defends your view on the issue of whether or not patients with no other treatment options have a moral right to unproven drugs.
Introduction
Many doctors, nurses, medical technicians, and other health care workers are involved in medical research. The field of medicine is not limited to the direct treatment of patients but also involves the continued expansion of medical research. A large part of such research is clinical research, which puts patients into the role of experimental subjects. This raises a number of challenging questions for health care ethics, many of which follow from the fact that physicians, nurses, and others involved in clinical research have a dual role. As researchers, they are committed to generating new knowledge about diseases, developing new treatments and drug therapies, and, in general, helping to improve the welfare of human beings by eliminating or controlling diseases and increasing longevity. However, researchers involved in clinical research must also be committed to the highest quality care for individual patients taking part in research studies. This assessment explores some of the ethical issues that clinical research raises and some of the safeguards in place to protect the interests of patients involved in research.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Articulate ethical issues in health care.
Explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to these issues.
Explain the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients.
Competency 2: Apply sound ethical thinking related to a health care issue.
Identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles.
Articulate arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with health care professionals.
Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.
Preparation
When a new drug is undergoing clinical trials to be approved for treatment, it must pass through a number of distinct phases of testing. These phases require rigorous study and evidence to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of new treatments. Passing through these phases and achieving approval takes many years for some trials. Before approval, patients not part of a clinical trial have limited or no access to experimental drugs, even though these drugs could be helpful and potentially save their lives. There are various groups pushing for greater patient access to drugs still in the experimental stage. In recent years, the FDA has made it somewhat easier to receive treatment with experimental drugs, but according to advocacy groups there are still too many restrictions (Munson, 2014).
This leads to a potential quandary when early stages of research on a drug sometimes suggest that the drug could be effective in treating a certain disease. On one hand, offering easier access to early stage trial drugs could help individuals suffering with a medical condition. However, on the other hand, making early access to experimental drugs easier could limit the pool of patients available to participate in clinical trials that establish whether or not the drug is truly effective and safe. This is an important consideration, as the vast majority of experimental drugs turn out to be completely ineffective or could have very dangerous side effects that will only show up over time and across a wider test population.
When completing this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the ethical arguments that are relevant to both views regarding the right to experimental drugs. It may be useful to review the suggested resources and conduct additional independent research while you are planning your assessment submission.
Do patients with no other treatment options have a moral right to unproven drugs? Write a paper that explains and defends your view on this issue. In addition to reviewing the suggested resources, you are encouraged to locate additional resources in the Capella library, your public library, or authoritative online sites to provide additional support for your viewpoint. Be sure to weave and cite the resources throughout your work. In your paper, address the following points:
Identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles.
Explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issue.
Explain the costs and benefits of making unproven, unapproved experimental drugs widely available to patients. Consider the costs and benefits not only to the individual patients who take these drugs but also potential costs and benefits to other patients.
Explain arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients.
Support your view using ethical theories or moral principles (or both) that you find most relevant to the issue.
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
Length: 2–3 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Reference
Munson, R. (2014). Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in bioethics (concise ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
5.1 Case Analysis: Global Logistics (PLG1)
Review the three attached case analyses. Incorporate the steps in the SCM Case Analysis Guide (attached) to complete a 4-page document per each case. To analyze both cases properly, you must focus on both the issues faced and the environment surrounding the organization featured in the case. This process, an applied form of the scientific method, will also contribute to your development of important personal analytical and business writing skills. Submit one 12 page document with your analysis of both cases.
Your analysis of all three (3) cases will be combined in one document and should follow the SCM Case Analysis Guide, be between 4-5 pages for each case, excluding the cover page, and formatted in APA style. Submit one 12-15 page document with your analysis of all three cases. Save your document using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number or description. Do not add punctuation or special charters to the file name.
Essay Causal Argument
Essay #1:
Causal Argument
Assignment:
Write an argumentative essay in which you
put to use the concepts and techniques of causal analysis. In this 3-4 page essay, you will consider the
cause-and-effect relationships between events or conditions, arguing specific causal connections. You will establish
these connections in convincing detail, revealing causal chains where necessary
and being careful to avoid fallacies. You should consider both the short-term
and long-term effects. Remember to
provide a clear, arguable claim and supporting reasons for your argument. Use
no outside source evidence for this one; focus instead on evidence that you
can generate yourself: chains of
reasons, concrete and hypothetical examples, personal anecdotes, and common
knowledge.
Objectives:
To use the elements of argumentative
essays, including the claim/ thesis and its supporting reasons. To interpret relationships between events or
conditions or attitudes critically and logically. To fully develop support paragraphs with
convincing evidence. To organize details
effectively. To present a college-level
essay, free of major errors in sentence structure, grammar, and punctuation.