Movie Paper

For this paper, you will watch “The Stanford Prison Experiment’ , and analyze it from the social psychological perspective. After watching it, you will need to identify THREE specific concepts from class that are illustrated in this film. Specific concepts means something more than just “attitudes” or “prejudice”. For example, if you wanted to discuss a concept associated with attitudes, you could discuss the disconnect between attitudes and behaviors, the experience of cognitive dissonance, or sources of attitudes.) In your paper, you need to clearly explain your three concepts and how they can be seen in the movie. You will need to provide a specific description of how the concept is conveyed. For example, if it is part of the plot explain how. If it is part of the character development, behavior in a scene, evident in dialogue or something else explain how the concept is illustrated. Lastly, you will need to assess whether the film portrays social psychology accurately.

Your paper should be roughly 2-4 typed pages, assuming regular 12 font-size, margin and double spacing. Please focus more on content than length, and make sure that you include and explain all the relevant material.

While the structure of your paper may vary slightly, you should plan on having the following paragraphs/sections:

• Name of the movie and brief overview of film (the key word here is brief – focus on a summary that includes only important aspects)

• Identification and explanation of concept 1 and evidence for concept 1

• Identification and explanation of concept 2 and evidence for concept 2

• Identification and explanation of concept 3 and evidence for concept 3

• Assessment of accuracy in film depiction of concepts

• Works Cited/Bibliography (You must include this section): Regardless of whether you know something is true, if something is not common knowledge you must cite a supporting resource. For this class, a good rule of thumb is this – if 9 out of 10 people you find at the mall probably do not know the fact you are writing about then you must cite a supporting resource. Whenever you use ANY resource, you MUST cite it in the body of your paper and include it in your bibliography. Use APA style for references and bibliography.

Sustainable Design Elements and Categories

Sustainable design elements and systems align with different categories within assessment tools like LEED, BREEAM, WELL, etc. (e.g., Site, Water, Energy, Materials). Which of these types of categories was most important for your selected case study project? Explain. Do you think these categories are still useful for producing regenerative real estate projects? Why or why not? (If not, what would you suggest instead?). Consider whether you think prescriptive or performance-based requirements are more effective for maximizing a building’s sustainability and/or for increasing voluntary compliance across the real estate sector.

CYB570 – WA6 – cyber incident response planning

Write a 4- to 5-page paper (1000 to 1375 words) in APA format analyzing the life cycle of cyber incident response phases.

Your paper must include preparation; detection and analysis; containment, eradication, and recovery; and post-incident activity. This paper should also describe cyber incident response planning, coordination and the sharing of information, mitigation strategies, and how to apply methodologies and frameworks to develop a robust cyber incident response. Based on the cyber incident response process and using the resources presented in this module (and conducting your own outside research), provide a use case for a relatively big organization (1,000 or more employees at multiple locations) on how to form the cyber incident response team.

In this use case, describe the following:

Models of incident response team(s) and advice on selecting an appropriate model.
Essential parts in forming effective incident response personnel.
Related services that the incident response team could provide.

Ensure that you include at least four references (three from the course material and one from external sources) using corresponding in-text citations in APA format. [MO 5.1, MO 5.2, MO 5.3] Write a 4- to 5-page paper (1000 to 1375 words) in APA format analyzing the life cycle of cyber incident response phases.

CYB580 – WA8 – vulnerability disclosures

Using the readings from the module, address the following:

Consider the topic of vulnerability disclosures. Write a statement for internal and external audiences that addresses your organization’s position on vulnerability disclosure. Include an explanation of how this policy will affect your recommendations to customers as to how they should develop system-specific plans for patches and change management.
Make a case for whether or not it is ethical to use licensed software that one has obtained without paying the licensing fee. What is your role as a cybersecurity professional in encouraging ethical use of software ?

Write a 250- to 500-word response (1 to 2 pages) for each part of the assignment, for a total of 500 to 1000 words. Be sure to cite the readings in APA format to support your paper. [MO 6.1, MO 6.2]

Diverse Scientist Paper

You required to turn in a 1-2 page paper on a Scientist name Dr.Nanibaa Garrison. The paper can not be less than 750 words.
Use Arial, 12pt, single spaced. Include the Titles below. Use the third person (not using “I”).

Here is a link that gives some information about Dr.Nanibaa Garrison:

Nanibaa’ Garrison

Title Example:

TITLE: Scientist’s Name — Problem they studied

The paper should include:

1. Personal Background:

Describes the personal background of a diverse contributor to biological science. Think of the talks you have heard. Use our presenters as an example when writing your background (this is not a CV). Early days, challenges, and other interesting things you might find in a
biography.

2. Research Progress and Accomplishments

Give a short and interesting overview of their research progress and accomplishments. Focus on and summarize the question they are
most well-known for investigating or the problem (health, environmental, scientific, etc) that they worked towards solving. Then briefly
describe 2 significant contributions (Note: your publication references listed below should be relevant to these areas).

3. How this changed science, health or their environment.

Describe how this person or their accomplishments changed either scientific thought, or health, or the world around them

4. 5 Key Citations (only 5).

Ideally, these 5 citations would include a published review or article about the person, a link to a video of an interview with or about the
scientist –if one exists, and 2-3 key research publications by the author.

PRACTICE TOOLBOX: CHILD ASSESSMENT

Access the Learning Resources for three assessment tools often used with children: the NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scales, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, and the Behavior Assessment System for Children.
Explore all three assessment tools. Then, select one that you can see yourself using in practice with child clients.
Consider why you have chosen this assessment tool and its strengths and limitations.
Submit a 1-page paper analyzing the child assessment tool you have chosen:
Why did you select the assessment tool?
Why might it be especially helpful for use with children?
What challenges or limitations might there be for this assessment tool?
Use the Learning Resources to support your Assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list

Brandell, J. R. (Ed.). (2020). Theory & practice in clinical social work (3rd ed.). Cognella.
Chapter 6, “Clinical Practice With Children” (pp. 103–122)
Park, K. K., Horn, E. M., & Kurth, J. A. (2021). Strategies to support community inclusion of young children with disabilitiesLinks to an external site.. Young Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.1177/10962506211028575
NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scales
American Academy of Pediatrics and National Institute for Children’s Health Quality. (2002). NICHQ Vanderbilt assessment scales: Used for diagnosing ADHD.Links to an external site. https://www.nichq.org/sites/default/files/resource-file/NICHQ-Vanderbilt-Assessment-Scales.pdf
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Goodman, R. (2002). Strengths and difficulties questionnaire.Links to an external site. https://depts.washington.edu/dbpeds/Screening%20Tools/Strengths_and_Difficulties_Questionnaire.pdf
Behavior Assessment System for Children
Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2015). Behavior assessment system for children 3rd edition: BASC-3.Links to an external site. https://www.pearsonassessments.com/store/usassessments/en/Store/Professional-Assessments/Behavior/Comprehensive/Behavior-Assessment-System-for-Children-%7C-Third-Edition-/p/100001402.html
Note: On this webpage, explore the “Product Details” and “Resources” tabs to understand the BASC-3 tool.

CYB580 – WA9 – “dirty-hands problem”

Consider the “dirty-hands problem” in Badaracco and mentioned in the case study, “Building a ‘Backdoor’ to the iPhone: An Ethical Dilemma.” Review the four questions Badaracco suggests as a framework for assessing right-versus-right dilemmas. Then, discuss the four spheres of managers’ commitment and how they specifically apply to the case study. How do you think Cook should handle this dilemma? Provide a rationale for your answer.

Your paper should be 750 to 1250 words (3 to 5 pages). Cite the readings and any other sources you use in APA format. [MO 6.1]

Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective

prepare thought-provoking questions and to facilitate the participation of every class members to engage in
critical and in-depth analyses of the assigned readings, as well as integration across readings. You should
provide an organized structure for our interaction and make sure that we compare and contrast perspectives,
discuss the primary themes and contributions of the research, identify gaps and potential areas for future
research, and stay focused on the topic.

Pros and Cons of Prenatal screening for fetal genetic/chromosomal disorders

1. 15 points A faculty approved ELSI issue is identified clearly. Brief statement of the controversy is present. Student writes a clear sentence that identifies the topic and provides several sentences introducing the issue and what the reader can expect in the paper. There is a preview of what the reader can expect in the paper. Citations are present.
15 points A faculty approved ELSI issue is identified clearly. Brief statement of the controversy is present. Student writes a clear sentence that identifies the topic and provides several sentences introducing the issue and what the reader can expect in the paper. There is a preview of what the reader can expect in the paper. Citations are present.

2. 25 points The pro and con sides of the controversy are stated with objective strong arguments presented for each side. Student writes at least 3 paragraphs (at least 5-7 sentences for each paragraph) detailing the pro side and an additional 3 paragraphs detailing the con side of the issues. The information includes citations referred to scholarly articles that offer support for the arguments presented. This section is written in an objective, balanced manner, without personal opinion interjected into discussion. No use of “I” in this section.
25 points The pro and con sides of the controversy are stated with objective strong arguments presented for each side. Student writes at least 3 paragraphs (at least 5-7 sentences for each paragraph) detailing the pro side and an additional 3 paragraphs detailing the con side of the issues. The information includes citations referred to scholarly articles that offer support for the arguments presented. This section is written in an objective, balanced manner, without personal opinion interjected into discussion. No use of “I” in this section.

3.15 points Student presents a definitive personal opinion of the arguments presented. Offers two substantive reasons supporting personal view (pro or con). Student clearly states which side of the argument they believe their own beliefs are most in line to support. Offers an explanation as to which information presented in the previous section was most influential in influencing their opinion using citations. Reports whether or not their perception of the topic changed after reading the articles.15 points Student presents a definitive personal opinion of the arguments presented. Offers two substantive reasons supporting personal view (pro or con). Student clearly states which side of the argument they believe their own beliefs are most in line to support. Offers an explanation as to which information presented in the previous section was most influential in influencing their opinion using citations. Reports whether or not their perception of the topic changed after reading the articles.

4. 3 sources within past 5 years; all scholarly. Sources represent both sides of issue. Student provides citations and references. 3 sources within past 5 years; all scholarly. Sources represent both sides of issue. Student provides citations and references.

5. 10 points Paper is logically presented; avoids generalizations and metaphors. Proper adherence to the parts of the paper, including the introduction, body, and summary. Effective transitional phrases used for paragraph structure. Clear writing flows from one section to another. Writing is in formal tone.
10 points Paper is logically presented; avoids generalizations and metaphors. Proper adherence to the parts of the paper, including the introduction, body, and summary. Effective transitional phrases used for paragraph structure. Clear writing flows from one section to another. Writing is in formal tone.

6. 10-8 points Few (1 to 2) spelling or grammatical errors which impact wording. APA (7th edition) format is followed throughout the paper. The paper length is 6-8 pages, including title page and reference page
10-8 points Few (1 to 2) spelling or grammatical errors which impact wording. APA (7th edition) format is followed throughout the paper. The paper length is 6-8 pages, including title page and reference page

7. 5 points Student briefly and clearly presents to class a summary of information learned • Identifies topic and the controversy • Identifies main argument “pro” • Identifies main argument “con” Shares their view; maintains eye contact with audience (minimally looks at notes)
5 points Student briefly and clearly presents to class a summary of information learned • Identifies topic and the controversy • Identifies main argument “pro” • Identifies main argument “con” Shares their view; maintains eye contact with audience (minimally looks at notes)

8. Summarizes the main points for the pro and con sides of the ethical issue. Provides two specific nursing recommendations for nurses to consider when faced with the particular genetic ethical issue when interacting with patients and their families. Summarizes the main points for the pro and con sides of the ethical issue. Provides two specific nursing recommendations for nurses to consider when faced with the particular genetic ethical issue when interacting with patients and their families.

Please follow ALL instructions PRECISELY.

PRACTICING POLICY REVIEW

To Prepare:
Review Chapter 7 of the Jansson text as needed.
Review the assigned Georgia voting policy, Election Integrity Act of 2021, from the Learning Resources this week.
You will use this policy to familiarize yourself with the structure of policy documents and the process for policy analysis—an important foundation before you begin your own policy search. Next week, you will select a local or state policy related to the social problem you identified.
Review the Policy Selection Process document in the Learning Resources this week. This document outlines the search for and selection of the Election Integrity Act of 2021—you will need to follow a similar process for your own region or state to complete your Assignment next week.
Identify the social problem(s) addressed in the policy.
Select an excerpt from the policy that you would change—this could be a small change, like an addition, or a large change, like a complete revision or removal—to better alleviate the social problem.
Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
Describe the social problem(s) addressed in the policy.
Which areas in the policy indicated the social problem(s) to you?
Why, as a social worker, should you be concerned with the problem(s)?
Are there other problem(s) not directly identified that might be impacted, positively or adversely, by the policy?
Which population(s) is/are impacted by the problem?
What is the relationship between the social problem(s) and the population(s)? In other words, why are some people impacted by the problem(s) when others are not?
How is/are the population(s) taken into consideration in the policy?
Summarize the excerpt from the policy that you identified as needing change.
What are the strengths of this excerpt in helping to alleviate the social problem? If you do not see any strengths, that is okay—explain why.
What are the limitations of this excerpt in helping to alleviate the social problem(s) for the population(s)?
What specific changes would you make to the excerpt to alleviate the social problem(s) for the population(s)? You can describe the changes or quote direct policy language you would change. Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Chapter 7, “Analyzing Problems in the First Step of Policy Analysis” (pp. 204–243)
Policy Advocacy Challenge 1.2 (p. 9)
Policy Advocacy Challenge 2.6 (p. 43)
Policy Advocacy Challenge 3.4 (p. 92)
Policy Advocacy Challenge 5.1 (p. 144)
Policy Advocacy Challenge 7.1 (p. 210)
Policy Advocacy Challenge 11.5 (p. 387)

Georgia General Assembly. (2021). SB 202: Election Integrity Act of 2021Links to an external site.. https://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/59827