Explain how Mills Utilitarianism provide support for the argument in favor of turning the trolley?

Write an essay ONE (1) the two topics explained below. The essay should be done in Microsoft Word
format (double spaced 12pt Times New Roman or Arial font). There is no minimum or maximum
length, however, you should give as much detail as you can. The document containing this essay should
be submitted electronically by attaching it to the Blackboard assignment for the topic that you have
chosen.
If you would like to try for extra credit, write an essay on the other topic (indicate at the top of the essay
that it is the extra credit essay).
Topic 1: Turning the Trolley and Utilitarianism
A complete answer will address all of the following:
1. What was the argument presented in class in defense of the claim that the right thing to do in the
case of the trolley is to turn the trolley? Present and explain the reconstruction of the argument that
I presented in class and in the lecture notes. If there is no reconstruction of the argument in
standard form, numbered premises and conclusion, the argument has not been presented.
2. What is utility and what is the Utilitarian calculus? Use examples to show how these concepts work.
Feel free to use the ones that I used.
3. What is the fundamental principle of morality according to Mill (hint: AU)?
4. How does Mills fundamental principle of morality work in showing that actions are morally
right/wrong? Give examples to illustrate your points. You may use the ones that I presented.
5. How does Mills Utilitarianism provide support for the argument in favor of turning the trolley?
Explain how it shows that the argument presented above is sound.
BE SURE TO ANSWER ALL FIVE (5) QUESTIONS!

Describe the pros and cons of having a multitude of policy-makers engaged in the public policy cycle.

You will respond to all six questions, three from each chapter and write a full paragraph for each question. Your response must go beyond general description, it must show your understanding of the question. A paragraph is a minimum of five full sentences and must be meaningful.

Chapter 2
1. Describe the pros and cons of having a multitude of policy-makers engaged in the public policy cycle.
2. Executive task forces/commissions are examples of public policy-makers. Would they be best classified as primary official, supplementary official, or nongovernmental? Why?
3. What policy issues fall within micropolitics? Subsystems politics? Macropolitics?
Chapter 3
4. Select a current public problem. Analyze its dimensions (causation, nature and scope, tractability, and severity) and the difficulties it may present for policy-makers in finding a solution.
5. Identify and discuss several issues currently found on the national systemic and institutional agendas.
6. What are current, real-world examples of factors that helped get an issue onto the policy agenda?

What evidence or research supports the role of this organization in public health?

-How is this agency fulfilling a meaningful function in the community?
-Describe ways this organization can be more focused on the diverse needs of the population it serves.
-What evidence or research supports the role of this organization in public health?
-How might interprofessional collaboration with various members of the healthcare team use this organization’s services?

Remember the basic rules of posting:
-You must include citations to support what you write and they must be in APA format. At least one should be another peer reviewed scholarly source besides your texts and readings, and follow the basic rules of not more than 5 years old.
-Emotion and intent clearly come through in this medium. Please choose your words carefully.
-Be courteous, non-judgmental, and supportive, even when you disagree.
-Postings must have substance: “I agree” or “Good posting” are examples of postings that do not meet this criteria and will not count as a required posting.

THE ATTACHED TEXTBOOK MUST BE CITED

Explain how the relationship between Indigenous people and police be transformed into a more positive one?

Forum 1:
There has been much debate in Canadian society regarding the role, purpose and effectiveness of sentencing circles in Canada. In more recent years we have also seen a decline in their use. Why has there been such a decline? Do you think that sentencing circles have served their purpose and it is time to move on to other methods?
Forum 2:
Over the past twenty years there has been numerous justice inquiries held and reports produced due to injustices involving Indigenous peoples and police. How can the relationship between Indigenous people and police be transformed into a more positive one? Please also comment on another student’s post.

What is the impact of big data based cooperative logistical delivery method on logistics?

What is the impact of big data based cooperative logistical delivery method on logistics?1) AlShaer,
Mohammed ; Taher, Yehia ; Haque, Rafiqul ; Hacid, Mohand-Sad ; Dbouk,
Mohamed (2019). IBRIDIA: A hybrid
solution for processing big logistics data. 2019-08, Vol.97, p.792-804.https://adelphi.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01ADELPHI_INST/p8afbk/cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A542934593
2)Zhu,
Dingju (2018). IOT and big data based cooperative logistical delivery
scheduling method and cloud robot system. 2018-09, Vol.86, p.709-715.
https://adelphi.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01ADELPHI_INST/p8afbk/cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02352954v1
Please read the instructions carefully and do not skip any step:You should write two separate annotated bibliographies from these two sources about the topic. For each source, you will write
an annotated bibliography that briefly summarizes and critiques
the research and reflects on what information/ideas the authors
have contributed to your understanding of this topic.

Include the following
information in each annotated bibliography:

an
APA style Reference entry

a summary of the research that includes (1) the
authors research focus and purpose, (2) their methodology + types of data collected, and (3) the main findings
and conclusions they present

your evaluation of potential
limitations/weaknesses in how the research was designed or carried out

a
reflection on what ideas/information the authors have contributed (1) to the
field and (2) to your personal understanding of this topic and research interests
I have uploaded sample Annotated bibliography as guide

Describe the communication encounter you experienced that was influenced by either perception and/or filtering.

Throughout this course, many discussion opportunities come up where you need to respond to other people’s opinions and comments. Address the discussion topic after you have completed your reading. Be sure to post at least three times over three separate days, with your first post made by Saturday of the unit week. Your three posts should be composed of your own initial response to the question and two additional responses to your classmates and/or instructor.
Discussion Topic:
Chapter 13 of your text notes two significant pitfalls that can occur during the communication process: filtering and perception. Thinking back on your own personal experience, you have likely experienced the impact of one or both of these blockades to perfect understanding. In this discussion, you will share an example and address how the communication experience might have been better handled.
Using your own experience as well as the material from Chapter 13 of the text, address the following in your response:
Define perception and filtering in your own words.
Describe the communication encounter you experienced that was influenced by either perception and/or filtering.
How did the effect of a communication pitfall impact both the sender and receiver during the communication process? Give at least one specific example for each party.
With your newfound knowledge of communication pitfalls, what could you have done differently in the situation to avoid any negative impact of perception and/or filtering?
Return to Unit 8 Discussion Instructions
Reference
Bateman, T. S., Snell, S., & Konopaske, R. (2020). M: Management (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Chapter 4

What would be the most productive media strategy within the bounds of current legal precedent?

In your final essay provide an overview of what you have learned about the administration of corrections organizations. What are your major take aways from this course? What specifically do you know now that you did not know before the course began? To what extent should the media be allowed to interview inmates and film inside corrections facilities? What would be the most productive media strategy within the bounds of current legal precedent?

Title page (first page) the title should be 8-12 words in length and self descriptive (a title that clearly summarizes your essay)
Abstract (second page) (heading)
Summarize your entire paper in 3 parts and about 120-150 words: Problem statement, purpose statement, and findings and conclusions.
Example:
In this paper I reflect on what I learned about corrections administration as well as commenting on the role of the media, both in the news and in the entertainment industry. The purpose of the paper is to expound on course reflections and the role of the media influence in contemporary corrections administration. I concluded that (list 2 or 3 of the take aways you will discuss in a few sentences). I also suggest (summarize your media strategy in a few sentences). Remember, the abstract is a short summary of your paper.
(one or two sentences, no more than 120-150-words).
Introductory paragraph (Start a new page and use your title as a heading): introduce your take aways (briefly) and how you plan to address the media strategy. (one-two paragraphs).
Most Significant Concepts (heading). (One-two paragraphs only).
Topics of New Learning (heading)
Medias Role in Corrections Facilities (heading) (explain)
Legal Precedent and Productive Media Strategy (heading) (explain)
Conclusion (heading): one paragraph and summarize what your entire essay said.
Reference (heading) Start a new page, perfect APA and strong scholarly sources.
Double space everything, do not over space or leave sections of space. Spell and grammar check.