Best Writer

Case #4 -week 7
Frank is a 37 year old man who is getting married for the first time. His fiancee Holly and he went to middle school and high school together but did not really date until a few years ago. They seem truly in love. Frank was social awkward in high school because of Asperger’s syndrome ( on the Autism Spectrum) and unfortunately was a target of lateral violence ( bullying). Frank’s sister will be Holly’s bridesmaid. Holly does not have a brother and is an only child. She would like her cousin Gerald to be a groomsman since he is a member of her family. Gerald was one of the main bullies during Frank’s high school period, leading to an attempted suicide in 10th grade. The scars remain on Frank’s right wrist. Frank is willing forgive Gerald enough to have him attend the wedding, but not as a groomsman. What would you recommend Frank do? Why?

Weighting 30%. Word count: max. 1000.
For this assessment, you will respond to case study questions particularly reflecting and analysing the context of the organisation, leaders decision making and the outcomes of the actions taken. In particular, you will reflect on the value of leadership for a particular organisation, and critically consider whether leadership matters. You will need to analyse the case study in light of the leadership theories and concepts discussed in the unit.
When responding to the case questions, you will need to ensure that the following criteria are met: 1) diagnosis and recommended actions are a good fit for the context presented in the case study; 2) diagnosis and recommended action are based on a sound theoretical basis; 3) critical thinking skills are demonstrated; and 4) appropriate academic writing style and referencing are used. How to analyse a case study
1. Read the questions carefully
What are you being asked to do? Decide? Describe? Analyse? Make recommendations? Use this information to focus your reading of the case study. Highlight key words, characters, and events.
Start to think about leadership theories and concepts that could be related to the case.
2. Read the case study carefully
Read it from beginning to end to get an overall idea of what is happening.
Highlight anything you feel is important and related to the problem.
Sometimes the problems are not immediately clear, and you may need to read the case several times before you understand fully what is happening. Its important to understand the CONTEXT of the situation so that you can see how this might influence decisions made and resulting consequences.
3. Ask questions and be a detective
Descriptive questions: Where? What? When? Who?
Analytical questions: Why? How? What if?
Evaluative questions: So what? What next?
Investigate and eliminate what is irrelevant to the situation or appears to not fit the case context.
Make notes. Analyse and organise the information.
4. Structure your response – Make sure your answer:
Is evidence-based (using data from the case);
Is supported by relevant peer-reviewed literature;
Demonstrates integration and synthesis;
Uses linking words to connect your argument, and includes a short introduction and conclusion;
There is no single right answer as long as your arguments are supported through evidence of research and well-crafted by your critical thinking skills, many different points of view are possible.

Key concepts
Leader identity and self-leadership
Coercive leadership style
Authoritative leadership style
Affiliative leadership style
Democratic leadership style
Pacesetting leadership style
Coaching leadership style
Resources for this topic
Essential readings
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2019). Self-leadership: A paradoxical core of organizational behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 47-67.
Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
ESMT Case Study Leadership styles by Konstantin Korotov
Recommended learning materials
Miscenko, D., Guenter, H., & Day, D. V. (2017). Am I a leader? Examining leader identity development over time. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 605-620.
Learning activities/tasks
Prepare for the discussion of the case study by reading it and answering the posted questions. Complete a self-leadership assessment.

Please make sure the assignment is coherent, concise, and ideas are fully developed. Please make sure to use big vocabulary words. Please make sure to proofread any grammatical errors and fix sentence structure. Please follow all the instructions I have given you. Please follow the grading rubric that is provided along with the instructions. Please do not plagiarize. Please make sure to analyze more and put it in your own words.

TOPIC:
Huricanes Harvey, Irma,
and Maria and how the three significant storms had a cumulative effect.
You will prepare a ten
to twelve (10-12) page case study analysis of an actual emergency
management process. The case study you select to analyze MUST focus on
the processes used to:
Prepare for;
Respond to; AND
Recover from an actual
incident.
NOTE: You may select any level of government or
business to analyze. However, the scope of the case study MUST enable you to
analyze ALL THREE aspects of the emergency management process
identified above.
Your final paper should
include:
Title page;
Summary of the case study;
Purpose / objective of the
case study
Primary issues
Secondary issues
Context of the event
Pre-incident situation
Environment surrounding the
issue
Background on the issue and/or
organization involved
Challenges faced
Decision process utilized
Actions taken;
Narrative response to the
following questions, based on your case:
How did the actions and
decisions impact the outcomes?
Was the outcome desired or
expected?
How was the organization
positioned to respond to subsequent issues?
List the strengths and shortcomings
of the emergency management operations / processes.
Identify the actions you would
take to address EACH strength and shortcoming.
Explain your answer, citing
specific examples.
Additional recommendations /
lessons learned.
Reference page.
REMINDERS:
The paper should be ten to
twelve (10-12) pages in length.
NOTE: This page number is in addition to the
title and reference pages.
The paper must follow all APA
formatting and style guidelines.
You must use both course
materials and outside resources to support your position.
The focus of
your case study should be how
the Emergency Management process (good,
bad, or ineffectual) played a role
in the incident or event you
are presenting.
Do NOT focus
narrowly on a response asset
(police/fire) or a support asset.

Write a 2-3-page paper, providing the foundation for the analysis of a healthcare organization and applying an understanding of the external healthcare environment.
Assessment Overview
For your course project, you will conduct in an in-depth analysis of a chosen healthcare organization and recommend evidence-based strategies to address organizational challenges and opportunities in a dynamic environment. For this assessment, you will provide the foundation for this analysis and apply an understanding of the external healthcare environment across core disciplines.
Assessment Instructions
Complete the Organization Overview section and the first part of the PESTLE Analysis section of the Course Project Template [DOCX]. The sections should be 23 pages in length.
Use the same copy of the Course Project Template for each assessment, building on the document as you progress through the course. This will ensure cohesion and prepare you for the final project.
Organization Overview
Introduce the organization you are choosing to work with.
You can use the same organization used in HCM-FPX5310, building an in-depth portfolio, or you can select a new organization, building a diverse project portfolio.
If you are struggling with choosing an organization or are looking for an example of an acceptable topic, consult the Healthcare Organization Options [DOCX] document.
PESTLE Analysis
Conduct a general PESTLE analysis of your chosen organization.
Choose a topic identified by this analysis. This can be a challenge or opportunity to be pursued.
Identify possible factors in the external health care environment that impact organizational outcomes, both overall and to the specific topic you have selected.
Submission Requirements
Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message and quality.
Format your paper according to current APA style and formatting.
Use at least two scholarly resources beyond those given in the course.
Both sections should be between 23 pages, plus references page.
Use 12-point, Times New Roman, double-spaced.
Refer to the Analyzing the Impact of the External Healthcare Environment on an Organization Scoring Guide to ensure that your reflection meets the grading criteria for this assessment before submission.
Evaluation
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies through corresponding scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze the impact of the external healthcare environment on organizational outcomes.
Analyze challenges and opportunities specific to the selected topic in the chosen organization.
Conduct a PESTLE analysis specific to the selected topic.
Identify possible external healthcare factors that impact organizational outcomes.
Competency 4: Communicate healthcare management needs, opportunities, and strategies with multiple stakeholders.
Write coherently to support a central idea with proper APA format, correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a business professional.

Students are expected to write a double-spaced, 5 page (including Works Cited) literary analysis in 12 point Times New Roman font. Papers must be submitted in MLA format and include a Works Cited page with at least 3 scholarly/academic sources (these can be found at the BSC library databases such as EBSCO–Literary Reference Center, Google Scholar, and various .edu websites). Sources such as Wikipedia, StudyMode, and Shmoop will not count. Cited definitions of literary terms will not count toward the required number of secondary sources.

As you complete your research papers in the coming week please keep in mind that you have to write an analysis of one of the works we studied, not a biographical paper about an author. For example, you might want to analyze the effects of irony in “The Necklace”

Interview an older member of your family about the familys history. Try to identify ahistorical event that resulted in a family tradition carried on today. If you cannot interview an older member of your family, you can interview an older friend.

Module 1 Assignment:
Case Study Analysis
An understanding of cells and cell
behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and
treatment. But some diseases can be complex in nature, with a variety of
factors and circumstances impacting their emergence and severity.
Effective disease analysis often
requires an understanding that goes beyond isolated cell behavior. Genes, the
environments in which cell processes operate, the impact of patient
characteristics, and racial and ethnic variables all can have an important
impact.
Photo Credit:
Getty Images/Hero Images
An understanding of
the signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical
step in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this
understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their
treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms
presented. You identify cell, gene, and/or process elements that may be factors
in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.
To prepare:
By Day 1 of this
week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study
Assignment. Please see the Course Announcements section of the classroom for
your assignment from your Instructor.
The Assignment (1- to
2-page case study analysis)
Develop a 1- to
2-page case study analysis in which you:
Explain why you think the
patient presented the symptoms described.
Identify the genes that may
be associated with the development of the disease.
Explain the process of
immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.
By Day 7 of Week 2
Submit your Case Study
Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2.
Reminder: The College of
Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction,
summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center
provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates). All papers
submitted must use this format.

For this assignment, you will write a 2 page minimum paper. This DOES NOT include the title page or reference page. You do not need an abstract page for this assignment. Before submitting your work, please make sure you have cited properly and run your work through a plagiarism checker. The topic of the paper will be “Nursing Opportunities In Today’s World.” I suggest you pick a couple of areas that you may be interested in, research those areas, and write about them. Make sure your are utilizing APA formatting IN Microsoft Office WORD. You must cite at least 2 sources (please do not use Wikipedia).

Now that you have completed your decision matrix, you will discuss your decision-making process and how you have used the matrix. For this discussion, you should NOT post your matrix but rather use it as a tool to evaluate your business. In your initial post, address the following:
Explain how you could use the matrix in a different business/technology scenario. Give an example.
What was the most challenging part of applying this matrix to the final project?
What recommendations would you make to change your project, given some of the challenges you faced?