Best Writer

Explaining how a dystopian society controls and manipulates the individual and the society as a whole

Remember Sally? You decided that it is time to reorganize your department to make it work better. After reading through the mission (unchanged), the current structure, your budget, and a description of some of your staff, you need to create the following:
A revised organization chart showing your changes.
A revised budget showing the financial costs/benefits of your changes.
A memo to the executive team explaining your changes and justifying your choices. The memo should be less than two singlespaced pages long. Paragraphs should be single-spaced with an extra space between paragraphs (like this document). Remember that your boss wants information to be clear and concise.
4. A PowerPoint listing :
the problem,
your proposal,
how much it will cost/save, and
why you think it will work.

Choose one question from questions 16-19. In 600-650 words, answer that question using 4-5 assigned comics texts from the syllabus. Cite specific examples from each text to support your claims. Do not repeat texts used to answer the other question. Be sure to state the WORD COUNT in the essay heading.
Example:
Name
ENG 10200-435
Fiction Exam
Due 5 May 2020
Word Count: 695
The questions are: 16. is the narrator a participant in the the storys action or merely an observer?
17. how trustworthy is the narrator? is the narrator a relaible witness or commentator on the action and behavior of the storys charcacters? why or why not
18. do you think any objects or events in the story are symbolic? why or why not
19. are there other symbolic objects elemts of a character, setting, language for example?
the stories are https://twitter.com/mutantxfactor/status/833092604552237057 https://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2000/02/14 https://www.comicskingdom.com/curtis/ https://www.instagram.com/newyorkercartoons/?hl=en

next question
Choose one question from questions 11-15. What play(s) can be paired with fiction texts? In at least 450 words, answer that question using 4-5 fiction texts from the syllabus. You must use at least 1 play from Module 2. Cite specific examples from each text to support your claims. Do not repeat texts used to answer the other question.
the questions are:
11. where and when is the action of the story set?
12. to what extent are aspects of the setting symbolic? How do you know?
13. can you imagine the story set in another place or time? why or why not
14. who narrates the story’s action? is the point of view first person or third? does the point of view shift during the course of the story? if so, where why and with what implications for meaning?
15. how much does the narrator know about the characters? is the narrator completely omniscient? does the narrator possess limited omniscience? or does the narrator know only as much as the reader?
The stories The Sign by Sneha Susan Shibu. Maupassant The Necklace, Parker & Hart
Wizard of Id, Parker, Jackson The Daemon Lover, Harper The Two Offers
The stories are Williams Cat on a Hot Tin Roof & film, Hansberry A Raisin in the Sun &
film; Wilde The Importance of Being Earnest & film, Luce The Women &
film; Guide to Understanding Opera; Bugs Bunny opera videos, Grimke Rachel, Verdi
Aida & film; EO: Citation and Documentation you can pick any story.

1. Discuss 3 strategies for your stress management and wellness after you have read this week’s chapter and watched the videos.
Provide at least 2 personal examples on how you will apply the strategies.

2. Discuss 3 strategies for your money management after you have read this week’s chapter and watched the videos.
Provide at least 2 personal examples on how you will apply the strategies.

In Quebec, the
repatriation of the 1982 Constitution reduced democratic space in the
Canadian
federation and deprived it of its freedom of action (jurisdiction) and its
honors from the co-founding people of Canada. After Quebec’s failure in the
referendum it gave itself the courage to
to regain his
place he wanted to reactivate his duality with the federal government, he
continued to negotiate his
integration
through other consultation frameworks such as the Charlottetown Accord
and the Meech
Lake Agreement (1987-1990), all negotiations were unsuccessful to disfavor.
of Quebec.
In this work I
will highlight the different intergovernmental negotiations
initiated by
Quebec and / or by the federal government that had the objective of redotating
to Quebec its
veto right to be
recognized as a distinct society in Canada. At the end of my research, I
criticize the
steps taken to this end and reveal why they failed.
These are the sources, I have provided to the Professor, they are available in English too, and these are the source sto be used:

1. La rforme constitutionnelle et la notion de socit distincte :
Dupl, Nicole. “La rforme constitutionnelle et la notion de socit distincte.” Revue
gnrale de droit 24.1 (1993) : 65-79.

2. Le dossier constitutionnel Qubec-Canada :
Tremblay, Jean-Marie. “Alain G. Gagnon, Le dossier constitutionnel Qubec-Canada.”
(2005).

3. Libert et dvoilement dans les socits multinationales :
Tully, James. “Libert et dvoilement dans les socits multinationales.” Globe : revue
internationale dtudes qubcoises 2.2 (1999) : 13-36.

4. La paradiplomatie identitaire : Le Qubec, la Catalogne et la Flandre en relations
internationales :
Paquin, Stphane. “La paradiplomatie identitaire : le Qubec, la Catalogne et la Flandre
en relations internationales.” Politique et socits 23.2-3 (2004) : 203-237.

5. Nationalisme et fdralisme au Canada : le dbat sur la dualit :
Adele Marie Kabuo Kahota
Lecours, Andr. “Nationalisme et fdralisme au Canada : le dbat sur la
dualit.” Fdralisme Rgionalisme (2000).

6. La dynamique rfrendaire : pourquoi les Canadiens ont-ils rejet l’Accord de
Charlottetown ?
Johnston, Richard, et al. La dynamique rfrendaire : pourquoi les Canadiens ont-ils
rejet l’Accord de Charlottetown ? , Revue franaise de science politique, vol. vol. 46,
no. 5, 1996, pp. 817-830.

7. LA CRISE DU FDRALISME CANADIEN : Le Qubec au pied du mur :
Lapierre, Jean-William. “LA CRISE DU FDRALISME CANADIEN : Le Qubec au
pied du mur.” Esprit 62 (2 (1982): 231-238.

8. LENTENTE DE CHARLOTTETOWN VUE DU QUBEC :
Ryan, Claude. “LENTENTE DE CHARLOTTETOWN VUE DU QUBEC.” Options
politiques 2003 (2002).

9. Pour une identit canadienne post-nationale, la souverainet partage et la pluralit
des cultures politiques :
Bourque, Gilles, and Jules Duchastel. “Pour une identit canadienne post-nationale, la
souverainet partage et la pluralit des cultures politiques.” Cahiers de recherche
sociologique 25 (1995): 17-58.

10. Fin du nationalisme qubcois ?
Bock-Ct, Mathieu. Fin du nationalisme qubcois ? , Commentaire, vol. numro
146, no. 2, 2014, pp. 279-286.

Basic scientific literacy is essential for understanding real-world applications of the natural sciences. As a consumer and voter, you will be faced with issues that require a basic understanding of science. For example, you might ask yourself the following questions: How can genetically modified foods affect my health? Should scientists be held liable for not predicting earthquakes that led to human casualties, as they were in Italy in 2012? Is anthropogenic climate change real? Is fracking a concern where I live? Because of the prevalence of natural science issues such as these, it is important to understand basic natural science concepts and how they impact our daily lives.
The project for this course has two parts. In Part One, you will conduct a research investigation that examines an issue in the natural sciences. You will identify appropriate resources for investigating the issue you select, use these resources to develop a question related to the issue, and apply natural science principles to the issue and question. In addition, you will identify an audience who would be interested in the selected issue. In Part Two, you will develop a presentation for the audience you identified in Part One. In your presentation, you will explain how scientific thinking has impacted you and your audience, supporting your claims with evidence.
Part One of this project addresses the following course outcomes:
Illustrate the impact of scientific thinking on personal and professional experiences
Select appropriate and relevant science resources in investigating contemporary issues in the natural sciences
Communicate effectively to specific audiences in examining fundamental aspects of the natural world
Apply essential principles of the natural sciences in addressing critical questions related to the natural world
Prompt
Select a contemporary issue in the natural sciences to investigate. You may select an issue that was discussed in the course, or you may select your own, with instructor approval. You could consider using your topic and question from Perspectives in the Natural Sciences if they are something you would like to investigate further for this project. After selecting an issue, you will conduct a research investigation, identifying appropriate resources for researching the issue, developing a question related to the issue, and applying principles of natural science to your issue and question. You will submit your planning document as a written report.
1

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction: In this section, you will discuss your natural science issue and select resources that you can use to research the issue. This will lead you to the development of a research question related to your issue. Specifically, you should:
a. Describe the issue in the natural sciences that you have selected to investigate. Why is this issue significant?
b. Describe at least three science resources that you could use to investigate the issue you selected. Your sources must be relevant to your issue
and must be of an academic nature appropriate for the issue. In your description, consider questions such as: What are the similarities and differences in the content of your sources? What makes them appropriate and relevant for investigating your issue? What was your thought process when you were searching for sources? How did you make choices?
c. Based on your review of science resources, develop a specific question related to the issue you selected. In other words, what would you like to know more about?
II. Body: In this section, you will use the natural science resources that you selected to investigate your question, focusing on an appropriate audience and
the scientific principles related to the issue. Make sure to cite your sources. Based on your research:
a. Identify an audience that would be interested in your issue and the question you developed. For example, who would benefit most from hearing your message, or who could best help in addressing the issue?
b. Describe how and why you can tailor your message to your audience, providing specific examples. For example, will your audience understand scientific terminology and principles, or will you need to explain them? How will you communicate effectively with your audience?
c. Identify the natural science principle(s) that apply to your question and issue. For example, if your issue is global climate change, the principle you might identify is that the sun is the primary source of energy for Earths climate system.
d. Explain how the principle(s) you identified apply to your issue and question. In other words, how are the natural science principle(s) you identified relevant to your question and issue?
III. Conclusion: In this section, you will conclude your research investigation by discussing future directions for the debate on your issue. Specifically, you should:
a. Formulate a hypothesis that addresses the question you developed. Make sure your hypothesis is based on your investigation of your question.
b. Explain how a natural scientist would go about collecting evidence to support or refute the hypothesis you formulated. In other words, what
would the next steps be if a natural scientist were to continue researching your hypothesis? Make sure to support your response with the natural science resources that you selected.
IV. Provide a reference list that includes all of the science resources you used to investigate your issue and question. Ensure that your list is formatted according to current APA guidelines (or another format, with instructor permission).
2

Project Part One Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your planning document should be 35 pages, double spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. Y

Choose “one or two” literary theories to do the critical analysis of A Rose For Emily.
You have to “quote” passages from the papers to support your arguments.
You can name the title of this paper.

Many press reports, and to some extent the 9/11 Commission Report, referred to the failure to share information as one reason the US was unable to prevent the terrorist attacks of 9/11/01. Cite at least two specifics that point to this being true or why not.
Discuss at least two information sharing models that have been recommended since then.
Summarize some technology available to support these information sharing models.
Discuss what you think would be the most effective information sharing model to help prevent terrorist attacks

Creating a New Position
Due Week 9 and worth 160
As an HR Manager, part of your job is to analyze the staffing levels within the organization. You have to hire to fill one position within the organization. You can choose the organizational position you currently work or a future position. For this assignment, create a new position and write a description of the needs it fills in the organization, the job description, and the compensation and benefits package.
You will create and submit your assignment by using the ecree link. Just click on the link, and start writing. Your work will be saved automatically. You’ll see some feedback on the right-hand side of the screen, including text and videos to help guide you in the writing process. When you’re ready, you can turn in your assignment by clicking Submit at the bottom of the page.
Click the assignment link to start your assignment in ecree. Please note that ecree works best in Firefox and Chrome.
Write a 57 paragraph paper in which you:
Explain three or four job components in the job description and specifications for the job.
Explain what will be included in the compensation and benefits package related to the job.
Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
Include at least one reference to support your paper.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Outline the requirements for a new position, including a job description and the compensation and benefits package

The Western Literary Tradition – Formal Essay #3 – Instructions

CHOOSE ONE (1) of the following questions.
Documented research essay. The paper should be five-seven (5-7) full pages in length (with an additional Works Cited page) with an introduction and a conclusion.

1. Write a literary paper in which you make a case for Hamlet’s sanity or insanity, based on his behavior. Use direct quotes from the text of the play to support your argument. Cite specifically to the source, using standard MLA-style documentation. In addition, find two critical essays (external secondary sources) from the Essex databases.
OR
2. What can be discerned about the psychological movement of Hamlet’s character as the play progresses? Re-read and choose at least TWO (2) of the soliloquies which are delivered by Hamlet. Write an essay in which you discuss Hamlet’s psychological progression. Use direct quotes from the play to support your argument. Cite specifically to the source, using standard MLA-style documentation. In addition, find two critical essays (external secondary sources) from the Essex databases.

PAPER GUIDELINES
The assignment should be supported by the literature (quotations from the literature) AND independent research (quotes from at least TWO (2) critical sources, meaning journal articles, properly cited using MLA 8th Edition Works Cited style). Use the Essex County College databases to retrieve articles. The paper should be five to seven (5-7) pages in length with an introduction and a conclusion.
DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. ANY AND ALL SOURCES (which must come from critical journal articles–not from encyclopedias or summaries) MUST BE CITED, per MLA STYLE.
USE STANDARD MLA HEADING (see MLA Style Sheet under “Class Information”), CREATE YOUR OWN TITLE FOR YOUR ASSIGNMENT, AND DOUBLE-SPACE ALL WRITING.
Your writing must show that you have properly met the standards of what I consider acceptable for a 200-level literature course. It is YOUR responsibility to ensure that your papers are proof-read before you hand them in. Below is how I break down the points:
Clear thesis, well-organized supporting points and conclusion: 60%
Cited adequately and correctly from the texts (primary & secondary): 20%
Demonstrated writing strength (structure, spelling, grammar): 20%
Be sure to use quotes from the text to support your argument. You must use proper MLA-compliant heading and style, and you must create your own title for the paper. Do not call the assignment by the name of the text under discussion–for example, do not title your paper “Walt Whitman.” The paper should have a clear thesis supported by the literature. The paper should have an introduction–opening paragraphs with a thesis statement (including author and title of text), body paragraphs with properly cited quotes using standard MLA-style documentation, and a clear conclusion.
Do not wait until the last minute to submit your paper–that’s when computer issues, Internet problems, etc., arise–it is your responsibility to have your work in on time. You are being graded on the following:
Clear thesis statement, well-organized supporting points and conclusion
Cited adequately and correctly from the primary text and secondary sources (literary journal articles)
Demonstrated writing strength (sentence structure, spelling, grammar) appropriate to a 200-level literature course
Proper use of MLA formatting style (per PDF guides in “Class Information”)
Plagiarism results in an “F” on the paper. A second instance of plagiarism results in automatic failure of the course.

YOU MAY NOT USE the following as sources, as they are NOT considered scholarly works: SparkNotes, CliffsNotes, ClassicNotes, Enotes, GradeSaver, or other student guides; also, do not use encyclopedias, dictionaries, or sites which simply offer summaries. Further, do not use plagiarism sites such as 123HelpMe, Free Essays, or any other essays for sale type sites. Simply “re-wording” the works of any of these sites by substituting or changing adjectives or nouns constitutes plagiarism. All papers will be submitted using TurnItIn, which captures uncited sources and instances of plagiarism.

PLEASE NOTE: Simply re-wording summaries or analysis from another source constitutes plagiarismyour work must consist of YOUR OWN THOUGHTS AND WRITINGplease dont fail this course because of plagiarism. Make sure that you use quotation marks and that you give proper credit to the source if you are paraphrasing.
When you have completed the assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place and submit a copy to your instructor using Moodle.