Best Writer

1. Why do you want to pursue your dental education at New York University College of Dentistry (NYU)?
Max. Characters: 5000

2. Why do you want to join the UCSF community? Please state briefly how you will contribute to the UCSF School of Dentistry.
Max. Characters: 1500

3. Consider your interests, experiences, characteristics, and skills. What makes Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine (GSDM) a good fit for your dental education? As a dental student, how will you contribute to the school community?
Max. Characters: 800

I have attached my answers to my other supplemental questions, my resume, and my personal statement for your reference.

Follow the steps below and take a look at the Week Two Example Paper
download
for an example of how to complete this paper.
Step 1: State a thesis statement on your topic.
This thesis statement does not have to end up being your final position on the subject, but for this workshop, it will serve as the position you will be defending. Your thesis statement is the conclusion of your argument.
Example: If my topic is the moral acceptability of capital punishment, my thesis could be that capital punishment is not morally acceptable.
Step 2: Present your main reason or reasons in favor of your thesis.
These reasons are the premises of your argument. State your argument in standard form.
Example: If my thesis is that capital punishment is not morally acceptable, and my reason is that it sometimes kills innocent human beings, then my argument would be the following:
Premise 1: Capital punishment sometimes kills innocent human beings.
Conclusion: Capital punishment is not morally acceptable.
Step 3: State the new premise (or premises) that would be needed in order to make this argument valid.
This new premise provides what is needed to link (in a valid way) the first premise(s) to the stated conclusion. For more guidance on how to do this, review the assigned sections of Chapter 3 in your textbook, and watch the videos What Is a Valid Argument?
(Links to an external site.)
and How to Make a Sound Deductive Argument
(Links to an external site.)
.
In the above example, the new premise needed to make the argument valid would be the following:
Premise 2: It is not morally acceptable to do anything that sometimes kills innocent human beings.
The new premise connects the first premise to the conclusion in a way that makes the argument logically valid.
Step 4: Discuss whether the new premise is true (in your view) and why.
Does it have any counter examples? If it is not true (in your view), then how could you modify it so that it is true but still supports the conclusion? If it is true (in your view), how might you respond to a likely objection to it?
In the example above, the new premise may not be true. A counterexample could be war. Wars typically kill at least some innocent human beings, but that does not make all of them morally unacceptable.
To figure out how to modify the premise, one can ask the following: What is the difference between good wars and capital punishment? Perhaps it is that good wars are necessary to prevent greater overall harm.
So, one might change the premise to, It is not morally acceptable to do anything that sometimes kills innocent human beings, unless it is necessary to prevent greater overall harm. This new version of the premise shows what is wrong with capital punishment without also entailing that war is always wrong.
Step 5: State the new version of the argument in standard form, adding any other premises needed to complete the reasoning (meaning to make it valid).
The new argument becomes the following:
Premise 1: Capital punishment sometimes kills innocent human beings.
Premise 2: It is not morally acceptable to do anything that sometimes kills innocent human beings unless it is necessary to prevent greater overall harm.
Premise 3: Capital punishment is not necessary to prevent greater overall harm.
Conclusion: Capital punishment is not morally acceptable.
Step 6: Discuss whether the new argument is deductively valid and whether all of its premises are true.
If your argument meets both of these requirements (namely that it is valid and all premises are true), then you have an apparently sound argument; great job! If not, then go back to the steps above and repeat until you have a sound argument and revise Step 5 until it meets both requirements. (so that what you post under Step 5 above is your final, sound version).
Step 7: Once you have an (apparently) sound argument, present an objection to it.
Imagine for a moment that you are a smart person with the opposite perspective on this issue. What would be your best objection to the argument that you just gave? It can be an objection to the truth of one of the premises or to the validity of the reasoning, or it can be a counter argument intended to override your argument. In any case, express here what you take that best objection to be.
The Creating a Sound Argument Workshop paper,
Should be 1 to 2 pages in length.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of workshop in bold font
Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
Students name
Name of institution (University of Arizona Global Campus)
Course name and number
Instructors name
Due date

Florida (like all states) has a Crime Victim Compensation Program that provides financial assistance to victims of crime. Victim compensation programs are usually offender-funded, and are not paid for by tax dollars.
1. Do you agree with the existence of these programs? In other words, do you think the government should help crime victims recoup crime-related financial losses?
2. Why or why not? Explain and support your opinion.
You must use at least two outside credible sources in your essay.

Choose a specific event or movement in American History from 1920-2000 and prove how that event or movement changed or was very important to American history.

A 47-year-old male patient (A) presents to your office c/o painful and bleeding defecation that started a
couple of days ago. Pt also states that he noticed some intermittent pruritus on his back. Pt comes to
your consultation accompanied by his male husband of 45 years old (Patient B), who suddenly states to
you that he had noticed a painless blister on his genital area, but he is not quite sure when it
appeared.
Patient A: With no past or family relevant history and with no known allergies (NKA).
Patient B: With a PMH of seasonal allergic rhinitis and NKA. No other family or relevant history.
On complete physical examination of both patients your assessment reveals the following findings:
On Patient A: You noticed a visible anal fissure in the inferior region of the anal sphincter. Besides, you
also noticed disseminated papules in the trunk and macules on palms and soles (as shown below).
Patient B: On examination, you noticed a visible ulceration in the genital area, and patient denies any
pain on palpation. On general assessment, no adenopathy noted or reported by patient (B).

Since both patients are a marital couple, you proceed with serological testing for each patient (A & B).
You suspect a sexually transmitted disease. On your verbal assessment, both patients (A&B) deny having
or being treating in the past for STDs in the past, to which you believe.
Lab Results:
Patient A: Leukocytosis – Treponema (Positive) Non-Treponema (Positive) HIV (Negative) Hepatitis
(Negative)
Patient B: Treponema (Positive) Non-treponema (Negative) HIV (negative) Hepatitis (Negative)
——————— Do not include the above section in your paper. Please answer the following questions in APA format and include in-text references.
1) What serological lab works would you order to obtain the above results? (Be specific with the lab
names)
2) What is the diagnosis for Patient A?
3) What is the diagnosis for Patient B?
4) What would it be the differential diagnosis for patient A and patient B? (be specific. Your diagnosis
contains stages. Therefore, be specific on them)
5) How are you going to treat Patient A? (Be specific and include the time of treatment)
6) How are you going to treat Patient B? (Be specific and include the time of treatment)
7) What would be the possible cause of this infection if both patients did not have any sexual encounter
outside their relationship in the last year? Again, you believe both patients did not have any sexual
encounter outside their marital sexual relationship.

From a city’s standpoint (taxpayers), is it a good investment of tax dollars to fund a new stadium/arena for a professional sports team? Explain your answer and give specific examples. Also, list some areas of revenue and expenses the city may be able to expect.
use and cite at least three academic sources including Fried for max points

In this assignment, you will prepare an essay on the hearsay rule and the rationale behind the rule. Explain the 4 main dangers of hearsay, and discuss 2 hearsay exceptions. Include examples.
Assignment Guidelines
Address the following in 2-3 pages:
What is the hearsay rule? Explain in detail.
What major cases were involved in the establishment of the hearsay rule? Summarize.
What is the rationale behind the rule? Explain.
What issues exist regarding the hearsay rule? Explain.
What are the 4 main dangers of hearsay? Explain in detail.
What are the hearsay exceptions? Explain.
Are there any hearsay exceptions that you disagree with? Why or why not? Explain.
Use at least 2 scholarly resources to support your arguments.
Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

The format of the paper should be the question followed by the response to each question as in a Q & A format, the case study should be 3.5 pages long.

Questions

1. What would be the major components of your proposed policy for both medical marijuana use, as well as recreational marijuana use?

2. How would you “sell” it to employees and management with your organization? Please be detailed.

3. What could be some of the unintended, short-term, and long-term consequences of your proposed policy?

Format
Double-spaced

12pt font

APA format

Properly formatted
citations and Works Cited page using APA guidelines
INTRODUCTION
16-20 Points
Provides 1 or 2
paragraphs for an Introduction which also includes a table with the currency
exchange rates for a consecutive 5-year period
Main Body (Analysis)
40-50 Points
Provides an economic
analysis for the currency selected and for the US Dollar with little or no
errors.
Provides an opinion based upon the analysis and includes three to four valid
citations to support that opinion. The citations are properly cited in-text
and the analysis is a minimum of three to four pages.
Summary
6-10 Points
Provides a clear
summary or conclusion restating the analysis in 1 or 2 paragraphs.
6-10 Points
Grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and sentence structure has little to no errors. Provides clear
organization and uses transitional words when necessary with little to no
errors.
Provides in-text citations and citations on a Works Cited page.
Provides a minimum of 3 to 4 citations
The paper is a minimum of 4 to 5 pages in length.
6-10 Points
Formatting
guidelines are followed and APA guidelines are followed with little to no
errors.

1-.Please write your assignment giving your opinion of the courts today. Are they fair, do they protect our freedoms, and liberty.? Do you think our system and laws are still a living document, are flexible enough for changing times or do you recommend changes in our present system of Justice to improve justice and equality

2.Due to the importance of the Supreme court and it’s lifetime appointments, should the Supreme Court selection process continue with it’s political overtones ,or should a panel be selected to nominate Judges ,to the supreme court ,that are deemed qualified,intelligent, and not politically bias.

3. give your opinion as to Affirmative Action Programs and did they help eliminate or reduce discrimination over the decades ?
Besides training programs, what would you do to further reduce discriminatory behavior ?

4.In view of the 1st amendment, ,was the storming of the Capital on Jan 9th protected by the 1st Amendment or was it an excessive abuse of the freedom we have guaranteed by the Constitution. Please state your opinions.

5 (chap6).your opinion as to whether the federal Government should control the possession of guns,or be able to restrict ,certain types of firearms? What about assault weapons primarily used for armed military conflict ,or the need for large capacity magazines?

6.(chap7 )your opinion based upon the information in the chapter as to Stop And Frisk as a anti-crime initiatives. Is this discriminatory and would you use this technique to reduce gun crimes in N.Y.

7.(chapter9) -please direct yourself to Border Searches. With the immigration crisis and the huge numbers of persons crossing the borders between official entry positions. border searches are vital to U.S. national security. Why aren’t these people ,vehicles,or merchandise subject to probable cause for conducting searches of the people, or baggage crossing the border. Do you believe this is constitutional or a possible violation of the 4th Amendment.

8.(chap10)please give your opinion. Do you think giving a Miranda warning impedes police work and make the citizens more susceptible to crime ?

9.Please give your opinion on the question ,Do public defenders provide less effective defense than would a private attorney? What might a private attorney with a wealthy client be capable of that a public defender with an indigent client would not? Is one clearly better than the other?

10.Please give your view of who does society deem appropriate to put to death? Should this include the mentally ill, the intellectually disabled, and juveniles? How do you believe the ultimate punishment should be carried out / By electrocution, hanging, firing squad or lethal injection. Do the ends justify the means?