Best Writer

Upload a document (picture, Word, PDF, Powerpoint) which contains your proposed outline for your XKCD Project. It should include the main topics and sub-topics (especially physics) that you plan to discuss (and in the order you plan to talk about them) related to your chosen topic. Not too much detail is required; Mr. Stuard just wants to make sure you have given this some serious thought at this point. A simple bullet list in a text document, or the titles of your slides (no content on the slides is necessary at this point) will do.Upload a document (picture, Word, PDF, Powerpoint) which contains your proposed outline for your XKCD Project. It should include the main topics and sub-topics (especially physics) that you plan to discuss (and in the order you plan to talk about them) related to your chosen topic. Not too much detail is required; Mr. Stuard just wants to make sure you have given this some serious thought at this point. A simple bullet list in a text document, or the titles of your slides (no content on the slides is necessary at this point) will do.

Im doing the project on Rocket Golf

The website is https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/https://what-if.xkcd.com/85/

If your instructor provided previous feedback on your last journal, briefly outline how are you improving based on it. (In Word, you may need to select “Review—Tracking—All Markup” to see feedback as “track changes”.)
Reflection on the peer review process.
a) What did you learn from evaluating your peers’ papers?
b) Did evaluating your peers’ paper change how you write? Provide examples.
c) Was receiving peer feedback on your own paper helpful? If so, provide examples.
d) Was there anything about this process that surprised you?
e) What did you enjoy / not enjoy about this process?
What will you take away from RE374? You may want to think about how/if this course challenged /changed your thinking around religion and sexuality, but other responses will be accepted too.
Overall Feedback
Your paper presents a fairly surface-level response to the lesson that can recognize and repeat examples from the lessons but not provide any higher-level critical engagement with them. You should be able to evaluate these examples using specific course theories/theorists. This deficiency is seen, particularly in your inability to articulate / apply anything specific about queer/feminist theory.
When I look at your progress in the course, the vagueness of your response appears to be connected from the lack of time spent on lessons. I suggest re-evaluating your approach to the class. Overall Feedback
Your paper presents a fairly surface level response to the lesson that can recognize and repeat examples from the lessons but not provide any higher level critical engagement with them. You should be able to evaluate these examples using specific course theories/theorists. This deficiency is seen, particularly, in your inability to articulate / apply anything specific about queer/feminist theory.
When I look at your progress in the course, the vagueness of your response appears to be connected from the lack of time spent on lessons. I suggest re-evaluating your approach to the class.
Rate this paper’s overall readabilty
5 of 5
Rate the strength of this paper’s thesis.
3 of 5
Rate this paper’s ability to sustain a coherent point of view
3 of 4
Rate this paper’s ability to fulfill the aims of the assignment as articulated in the assignment instructions
4 of 4
How well did the author follow the course writing tips?
3 of 4
Did the paper accurately cite use the Style Guide indicated in the instructions?
3 of 4
What does this paper does well?
It is very readable and easy to follow along with the points the author makes about the strict right
What is at least one area where this paper needs improvement?
Instead of answering direct questions from the assignment instructions, I think it would be useful to find connections between the author’s points
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate effective use of course concepts and application of theorists.
The author draws on Foucault’s idea of bipower, and Endsjø’s chapter on religio-sexual priorities, but I think they could embed connections to these theorists throughout the paper and in the other paragraphs about the strict right.
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate critical thought and shows sparks of originality
I like how the author draws on information about the strict right and how it is prevalent in the WRDSB debates today.
Describe how this paper’s organization is or is not effective and logical
I think it would be more effective if each paragraph supported a central thesis using course content
Describe how this paper does or does not systematically support its argument with many specific examples
It does, but the support isn’t embedded throughout the paper to support the thesis
Describe how this paper does or does not make effective use of course writing tools (writing tips, library tutorials, etc.)
It is well written, some sentence fragments are a bit awkward but reading the paper out loud would help
If you had to assign a grade to this paper what would it be?
4 of 5
What are the last 4 digits of your student number?
920Rate this paper’s overall readabilty
5 of 5
Rate the strength of this paper’s thesis.
3 of 5
Rate this paper’s ability to sustain a coherent point of view
3 of 4
Rate this paper’s ability to fulfill the aims of the assignment as articulated in the assignment instructions
4 of 4
How well did the author follow the course writing tips?
3 of 4
Did the paper accurately cite use the Style Guide indicated in the instructions?
3 of 4
What does this paper does well?
It is very readable and easy to follow along with the points the author makes about the strict right
What is at least one area where this paper needs improvement?
Instead of answering direct questions from the assignment instructions, I think it would be useful to find connections between the author’s points
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate effective use of course concepts and application of theorists.
The author draws on Foucault’s idea of bipower, and Endsjø’s chapter on religio-sexual priorities, but I think they could embed connections to these theorists throughout the paper and in the other paragraphs about the strict right.
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate critical thought and shows sparks of originality
I like how the author draws on information about the strict right and how it is prevalent in the WRDSB debates today.
Describe how this paper’s organization is or is not effective and logical
I think it would be more effective if each paragraph supported a central thesis using course content
Describe how this paper does or does not systematically support its argument with many specific examples
It does, but the support isn’t embedded throughout the paper to support the thesis
Describe how this paper does or does not make effective use of course writing tools (writing tips, library tutorials, etc.)
It is well written, some sentence fragments are a bit awkward but reading the paper out loud would help
If you had to assign a grade to this paper what would it be?
4 of 5
What are the last 4 digits of your student number?
920Rate this paper’s overall readabilty
5 of 5
Rate the strength of this paper’s thesis.
3 of 5
Rate this paper’s ability to sustain a coherent point of view
3 of 4
Rate this paper’s ability to fulfill the aims of the assignment as articulated in the assignment instructions
4 of 4
How well did the author follow the course writing tips?
3 of 4
Did the paper accurately cite use the Style Guide indicated in the instructions?
3 of 4
What does this paper does well?
It is very readable and easy to follow along with the points the author makes about the strict right
What is at least one area where this paper needs improvement?
Instead of answering direct questions from the assignment instructions, I think it would be useful to find connections between the author’s points
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate effective use of course concepts and application of theorists.
The author draws on Foucault’s idea of bipower, and Endsjø’s chapter on religio-sexual priorities, but I think they could embed connections to these theorists throughout the paper and in the other paragraphs about the strict right.
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate critical thought and shows sparks of originality
I like how the author draws on information about the strict right and how it is prevalent in the WRDSB debates today.
Describe how this paper’s organization is or is not effective and logical
I think it would be more effective if each paragraph supported a central thesis using course content
Describe how this paper does or does not systematically support its argument with many specific examples
It does, but the support isn’t embedded throughout the paper to support the thesis
Describe how this paper does or does not make effective use of course writing tools (writing tips, library tutorials, etc.)
It is well written, some sentence fragments are a bit awkward but reading the paper out loud would help
If you had to assign a grade to this paper what would it be?
4 of 5
What are the last 4 digits of your student number?
920
Rate this paper’s overall readabilty
3 of 5
Rate the strength of this paper’s thesis.
4 of 5
Rate this paper’s ability to sustain a coherent point of view
3 of 4
Rate this paper’s ability to fulfill the aims of the assignment as articulated in the assignment instructions
3 of 4
How well did the author follow the course writing tips?
2 of 4
Did the paper accurately cite use the Style Guide indicated in the instructions?
1 of 4
What does this paper does well?
The paper does well with providing arguments that back up the thesis. They expand on the points they make, rather than just simply stating them!
What is at least one area where this paper needs improvement?
This paper could be improved by proofreading and making sure they are not repeating the same things multiple times! The organization of the paper can also be improved and the headings for each question are not needed.
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate effective use of course concepts and application of theorists.
This paper effectively uses course concept and relevant theorists that back up the argument well.
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate critical thought and shows sparks of originality
This paper demonstrates original thought as they include examples to further explain their point.
Describe how this paper’s organization is or is not effective and logical
The organization of the paper is logical, however, the conclusion could be stronger to wrap up the main points.
Describe how this paper does or does not systematically support its argument with many specific examples
This paper uses examples of how society in general regulates sex and sexuality which is good.
Describe how this paper does or does not make effective use of course writing tools (writing tips, library tutorials, etc.)
This paper used the wrong citation style guide which is why I do not think they made good use of the resources! But this will be good to know for when they submit their final paper.
If you had to assign a grade to this paper what would it be?
4 of 5
What are the last 4 digits of your student number?
2780Rate this paper’s overall readabilty
3 of 5
Rate the strength of this paper’s thesis.
4 of 5
Rate this paper’s ability to sustain a coherent point of view
3 of 4
Rate this paper’s ability to fulfill the aims of the assignment as articulated in the assignment instructions
3 of 4
How well did the author follow the course writing tips?
2 of 4
Did the paper accurately cite use the Style Guide indicated in the instructions?
1 of 4
What does this paper does well?
The paper does well with providing arguments that back up the thesis. They expand on the points they make, rather than just simply stating them!
What is at least one area where this paper needs improvement?
This paper could be improved by proofreading and making sure they are not repeating the same things multiple times! The organization of the paper can also be improved and the headings for each question are not needed.
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate effective use of course concepts and application of theorists.
This paper effectively uses course concept and relevant theorists that back up the argument well.
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate critical thought and shows sparks of originality
This paper demonstrates original thought as they include examples to further explain their point.
Describe how this paper’s organization is or is not effective and logical
The organization of the paper is logical, however, the conclusion could be stronger to wrap up the main points.
Describe how this paper does or does not systematically support its argument with many specific examples
This paper uses examples of how society in general regulates sex and sexuality which is good.
Describe how this paper does or does not make effective use of course writing tools (writing tips, library tutorials, etc.)
This paper used the wrong citation style guide which is why I do not think they made good use of the resources! But this will be good to know for when they submit their final paper.
If you had to assign a grade to this paper what would it be?
4 of 5
What are the last 4 digits of your student number?
2780Rate this paper’s overall readabilty
3 of 5
Rate the strength of this paper’s thesis.
4 of 5
Rate this paper’s ability to sustain a coherent point of view
3 of 4
Rate this paper’s ability to fulfill the aims of the assignment as articulated in the assignment instructions
3 of 4
How well did the author follow the course writing tips?
2 of 4
Did the paper accurately cite use the Style Guide indicated in the instructions?
1 of 4
What does this paper does well?
The paper does well with providing arguments that back up the thesis. They expand on the points they make, rather than just simply stating them!
What is at least one area where this paper needs improvement?
This paper could be improved by proofreading and ensuring they do not repeat the same things multiple times! The paper’s organisation can also be improved and the headings for each question are not needed.
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate effective use of course concepts and application of theorists.
This paper effectively uses course concept and relevant theorists that back up the argument well.
Describe how this paper does or does not demonstrate critical thought and shows sparks of originality
This paper demonstrates original thought as they include examples to further explain their point.
Describe how this paper’s organization is or is not effective and logical
The organization of the paper is logical, however, the conclusion could be stronger to wrap up the main points.
Describe how this paper does or does not systematically support its argument with many specific examples
This paper uses examples of how society in general regulates sex and sexuality which is good.
Describe how this paper does or does not make effective use of course writing tools (writing tips, library tutorials, etc.)
This paper used the wrong citation style guide which is why I do not think they made good use of the resources! But this will be good to know for when they submit their final paper.
If you had to assign a grade to this paper what would it be?
4 of 5
What are the last 4 digits of your student number?
2780

I need someone to expand on these topics and explain and give facts. I also provided the sources too.
This report aims to examine the arguments supporting and challenging the thesis statement, “Global warming is caused by human
activity,” and provide an objective analysis of the evidence available. I need three supporting and challenging reasons in their own
paragraphs explained in detail.
here are the sources.
Supporting Arguments:

IPCC. “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers.” IPCC, 2013, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGI-AR5_SPM_brochure_en.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr. 2023.
NASA. “Global Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet.” NASA, 2022, https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/. Accessed 5 Apr. 2023.
IPCC. “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers.” IPCC, 2013, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGI-AR5_SPM_brochure_en.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr. 2023.
Challenging Arguments:

NASA. “Global Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet.” NASA, 2022, https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/. Accessed 5 Apr. 2023.
NASA. “Global Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet.” NASA, 2022, https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/. Accessed 5 Apr. 2023.
IPCC. “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers.” IPCC, 2013, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGI-AR5_SPM_brochure_en.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr. 2023.

Length: 4 pages, double-spaced + Annotations

The structure for this assignment will be a brief narrative wherein you define the theme or thematic expansion on which you have chosen to focus and an annotated list of the 4 books and 2 journal articles that you believe would best illuminate this theme. In this narrative, you should anchor your topic to the broader history of higher education through references to things you have read previously (in this and other courses) as well as to “general” histories of higher education, and express how this counter narrative theme could contribute to a more complex (critical) understanding of the history and current state of higher education. This narrative should be roughly four pages in length (double spaced). Your annotations should be roughly one paragraph (~half page, double-spaced) per book selected. Please note: You are not required to completely read the books or articles that you identify, but you should read enough about them to know that they are an appropriate selection.

We have spent a good portion of the focus of this Classical period focusing on Mozart and his life as a child prodigy. How about Haydn? Discuss why you feel he was also considered 1 of 2 Classical Masters

NO EXTERNAL/UNASSIGNED MATERIALS OR INFORMATION WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Be sure to respond to all parts of the question. You cite your sources if you use a direct quote. Otherwise, citing isn’t required since you are using only assigned materials. This is not a formal essay with an introduction, conclusion, etc. Your goal is to demonstrate that you have: 1. completed the readings; 2. listened to the lectures; and, 3. understood and synthesized the course material so far. Save in double-space so I can read your response more easily.

11. Describe the strategies Indigenous individuals and communities have taken and continue to take in responding to colonization. You should be able to identify at least two strategies. Provide examples from both Canada and the US. How effective have the various strategies been? Explain. Rely on both assigned books and the lectures, giving examples to support your points

course material to be used – https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.uwinnipeg.idm.oclc.org/lib/uwinnipeg/reader.action?docID=4931256.
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.uwinnipeg.idm.oclc.org/lib/uwinnipeg/reader.action?docID=5760003

plan and create the shell of your diversity and inclusion handbook. You may use whatever tools you see fit.

Remember, this handbook is to be utilized as a resource for your organization, so make sure you create something that is relevant to your needs.

Part 1 consists of the following:

· Cover Page: Design a cover page that is relevant to your needs. Use the company logo, or something that represents you and your teams at work.

· Purpose: Explain the purpose for this project. Build off the topics discussed in this module and explain the importance for having a diversity handbook in your organization, and what people can gain from using it.

· Biographies: For each member in your team, write a 1-2 paragraph biography.

· Design Scheme: Ensuring Content is ascetically pleasing.

Looking Forward: This course aims to develop a diversity and inclusion handbook that leaders can use in their workplaces. You will work on segments that are related to the assignment and will combine them into one unified handbook.

In this module you will work in your groups to complete the first section, including: Cover Page, Purpose, Group Biographies, Document Design Scheme.Looking Forward: This course aims to develop a diversity and inclusion handbook that leaders can use in their workplaces. You will work on segments that are related to the assignment and will combine them into one unified handbook.

In this folder presented you are given several website links to information on the autoimmune, neurogenerative disease Multiple Sclerosis. In this Unit, you will learn how our tissues and organs work together to form organ systems and learn details of how the nervous, endocrine, skeletal and muscular systems function (and their structure). Linked to this assignment are pages to a Case Study on MS for you to read. Using this information and the information from the introductory material folder, write an essay discussing this disease and its effects on a person. You should include information on tissues (especially nervous) and each of the systems relevant to this unit. An autoimmune disease is one where our immune system attacks our own tissues as though they were foreign and destroys them. We will discuss the workings of the immune system in Unit 4 and so you do not need to include that discussion for this assignment. Things that you might discuss can include how the disease affects the nervous system and how that in turn affects the ability to move. You might consider the long-term progression of the disease and symptoms that may come and go. There are many things that you could consider but keep your discussion factual and relevant to the unit. If you use information from resources (including those presented here) you should cite them in APA format.An essay that is 500-1000 words can be adequate for this assignment but it needs to be on point.Case Study on MS: (linked from Weber State University Dumke College of Health Sciences)

-Write a paper about a trial or proceeding.
-should be 800 words minimimum.
-it could be any type of proceeding ( state, federal, even international. Administrative or arbitration matters.)
– The proceeding must have taken place since Jan. 1, 2012.
-PLEASE STATE THE DATE AND LOCATION (COURT) OF THE PROCEEDING AS WELL AS – IF POSSIBLE –
THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES, THE LAWYERS, AND THE JUDGE OR ARBITRATOR
additional instructions in the files section.

Your role is to create a new thread describing the three most critical or novel concepts that you discovered in the supplemental readings and/or TED Talks. Your responses must incorporate content from all of the required readings/TED videos for this week. Your post and your responses must be THOUGHTFUL to receive credit (e.g. “I agree” doesn’t count. Several sentences are needed to describe each of the three takeaways and in each response to classmates).