Best Writer

In order to fulfill the requirements of this proposal, the attached checklist must be followed closely. I have also included tips for success for this proposal, as well as the template. Some pros and cons I can provide for this proposal are below. I hope these prove helpful.

Pros
Scalability of AWS to meet Techfite’s growing needs for storage space
AWS provides cloud storage, so Techfite does not need to purchase additional hardware
AWS provides more secure storage than Techfite currently uses
AWS provides excellent customer service
AWS provides in-house training for Techfite’s employees
Cons
Necessity of training employees on the use of new technology
Lack of control over storage and security
If AWS goes down, data is unavailable until service is restored

Hello, Kindly respond needed to that discussion with zero plagrisim and includind 1 resource at least. Thank you.

Through various agencies and decision/policy-making, the government enhances the lives of citizens in a bureaucratic manner; bureaucracy improves our lives. For example, in the United States, the federal government, via its bureaucratic rules and agencies, conducts functions to satisfy people’s various needs and improve their quality of life (Greenberg, 2018). For example, the Department of Agriculture (USDA) offers food and nutrition services, rural development, and farm services. Thus, bureaucracy affects our freedom in the sense that it offers our freedom to have equal access to our natural resources, freedom to be governed, freedom of speech, and many more. Bureaucracy is all around us, from government agencies to offices, so it’s essential to know how bureaucracies work, and the pros and cons of bureaucracy” Thus, it denotes that bureaucracy is not perfect, it has its pros and cons (issues or problem), but bureaucracy has been proven to improve the standard of living of the people. Hence, I firmly believe that bureaucracy is an influential aspect of our lives because it improves the quality of life and prevents interest-driven privatization. Despite its positive effects on the people, bureaucracy is also subject to red tape, conflict, duplication, imperialism, and waste. But among the five, conflict is one of the common problems encountered in bureaucratic countries. Conflict exists when some agencies work at cross-purposes with other agencies. The Agricultural Research Service tells farmers how to grow crops more efficiently, while the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service pays farmers to grow fewer crops. Because Congress has 535 members and little strong leadership, it is not surprising that it passes laws that promote conflicting or even contradictory goals (Wamsley, 2020). In this case, I would suggest that lawmakers create a framework and standard policy that will assure the different agencies that they will not intervene or interfere with other agencies. With this, a smooth transition of work is being observed, and the functions of each agency will be maximized without compromise.
References
Greenberg, E. S & Page, B. I. (2018). The Struggle for Democracy, 2018 Elections and Updates Edition. (12th ed.). Pearson
Wamsley, G. L., Goodsell, C. T., Rohr, J. A., White, O., & Wolf, J. (2020). A legitimate role for bureaucracy in democratic governance. In The state of public bureaucracy (pp. 59-86). Routledge.

Look for references to both oppression and empowerment in “She Had Some Horses.” How and why does Harjo use horses to symbolize both loss and opportunity for the Native American community? Discuss.

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/141852/she-had-some-horses-590104cf40742

Focusing on Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Hurston, explain whether you think her work espouses a feminist or an anti-feminist stance. Does the text appear to celebrate those actions which further independence and empowerment for women? What kind of depiction does it offer of its female characters?

Only reference the book please.

Please review your Research Project Presentation Guidelines before submitting your final presentation here. Also once
you submitted here, reminder to post your presentation in Research Project Presentation Discussion & Peer Responses
DUE and comment on others presentations.
* Make sure you include your works cited page!

Research Project Presentation DNCE 77
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Content
At least 12 slides, on one of the topics given.
100 to >89.0 pts
Full Content, good details included and fully followed guidelines.
89 to >79.0 pts
Missing Content, needed more support details.
79 to >70.0 pts
Missing good amount content, needed more support information included
70 to >0 pts
No Content/Not on Topics Given/ Not enough details given
100 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Video Included
At least one video or link included
10 pts
Included at least one video
0 pts
No Videos included.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Works Cited Page with 5 sources
At least 5 citations included on works cited page.
30 pts
5 sources given
22 pts
4 sources given
16 pts
3 sources given
12 pts
2 sources given
6 pts
1 source given
0 pts
No Citations Included
30 pts
Total Points: 140

6to 8 pages of content
• Minimum 4 sources
• Size 12 times new roman font
Double spaced
One-inch margins
• Title page
• Work cited page
• Follow APA guidelines (do not need
abstract, if you use one does not count as a
page)
Due August 11th
Work cited and Title does not count
towards page total
A

Hello Film 71,
My expectation is that your final is going to be an improved version of your midterm.
But I also expect that you will go beyond my edits so take this as an opportunity to practice editing your own writing, which is a really important skill.
Edit out common errors. So I have noted in some lectures and in some slides and in some additional material some common errors and also some typical suggestions on how to improve your work and write a quality film analysis. My expectation is that you all have seen all of that material, so I will mark down if I’m noting common errors that I know I have made a point of pointing out to you already, for example, films are italicized only no quotation marks and they are italicized every time you mentioned them. So if I see that error, at this point on the final I will be marking that down okay and if you look in the midterm module you’ll see an attachment that says useful reading for crafting a film analysis, in addition to that, please make sure to note carefully the instructions right and I have also provided additional slides in different weeks that have suggestions so just review the material, not just for suggestions for the midterm also but you know if you know that you’re writing on cinematography or you know that you’re writing about a film that’s very similar to Memento then go back through that material check out the supplementary reading that I’ve provided, do further research or Google your film and see who else has written about it and try to be in conversation with those people.
That is actually a key skill in advanced scholarship, so in advance scholarship as it stands today being able to identify other people in the field, discussing subjects like yours and entering the conversation they have started, adding critique, challenge, affirm that is kind of at the heart of advanced scholarship so take this as an opportunity to practice.

The instructions for your final exam are provided in the Final Exam Prompt:

Your final essay is another argument. In this assignment, you will argue that you have or have not developed as a writer. In this essay, you will be looking at your own writings for this class and analyzing how you feel you’ve applied what we’ve learned in class to your writing process, your experience in this course, and how you changed as a writer.

Think about your writing process and how you’ve become more aware of your own unique ways of writing. Has your writing changed during this course? You should think about strategies that you learned in class, suggestions you received—what worked, what didn’t?

The Essay

In your final essay (800-1000 words), you will need to cite examples and quotes from your essays as proof of your increased writing knowledge. This will give your audience a clear indication that you understand how the changes you’ve made affect the quality of your writing.

Certainly, not all stories have storybook endings: there’s a chance that you have improved some, but you still don’t consider yourself a great writer. You may think that you’ve noticed some small improvements, but simply aren’t convinced that your skills developed as you thought they might or expected them to. That’s okay. You don’t have to pretend that you’ve made phenomenal improvements over the course of this course, if, in fact, you haven’t.

Most of us, when growing academically, find the experience mixed. You likely have made improvements, and you likely still have room for additional development. Thus, for this essay, be honest, sincere, thoughtful, and specific and you will succeed with your argument about the degree to which you improved in your development.

Your goal is to argue, using examples from your own work, about the growth you’ve experienced as a writer this session.

How to Prepare

Define how you think you’ve changed as a writer this session by thinking about these questions.
How did your writing change during this course?
What do you know about your writing process/growth? What kind of writer were you before entering this course? What kind of writer are you now? How do you describe your own writing process? How has your process changed since taking this class? What do you still need to work on?
How does your writing/thinking at the end of the course compare to where you started? Examples?
How do your essays show the changes you’ve noticed? What kind of proof can you use from these essays to back up your argument? Examples?
What were some of the most influential ideas/activities you encountered this session? What concepts are most valuable to you? Why? How will you use these concepts in the future?
What did you conclude about your writing process/growth?
Support your Argument: Specific Examples & Quotes
You could start the essay with a statement defining how you would describe yourself as a writer, a critical thinker, and rhetorician, as compared to the first day of class or the first essay. To help you develop the argument, you could

Include specific anecdotes, examples from your papers and your personal experiences while writing this session.
Use quotes to back up the points you make about your development as a writer. You can use quotes from peer reviews, notes, class writings, graded essays, but you MUST quote from your own work several times.
Take this week to review comments on each of your projects. Make notes on areas you were pleased with as well as areas you struggled with. Use quotations, as appropriate, from others’ comments to you and from your own work.

To cite from your work, document it by including the name of the essay, the type of assignment, date, and the page number in a References page. For example, if Janet Smith cites from her values essay entitled “Alphabetizing Elephants” submitted on July 12, 2020, her citation would look like this.

Smith, J. (2020). Alphabetizing elephants. The Values Essay.

If Janet used a source from her Classical Argument entitled “Balancing Work and Exercise,” her References page would look like this.

Smith, J. (2020a). Alphabetizing elephants. The Values Essay.

Smith, J. (2020b). Balancing work and exercise. The Classical Argument Essay.

Please submit the following:
Written 1-2 page handout used in the training including the What, Why, and How.
A completed fidelity checklist for the procedure you are teaching.
A summary of the overall training including participant responses to the questionnaire, challenges, and areas you would change in future trainings.
Description of where and when the training took place. A description of the participants, numbers, roles, reasons for participation. A description of any challenges during the training. A reflection of the overall training success.
A copy of completed social validity questionnaire(s).
Please submit your assignment via Canvas.
Note: You must attach Module 5 (Part 1) with any corrections highlighted in yellow, to your Module 6 (Part 2) submission.
Rubric
BST Handout, PowerPoint Slides, and Fidelity Checklist
BST Handout, PowerPoint Slides, and Fidelity Checklist
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHandout
20 pts
Full Marks
Written 1-2 page handout used in the training including the What, Why, and How.
0 pts
No Marks
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFidelity Checklist
20 pts
Full Marks
A completed fidelity checklist for the procedure you are teaching.
0 pts
No Marks
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary
20 pts
Full Marks
A summary of the overall training including participant responses to the questionnaire, challenges, and areas you would change in future trainings. Description of where and when the training took place. A description of the participants, numbers, roles, reasons for participation. A description of any challenges during the training. A reflection of the overall training success.
0 pts
No Marks
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSocial Validity Questionnaire
10 pts
Full Marks
A copy of completed social validity questionnaire(s).
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 70

PSYU 351
PowerPoint Presentation Points:
The intent of this assignment is to share and discuss your SA topic with members of the class as
you describe, through online discussion, how various
philosophies and schools of Psychology contribute to the present form of Psychology (CLO #4).
Additionally, presenting your SA topic provides an opportunity for others to learn from your
interests and to demonstrate the
quality
of your scholarly research.
The PPT is to contain a minimum of 12 slides, and a maximum of 15 slides, that must include
the
following:
Title slide, Personal Interest slide (refer to the SA Final Paper Proposal
Assignment, Week 2), Introduction slide, and a maximum of two Reference slide(s). From a
historical perspective (see SA requirements), slides discussing the content of the topic must
clearly contain information related to theory, application, contributing theorists, and related
material. Images may be used, but must be relative to, the discussion presentation of the specific
slide. All references and in-text citations must be in current APA format (7th edition). Name the PPT document as follows: “Your Last Name, first
initial, PSYU 351 PPT.”