Effective use of social media strategies holds the potential to enhance your professional brand. In the last few years, the importance of personal branding has grown astronomically as social media tools like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram®, and YouTube™ have given everyone easy access to share stories and document experiences.
Discuss how and when to use social media in professional contexts. Provide a specific situation (professional or current event) and give details on how you can apply strategies to support personal branding. Discuss why these techniques would be effective.
First, lay out the definitions of these terms as you understand them (referring at the very least to the Bordwell and Solanas/Getino readings), and then using specific examples from the film, make your argument as to which category you believe the film is better situated.
Using your understanding of the filmic techniques learned throughout the module, write an analysis of no more than 1,000 words on the opening of any of the films screened as a weekly case study. You should select no more than 5 minutes in total, and exclude the credits sequence.
film:
Moonlight (Barry Jenkins, 2016)
Carol (Todd Haynes, 2015)
Watch Get Out (Peele, 2017)
The following videos from the American Sociological Association present summaries of sociological research and research findings. Choose two (2) videos to watch. Write an essay using the format described below. The essay does not have to be written in a specific format such as MLA or APA but it does need to be written in the following four paragraph format and include proper spelling, punctuation and grammar. Be sure to discuss all required issues. There is no need to include formal references/citations for this assignment.
Paragraph #1 – Introduction. What you include in your introduction is really up to you:
You can simply introduce the issues discussed in the following paragraphs.
You can discuss what you’ve learned about the importance of sociological research.
You can introduce some common themes and concepts you found among the videos you selected.
Or you can take your own direction for this introduction paragraph.
Paragraph #2 – Video 1 summary and analysis:
Discuss the research methods used (how exactly did they gather their data? what were the advantages and disadvantages of the methods they used?).
Discuss which research orientation you believe best fits the researchers’ approach, and why.
Discuss the research findings.
Discuss how the research in the video relates to specific sociological issues and concepts of culture (Ch. 2), socialization (Ch. 3), and/or social interaction (Ch. 4) that we have covered (be specific).
Discuss why/how the research findings might be important to understand in our society and/or how the findings may be used to shape public policy.
Lastly, discuss what you found most interesting about the research methods, the importance of the findings to our society, or the implications of the research for public policy.
Paragraph #3 – Video 2 summary and analysis:
Discuss the research methods used (how exactly did they gather their data? what were the advantages and disadvantages of the methods they used?).
Discuss which research orientation you believe best fits the researchers’ approach, and why.
Discuss the research findings.
Discuss how the research in the video relates to specific sociological issues and concepts of culture (Ch. 2), socialization (Ch. 3), and/or social interaction (Ch. 4) that we have covered (be specific).
Discuss why/how the research findings might be important to understand in our society and/or how the findings may be used to shape public policy.
Lastly, discuss what you found most interesting about the research methods, the importance of the findings to our society, or the implications of the research for public policy.
Paragraph #4 – Conclusion and closing thoughts. What you discuss in this final paragraph is up to you.
Videos are
For this paper you will choose a behavior of yours or someone else’s that developed as the result of classical conditioning. Examples include feeling happy when you hear a particular song, fear of dogs, feeling sick when you see a particular food. Answer the following questions in the form of a 2-3-page paper:
Describe the behavior. How did it develop?
Identify the neutral stimulus (NS), unconditioned stimulus (US), unconditioned response (UR), conditioned stimulus (CS), and conditioned response (CR).
Does the conditioned response exhibit stimulus generalization or stimulus discrimination? Discuss.
How might you go about extinguishing the conditioned response?
What does the research literature say about your selected behavior? Cite at least 2 peer-reviewed articles.
access this Video about CRISPR from pbs.com. The video details the basics of a genetic editing tool called CRISPR that can be used to make targeted edits in DNA. The video also presents several ethical dilemmas that might arise from this new biotechnology. After going through the video, respond to the following prompts with your thoughts on these issues:
When is gene editing okay?
When should gene editing be used? When should it not?
Should everyone have access to genetic editing or only some people? What factors should determine who gets them?
Should genetic editing be regulated by the government? What kinds of restrictions would you impose ifyou were in charge of this regulation?
Video: https://florida.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/gene-editing-and-crispr-how-far-should-we-go/gene-editing-and-crispr-how-far-should-we-go/
***Writer, attachments are previous completed assignments that you can use for the essay. I also included an example of how the final product should look***
Submit a 4-5 page summary on your assessment of the information from your personal assessments, the discussion forum information that you recorded during the course, the assignment information that you recorded during the course, and your take-aways from the weekly required reading and lectures. You should assess and correlate the information to synthesize how you can you this portfolio for your future. You will need to discuss these points from; alternatives, analysis, application, and action. Please also support your viewpoints with 2 or more peer-reviewed article from the GU library that were not used prior within the course. The articles will also need to be no more than 5-years-old in publication.
The 4-5 page assignment should be submitted as a Word document and APA format is required. The title page and reference page are not counted in the 4-5 page requirement. Here is a template.
A. Remember the word “argument” does not mean a fight in a writing context. An academic argument is more like a thoughtful conversation between two people with differing viewpoints on a debatable issue. However, you are required to take a position on one side of the issue.
In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the touchstone.
Your submission must include an APA style reference page following the essay. In your research, you will need 2-4 credible primary or secondary sources to use as support in your essay.
On a separate page, below your reference page, include thoughtful answers to the Think About Your Writing questions. References and Think About Your Writing questions are NOT included in the word count for this essay.
E. Requirements
The essay should be 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words in length
Argumentative Essay Guidelines must be followed or submission will not be graded
Double-space the essay and use 1-inch margins
Use a readable 12-point font
All writing must be appropriate for an academic context
Composition must be original and written for this assignment
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited
Submission should include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition
Your submission must include the essay, reference page, and your answers to the refection questions
Submit a single file only, including all assignment components
Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
Instructions on Individual Assessment
Background information
There is a vast criminological literature that identifies a wide range of factors as causally linked to criminal behavior. These include developmental, social, and economic factors. Select a theory or group of theories to explain deviant behavior.
Your task
2. You are required to write an essay of 2,000 words (+/- 10%) with a view to explaining the concept of (selected criminal behaviour theory (theories) and showing their causal links to explain criminal behavior.
3. You should draw upon researches/studies by scholars from reliable sources to support your arguments. Besides, you should also give your own insights by drawing on your own experiences or encounters in your personal and career life.
Deadlines for submissions
4. Submit the essay by 2022-08-15 (Session 6).
Remember:
• To conduct thorough library research on the chosen issue
• To paraphrase citations where necessary to avoid committing plagiarism
• To employ Harvard Referencing Style while appending your citations
• To write in the fashion of an expository essay
• To signpost the passages by using sub-headings
• To stay neutral in your stance. Only claim something that is supported by evidence (research/ studies by scholars)
• To input your insights and draw on your experiences and encounters
Assessment
5. The pass mark of this essay is set at 40%. Your works will be assessed based on your ability to demonstrate the following capabilities and marks will be awarded according to the scoring rubrics below:
• Demonstrate appropriate essay structure, references and academic style;
• Demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of your chosen issue;
• Evaluate concepts, principles and arguments; and
• Identify appropriate evidence/reasons to support your arguments and insights.
Scoring Rubrics
90-100% Exceptional work with presentation of the highest standard. The work contains coherent arguments and ideas. There is a detailed understanding of subject matter and critical analysis of issues/problems. Points are made clearly and concisely, always substantiated by appropriate use of source material. There is evidence of a sound ability to critically interrelate theories with examples from practice where appropriate.
80-89% Outstanding work with presentation of a very high standard. There is comprehensive understanding of key concepts and knowledge and evidence of critical analysis and insight. Accurate interpretation of data with arguments, ideas and solutions presented effectively and based on strong research and reading.
70-79% Extremely good work with presentation of a high standard. Evidence of strong knowledge and understanding together with some critical analysis and insight. Source material is used effectively to support arguments, ideas and solutions.
60-69% Very good presentation. Sound knowledge and understanding with an emerging ability to critically engage with and apply the concepts involved linking them to practice where appropriate. Good use of source material which supports most points clearly. Content is wholly relevant and is coherently structured.
50-59% Presentation is of a good standard but some shortcomings. Evidence of a sound knowledge base but limited critical and practical application of concepts and ideas. Content is largely relevant although points may not always be clear and structure may lack coherence. Contains some critical reflection and some use of source material to illustrate points.
40-49% Adequate presentation. The work is descriptive and/or lacks critical analysis where required but is relevant with limited though sufficient evidence of knowledge and understanding. There is some evidence of reading although arguments/ proposals/solutions often lack coherence and may be unsubstantiated by relevant source material or partially flawed. Links to practice are made where appropriate.
30-39%
Fail Poorly structured, incoherent and wholly descriptive work. Evidence of a weak knowledge base with some key aspects not addressed and use of irrelevant material. Flawed use of techniques. Limited evidence of appropriate reading and no evidence of critical thought. Little reference to practice where appropriate.
20-29%
Fail Very poorly structured, incoherent and wholly descriptive work. Evidence of a very weak knowledge base with many key omissions and much material irrelevant. Use of inappropriate or incorrect techniques. Very little evidence of appropriate reading and no evidence of critical thought. No links to practice where appropriate. To obtain a mark of 20% the work must show evidence of a genuine attempt to engage with the assessment requirements and with the subject matter.
0-19%
Fail The work is extremely poorly structured and presented. It demonstrates no real knowledge or understanding of key concepts and principles. Much material is irrelevant, incorrect or omitted. No evidence of critical thought. No effective use of supporting material. No links to practice where appropriate. Not a genuine attempt to engage with the assessment requirements and/or subject matter.
Paper must be typed and submitted in a Word document (doc or docx).
Paper should be 5-6 pages in length when double-spaced and using a 12-point font. (title page, works cited, and appendixes don’t count toward the page requirement.)
Include at least four sources; the textbook may be used as one of your sources.
Please DO NOT cite any online reference encyclopedias such as Wikipedia, Britannica, or Encarta.
Your sources should consist of scholarly journal articles and books available through the Ivy Tech Virtual Library ONLY.
All sources must be cited (must have an end note or a foot note) and the source included in a bibliography. The format of the citations and bibliography must be of a nationally accepted formatting system such as MLA or APA.
By Module 7, the completed draft of the essay should be submitted for instructor review.
Drafts will be submitted through the Essay Paper Assignment, which is also found in Module 8. Submitting it here will give the following benefits:
Access to the Essay’s rubric for your review
A TurnItin report will be generated to help with identifying plagiarism concerns with each draft submission
Instructor will be able to give specific feedback on your progress for this assignment from within the course
You will be allowed to submit your draft versions up to 2 times, only if submitted the day before or earlier than the Essay due date and time.
If the Turnitin plagiarism percentage is 25 percent or above, the instructor will be reviewing your submission and reaching out to you if you might be in violation of Academic Honesty policy.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
COMMAND OF TOPIC
The essay identifies and describes the premises of the philosophical position.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
SOURCES & CITATION
Essay has four sources, citation, bibliography, and plagiarism verification.
