Best Writer

Throughout this course, you have focused on a specific health issue occurring within a specific population. You researched position papers regarding this health concern, and you developed a health policy proposal to positively impact the health of the affected individuals. It is now time to reach a greater audience regarding your policy proposal.
You are going to write a letter to the editor of a peer-reviewed nursing journal. Choose from one of the journals in the

Ultimate List of Nursing Journals

and go to the journal’s Web site to find out the requirements for submitting an editorial, such as format requirements, topics, and word counts. Make sure you select a nursing journal that covers the topic about which you are going to write. If you want to use another journal that is not on this list, please make sure the journal does address health care, because this is the purpose of the assessment.

For this assessment, you will write a letter to the editor of a scholarly journal. Your goal is to be informative about the policy that you developed for your previous Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal assessment, while also being persuasive about the need for and benefit of similar policies in other health care settings. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your assessment submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [DOC] Download Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [DOC]to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.
• Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
o Look back to the data or scenario you used in your previous assessment to address this criterion.
• Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.
• Justify why the developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
• Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.
• Analyze the ways in which interprofessional aspects of the policy will support efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.
• Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Describe why is health assessment so important in the nursing profession? Identify key contributions to nursing and explain its importance in healthcare.

Guidelines:

APA Format
MUST utilize credible data sources such as CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalKey, The Cochrane Library. Library resources can be accessed from the Library page at the FNU.edu website. FNU Librarians are available to assist each student with retrieving the required scholarly content.
Research paper must be 300 – 500 words.
3 or more scholarly sources must be utilized
Sources must be within the last 5 years
Must have a minimum of 3 Sources
All article sources must be cited by including them in reference sheet (separate).

Learn how to organize your argument into a thesis statement and outline in preparation to write a paper.

Assignment

Construct a thesis statement and an outline for a critique of Benoit Denizet-Lewis’s article “Double Lives on the Down Low.” This assignment is preparation for the upcoming critique paper.

Submit as an MSWord Document (doc or docx) or PDF in standard MLA style: 12 point font, standard margins, and double spacing; your name, course name, instructor’s name, date, and title at the top.

(1) Review Text & Annotations of “Double Lives on the Down Low” [Perusall]

(a) Use highlights and annotations to pinpoint the author’s key claims

(b) Identify the types of evidence the author uses to support those claims

(c) Identify the main rhetorical appeals the author uses to make the claims persuasive

(2) Perform a Rhetorical Analysis of “Double Lives on the Down Low” using the Guide to Rhetorical AnalysisLinks to an external site.

(a) Determine what the author is trying to accomplish in this article

(b) Note which rhetorical appeals the author uses to further this goal

(c) Evaluate to what degree and in what ways the author is successful or not in achieving this goal

(d) Consider how you can support this evaluation in your critique

(3) Review Annotations and Consider Various Critiques of Sensationalizing the Down Low

(a) Critiques of the Down Low [Perusall]

(b) Deconstructing Down Low Discourse [Perusall]

(4) Preview the Full Instructions for the Critique Paper

(5) Develop a Critique of “Double Lives on the Down Low” using the Guide to CritiqueLinks to an external site. & Video Guide to CritiqueLinks to an external site.

(a) Remember that a critique is distinct from a summary or a personal response

(b) Evaluate the quality of the text’s argument (claims) and argumentation (rhetorical appeals)

(c) Articulate a critique of the text in the form of a thesis statement with main and subclaims

(6) Submit a Thesis Statement & Outline for the Upcoming Critique Paper using the Guide to Thesis & OutlineLinks to an external site.

(a) Remember to name the author and title of the text

(b) Note that you are expected to do this analysis and writing yourself, without using external sources other than the assigned readings and guidelines

(7) Consider Feedback from the Thesis & Outline to Incorporate in Upcoming Steps of the Writing Process

Further Instructions (in addition to the above guidelines)

(1) A model of a thesis for a critique paper is the following:

Denizet-Lewis’ article “Double Lives on the Down Low” is in/effective at doing X (informing the public about health concerns, bringing an understudied social phenomenon to light, entertaining readers, selling newspapers…) because of A, B, C, and D (list subclaims – reasons for the main evaluation – in the order they will be discussed in the paper).

(2) The thesis should do these things:

(a) Explicitly focus on the object of evaluation.

(b) Make an evaluation.

(c) Connect that evaluation to the purpose of the object.

(d) Give the reasons for the evaluation/judgment.

(3) A model of an outline can be found in the Guide to CritiqueLinks to an external site.

(4) An outline should do these things:

(a) Consolidate your argument into a few key claims

(b) Hierarchize your argument into main claim, subclaims, points, and subpoints

(c) Distinguish argument from evidence

(d) Organize your claims and evidence into a logical order of presentation

(e) Present your ideas in a visually accessible (hierarchized) way, using numbering & indentation

Write a research article elucidating the social issue of gender inequality, with a focus on women’s rights. maltreatment of children Learning.Please see the link that attached ” Final Exam Paper details for ANTH” that will give you all information needed. Note the the WRITER: please let me know which article you would like to use out of the ones i listed on the word document and i will gladly send it over so you can have the exact article that the professor issued. Thank you.

Compose a research paper outlining the four stages of process optimisation.

Write a research paper outlining the details of the call time business email research.Managers need to make informed decisions. Using data, or research, to analyze your business is an important part of making decisions and evaluating business performance. An IT manager analyzes service levels, a marketing manager tries to predict results of planned campaigns, and virtually any business manager needs data to identify relationships between relevant variables. Your skill in business research to analyze data and drive decision-making helps you to add confidence despite uncertainty, draw conclusions about organizational performance, and add value to your organization.

Scenario
As the manager of a customer service call center, you are evaluating the quality of the call center’s operations. One of the most important metrics in a call center is time in queue (TiQ), the time a customer waits before a customer service representative (CSR) comes on the line to help. To provide the best customer experience, you want your customers’ wait to be less than the 2.5-minute (150 seconds) industry standard. You know that when they wait for too long, customers are more likely to have a negative experience or hang up before being helped.

Another metric you measure in the call center is the handle time, or service time (ST), the amount of time a CSR spends servicing the customer. Last month’s average ST was approximately 3.5 minutes (210 seconds). Your industry experience tells you that average ST can be influenced by a CSR’s level of training, amount of experience, and whether the CSR can provide resolution to the issue quickly. Recently, you tested a strategy to have callers identify the type of issue they are calling about and then route calls to CSRs with expertise in that issue.

The new protocol (PE) is being tested side-by-side with the current protocol (PT) to see if ST is improved with this strategy. The regional director was hesitant to test the PE protocol for two weeks, already concerned about the customer experience, but agreed to the test. After the first few days, the regional director is anxious to know the results and asks you to send a report. You ask the user experience (UX) team to pull a report for the TiQ and ST for both protocols to analyze.

Preparation
Review the call time analysis provided by the UX team. You may also review the call time data in Excel, if desired.

Assessment Deliverable
Write a 350- to 700-word email, or memo, about the PE and PT test results after the first few days. Address the following in your email:

Analyze the impact the new protocol (PE) has had on time in queue and service time.
Determine if the PE protocol should be implemented widely in the call center with what you know so far.
Identify what additional data and analyses would be helpful to determine if the PE protocol is working.
Explain what is likely to happen to TiQ and ST if the PT protocol is kept.
Explain how a sudden increase of 20% more calls might influence TiQ and ST.
Justify whether the data is sufficient to determine if the PE test is successful.
Suggest additional metrics and supporting data needed to determine the performance of the call center’s operations.

Format references according to APA guidelines.

Write a research paper that explains what the primary focus of biology is.