Best Writer

Please answer the following prompt with as much detail as possible. Also note the following:
A well written essay will demonstrate mastery of concepts presented in the textbook, film and relevance to sociological inquiry and your personal life.
Essays should be no shorter than 1000 words and typed in the standard 10-12 font double spaced.
Essays must be written in a grammatically correct manner.
Essays must conform to APA format.
There is no need to use outside sources but whether or not you do, all sources consulted (paraphrased or not) must be cited according to APA standards and must include bibliographic references (including quoting or citing from the film).
Plagiarism or other forms of academic dishonesty will not be tolerated and result in an ungraded assignment (hence a “0” for that assignment).
Failure to meet the minimum page or word count requirement will also result in an ungraded assignment.
Once you have typed your essay in a word processing document, submit in the dropbox prior to the due date. Do not type directly into the message box.
Please note that all submitted essays will be filtered through Turnitin which checks your submitted work for plagiarism and/or academic dishonesty by matching it to other submitted work (by yourself and others) in a database.
Essay Prompt
The films Miss Representation and The Mask You Live In delve into numerous themes relating to concepts discussed in your textbook and presented in supplemental videos. Both films include discussions concerning media representation, the social construction of masculinity and femininity, gender inequity, sexism, violence, rape, self-image, eating disorders, race, body image, media centralization, labeling, deviance, the sexualization of young girls, objectification of women’s bodies, and suicidal and homicidal violence, to name a few concepts.
After watching both films and reflecting on the course material presented:
1) Discuss the main points of both documentaries, paying keen attention to the aforementioned issues, and, its effects on the social expectations and lives of young girls, boys, men, and women.
2) Where relevant, relate the films to concepts discussed: in chapters 3, 4, 11, 16 and supplemental videos and articles provided in Blackboard.
3) Finally, personally reflect on what the film meant to you and how the mass media has contributed to your notions of beauty, sexuality, and gender.

Why would it be important for a content area teacher to know the reading and writing proficiencies and deficiencies of a student? What are good practices for this type of assessment and instructional planning?

3 topics for my research paper.
Discuss sUAS Operations and the Commercial
Applications
Discuss the History of Aviation and its
present Aviation Operations
Discuss the History of Space Exploration
and Present-Day

Minimum of (4) four pages required for each topic, for a combined total of no less than 12 pages not including
title and list of references. APA-7 format is required. Minimum of 1 Scholarly
references per topic.

As this program concludes, discuss your excitement and apprehension as you prepare for student teaching. What do you feel you have left to learn? Is there anything you need to refine or revisit before starting your student teaching experience? How will you do this, or what additional support do you feel you need at this time to be successful?

Examine a website of your own choice (e.g. a university, a company, an instructions guide, etc.). Focus on how it uses Markel’s principles of excellence in technical communication discussed in Chapter 1. I

Provide justification for how it uses these principles of excellence by Markel, and then summarize whether or not you believe it is an effective example of technical communication. Be sure to include the link for the website as well.

Purpose: This written assignment is an opportunity for you to demonstrate your understanding of the course material by 1) explaining concepts from class lectures in your own words and then 2) applying these concepts to additional material (i.e., classic journal articles in developmental psychology). As the purpose of this course is to think critically about the topics in developmental research, about how research is conducted in developmental psychology, and about the implications of developmental research, applying ideas discussed in class to new material is the ultimate goal of the course.
Instructions: Your written assignment will be based on the same article that you will present on for the group presentation. After you are assigned an article for the presentation, you will then choose a second article to compare to your presentation article. Article pairing options will be provided.
You will then discuss and compare the two articles in relation to each of the four sections of the course (Critiques, History, Methods, and Critical Developmental Psychology). In other words, there will be four parts to your written assignment that parallel the four sections of the course.
Below are the guidelines for each part of your paper:
Part I: Critiques of Developmental Psychology
– First, you will need to identify the point of similarity between the two articles (i.e., what makes the two articles comparable) that will form the basis of your written assignment. This may be a shared research topic, shared age group, or shared research methodology.
– What critique discussed in class will you apply to your two articles?
– Explain the critique clearly before applying the critique to your articles.
– Argue whether the critique can be justifiably applied to your articles (in other words, explain
whether the critique is applicable to one, both, or neither of your articles).
Part II: Literature Review
– Provide background information on your two articles; in other words, give a brief literature review of your articles.
Part III: Research Methods in Developmental Psychology
– What research methods were used in these articles? How were they different from or similar to each other?

– How do these methods inform our knowledge of development? What don’t these methods tell us about development?
– Be sure to include information about research methods from class lectures (pros, cons, and critiques of research methods) in your written response.
Part IV: Critical Developmental Psychology
– What are the implications of these two studies outside of academia?
– Apply a critical developmental psychology perspective to your two papers when evaluating the
broader implications of this research. Explain potential implications based on discussions from class or come up with your own.
Referencing: As a large component of this written assignment is to demonstrate your understanding of class material, you will be using your own words to explain concepts discussed in class (essentially this will be how I assess your understanding of course material). As this is a paper, however, and not simply a long answer question on an exam, you will be required to use proper APA citation. When referring to information from class lectures, you can reference as follows:
Lecturer Last Name, Lecturer First Initial. (year). Title of the Lecture. Personal Collection of Lecturer First Initial, Lecturer Last Name, University they work for, City, Province.
e.g., Jones, A. (2022). Introduction to a Critical Evaluation of Developmental Psychology. Personal Collection of A. Jones, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB.
Of course, if you are keen, you can read and cite the original sources referred to in class, but it is not required.
Any other sources referred to in your written assignment must be cited. Your two target articles will certainly have to be cited, and any additional sources used to inform your background knowledge and support your critiques must be referenced.

Criteria
Grammar
Section 1 (20%) due Friday, May 27th (noon) Description
Points
Overall
Structure
– train of thought is easy to follow
– sections are well-organized (overall layout, paragraph, and sentence structure)
/3
– grammatical mistakes do not take away from student’s meaning /2 – gross grammatical mistakes are absent
Part I: Critique
Critique Explanation
– the student demonstrates understanding of the critique through clear explanation in their own words
– the critical points of the critique are made clear
– how this critique affects our knowledge of development is identified
/5
Application to Classic Papers
– the critique is explained in relation to the student’s focus articles (how is the critique relevant to the articles?)
– the student provides a well-reasoned argument for why applying the critique to their target articles is or is not justified
– an attempt is made to integrate the two target articles when applying the critique (think about the point of comparability for the two target articles)
/5
Part II: Literature Review
Literature Review
– the student demonstrates knowledge of background research leading up to these classic studies
– the amount of detail is appropriate for the page length of this assignment (approximately 1.5-2 pages for this section)
/5
Total /20
Criteria
Grammar
Section 2 (20%) due Tuesday, June 21st (noon) Description
Points
Overall
Structure
– train of thought is easy to follow
– sections are well-organized (overall layout, paragraph, and sentence structure)
/3
– grammatical mistakes do not take away from student’s meaning /2 – gross grammatical mistakes are absent
Part III: Research Methods
Description of Methods
– differences and similarities between the methods used in the two studies are stated
– the research methods used in the two articles are explained with sufficient detail; that is, details that are not relevant for our purposes are omitted, but information necessary for general understanding and for the critique are explained
/5
Critique
– the student uses content discussed in class to explain the pros and cons of research methods used in the classic studies
– student states how these methods inform our understanding of development
/5
Part IV: Critical Developmental Psychology
Application
– concepts from critical developmental psychology are clearly applied to the focus articles
– broader implications of these classic studies are acknowledged
/5
Total /20

Remember that the purpose of an essay or paper in this class is to ask a
question, then attempt to answer it using peer-reviewed literature. The student should identify the
premise of the paper clearly and relate each sentence and paragraph to the question they are
attempting to answer.

This five paragraph persuasive essay (introduction, 3 body paragraphs and a conclusion) is made up of the following:
A clear persuasive thesis statement in the first paragraph after the topic is introduced and the importance of the issue is clear to the reader
Logical transitions between the into, the body, and the conclusion
Body paragraphs that support the persuasive thesis with evidence as well as address the opposing viewpoints
A conclusion that wraps up all the information presented in the body

Criteria
The rough draft of your essay should contain the following basic features:
A well-defined issue that is controversial by nature
A clear thesis statement that demonstrates the position you will be taking throughout the essay
A counter argument defending the opposing viewpoint
A refutation to or compromise with the counter argument

In addition to the above, the rough draft of your essay should be:
From 500 to 800 words in length, double-spaced, with one inch margins
Written primarily in third person
Edited for spelling, mechanical, grammatical, and typing errors

My historical event is Desegregation in Boston. The question that is trying be analyzed is how did
desegregation impact society, and what historical event (Brown v Board Education; PLessy v Ferguson)
contributed to the Boston busing crisis?
The instructions are uploaded

The paper will consists of three main components: 1) Introduction (Anatomical & Mechanically) introduce the overall anatomical and mechanical features of your topic. Specifically, this section will provide specific information about the injury and highlight the specific healthy functionally of the anatomical region., 2) Identifying the rehabilitative processes associated with the injury, 3) Addressing what you believe the large contributing factors that contributed to the injury and physical rehabilitative protocol the individual should follow to improve the clinical/biomechanical problem.