Best Writer

Please complete the Beowulf The Reality of Monsters assignment. Please complete all 4 of the General Monster Questions. For question 1 and 2 please see the attached story Beowulf to complete the questions. For the Design-A-Monster part is writer’s choice, you can create a monster however you want as long as you follow instructions. Writer can skip number 5, you don’t have to draw a monster but please do all of the other part so I can imagine what the monster look like to draw. Please also write a 2 page story of the monster for number 4. Please follow the rubric.

Write a research on “How do the benefits of medical marijuana in the states that have legalized its use justify legalizing it in the remaining states in the US?”

1.) Complete the readings assigned for each Critical News Analysis.
2.) Select an issue from the readings that you can connect to a contemporary issue/controversy in Comparative politics (no older than six months) relevant to the current Section of the course. Information concerning contemporary political issues/controversies must be presented with reference to at least one of the following sources: The New York Times, Washington Post, or The Wall Street Journal.
3.) Next, do the following in the Modules section in Canvas under the title for each assignment: Write approximately in which you connect the readings for that section of the course to the larger world of Comparative politics. Use criteria being studied in class to analyze a current event/issue. Full credit for this assignment rests on your ability to relate the news item in Comparative politics to the class readings for each section of the course.
Previous

Topics are:
India
Mexico
China

Explain how a company can raise capital through the issuance of equities.

Research two short diffrent articles, passages, or advertisements involving fallacies from published materials in print or on the internet and explain the fallacies committed in them–fallacies such as appeal to pity, appeal to force, appeal to the people/populace, abusive ad hominem, tu quoque, two wrongs make a right, straw man, red herring, appeal to ignorance, appeal to authority, weak/faulty analogy, post hoc, slippery slope, hasty generalization, accident, begging the question, loaded/complex question, false choice/dichotomy, composition, division, and equivocation.

Research and find a short article, passage, or advertisement that includes a fallaciousargument.
Copy and include enough of the article or passage to show the fallacy in context but the length of copied article or passage should not exceed 150 words. (Find a short stand-alone writing or an argument paragraph pertaining to a long article, but the content of the argument being separable from the article. In the latter case, copy only the argument passage containing the fallacy not the whole news article and make sure that doing so does not distort the content of the argument.)
Underline or highlight the fallacious part of the writing, i.e. the premises and conclusion of the argument.
Identify and explain the fallacy committed in the writing with a length of approximately . (Even if more than one fallacy is detected in the writing, it still counts as one, as long as another fallacy occurs in the same copied item.)
Specify the source, i.e. the name and the date of the publication. The source must have a publication later than the first day of class.
Organize the two items in one report if you submit two. (Do not submit the items separately in two different files, but submit them in one report.) Each item must include the copied writing of no more than 150 words with the fallacy underlined on it, the source and the published date of the writing, and your analysis of the fallacy in about 100 words.

As part of the triple bottom line (TBL) focus, your organization’s CEO has asked each departmental manager to conduct a SWOT analysis of how transitioning to TBL will affect their departments. These SWOT reports will be provided to you for further analysis and interpretation in the upcoming week.
While you wait to receive these inputs from your CEO, you have decided to hone your business analysis skills by analyzing and interpreting the results of a well-known company, Trader Joe’s.

Prompt
Review the Trader Joe’s Case Study provided in the textbook.
Case Study: Trader Joe’s | Keeping a Cool Edge
Your task is to create a consulting report based on your analysis of the Trader Joe’s case. In your report, address the following items:
Part 1: Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
Describe the relationship between strategic thinking and operational thinking.
Distinguish between strategic thinking and operational thinking.
Identify the aspects of the Trader Joe’s case that relate to strategic thinking.
Identify the aspects of the Trader Joe’s case that relate to operational thinking.
Identify one key performance indicator each for strategic thinking and operational thinking.
Which KPIs would be appropriate to measure success in marketing for Trader Joe’s? Which KPI would be most important to consider? Provide a rationale for your answer.
Part 2: SWOT Analysis
How should an organization interpret the results from a SWOT analysis?
Identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) from the Trader Joe’s case. To answer this question, use the SWOT analysis template provided below. One example for each quadrant has been added to help you get started.
Which information from Trader Joe’s SWOT analysis is internal? Which information from Trader Joe’s SWOT analysis is external?

Trader Joe’s: SWOT Analysis

https://education.wiley.com/content/Schermerhorn_Management_14e/media/simulations/cases/case1.html
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
Example: “Trader Joe’s culture of product knowledge and customer involvement is carefully cultivated among new hires and current employees.”
This phrase implies that the company has a process for collecting, reviewing, and using knowledge to make product improvements, which results in market responsiveness.
Example: “If customers don’t like something about a product, out it goes—count spinach and garlic from China among the rejected losers.”
Because the company tests new products with customers and is willing to take a loss if customers don’t like products, this could lead to increased opportunities costs for those products that company purchasing agents passed up and decreased profits.
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
Example: “However, Trader Joe’s has a cozy and intimate atmosphere that its rival lacks.”
This could be an opportunity to bring in local artists and designers to co-promote the Trader Joe’s brand and to increase local brand engagement and adoption.
Example: “search out tasty, unusual foods from all around the world”
This could be a potential threat in times like we are experiencing right now, when global supply chains are disrupted and fewer products are available.

Write a paper for book critique from a theological Christian perspective.

Responsible eating can help to promote social and economic justice.

(DISCUSS THIS ARGUMENT BY USING ONLY THESE 2 ARTICLES RESPECTIVELY (LIEN,BERRY)
FOLLOW THIS FORMAT WHILE WRITING :
1.EXPLAIN AND DISCUSS THE ARGUMENT ON YOUR OWN WORDS
2.AUTHOR LED-IN (YOU NEED TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT WITH AUTHORS QUOTATION OR PARAPHRASE)

3. THEN EXPLAIN AND DISCUSS THE AUTHORS POINT (YOU CAN AGREE OR DISAGREE)

4. AFTER THAT INTRODUCE THE 2ND AUTHOR ( (YOU NEED TO ALSO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT WITH THIS AUTHOR WITH AUTHORS QUOTATION OR PARAPHRASE)

5THEN EXPLAIN AND DISCUSS THIS AUTHORS POINT AS WELL (YOU CAN AGREE OR DISAGREE)

6.MAKE A CONCLUSION OF YOUR PARAGRAPH

I need links of sources used.

I have to read one of the essays in the attached files and then do an evaluation of it.

For your last paper, I would like you to write an essay in which you evaluate one of the essays provided below (see file). You’ve all had some sort of an evaluation done either at work or at school: at work, your boss may sit with you and review your performance according to some agreed-upon set of criteria; academically, your grade is an evaluation of all the submitted assignments according to the criteria provided in a rubric.
Essays
Essays for Paper 4 (1).docx Download Essays for Paper 4 (1).docx
A few questions to consider while reading the essay:
1) Is the issue the writer is taking a position on clear? Is there enough evidence to convince you that the problem exists? An issue is the problem concerning which people have different points of view. For example, here’s an issue that you are all familiar with:
Whether people should be allowed to carry guns on university campuses?
So an issue can be a question for which people provide different answers. Some people might say ‘Yes,” while others might argue ‘No.’ Whenever you evaluate a position, make sure that the issue/question is clear.
2) What is the writer’s position/thesis? Are there any ambiguous words in the thesis that need clarification?
Some writers will present their position on some issue explicitly, while others may only imply their position. I would suggest that you read the whole essay carefully before you write down what you think the writer is arguing.
3)What are the major claims (grounds) the writer presents and what evidence does the writer provide to support those claims? Does the writer back up his or her claims?
Focus on the argumentative claims the writer makes:
For example, if I said that my height is 6 feet, you can easily test that claim by measuring my height.
On the other hand, if I said that colleges are stifling free speech, you are likely to ask me a couple of questions: where is the evidence, and what do I mean by stifling? So as you read this essay, try to extract from it the argumentative claims and then ask yourself whether there is evidence that supports the writer’s claims.
Make sure to look for evidence that supports or challenges the writer’s position. If the writer does not provide evidence, then you should not accept the claim.
4) Does the writer provide opposing viewpoints, and argue why he or she disagrees with them?
Ask yourself whether the writers engage with the arguments of those who disagree with them. If the writers do not provide an opposing viewpoint, then you should ask yourself whether the opposing viewpoint weakens the writer
5) Do the claims collectively support the writer’s thesis?
Here’s the OUTLINE that you should use to organize your essay:
1) Introduction: Briefly introduce the issue/problem that the writer is identifying. Show the reader why the issue is an important one. At the end of the introduction, present your thesis that is your position on the writers’ position. For example: X argues that more and more college students are suffering from anxiety because of A, B and C. X’s argument is based on selectively chosen anecdotal evidence and is further weakened by the frequent use of generalizations, faulty causes, and half-truths that collectively prevent him from making a sound argument. Remember, your thesis must tell us what your position is regarding the writers’.
2) Facts regarding the issue: In this section, you should provide evidence to clarify for the reader the scope of the problem. Help the reader understand to what extent the problem/issue is, in fact, a cause for concern.
3) Summary of major claims and evaluation: In this section, you should 1) provide at least FOUR major claims the writer makes to support his or her position, and 2) determine whether the claims are supported by evidence and whether the writer has backed-up the assumptions underpinning the claims/ground.
For example, if the writer argues that colleges are trying to silence speech that the colleges think may harm students emotionally, then the writer must provide evidence to convince us that the attempts to censor are taking place on a majority of campuses. If there are no facts to convince the reader that a problem exists, then we don’t have to believe the writers.
Here’s another example: A lot of people believe that cities with large immigrant populations have higher crime rates than do cities that don’t have large immigrant communities. Just saying something does not make an argument; you must give me evidence that shows the connection between large immigrant communities and rising crime rate. Facts and statistics.
I would suggest you provide one claim per paragraph and then evaluate it by either showing that no evidence is provided to support it or by providing evidence that challenges the claim. If there is more evidence to challenge the writer’s claim, then the claim is weakened.
4) Opposing Viewpoint: Ask yourself whether the writer has engaged with the opposing viewpoint? If s/he has not, then provide the opposing argument.
5) Finally, toward the end of your essay, you should make some recommendations to strengthen the writer’s argument. Argue what would make the argument stronger; or, you could reject the problem itself by showing that what the writer has argued is based on propaganda and anecdotal evidence, and so on.
After reading your essay, the reader should have a clear understanding of the weaknesses of the writer’s argument. I’ve provided below a possible organization of paragraphs to help guide your analysis:
Introduction and thesis
Facts regarding the issue/problem
Summary of writer’s overall position
Claim 1
Evaluation
Claim 2
Evaluation
Claim 3
Evaluation
Claim 4
Evaluation
Opposing Viewpoint
Recommendations for improving the argument

Write a research paper about “the future of special education.”